Member Info for ArthurDogal

LeddahJack,

As it will sum up what has been an awful 7 months and counting for GST.

One of us will be right tomorrow.

There will be no results - SP goes down even more more

There will be results , good ones, SP rises rapidly , we’re all rich

There will be results bad ones, SP goes down even more

At this point, it’s take your pick.

Or is it?…..

No results are coming tomorrow are they

BFD,

Yes, as it’s the “thing” to do, multi and I mean multiple other companies have announced their buy, remember we announced our 1 via linked in

It’s my gut feeling we haven’t any more, and I’ve said before i expect the line in the RNS to go

“Bitcoin raise was very successful, at the moment we hold 1 BTC and will purchase more as and when it is the correct time for the company”

Billy,

I’m sorry, but loads of companies have been saying openly how much BTC they are holding.

One company even called others out basically saying you have said you having a BTC treasury but arnt actually buying any.

Which is starting to sound like GST lack of buying

The more you think about it,

The more it makes sense .

So AHS disappeared for a while, I said he had sold out, you were all going no no no.

He magically came back and later admitted he sold some.

I’d bet he sold all, bought back in and now regretting it.

At no point since Jan has mr positive been like this

He obviously wants to get in cheaper with deramping, or a paid troll ..,,.

Who’d of thought on here, we’d be bang on 1p the evening before results might come out.

A non complete claim could arise when a party involved in the takeover (e.g., shareholder, regulator, or rival bidder) brings a claim or objection that lacks the required legal basis or evidence. These usually fail due to:

Causes:

• Lack of standing (e.g., party doesn’t have legal rights to make the claim).

• Insufficient evidence (no proof of harm, breach, or misrepresentation).

• Failure to meet regulatory or procedural requirements.

• Vagueness or lack of specificity in the allegation.

• Missed deadlines (statute of limitations or regulatory deadlines).

Seeing as we all love AI. Think it’s pretty obvious something very dodgy he’s gone on with semnet .

In a legal sense, a non-complete clause typically refers to a clause in a legal document—like a contract—that is incomplete, vague, or lacks essential elements, making it unenforceable or unclear on its own.

It might occur when:

• Key terms are missing (e.g., parties, consideration, timeline).

• The clause is ambiguous or poorly drafted.

• The clause depends on further information or another clause to make sense.

⸻

Examples:

1. Incomplete Clause (Problematic):

“The Seller agrees to deliver the goods…”

• What’s missing? When? What goods? Where? Without more detail, this is not a full legal obligation—it’s a non-complete or defective clause.

2. Dependent or Conditional Clause:

“If the Buyer fails to make payment…”

• This is not a full clause legally until it’s followed by what will happen (e.g., “…the Seller may terminate the contract”). By itself, it’s incomplete in legal effect.

Could it be we don’t actually own any of semnet after all?

That would tie in with non complete

Why are people arguing over it?

It’s non complete, if it was non compete they would have put another RNS out.

Kopf ,

See my post from earlier, in my view this won’t stay above 1p if results are either not positive or don’t come out by Friday

Zag,

Your post is very correct I think, even though people will say it’s incorrect.

I’ve been saying for a while that it will end up with “December results arnt far away”

Thanks Nero.

You too, I’m not in need of the money I’m invested even though I’m well down on it at the moment, so in my eyes there’s no need to sell.

Have a good day .

Nero.

It’s quite obvious really.

If you sell for a loss, then it might end up coming good and you have lost the chance to get it back.

If you’re not desperate for the cash, surely it makes more sense to leave it there for the X amount of time in the hope it goes up?

Shares

Told people many times, I’m not selling for a loss, I’d rather lose the lot.

Billy,

Can you answer it as no one else has.

What happens to that $400,000 if it isn’t listed?

Nero,

It’s a question, can you answer it?

If it isn’t listed, do we get the $400,000 back? Nowhere does it say we will.

The odd thing is guys,

Nowhere in any RNS does it say we will get it back, only upon successful listing.

Does anyone else know further is or this $400,000 down the drain not to be mentioned again?