Member Info for B2HS2L

Just like to echo others thanks for your watchfulness Pboo.
I take from your post that you are not usually able to report early morning traffic at Brockham.
As such, early HGV activity on site is not known.
Its such a shame wildlife photographers can capture Snow Leopard images, but its probably not feasible to use this type of camera without experiencing memory card or camera theft.

I don't expect a fair fight, even if the battle is fought out of public sight.
I think we can expect the Nomad to be reminding the board of their responsibilities re information release, but if you are gradually 'opening the taps' as wasit suggests, then perhaps all you can say is 'we bought oil to surface' and leave it at that as the situation gradually improves.
If wasit is right, that's really good news for all investors.

10.58 today, Weald Oilers tweet delivery of Nitrogen.

11.59 Tanker observed leaving Brockham.

Why didn't we hear about the arrival of a tanker at Brockham?

Perhaps the issues reporting tankers we had last week, have caused Weald Oilers to only report tankers leaving Brockham?

Is this the case please Pboo, - we just need confirmation if so?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

With respect to news of oil to surface and flow rates.
I think our patience will be stretched still further.
If / When the ballot opens to vote on Tidswells proposal to appoint two directors to the board (both still the subject of due diligence by the Nomad), and the removal of Vonk, then that will be the time Vonk will provide all the information available about bringing oil to surface / flowrates / reserves, to get the vote Vonk band wagon rolling. I hope he gives much prominence to the part Chris Clay has played, and says little about Tidswell's part in getting Brockham flowing.

In the circumstances, we could be forgiven for assuming Tidswell is on extended leave of absence, as there is a clear conflict of interest between performing his duties and the subject matter of the general meeting he has convenened.

I’m starting to think this pump might the reason they stopped for Christmas and new year.
They put the application in on the 2nd after new year.
Maybe not already having the pump sorted is why Tidswell and DL suddenly wanted Vonk out. Who knows... but lots of unknowns at the moment imo.
++++
Jimi,
Tidswell and DL want Vonk out for much bigger reasons, - like control of so much oil, restoration of status.
Never mind the two stooges, I wonder if the Nomad thinks Tidswell is MD material, as the Nomad has changed since Vonk has been in charge.

This is getting to me..

You said Tidswell, you meant Tidswell, and I read Vonk..
sorry itsallaboutme.

Actually its all about Tidswell..

++++
If they are only using Nitrogen to flow the well then perhaps for once they are getting permission in advance for something needed further down the line. So, has Tidswell finally decided to be proactive?
++++
Think you mean Tidswell, but I'm hoping the *astard is on gardening leave..

I disagree its ALL about the oil Captain, unfortunately its just as much about the yet to be scheduled general meeting and the unknown amount of support Tidswell has from HNW individuals etc.

AJ10 For Info:

Here is a repost of Alan 2017's view at 10:19 yesterday:

B2H - when you displace a well of fluids you have 3 stages of what comes back to surface:

1. Clean completion fluid (brine plus additives)
2. Interface (this will include completion fluid contaminated with oil)
3. 100% hydrocarbons

Most likely what has left the site is the oil extravt d from the brine (interface). They would do this in the oil water gas separ

So the waste takers would be the completion fluid.

So that means we are very close to flowing the well and getting 100% hydrocarbons.

If you have not heard of Chris Clay, perhaps you have done insufficient research.
IMO you might look at Alan2017 posting history for the last month to bring yourself up to speed.

Understood Alan, thanks for your response.

Need clarity if possible from anyone with suitable input here please.

Two tankers with oil plates and two without have appeared at Brockham (thanks Pboo).
If there are problems cleaning up the well, I would expect waste tankers to take away those substances (brine / completion fluid etc) other than oil, because you would not want anything but clean oil in the storage tanks.
The same with contaminated oil, - it should not go in the storage tanks.

Could it be the two tankers with plates should not have had plates? - are refineries disciplined over the correct labeling of tankers with respect to oil and waste oil?
Is it likely ANGS have one storage tank to contain oil that is not clean please?

Lastly, is it known if anyone is working at the well over the weekend?

Appreciate the update Pboo.
Were the 2 with no plates the last two please?

Chas - If it transpires there is nobody working this weekend, does that translate to 'no oil to surface'?

Scally - If you can remove the detritus from the oil at the refinery (they must have some capability - for a fee), then the oil is good to go.

My explanation of the appearance of tankers so far is that oil is flowing,
but that it may be contaminated with foreign bodies despite clean up operation.
As such they can't place the oil in the storage tanks so request a tanker to take it away.
We think flow rates will be low at first, and this tallies with the number of tankers so far which may not be full when they leave site.
They are taking things very slowly.

Yes, good commercial flow required.
Tidswell making noise is more than a nuisance for me though.
Is it his supporters who are buying 100K at a time, - that's what I'd like to now.

If the next RNS contained the news that Tidswell no longer wanted to replace Vonk with two stooges, then sp would react far better than the sighting of another tanker at Brockham.

ANGS needs clarity and purpose in the Board Room, preferably with Tidswell in the rear view mirror.
Until that happens the sp is in limbo.

Having briefly read the UKOG RNS today, they seem reasonably happy with flowrates, and believe that KL3 and KL4 are linked.
If this is how a compromised well behaves that is 5 miles away, I'm happy to stay with Alan's belt and braces 1000BOPD estimate, for a purpose built well.
This assumes we do no damage by messing up with our attempts to get Brockham flowing of course, but hey we have had no reason to doubt the capabilities of this crew.
DL 'inspected the troops' and gave his sanction as to there suitability before Christmas.. if that means a lot..

#6 - See Pboo's 16:32 post

We are not getting updates from the eyes (thanks baits).
I haven't missed their shenanigans at all, Nor the reporting bias to UKOG.

Seeing the back of Tidswell will do wonders for the sentiment and the sp don't you think?
But I suspect some will watch without being shareholders.