Zama allows you trade Oppos+ Hedge11 Jan 2019 14:16
Geo101, I agree that Zama and block 7 has more in the tank and only suggest punting it if Block 30 proves up as I said, but if Block 30 is a successful candidate, then IMO sacrificing Zama allows PMO to de-risked SL where we have more control and % in play, could be a hedged trade off move. Besides if you could monetise 400MMboe say at $4 what would you get +$1 bn Net cash. Remember there are not that many world class discoveries 'Potentially Up for Sale' . Oil majors need these feasts to continue their MO, as they say $1bn in the hand helps 4 projects out in the bush and acquisitions. Only an idea, but would DE-Risk PMO and all projects and fast track growth, only to help Block 30 come on line, albeit smaller but still material to PMO. Nice problem to have. IMO Olliesky, in answer to your question, its one way the MM's play these matters out, they see the long term value -trap it away and leak it out slowly for stake building. E.G take Amer, they've just landed their Zama - CPO5 smaller but still a National find in Col, Amer SP 20p, when net to Amer could be +2-300MMboe if the entire field proves up as one contiguous, but II's stake building with discounted shares as with PMO. Furthermore PMO is front loaded into terms of project maturity or time to bring to market, if we could use part of a $1bn to acquire mid life projects this would prop up current production profiles and reserves, that would value us up, I feel this does hold PMO back at the Mo.
The market will hold this down as long as they can pass ENOUGH discounted value to II's and/ or interested parties, whilst PI's and other get fed up due to longer lead times, but when all is ready, a transformational re-rate happens, I'd take the +$1bn and FID 2 more for the price of one and by the Q4, debt down and balance repaired to boot, win win. IMO DYOR. It would allow acquisitions also as Pleebs stated so you could bolster IMMEDIATE output, immediate reserves and preserve trading performance not so reliant on longer lead time future plays to support growth. The output balance of future, current and immediate projects becomes more balanced, today we are too reliant on future projects to deliver trading results and we are heavily discounted for it IMO - forgetting debt a second. IMO DYOR I'd like to get MOL as a discount with SL, as the strong solid MOL output and reserves helps also DE Risk SL END . HNY