RE: Carey Gillam29 May 2018 10:52
Ash said
"We are reading more and more about the impact of things on the environment but it still does f. all for the SP."
I think the reasons for that are simple
1) Eden is not feeding into that noise around the environment to offer any counter where they have one and Powerscourt appear not to be offering anything up either. The environment may be impacted, but so few investors know what Eden can do about it. This is where Powerscourt should be engaging with the likes of Carey Gillam, the Guardian newspaper and more and both introducing Eden and educating the journalists in order to gain traction and both column and digital coverage.
2) Eden has no Investor communications plan. Without the same they cannot expect to build understanding, knowledge and engagement with the share price. We know this because the trend says so. We know this because when companies, Eden included to ad hoc work as recently the outcome is always the same. A small flurry of interest and activity followed by a rising share price and then some profit taking because people know there is no more to follow and as such, no upward momentum in the share price
3) Eden fails to qualify the success of the product (as we are right now) that addresses one of these environmental issues. So, what effect has Mevalone had against conventional pesticides and how has that affected demand for Mevalone this year (2018) by the buying community, namely, farmers
4) And finally, qualification and detail around the product application extensions and value of the same around Mevalone.
Eden currently has one commercial product, Mevalone and we do not know the success of this product at all.
If Eden would just address these four areas now, I feel confident that the share price could double quite easily. The do however, have to understand the nature and delivery of the same so that they create appeal and appetite for the Company and its prevailing share price.