Member Info for ARahim

And AZ made 1.1m call option at sp = 0.86p min. He expecting sp to be well above 0.86p by december.
Lots of gold news to come.

Sorry, the the figures are: fees 2.3m, sy me monetization 6m generated income for banks 20 m.

6m is the subscription fee. It is payable for 3-4 years, the forth year is opgional. + monetization fee of 20m which will be in the coming month. With more devils joining the subscription fee alone will require much higher sp let alone the monetization fees. Next year expect much more subscription fees and large companies monetazation. These revenues extend for three years and grow in numbers as well.

It is obvious this is not what AZ is betting on to push sp well above 0.86p by december. This is only the Italian market. Two of three large companies could see revenue x10.

It says in one country in the first year they achieved 6m. Great result. Lot to come.
Very robust model.
AZ is getting on a price well above 0.86 by december.

Posts good only for the waste bin.

A put call is an insurance against sp deterioration, investors in this category are not likely to use bb to de-ramp as they are interested in reducing risk to investment.
Holders of put calls without holding any shares are the trouble in this bb. They invested small amount in a bid to achieve large gains. They have based their decision on the spike. But this is not a spike and AZ closed the door by betting on the other direction. Will they give up their hoop soon and save what is left if any. Congratulation AZ you burnt the tail of the wicked.

In sy me case, better not to know the garantor, there are few financial institutions around.
What matters is the higher sp the more we and AZ are going to make. The guarantor should have put holders as well and they are present in this bb.

occams, it is an option to buy at 0.69p. they spent 1.1m on 630m shares, that is 0.175p an option.
Now if the prices gets above 0.69 and bellow 0.86 they can exercise the option and cover some of their costs, if the price is above 0.86p they will make a profit. It will be crazy not to exercise at these prices. if the price is bellow 0.69 they are not going to exercise and loose their bet of 1.1m.
They have actually bought the option as the statement bellow clearly indicates :"acquired ".
"Supply@Me has been notified by shareholder, Orchestra Group, that it has acquired an option giving it the right to receive 630,000,000 ordinary shares of the Company if the share price is at or above 0.6945 pence per share on 31 December 2020. The option cost is £1.1million."

AZ will pay 0.86p a share 1.7p the price of option + 0.69p. Hwo knows better AZ or the option dealer? I guess AZ. The option dealer has to offset this risk by put option. It really does not matter a lot for options providers, but it does for AZ and syme.
My bet is with AZ with price minimum of 1.5p. Happy days.

Wise not side. Spellchecker is a problem.

Unwise, you are the only side posted today. Patience is key herd.

Does it realy mater if closed higher or lower. AZ made a bet to make loads of money within 3 months. Much higher than 0.89p. Waiting for revenue news, days, as we being informed.

Bobak went in with bad intentions, he got burnt in the tail. He lived to tell the story to his kids.

Traders want to double in no time. Victims, other traders. Happy days

It is bullish indeed, he expects the price to be rewarding for the risk taken. 0.89p is the brake even but his expectation must be well above that. 1.5p- 2-3p. Good signal for short term investors.

This board is full of short time traders, just full of s##t. The faster they loose hope the beter.

II are the deep pockets here. The buy large sums as we will see at the end of the day and they sell on spike. They are invisible because they use nominal accounts. Options are worth 0.5 % of kcal at 0.7p. They are just for signalling confidence.

Facts for AZ is progress happening, for the market it is contracts signed. You have to build trust in AZ at least in the short run. He did not invest at that level to make a loss.

It is a software company. The cost does not grow with revenue. At low revenue it could be 50% or more ,20m revenue may have 10m cost, but 100m revenue may have 20m cost at worst.