Member Info for 0134

You sound suspiciously like Jambone.

Are you Jambone or is he just writing your posts these days?

This is like a Day today interview, Stephen you've lost the news!

"Ask him if he still thinks QBT will be revenue generating in 2024, as previously stated."

"Ask him why they aren't sure it will perform in an operational situation after 5/6 months of live testing"

Good news about the money, obviously, drop in the ocean in terms of Bitcoin mining though. If the full amount was awarded, is that not effectively paying back the bonds anyway?

FG has backed himself into a corner by stating that QBT will be revenue generating in 2024, the clock is ticking.

By default if there is no positive news on this then it must be bass news.

Parker is either Jambone or copy pasting on behalf of Jambone. Reported.

True, it will (probably) run based on nothing, especially as liquidity is relatively poor, it accentuates any move.

Anyway I preferred to move that into something that may run and may actually have fundamentals, it was actually BTDR.

I lost patience with MIGI, so it'll probably run now.

Does it survive long term?

Parker, talking of agendas, are you going to call out Jambone and Suthy, who admin deemed it necessary to ban? Or Obelix, who was caught out as a multi id poster, or yourself who just admitted you'd like to see it cheaper for a top up.

Everyone has an agenda. Except me. Obviously.

What was your text message and what was his reply?

How is the testing going, when does he expect to update the market and does he stand by his comments that QBT will be revenue generating in 2024.

"This is definitely being manipulated by a few to get the share price down"

He says without absolutely no evidence whatsoever.

Contact the FCA and let us know the outcome of that one Steve.

That's gambling Nickbo.

..Sorry, admin have not banned any of so called derampers.

"I have complained to Admin about your accounts, they responded, they were looking into removing argumentative accounts, your still here, bit odd don't you think? why did admin not clear the decks?"

I only have 1 account, as admin will well know, whereas the rampers have been caught out with multiple ids. The fact that admin have deemed it necessary to ban Jambone and Suthy and none of the rampers suggests there is more than meets the eye going on.

"Can you come up with a single bit of actual proof that QBT cannot do what they claim?"

Time is against them Mikey, they've claimed that they'll be installed on clients and revenue generating in 2024, meanwhile 5 months into testing and no proof it works.

There's only really 6 months of the year left to get installed on clients. Let's see.

By the way I'd absolutely be invested if there was any proof whatsoever that it works, or if I thought this was anything other than a lifestyle company.

Parker - I don't know why Jambone and Suthy were banned and neither do you, but why do you presume to know better than admin who do know the reason?

According to this they will be installed on clients and generating revenue in 2024. 5/12 of the year gone, it feels incredibly ambitious for the 2nd video to still be true.

https://youtu.be/ObkZkcfan6Y?si=ZoLXoMXBO7eA4MP0

Jambone you're not even invested here, why do you come on here trolling? Post on a share you are invested in 🤡😉😂

...Fleccy, I think it must just be poor wording. But I'm surprised the company haven't come out and clarified, considering it's been misinterpreted a number of times, here and on YouTube/twitter etc..

Fleccy, I think it must just be poor

"mining BTC is a numbers game"

Realistically how many machines would QBT need access to in order to test in a difficulty window in order to mine at least 1 BTC?

"Method B works, next news, how far away is this?"

Interesting question, according to this https://youtube.com/shorts/6r06RD6dRRs?si=xMSI4X7cvpLkHwAI , they have been live testing for 4 months and according to this https://youtu.be/ObkZkcfan6Y?si=ZoLXoMXBO7eA4MP0 they will be installed on clients and generating revenue in 2024. 5/12 of the year gone, it feels incredibly ambitious for the 2nd video to still be true.

Again transparency from the company would be welcome.

As was mentioned earlier the company isn't helping matters by either not releasing information or releasing poorly worded communication, followed up with conflicting media interviews.

It would be good to get some transparency, for example how many machines is method B being tested on, what does that testing actually look like... Etc