RE: Another cancer treatment reported3 Jun 2026 09:33
Icecool - "Once you've proven the concept, shown the safety profile and got approval, everything can cascade into other indications."
+++++
CC - TD Cowen March -
With the inventions around 6103, there's two key aspects there.
The first is we can FAP enable now almost any medicine out there.
So whereas before we had to find something to fit in the active site, now it just hangs off, now we can attach almost anything.
We've got almost FORTY of these LINKERS, we've now made almost FIVE HUNDRED PRECISION MEDICINES, - it's kind of crazy our chemists are quite busy.
[So chemists were still adding to these numbers in March]
The second aspect is we can dial in the exact PK.
So when a potential partner / strategic partner says well what can you do with the PK of this medicine? Francis our CSO will reply 'what do you want us to do with it'.
++++
So when BP decide 6103 / 6207 are projects that suits their needs when looking for IP cliff megabucks drug replacement, Avacta has many many more 'seed' projects, ready to start work with the preCISION platform.
Can BP allow a platform this capable, with nearly 90% of solid tumors as addressable targets, fall into the hands of a competitor?
Not without a fight.
I see them trying to outbid each other, 6103 results in December and rate of 6207 progression are key milestones.
CC mentioned 'the next nine to twelve months, - this really promises to be a transformative period for Avacta, our shareholders and our patients, and what's important is by the end of that period, we will be seeing the initial clinical data in the AVA6103 program by the end of 2026.'