RE: 203018 Nov 2020 11:49
I would have to disagree Paul, but my opinion is no more valid than yours.
The government simply does not check if any of the things it says is possible. Look at the world beating test and trace and moonshot for a recent example of many. Boris just says stuff. He doesn't check with any experts to see if it's possible. He's not a details man.
Battery technology is so far off. I'd say for planes it's actually impossible. The battery would need to be collosal. For cars, maybe. But can the grid cope? What is the speed of charging your car? I'm regularly queing at the fuel station when petrol takes seconds to add to the tank. Hydrogen and renewables is not new tech. Its been around for ages. I've been to many presentations where hydrogen fuel cells have been trashed as inefficient and terrorism risks. If large scale renewables was viable we would have done much more, because money is what drives the world. It will cost 5x furloghs to get this out. The green party recognised this and said it would cost a trillion. Does the UK have a trillion? Even if we do emerging markets don't.
And let's just say the tech is possible in that timescale, which I don't believe it is, BP will have be involved in this. I'm not a climate denier, I know we have to and will change but not a chance in that timescale. In my opinion.
To summarise, I'm still feeling quite secure with BP.