Member Info for audio

Fair value on this is currently 46p

2 analyst have set a target price of 24p in the next 12 months.

Usually I would be sceptical of these kind of predictions but with the increases in tin prices I reckon they are achievable.

This is without other the other possibilities - just tin.

With 500000 shares at 9% down I am happy to wait this one out for as long as it takes

I totally agree Richyf3. This should be at 10p now with all this news about the price of tin.

After all it was nearly that back in June when the tin price was a lot lower.

I hope this gets to somewhere around that before any partnership annoucement to be honest as that should see it fly

Richyf3 - yesterday: #Tin price: 29225 (+582, +2.03%)

CCC - Yesterday: Latest:29,815 +1,172 (+4.09%)

Richyf3 - Today: #Tin price: 29680 (+885, +3.07%)

Where are you two getting your figures from because they don't match

@ CP.

It was 9p last July without all this additional promise and possible news.

I would be very surprised if 14p wasn't on the cards

Thanks for explaining what you meant BH.

I would go along with most of that

Blackhopper:

"i just dont like the way it is trading and the way all this is being handled"

Can you explain why?

Try as you might CC I doubt you will talk this one down.

What company do you use for your shorting?

Where do you get this "feeling" from nesty?

I for one am pretty upset about this being November and the promise was for September - even more upset about not being kept up to date with the reasons for the delay.

Our CEO rarely seems to put a foot wrong and is always quick to get news out - so what has gone wrong here?

I have 500,000 and I am getting nervous. Fortunately my average is in the 4's but I am watching this very carefully

CC -

From the most recent ATM RNS:

"The Company believes that the concentrate is also potentially suitable as feedstock for lithium refineries producing lithium carbonate or lithium hydroxide for the battery manufacturing industry."

A lot of water has gone under the bridge since your "historic" RNS.

You need to keep yourself up to date.

Everywhere you check it says the same:

year high: 0.5 usd

year low: 0.05 usdIf this is true then surely this is open to arbitrage?

that has to balance out the price between the two markets

What is the Fair Price of ATM when looking at its future cash flows?

£6.70 per share

Company Financials plus two analysts - Hannam & Partners, Stifel

I always knew that this company was a good buy but I never expected such a high predicted future value

Goaty, take a good look at my post.
It is not the complete article but a set of bullet points from the article.
Now tell me (without referring to some nobody called Bernard) exactly which of the points raised is not true.
I did a lot of research into batteries before I became an investor and I cannot see anything incorrect about any of it.
Obviously I do not have the hindsight of Bernard

Come on.. you have an awful lot to say lets hear what you actually think about VRFB's in regard to the Times article.
You seem like an expert so which parts are bull to you?

What follows are quotes from an article in the Times yesterday:
"Renewables can generate cheap electricity, but a big bugbear is what happens when the wind doesn't blow and the sun is not shining.
One solution is batteries. The usual Lithium -ion battery, however, is expensive and has a limited lifespan because it corrodes.
Imagine a battery that is cheaper, safer, reliable, lasts far longer without degrading, can store energy for long periods without damage and can be made into a huge storage centre.
This is no pipe dream it already exists even though its unfamiliar.
It is called a vanadium redox flow battery and it does not degrade, charging and discharging hundreds of thousands of times with high efficiency.
Even after 20-30 years of use it can be easily recycled or refurbished, which means it could last almost indefinitely if well maintained.
With such a long life it works out much cheaper than other options in the long run.
For power grids and especially for the intermittent supply from renewables such batteries are ideal.
In fact they are being installed on the scale of megawatts in Chinawith the largest supplying 400 megawatt hours, enough for the demands of 200,000 people for a day"

Also posted on BMN bb

What follows are quotes from an article in the Times yesterday:
"Renewables can generate cheap electricity, but a big bugbear is what happens when the wind doesn't blow and the sun is not shining.
One solution is batteries. The usual Lithium -ion battery, however, is expensive and has a limited lifespan because it corrodes.
Imagine a battery that is cheaper, safer, reliable, lasts far longer without degrading, can store energy for long periods without damage and can be made into a huge storage centre.
This is no pipe dream it already exists even though its unfamiliar.
It is called a vanadium redox flow battery and it does not dregrade, charging and discharging hundreds of thousands of times with high efficiency.
Even after 20-30 years of uses it can be easily recycled or refurbished, which means it could last almost indefinitely if well maintained.
With such a long life it works out much cheaper than other options in the long run.
For power grids and especially for the intermittent supply from renewables such batteries are ideal.
In fact they are being installed on the scale of megawatts in Chinawith the largest supplying 400 megawatt hours, enough for the demands of 200,000 people for a day"

This will also be posted on the IES bb

I got that wrong!
I just multiplied the tons by $93000.
It is $93000 per KG!

109,400 x $93,000
Roughly around $10 billion

HMHG do you even know why the regulation for the strength of steel was introduced in China?
It is highly unlikely that your imaginary industry expert said that.
unless, of course, he/she doesnt know either.

Your constant and obvious attempts on this bb are bordering on ridiculous.
You need to stop you are making a fool of yourself

Larger, pilot scale lithium metallurgical testing, which will also produce samples for potential offtakers, has commenced, with first results expected in first quarter 2023

results from laboratory metallurgical test work with Nagrom to produce battery-grade lithium hydroxide expected in third quarter 2023.

A lithium pilot plant for bulk processing ore - construction completed second quarter 2023

A full-scale, integrated tantalum separation circuit is progressing to construction phase, with long lead items ordered and construction scheduled to complete in second quarter 2023.

First production of tantalum concentrate is expected by third quarter 2023.

Due a serious re-rate this year

Larger, pilot scale lithium metallurgical testing, which will also produce samples for potential offtakers, has commenced, with first results expected in first quarter 2023

results from laboratory metallurgical test work with Nagrom to produce battery-grade lithium hydroxide expected in third quarter 2023.

A lithium pilot plant for bulk processing ore - construction completed second quarter 2023

A full-scale, integrated tantalum separation circuit is progressing to construction phase, with long lead items ordered and construction scheduled to complete in second quarter 2023.

First production of tantalum concentrate is expected by third quarter 2023.

Commercial engagements with lithium petalite concentrate offtakers have been initiated