Member Info for Albinio74

If someone started buying aggressively into the company it would shift the sp upward quite quickly, then we would start getting TR1s, unless they were very crafty, and then at 30% would have to make an official offer I believe.

Then have to mess around with assets they may not be interested in

Also if doing this in a hostile approach they could alienate the BOD and reduce co-operation and risk damaging the good relations currently established with the Greenland government by the current team..

Not sure our assets are far enough along yet so they may be more interested in the likes of Bluejay or Hudson.

Although they have done really good work so far at Amitsoq, so a JV there would be very pleasing, a hell of a lot more work required at Inglefield before anyone looks tat that i would have thought and probaly more at TBS to prove up grade and scale before anyone wants to buy into that I would have thought.

Just my opinion of course and you never now - perhaps early stage bargains for some are or interesting than proved up more advanced and more costly projects, but not how I thought things tend to work.

Man there is some serious irony in that post by mannan - almost enough to mine.

The SP fluctuation is irrelevant - until we have definitively hit or missed milestones.

We are now very close to knowing if Brockham, HH and TBS will meet medium term expectations.

That is true but some may argue there can be something in having the headline space to yourself, but agree no good if no one is looking.

But with plenty of news to come unlikely they need to be that strategic with info - still a slight chance of interesting news before year end but not counting on it.

Hope our sp can mimick Bluejays - little point judging fluctuating sp until significant milestones are hit or missed.

So by spring that should mean more evidence of progress at Brockham (isbit flowing), info on HH KL4, overall review of EWT and planning progress (production license) and of course TBS maiden resource estimate.

I don't expect Clogau news to move sp until they actually have the mine open with some sort of income and proof of concept- probably a couple of years away at best.

Updates on geochemical results etc is interesting and moves the project along but of no interest to the market.

Not that I expect it but a partner buying into Amitsoq or Limerick would be significant.

Interesting RNS update over at Bluejay which may bode well for us - they have been able to regularly upgrade their JORC, so if our maiden resource estimate is good would not be OTT to hope for similar over time there.

I like to round it up to 12% :)

Wow that has taken a lot of posts - so you believe them to be dishonest and hiding things - thanks for confirming.

I think you are wrong and misunderstand the complexity of O&G - assume based on that you'll be selling up and going on your way.

I certainly would not stay invested in a company where I believed operational issues were being reported dishonestly.

I see - just that the following quote suggests you think it is not to do with roads and weather, which very much implies you feel they are not being truthful.

"does anyone have an explanation as to why this well has been delayed from Sept onwards? I think we should be told"

I don't comment often here but check in most days and it seems you willfully reject what everyone else accepts as normal in o&g stocks, regardless of the financial model, it is complex and often involves multiple parties so delays routinely occur - I have had a number of such shares and some successful, some not, but ALL without fail experienced delays and operational issues from permitting, weather issues, mechanical problems, 3rd party mess ups etc

It seems you have a particular Knack of only seeing the negative and deliberately overplaying the significance of these things.

If you turn out to be right well played but at the moment there is no reason to think anything other than bad weather has compromised access.

Great spread of risk here with substantial upside potential - certainly much more positive than your posts would suggest.

Ricfle

"You just tried to put words in my mouth, asking questions that were not alluded to in my post, so I have no reply to this sort of BS.

I asked you one question, about the continual delays to Monroe swell, that you cannot, or will not reply to."

--------------------

Cool story bro.

Do you think they are inept or corrupt (or both).

Nothing for me to answer - all in RNS releases and presentations as well as the usual O&G hurdles.

Plain - yeah like jam on chips.

No need for any explanations from me, not on the bod and have made no claims or ambiguous posts.

Just asked you 3 very basic questions on your post. Would have been good if you could have answered.

Will leave you to your board clogging twaddle - have a nice weekend.

Ricfle.

Are you saying that there has not been heavy rain and that low grade roads are not effected by this to a point that can effect access?

Are you saying the BOD are willfully misleading the market and hiding something.

Are you saying that the O&G industry is not riddled with delays and hiccups due to the complex nature of the business.

I think we should be told.

Hopefully shows lots going on that will soon impact on SP.

https://twitter.com/Microsaic/status/1073559572181331969?s=19

https://twitter.com/Adrianwfire/status/1073156590172323841

Horsehill looking really positive - hope not too long for next official news.

Intersting few seconds on bluejay about 29 mins in - could bode well for TBS if someone has their eye on the area.

https://audioboom.com/posts/7115086-tekcapital-tek-reabold-resources-rbd-and-mining-analyst-john-meyer

The TBS explanation makes sense (2m drill) very expensive to use heavier duty equipment, if you then found the upper layers were not as good as expected.

Bluejay based their maiden resource estimate on a 3m depth, which i think included an assumption on what was below initial drill depths - so possible a mineral estimation will include underlying material below the 2m drill depth at TBS.

You can later use Sonic drills to assess further, which also appears to be what Buejay have done.

What i do not understand are the complications that may be associated with actually extracting layers currently in permafrost - whether that can bea layered process or not I don't know? anyone else?

However lots of variable mining does take place successfully in variable terrain with permafrost in place so perhaps some making more of that than was warranted for their own agendas.....

Yes thanks for sharing Rambo - what these boards should be used for.

https://twitter.com/profit_is_king/status/1072480432275496960

https://twitter.com/Adamthornton121/status/1072455585264750592

Thanks Barry - hope I get to make one of these in the future - will wait for it to go on the website.

Did they focus much on TBS?