Member Info for Basherman

I hope that we get multitudes of progress & good news this month, I am taking it as a positive that they have not done a placing yet as they know that more concrete news/agreements needs to land beforehand and seem quietly confident. Possibly this is required as a prerequisite for project funding and a fund raise isn’t required? Remember that article saying JM's looking to tap into project finance? Could that still be on the cards? Only QED know what the plan is? Good news and money in the bank for operations and we can kick on and accelerate to commercial revenue generating contracts. Get this agreement with MSC/Cargill sorted, in full and over the line this month before Q2 begins! Well done to all those Share holders who took part in the QRF visit & report. Very comprehensive. Respect! BioMSAR Zero if proven at scale would pretty much sell itself in a pitch (to new prospective clients) and may well be the straw that broke the camels back for these corporate giants to adopt to the MSAR platform, across their existing fleets, knowing that were are capable of significantly reducing emissions & costs depending on the input of the blends and reagents we use. We have the winning formula for decarbonisation and a pathway to net-zero! Jesus turned water into wine and Jason’s gonna turn waste into liquid gold! Have a good weekend all! Basher

She's a beauty

To be fair a buyout could be on the cards I reckon. If other companies wanted to shift some of their fleet to run on MSAR/BioMSAR or MSAR Zero, they they would have to pay a premium/royalties to whoever owns the IPO. Remember, our water in oil emulsion technology is patented, which in itself is worth money. The 80 million loss write off is also attractive too for big revenue generating entities. They said we have a pending Patent too for 'blend on board' technology. If we were in Dragons Den, they'd be all over the Patents lol. But we don't roll with Dragons, they are merely green flies compared to who were rolling with! Albeit not till we've passed the LONO and were certified to sail would a buyout be an option! A buy out would mulit-bag the value to shareholders for a quick gain, which would obviously be class for holders. I'd rather not sell because long term we'd be way better off sticking with it. Partnerships are required to scale up operations and that's why this collaboration with Cargill/MAC2 is a great bit of business from the board. Fair play to them.

AM said at the AGM, ' little old QED can't change the shipping sector on it's own.' Depends how quickly you want a pay out. LTH have waited ages tbf but I still stick with my prediction of 2 years for huge gains. Hopefully we get a flurry of good news Q2-Q3 on different fronts this year! The last 2 RNS's have been quality updates! Heading in the right direction. I'm surprised they haven't done a OO yet, so they must have plans? Once we get clarity on that matter then the shackles will be broken and we can rise to new heights! GLA Basher

Cough cough, casually gets in bed with a agricultural giant. They are making some serious dosh! Great step up for us and big milestone towards commercialisation! I was wrong about Wed-Thu, it was Tuesday all along! The only way is up baby! Blue chip in the making ;)

'Good things come to those who wait.' More of a relevant proverb for LTH. I've only invested since July last year and I can understand peoples frustrations for sure, but the way the world is heading with environmental sustainability being very high on governmental/business agenda must be massively in our favour in the coming years, especially with the flexibility of the fuels we offer for existing fleets! Bud Darr said they won't take Artic short cuts but looks to me like the Houthis in Yemen are going to make them do the polar opposite (no pun intended). I think the next positive RNS news will be a 'biggie' and certainly get the Guinness flowing to settle everyone's nerves and open the pathway to commercialisation. My prediction is it will drop before the end of the month on a Wednesday or Thursday. The fact the agreement has been drafted up and it's with the lawyers is a good sign, we just need 3 squiggles! Someone needs to tell the lawyers to get their finger out their ***. Also this tripartite agreement is only the first step so even after it drops, patience will be needed for the LONO to be completed. Hopefully the deal is comprehensive and gives insight into what happens afterwards, on completion of the trail at sea? Thoughts? Jason did say at the AGM their will be a QED SP rerate when you all see who were dealing with! God knows about the Valkor money coming in but hopefully we get good news soon on the Morocco front. 100% people have a right to vent their frustrations on here (some of the arguments are amusing ), just make sure you do a little dance when the tables are turned! ;) GLA Basher

Https://forums.capitallink.com/shipping/2024greece/

I'm not worried one bit because if you ask yourself the question. 'Does QED have a viable product & business for the future.' I'd say it's a strong yes and the question is not if we will go commercial but when? All the bumps and hurdles along the way are minor in the grand scheme of things. MSC are a shipping giant so it's not like your signing a quick straight forward agreement with a mickey mouse company, their are complexities and considerations & sometimes little details need to be refined for each signatory, especially when dealing with multiple parties. I work at BAE systems and it takes months to get Executives to sign off the most simple stuff, to the point where when it finally gets signed the document is ready for review and up-issue, which is very frustrating! So from what I gather we must be very close & in the final stages of review for JM to state December. Look back at the class results in Morocco and ask if our fuels have a place in the world? Literally governments are MANDATING business reductions in GHG & toxic emissions and you've all invested in a niche Decarbonisation company with game changing emulsion in water Technology & Patents for real world environmental/cost saving solutions (multiple sectors). I reckon it may take a couple of years to truly take off. 5 years for life changing gains. If you want a quick buck then maybe try Crypto. But until then, Chill Winston.

Joe Biden can string a better sentence together 😂

JM & Quadrise for the win. End of 💪🏻

Merry Christmas all & Happy New year 👍🏻

My boots are fully filled up now and I'm hoping for a transformative 2024 for Quadrise. Obviously the tripartite agreement will be a class to get that in the bag asap but I'm more excited about us collaborating with a strategic partner and when we get news on that, because we really do need help to make the kind of global impact & accelerate the pathway to decarbonisation that our Technology can deliver! 'So close we can almost taste it.' Let's hope we can get Commercialisation for QED sooner rather than later!!! GLA

''We have delivered a comprehensive response to the global stocktake. We have delivered a robust action plan to keep 1.5C in reach. It is a balanced plan that addresses emissions… it is built on common ground. It is strengthened by full inclusivity. It is a historic package to accelerate climate action. It is the UAE consensus.'' Not a bad time to be invested in a Decarbonisation technology company that is well positioned & has solutions to enable us to transition towards lower emissions in multiple applications now ;) The Morocco trial results pretty much speak for themselves!

Why's the ask 3.9? We getting an RNS today or wha? Seem to be loving news on Wednesdays atm. Hopefully Bud Darr got a ticket from UAE to UK for a pitstop before Xmas in Switzerland ;)

Apologies Auto correct put Darren! I know it's Darr lol. I think that's very promising... He's actually gunning for decarbonisation and levys to be implemented. Why? Also clearly said the Technology side is by far winning the race and eludes that some of the other ideas won't work and aren't practical and even IMO don't have that kind of capability . Also mentioned the availability of molecules which is a point Jason made at the AGM - why QED are a much more viable and cost effective option for decarbonisation. It's all the about the fuel you use, not fancy future ships. It's all about decarbonisation basically is the gist of what he said. I echo what I said few days ago, why would he mention us if we are trick up the sleeve. If I was him I wouldn't mention any advantage I had to my competitors if I have my own businesses best interests. He runs the biggest shipping company and wants to be the pioneer and pave the way for decarbonisation to set an example. Quadrise can sing the results they made recently on Land from the treetops but can only make noise in regards to shipping once they replicate in on Sea which they need MSC for to LONO, so they aren't gonna be rocking up to COP28 saying look at us because that could detriment the agreement they have in place with MSC. If we upset MSC we're screwed. Use your brains 🤣

Anyone who missed the 11.30 this is what was said by Bud Darren who got 6 minutes.

Question from the chair: Environmental regulations make your operations more expensive so why are you in favour of more stringent regulations and possibly a levy of Carbon emmisons?

Bud Darr, 'I believe the cruise sector and the lining shipping sector will decarbonise. Regulations are important if they are properly constructed, they will help accelerate the pace at which that happens & whether there are properly constructed or improperly constructed & I've seen examples of both. They will either broaden or limit the options we have that are available for the future molecule that we need to actually decarbonise (echos what JM said at AGM) because at the end of the day it's not about sound bites, it's not about statements, it's not about photographs or artist renditions of what ships are gonna look like. It's did we actually Decarbonise? I'm here to tell you there's a 2 legged race going on right now between the Technology that's required on board ships to be able to effectively and safely use the new fuels and then the 2nd leg of the race is for future fuels and right now the Technology side is winning the race by far. At the end of the days it's about the fuels because there are a lot of ideas out there but none of them will really get us where we need to go (I think he's referring to methonal in the ship upgrades in the latter not being able to work) and the industrys been wanting 2050 to be the target for a couple of years now, so we welcome the late newcomers to the party. We wanna get there but we're not in the fuel production business, so we really need helps and that depends on the upstream part of that. Maybe beyond what IMO is capable of reaching. It's critically important for stimulating and developing the delivery of those fuels including making a Mid-Stream which right now doesn't exist. There are operational measures we can take today like voyage optimisation or just in time arrival. There nothing dumber than a shop sailing across the ocean consuming fuel to just be anchored for 20-30 days. Bad ideas taking shortcuts through the North Artic sea. We take a strong stand on not taking shortcuts, the consequences of getting things wrong there are too high for short term gain in miles (obviously iceburg risk).

Important to look at the big picture and let's really decarbonise and get the fuels we need to make the transition now and not take shortcuts that come with additional risks to shorten the journey.

Thanks JackG 👊🏻

These results are incredible and we're doing more than what's needed in terms of emmisons reductions until 2040 (where 70-80% will be the new target at this stage - we already working on that solution BMZ - forgot who named it that but it's a class name), so that's 16 years worth @30% emmison reductions and cost saving, environmental targets we can deliver right now. Amongst all the other benefits, we get 7% more engine efficiency, just the icing on the cake. Wow! How much cost saving is 7% engine efficiency alone worth? Does that essentially mean the ship can travel further with less fuel 🛳️🤑

I'd also imagine some sort of emmisons financial tax which is lower the closer you are to set target. So if you make no effort and keep spitting out Co2, the main GHG atmospheric offender and other toxic gases with a business as usual attitude, then you should expect to pay the maximum fines by these regulatory bodies. No idea what they will be but it's enough to get these tycoons to sit up and hopefully fast track major changes needed to comply.

Meaning our clients would have to pay zilch if we can already get the 30% - 45%, whilst making crazy cost savings anyway and being easier to transition our technology without making huge upgrades investments on the ships. Money talks at the end of the day. Last time I checked MSC they are worth 92 bill 🤣

About as no brainer as it gets to crack on and get the ball formally rolling, putting pen to paper.... Or digital signatures since covid lol. 😎

IMO - Decorbonization. No wonder Jeremy Corbyn had no chance. 😂

Thanks for the linked in post, I did some research and I found this article outlining what those strategy changes IMO made in July23.

https://theicct.org/marine-imo-updated-ghg-strategy-jul23/#:~:text=In%20the%20first%20scheduled%20revision,by%202030%20and%2070%25%20and

Basically they need to crack on and aim for 20% reductions leading up to 2030. 30% by 2030. 70-80% by 2040. Zero by 2050! Surely BioMSAR Zero will be ready way before this. This begs the question what % reductions to conventional fuel applications do MSAR & BioMSAR currently produce?? We could be potentially way ahead of the game?

It's very much a phased approach and we have the technology readily available in the 26 years before 2050. This is essentially Class news for us as we are in a perfect position to implement these environmental emission reductions whilst actually making a huge cost saving using water (also cost saving not paying emmisons tax for non-compliance) , being incredibly Stable, blend on board solutions (patented) , interchangeabilty between fuels, safe for engineers, easy integration and not using molecules or compounds that will be gobbled up by aviation and road freight. I'm sure those chemicals will sky rocket in value for alternative methods. Supply and demand baby! Makes us a more viable option. I doubt Bud Darr will want to broadcast QED too much in front of all the other shipping giants because if it was me I'd want to keep any advantage I had against my competitors hush. Let's hope I'm wrong on that and we get a shout out or even better a contractual commitment sorted prior to the 9th for Bud Darren to boast about.

Whatever way you look at it, these environmental targets and emmisons sanctions are just the catalyst we need for major change not only in the shipping industry but all other oil app sectors. Sectors which are notoriously process driven and slow to change but this basically puts a rocket up their backside. 😎

No wonder QED need a strategic partner to collaborate with because they are going to need to scale up big time, rapidly to meet our 'prospective' clients requirements in multiple applications. Tiny company so far but Amazon, Meta and Apple were pretty much garage start ups and IMO I think QEDs IPOs alone are worth billions. Roll on 2024.GLA 🤘🏻

I tried to buy in this morning @1.8 but it took an hour to process my order, so bought back in at 2.2p. Paid £2K more for 150,000 less shares than I had initially lol! Thanks Lionel! Somethings clearly brewing! Hopefully can find some dips to get my holdings back to what they were! GLA Hopefully a £1 party Xmas 2024 ;)

Thanks Grib & cold fish. Think your right, be rude not to get back in. Hopefully I can find some sort of dip 😭

I for one am gutted. I got spooked at the AGM by all the questions on cash reserves, placing and negativity from others, sold my shares @1.29 pence. Bought at 1.2 so made a small profit then couple days later it's blowing up on no news. Sods law in my case. At least I don't have to listen to the moaning moaners anymore. Still hope this share blows up for my dad who's a LTH . But all the moaners need to stop bashing their own investment and shooting themselves in the foot! Knowing my luck this is going to the teens now 🤣

How do you know we're getting news on the 12th December? Or is it a guess?

Thanks, I've invested 5K @ 61p and have more funds to DCA if needed ;)