Member Info for B2HS2L

Production logging tool:

What is being observed on site re logging tool is compatible with what is in the following document posted by Alan2017 on 12.12.2018:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/441528/response/1076213/attach/html/7/Brockham%20X4Z%20Completion%20Programme%20of%20Work%20redacted%20Redacted.pdf.html

The RNS does not support a day traders agenda.
They are the ones wanting out now.
LTH's should have no problems with RNS, flow rate info due soon.

Seems some have forgotten Alan2017 posted this about 'First Commercial Production' recently, - I hope he does not mind me reposting it:

Trusttrade - this will be the Weald First Commercial Production test of the Kimmeridge. Plan is to flow it for at lease 12 months and any oil produced will be sold to the market at a very slight discount to the cost of Brent.

Here is a link to the what should happen in the next couple of days. I don't know how it opens on a Windows computer, but if its a mess then just press the top right button to download it as a PDF. This is a colour copy, so you can also see the image log with the fractures.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/441528/response/1076213/attach/html/7/Brockham%20X4Z%20Completion%20Programme%20of%20Work%20redacted%20Redacted.pdf.html

Moose
After oil rises to surface, they will want to keep the flow rate down initially (to protect well from damage long term) then increase flow.
So there is no decent flow to report until testing progresses further.

I cannot see them releasing an RNS that only says we have oil, - but no flow rates mentioned.

Agreed Moose. - It would be nice to think ANGS had a pre-prepared template they intended to fill out with info for this situation, - but thats probably asking too much.

A lot of time has to be spent analysing the data they have (assuming they have oil), some of which might update prospective amounts of oil etc. We live in hope.

Its possible I suppose that there might be an oil spillage or some other problem, and the crew need to stabilise the situation?

Rumour control often gets wind of this sort of thing, but have heard nothing.

That would definitely preclude an RNS until now.

I expect we will get an RNS tomorrow.

Hell of a way to spend a 'sabatical'.

Need to pop out.. - like we await your return.

This assumes we are hanging on your every word.

In the trying circumstance we find ourselves in, with the wait for news, your comedic value is much appreciated.

But that's it in terms of value thanks.

Just IMO.

waiting for news now.
Here's a list of other subjects awaiting news(not exhaustive):

1 Internal review of JTP share dealings.
2 >2 months since completion of Balcombe testing, - I understood further info would be released ~ 2 months after well test completion.
3 Update on what the 'business opportunity' the placing shares funded in the 07:00 RNS 05/11/2018 - reference:

"The Company is therefore undertaking the Placing to provide funds for general working capital purposes, principally in relation to the strategy at Brockham, as well as assist with funding accretive business development opportunities."

I remember viewing a video where Vonk was saying due diligence was being performed, but no update as yet.

I had a teacher who was fond of saying 'You need to buck up to be useless'..

Alan:............My question is do Angus have to release the RNS today or do they want to release it 7am Monday morning for the biggest impact rather than towards the close of Friday?

.......And also have all weekend to review whatever information they wanted to capture and analyse.

Reference British Geological Survey web pages (see link below):
www.quakes.bgs.ac.uk/helicorder/heli_dir_shz/HORS_SHZ_GB_00.2018121400.gif?v=1544783002

Observations on data:

1 Alan2017 has indicated this survey data is not suited to monitoring perforation activities at a well.

2 Are we expecting a period of high amplitude data lasting 7 to 10 minutes at a time?
ie are we expecting 200 Meters of perforations to take 7-10 minutes, or occur more than once in day?

3 If you alter the date in the link to a previous day this week:
a) Data is not available for large periods of time.
b) periods of high amplitude data occur at around 08:00 on 20181212. Definitely not ANGS activated.

I doubt these traces are suitable for monitoring well perforation activity.
It is not possible to verify what activity has caused the high amplitude data.
There is a reasonable chance that data will not be available when you are thinking perforation might occur.

Its bliss without UKOG posters posting twaddle for a few hours.

They're just as expectant of good or bad news for the weald (and their sp) as we are..

No longer sure if perforation performed today.

Rumour control should have provided a result (oil flowing or not)by now?

Alan mentioned perforations would preferrably be performed earlier rather than later in the day.

Perhaps ANGS have decided perforations should be performed earlier in the week rather than on a Friday?

If there's a 7am RNS, thats when the orders will pile up I think.
Not sure if that will happen though, unless they have have achieved all their goals today with no problems.

seismoilogy charts?

Now I know I'm barking up the right tree.
Thanks for lifting the mood whilst we all wait gkb.

Thanks for the Link scally.

http://www.quakes.bgs.ac.uk/helicorder/heli_dir_shz/HORS_SHZ_GB_00.2018121400.gif?v=1544783002

Take another look, the crew are still active.

...And we have no idea what level of INCOME these generators will provide!

Re your 23:35 link to 'Programme of work for the completion of Brockham X4Z'

Thanks for sharing this document Alan, much appreciated.

It is dated 07.08.2017, so unless there have been lessons learned from Balcombe or HH, lets hope that what is now intended is as stated.

Looking forward to a higher sp by Thursday close.

IMO:

1 Vonk says he has the cash to put Brockham into production.

2 The placing was to provide some meat on the bone in case of problems performing item 1.

3 The placing was to take account of an opportunity that arose beneficial to the business of extracting oil.

++++++

IF it is the case that equipment is not delivered to site to meets Vonks timeline, then the delay is likely to be because:

1 The opportunity mentioned in 3 may be part of the delay, and we are waiting for Due Diligence to complete. (unlikely)

2 A problem may have been encountered 'off-site' with paperwork or procedure.

3 Management are waiting for more news to be shared from HH.

4 Equipment providers cannot provide a key piece of equipment in time. (unlikely).

Vonk says he has finance to do all he wants, - more money would have been raised if he thought a delay to his timeline was imminent. Therefore the problem is unlikely to be finances.

Having listed out the above, I think by Friday the site will be busier.