Member Info for 100baggers

One of the posts he did today is about a male vibrator from 2012 that sells for £700, from an american compnany,the posts he does are getting just so obtuse and ridiculous. Honestly £700 and 2012, you couldnt make it it, but its true.

read that one before, 2 weeks ago, i think posters are looking for a new article this weekend that will really propel the share price on Tuesday to a new audience.

to put it simply, if there is a demand for something that folk feel important in their lifes, eg weight loss or sex, it will sell, regardless if it needs to have drugs in it or not. as long as it is safe, and has shown to produce results, folk will buy it.

remeber slimfast was sold otc as a slimming weight loss product, it had no drugs in it and was an AID to losing weight, in the same way MET3000 will be marketed, slimfast had peak sales of $850 million.

med3000 "rubbing worked instantly in only 8% of the men" "the actual gel took 5 to 10 mins to work in 60-70% of the men, without any rubbing, as you only rub in on for 15SECONDS. hence it was the blend of the gel which stimulated the nerve endings, producing an erection.(patent protected formula)
that is why it is called a medical aid, and not a drug, as no drugs are needed for the desired effect,, and can be sold OTC, in any supermarket shelves now !

11 million shares were traded on friday, yes that is a lot, but if the free float was 99% they price jump would have been less pronounced.A low float can be good or bad, depending how you look at it. it is good if you know that if folk want in, there are few shares available and will have to pay up, and pay up quickly,
again if a sell offf occurs it will drop fast as well.
remember warren buffett said volatilty is not the same as risk, risk is paying too much for an overvalued stock, volatilty is simply the movement of the share price.

folks, remember the free float avialable on this stock is only 53%, that is why it jumps up and down so much, all it takes is a few big buys to really spike it and vice versa. So dont think worry that alot must be buying or selling in £millions and £millions it is simply the low float that is causing the pronouced movements.
If you compare it to say megacaps , they have free flosts of up to 99%, which smooth outs their stock chart.

like i said yesterday,i was on lse up to about 4 yrs ago, under a diff name, i came off it due to folk commenting about hourly price moves and price targets too much.I felt not enough comments were about fundamentals about products of companies,I also got fed up with most of the comments on lse were about mineral exploration stocks, which seemed to be the all the rage.I rejoined as i felt this stock was a completley different multibagger with real potential longterm and it was realistic in its products.

I have been looking at almost every video, news items i can find in last 24 hrs about this trial.Here is what i beleive.This trial involved a placebo Med3000 vrs Med2005, Yes med 2005 had a drug in it (GTN).Now normally in drug trials the placebo is simply a sugar pill vrs a real potential drug.
But in this case the placebo is the one that produced results similar to the one with the GTN, thus the findings showed med2005 as a" failure" as it didnt produce increased results compared to the placebo med3000.
why was that? simply because the drug wasnt needed , as the gel produced the desired effects. why is that? because the ***** head has many nerve endings, that respond to heat and touch.and there is no need for a drug to increase the blood flow to get desired effects.(note,diabeties is caused by too much sugar in the bloodstream which creates a stickiness that also damages nerve endings), thus nerve endings need larger and more pronouced stimulation.
ok, some will say surely the stimulation, rubbing on of the gel, caused the effect, no, as only 8% said they got instant response, but the rest 60-70% said the needed 5-10 mins, why? cos the gel which as a propriety alcohol formulation was enough to cause the nerve endings to respond, not simply the rubbing on of the gel...
Now some will now say well anyone can create this gel, well no, it has patents, and others have tried but produce a burning, that is why futura say this isnt a "me too" gel. their gel doesnt have massive burning like others.
ok what is a medical device? it is NOT a drug which needs a doctors to prescribe it,.it is a device, an aid so to speak, that you can buy OTC, eg such as a weight loss drink., you find in tesco, asda, etc.
some on this forum and advfn keep going on about "what drug does MED3000 have, the answer is of course none, as it has now shown it doesnt need one to get the desired results, the results starts fairy fast and lasts 30 mins, due to the effects of the GEL, which is enough to work without any DRUGS.
the next step, will be manufacturing in uk and europe (the company is in many talks with manufacturers)and next along with the US FDA small trial, as they want to see if the gel works after 6 months The US is a bit stricter you see,(currently, the recent trial was over 3 months which was enough to get the CE mark)
the CE mark shows that the product is safe.
imo this stock is a BUY and will be many multiples of todays market cap.

please do not worry if you got this at 15 or 60p, if you are still waiting to buy,"
i wouldnt say drat,hmm, missed it at 15p!!!, i wont buy it now at 59p".that is bad thinking imo. many great growth stocks have been missed by investors waiting and waiting, until they pull the trigger many months or years too late to make life changing results.

i ALSO HAVE TO WORK OUT HOW OFTEN A CUSTOMER WILL BUY THIS, EG HOW OFTEN THEY WILL HAVE SEX/ UNKNOWN, PLUS THE PRICE DIFF BETWEEN VIAGRA£20 A PACK AND HOW MUCH A TUBE OF GEL WILL COST. LOTS OF VARIABLES. AND CALCULATE SALES, PROFIT MARGINS AND CASH FLOW. PLUS MR MARKET DOESNT ALWAYA DO THAT AND SIMP,Y PUTS A SSTOCK AT A SIMPLE PRICE TO SALES RATIO, AND THEN YOU CAN WORK OUT POTENTIAL MARKET CAP.

one of the reason i came off this forum, lse was the constant price predictions and share price movements(daily, lol).I look at fundamentals these days, i try to work out total sales, total cashflow returned to investors, then i work out total number of shares, plus any future dilution, ( a worry i always have).The n i consider institutes calcualting it also, and also the maount insiders have( we have 13% I BELEIVE. A GOOD SIGN!. THEN I ALSO CONSIDER WHAT MR MARKET WILL PAY, AS THAT IS NEVER KNOWN!!

i will try to post the video, it is on you tube, i suggest you watch all his videos.

viagra averaged sales PER YEAR of around $2 billion for 17 yrs, until its patents expeied and then cam generic rivals, sales all still around $400 million ayear at mo.I understand we would receive 50% of profit , is that right? due to this gel product profits being shared .

hello folks, after being off this for 4 yrs , i rejoined today, why, simply because of this stock. Last month i watched many videos by famous fund manager Peter Lynch, who said look for products that have huge runway.He once said about viagra, any good private investor could easily see it had huge sales forecast and you would have been a fool to ignore it.