Member Info for Baxi44

Louis10 reported for repeatedly posting link to paid service - and filtered.

Hi Louis10 - Thank you for you re-post of the link to your article
Let’s examine what we have established on this thread so far, shall we?
1. A discredited poster (Scot’s revealing post at 08.45 today, your signposting posting history - oops!).
2. A discredited article (on the face of it, a helpful, and authoritative, general caveat emptor for investors in AIM oil & gas companies - but then, at the foot of the article, the ‘subtle’, or more accurately insidious, links pointing the reader directly to Pantheon - the true agenda behind the article. Pretty unscrupulous!).
3. A discredited author (see #2 above, and less than flattering posts on this thread from those familiar with the author’s track record and his apparent financial motivation).
So, in summary Louis my lad, you’ve been busted, along with your insidious, and IMO, unscrupulous author.
Time to slink off now and engage in your mischief elsewhere.

So all is revealed, Louis10. You were doing OK, opening by seemingly innocently posting a link to an *authoritative* article on the pitfalls of investing in AIM O&G companies - until you clumsily ran your true colours up the mast in your post at 18.41 today. Alfista is bang on the money: you just revealed yourself as a “number 11 batter for the shorters”. And a pretty poor one at that - out for a duck! Nice try.

Hi Scott - thank you for your comment. I have noted that OMJ has been consistently disparaging of Pantheon for as long as I can remember, which is what prompted me to check out if there was a common thread in the links at the end of the article (and, specifically, why they were placed there). Putting all other considerations aside for a moment, to accuse a world renowned, and highly respected, organisation such as Slumberger of being complicit in promoting what amounts to a scam, totally destroys the author’s credibility.

A very interesting and thought provoking piece. I note he particularly references PANR in the links below the article (which I also grabbed my attention), so I thought I’d check out his Pantheon page posts on Twitter - and found I was blocked! I have no recollection of ever engaging with OilmanJim on Twitter, so why would I be blocked?. The only people that have blocked me are Josh Young and Fraser Perring- who are both leading the bear attack on Pantheon. Curious!

Sailplane, thank you. Great post and well worth sharing.

Hi Sailplane, Me again!
Would you have any objection to me copying your post of Sunday across to the Discord channel? TIA.

Sailplane: Many thanks.

Sailplane: would you have any objection to me re-posting your comment on Flight’s Discord channel?

Oil Man Jim has historically been uber critical of Pantheon. No sponsorship for posts? ??

Hmmm. LetYourselfGo, do I smell a crisply barbecued short on the horizon?

All credit to Scott for ‘steadying the ship’ with an objective summary of *facts* when nerves are tested by the absence of news and the forceful, and apparently, co-ordinated (but certainly uninformed) short attack.
I have a significant holding in Pantheon, and I remain confident in the fundamental integrity of the BoD, the credibility of their geology (and third party endorsements), and the expertise of their ops team.
We should perhaps remind ourselves that the fundamentals haven’t changed (and, indeed, have arguably improved) since the SP was nudging 150p.
IMO, a time for strong nerves and patience.

IMO The Peel Hunt broker note started the rot, and whilst containing inaccuracies, it served to seriously shake the confidence of nervous holders - and gave the SP manipulators a solid base on which to attack the investment case (which, for me, as a LTH hasn’t diminished). The directors’ unbelievably ill timed share sale did the rest. Not long now before the first major milestone is revealed.

The FUD brigade are having a field day at the mo, capitalising on (and profiting from?) the understandable nervousness at the short delay in an announcement. But we must remind ourselves that the fundamentals have not changed - and a significant number of respected industry specialists remain long on the stock.

If you really believe that, short the stock in a BIG way. Go on! I dare you!
Malevolent prick.

Email just received from ‘Simply Wall Street’ advising that one (unidentified) analyst has revised the Pantheon share price upwards from £1.86 to £2.54.

My thoughts, for what they're worth, are that a significant % of the shareholding is, apparently, in the hands of PIS (Michael Spencer & Lord Brown notwithstanding). That being the case, and in the absence of any TR1s to the contrary, a low ball predator might struggle to build a sufficiently strong position.

Holy smoke! Thousands of wells and billions of barrels of oil just from Alkaid! And didn’t someone remark that this is just the elephant’s ear?

On that basis, perhaps we should be lining up to thank the hitherto accursed Farralon for disposing of, and distributing, their huge holding over the last year?

Well said theiceberg