Less threads about certain people start a new topic if it gets toxic. Best of luck all. Adz xX Let's keep it wholesome all been some good conversations recently. π
Sorry Louis10 you lost the excuse me ability in here when all you did was post spam. So kindly excuse yourself from the conversation. You aren't welcome. π
Anyone other than Louis that is. Mate ffs give it a rest we are actually trying to have a conversation. If you wouldn't mind giving us your calculations and reasoning. That would be appreciated who knows Louis10 you might actually get a back and forth conversation on this one. I await your reasoning π₯
@Peaky that's definitely something I would like to see a discussion on. For me 50% isn't something even worth considering. I'd rather traditional funding if that were the case. I'm not sure who had the financial background on the forum I believe Chris or Iceberg (could be mistaken) But would love some input on that. Good post. Best Adz. π₯
RE: Accountability for dishonesty28 Sep 2023 23:05
Why would we discuss a false Doxxing. Did you want to discuss it? Are you saying the documents displayed are factual evidence? Didn't you say someone was shifty that posted them. Unless your saying they are correct and upstanding. Just wanting some clarification on your side. I'd probably leave it to legal experts to discuss it, that's what I'm doing. But if you want to explain any facts go ahead. Enjoy that. π