Member Info for asimpleinvestor

The argument that 'monetary value' trumps 'shares in issue' ignores the fundamental law of supply and demand. You can't 'echo sentiments' that dilution is immaterial when you have 50 billion shares competing for the same pool of capital. What is the monetary value of todays volume?

My point about todays 89 trades stands: if the monetary value of those trades is low but the volume is high, you aren't seeing 'accumulation'; you're seeing liquidity exhaustion. Volume is the engine, but Shares in Issue is the weight of the vehicle. If the vehicle is too heavy (too many shares), the engine (volume) has to work twice as hard just to move an inch. Call that trolling if you wish I call it mechanics of share trading.

"filtered am I? so why did you come on HEX bb at 1020 and been non stop posting towards me since? who is stalking who eh? Do take your claims where you wish and so will I."

I visit HEX every day since I’m invested, and we often discuss the share, especially now as it’s been pulling back from recent highs. My posting log confirms this. I replied to your post about helium storage units, and when you questioned something I said, I responded—similar to how we’re talking now. Discussing the share is fine, but making personal attacks or following people across boards to continue them isn’t acceptable. In those cases, the behaviour gets copied and reported. The moderator then decides the action they deem to be reasonable to take.

@Punter1234 quote today 12:00 So, what exactly is the allegation you’re suggesting? If you notice one... Insinuation isn’t a criminal act; it’s considered an act of defamation.

I don’t need to read them since I’m already well-versed in their content. You, however, should read them instead of just copying and pasting. Your attitude makes you look rather special but not the way you would like.

I’m starting to scale back my holdings and will only keep a few in my HL account. Given the volume seen lately and my desire not to completely tank the share price, it might take a while. So unless something extraordinary happens, don’t expect any sudden spike anytime soon.

With 50 billion shares in circulation, there would be plenty of time to grab a few if a favorable RNS drops on Tuesday without missing out. Given the current overhang, it would take massive volume to move the ticker.

I took some profit when it peaked and I’m glad I did. Now I’m feeling a bit restless about whether to top up since the price has dropped 9p, and it seems like news on offtake agreements or hydrogen developments could be coming soon. It’s been four months since the offtake agreements were first mentioned, and the hydrogen aspect was suggested to be on hold till come Spring.

Everytime I take a peak in here the share has dropped further.

@Punter1234 I didn’t accuse anyone of anything; I simply mentioned something someone said about that particular subject, which isn’t the same. I never accuse anyone of wrongdoing without direct evidence to support a claim. You should try that approach yourself. In this case, your own posts serve as direct evidence of your misconduct and as each post is published that misconduct deepens.

"Helium tube trailers are very different from Helium storage units.......end of."

Tell that to Weldship Corporation https://www.weldship.com/contact-us/

@Punter1234 can you share the piece of criminal legislation that puts this into context? It wasn’t criminal in nature, but I kept the original post in question filed away just in case it could be considered defamation under English law should it be mentioned at a later date, aside from the specific point of law that shows evidence of merit.

In relation to stalking for the purpose of causing distress however, the following Acts should be of interest to you:

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

Malicious Communications Act 1988

Communications Act 2003, Section 127

Online Safety Act 2023

Read and weep!

If milestones are met with its "CHRONOS" next-generation stack and "ALPHA 50" 50MW modules then we could see £1.70 - £2.50 but £6.00 is unlikely and yes, I too would quite happily accept £6.00

Quote "Helium tube trailers are a different thing entirely. In a lose term they could be referred to as a "mobile storage unit" Storing it from the Plant to the buyer.

Helium tube trailers aren’t really different from regular storage units—it’s essentially a pressurized container for storing helium. The terms are interchangeable, and many companies in the U.S. lease these trailers, marketing them as mobile or on-site storage units. For instance, Weldship Corporation, one of the largest high-pressure equipment suppliers, often uses phrases like “storage units” and “storage solutions” in their descriptions. Suggesting otherwise seems like grasping at straws and only makes the argument look weak.

@Punter1234 I’ve been invested in HEX since the start and have posted on the HEX board 19 times in the past 30 days. How long have you been invested in Lloyds, and how often do you post? From my perspective, it seems like someone is going through my posting history today and leaving quips on each board in succession, all of which have been reported for stalking with the intent to cause discord and disruption rather than contribute relevant content.

"ps what storage units loooooooool "if the inability to secure storage units" another no nothing embarrassing fool"

A pressurized mobile storage vessel is used for storing helium after production. I figured you’d understand that if you’ve been following helium production from Hex, especially since, you know, the forum you’re posting on.

@Punter1234 It appears I have a stalker!

"Anyone who showed any consideration for those requiring special needs would immediately find its use in those terms very offensive."

It’s not the words themselves that are inherently offensive, but the context in which they’re used. If the context doesn’t make them hurtful to people with disabilities, they’re generally not seen as offensive. Calling Starmer or Reeves “dumb” isn’t considered offensive, as neither of them is actually dumb, and they’re not disabled in that way, so using those words to describe their actions isn’t seen as an affront to disabled people.

I’m looking forward to the new disclosure rules in the Digital Communications Act taking effect, where users will have to provide personal details and verify their identity before posting on platforms like this. It means anything they post could be accessed by the legal profession if someone chooses to defame others, make unproven allegations, or break the law, making them personally liable. This is a big change from the current situation, where many post anonymously with nothing more than an email address to create an account. Just 2 months to go then posters like troublesome will suddenly disappear one way or the other.

@Punter1234 While your assessment regarding the complexities of long-lead items and plant optimisation is grounded in industrial reality, the threshold for a RNS filing is dictated strictly by the "Materiality" and "Continuous Disclosure" rules of the exchange. Under these frameworks, a company is not obliged to report every granular operational hurdle, such as the specific logistics of leasing tube trailers or routine maintenance, provided these do not fundamentally alter the timelines or production targets already communicated to the market. Disclosure only becomes a legal imperative when a situation be it a procurement delay or a technical bottleneck during the "slow fill" phase constitutes price-sensitive information that a reasonable investor would use to determine the company's value.

If the issues described were to result in a significant deviation from previously issued guidance which it does, the company would be required to update the market without delay. For instance, if the inability to secure storage units or a prolonged plant shutdown for safety upgrades were to materially postpone the date of first revenue or significantly reduce projected output, an RNS would be mandatory to prevent the creation of a false market. Furthermore, while the company does not need to respond to every piece of "deramping," the NOMAD (Nominated Adviser) would intervene to mandate a release if such activity led to a demonstrable loss of an orderly market or if a specific rumour required a formal correction to maintain transparency.

Consider your post read and corrected.

"Independent" means having no personal, professional, or other connection. However, for some posters here, it seems to mean whatever they choose, regardless of the official dictionary or legal definition.