The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
https://ibb.co/gZLrRZf
Finally got a bullish set up
All traders are bandits Coggy ;-)
It's just that most are on the long side, few complain about being on the right side of the serial promoters. No trunks time is imo, pretty much here, they tend to be subject to more scrutiny in a downturn
The small trades are often left over parts of orders on the SETS book. If you've got 400 on the ask and bid hits it for 393 then a lower ask jumps in front of you, the 7 shares will sit at that level, unless you move it down or cancel it until the order is filled. You only get charged once for the whole order.
That's not taken a great technical turn today, needs to recapture the uptrend and break the down (rather obviously).
https://ibb.co/smLXCyk
The other thing is that SINT outlier trade at 6xx, not coincidental or accidental.
https://www.fxstreet.com/news/breaking-us-2-year-and-10-year-t-bond-yield-curve-inverts-for-first-time-since-2007-201908141015
Told you a **** storm was coming, everyone knew better, especially those 'experts'. China data looks great too.
I don't think it's possible to blame the whole drop on the alleged HST shenanigans ;-) btw this goes on to a limited or greater extent on every SETS traded share at some time or another, probably more often on the long side. It's almost impossible to prove in it's mild forms, in fact 'supporting' DMA orders are the norm both ways. I don't think there will be a single direct access trader that hasn't done it.
With respect, Yorkshire, I think you're misunderstanding how spoofing and layering actually affect the sp. With SETSqx you get a lot of cancelled and duplicate orders than actually go through on the trades list this perhaps giving the impression the market is trending one way or the other. On SETS these 'techniques' solely rely on the psychological effect on manual AT trading and 'spoofing' the algos into believing there's more pressure than there may be. Algos spoofing algos quite often.
Jurisdictional issues still extant. Ironically any decision to pursue through the courts would be a strong indicator of poor governance. In fact i would go further. Only poor companies threaten legal action on bear raiders. If there's nothing untoward happening sp will recover fully and the company will quickly recover its capitalisation. Short sellers have far more to lose than longs, so tend to be extremely well researched. Witness BYND:NYSE for most of its existence for a good example of how wrong it can go.
Actually rather than being a matter of confidence I strongly suspect MW was somewhat surprised by the severity off the sell off, after all they weren't calling this as an out and out fraud. They will have had a target phased exit price and at around 75% from entry they may well have substantialy realised it
I find little merit in the argument that the minor miss-practice justifies the larger one. Curious, logic indeed: as if petty tax avoidance justified major corruption......
Are you actually saying, you're happy to be invested in an enterprise that is dishonest in a minor way because you're certain that's as far as it goes, and somehow acceptable? There's thousands and thousands of vehicles out there, why increase risk unnecessarily?
All the usual opportunist rampers squeaking away. Boy those short sellers must be hurting eh. Anybody ever consider there's something to the all stations.....noooo of course not, they're lawyers and always trustworthy, pmsl