Member Info for 0134

BTC was looking strong at high 70's to push on, funny how it changes so quickly. Despite that miners been on a good run of late, Mara 2x since Feb. Said I'd cash out mara if it got back to 18 from there, someone remind me if that happens.

FG not satisfied with the 500k raise, all hands to the pumps in terms of generating hype.

"the market potential for this is huge"

Would you say it's as big an opportunity as the digital twins? I wonder what happened there? 🤔

https://youtu.be/X8lF61MeLSs?si=cmfJXOCCMehyERRu

BTC creeping towards 80k 🤔

Anyone back in?

"The Italian lingo isn’t helping, it’s not being made 100% clear."

Unfortunately this is exactly what FG relies on.

What if FG is Beekeeper? He's trolling us at this point.

The question is how does FG have the time for all these methods, companies etc, shouldn't he be focusing on generating the revenue that he keeps promising. Anyway thank goodness for NDAs, else there would be some real accountability.

Very much a PRN laying the foundations for a pivot, QBT has been bled to death with placings, long live blockeeper. There will be some unprecedented progress with blockeeper announced shortly followed by a pump and a raise for FGs 2millions living expenses.

Where are jambone and suthy anyway, would like their view.

Well well well, don't say you weren't warned.

All those desperate PRNs make sense now. Expect no more updates until next year now.

How much of shareholders money has FG spent on Proactive Investor interviews since March?

Funny guy FG, don't here a peep out of him for months but when he needs a raise he'll PRN anything.

GLA all

Shocking lack of Comms from the board here, very very poor. Mcap less than QBT says it all.

Good call over at GST Chaebol 👏

I kind of like the look of Eightco (ORBS), took a small punt last on week's drop. Wary of more raises though. AI treasury play, ETH holdings and a stake in OpenAI. I think it's still the only publicly traded stock with that offers exposure to OpenAI too. It's a punt, mainly for the OpenAI stake.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4886505-eightco-holdings-worldcoin-openai-poh-assets-are-overshadowed-dilution

It must give FG hope reading all the posts on here. GLA all, FG will appreciate you feeding him for another year.

FG in overdrive trying to pump for a raise. Anything close to .70 and that'll be him off into the sunset.

Co pilot analysis.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (QBT) has released another optimistic RNS, this time announcing the start of live testing of its Method C “AI Oracle” on a Bitmain Antminer S9. On paper, the company presents this as a major technical milestone. In reality, it exposes the same underlying issues that have plagued QBT for years: outdated hardware, vague claims, no independently verifiable results, and a narrative that looks suspiciously like groundwork for another placing.

The most striking detail is the hardware itself. The Bitmain S9 was launched in 2016 and is now so obsolete that industrial miners retired it years ago. It is not “commercial grade” in 2026; it is a relic. You can buy one on eBay for the price of a takeaway — listings regularly appear for £40–£60. Yet QBT is presenting work on this museum‑piece miner as a breakthrough worthy of investor attention.

QBT claims the S9 was chosen because it is the last Bitmain rig with open‑source firmware, allowing them to modify the operating system and FPGA control board. While technically accurate, this explanation highlights a deeper problem: QBT does not have access to any modern hardware from major manufacturers. If the company had meaningful traction with the industry, it would be testing on S19, S21, S23 or Whatsminer rigs — the machines actually used by large‑scale miners. Instead, they are tinkering with a decade‑old platform simply because it is the only one they can legally modify.

The RNS reveals that this S9 project began in August 2025, meaning it has taken seven months to reach the point of “live testing.” Despite this long development period, the announcement contains no performance data, no measurable results, and no third‑party validation. Instead, it leans heavily on vague, promotional language about “mastering the innermost details” of mining rigs and “anticipated” efficiency gains. These are aspirations, not achievements.

QBT also stresses that this S9 work runs alongside a separate project involving a third‑party ASIC manufacturer’s rig. Conveniently, the company notes that results from that system cannot be shared publicly. This leaves QBT with no verifiable evidence to present to the market, while allowing them to imply progress behind closed doors.

The timing and tone of the RNS follow a familiar AIM pattern. The company emphasises “milestones,” “commercial demonstrations,” and “target markets” — all classic pre‑fundraise language. With no revenue, rising R&D costs, and a recently expanded team of specialists, QBT’s cash requirements are almost certainly increasing. Against that backdrop, today’s announcement reads less like a genuine technical breakthrough and more like a carefully crafted narrative designed to support the share price ahead of a placing.

In short, QBT’s latest RNS offers plenty of words but very little substance. Investors should treat it with caution.

FG pulling out all the stops to tee up a raise. Be careful folks, don't lose more than you can afford.

'Gardin pushing hard for the placing'

He's got to eat.

Hey Mikey I asked copilot to respond to the points you raise.

Mikey's attempt to dismiss the analysis as “generic AIM talking points” is revealing — not because it undermines the thesis, but because it confirms it. When a defence amounts to “everyone else on AIM does this too”, that is not a rebuttal. It is an admission.

Let’s break down the counter‑arguments.

1. “We’re an R&D company, so no revenue is normal.”

This is the oldest refuge of pre‑commercial AIM entities. The issue is not the absence of revenue — it’s the absence of independently validated progress, the absence of customers, and the absence of any evidence that years of R&D have produced anything commercially viable.

R&D is not a shield against scrutiny. It is a phase. QBT has been in that phase for many years with nothing to show but dilution.

2. “We’re now testing on an ASIC rig.”

A single line about “live testing” is not a milestone; it is a press‑release placeholder.

Where is the third‑party verification?

Where is the performance data?

Where is the miner willing to put their name to a pilot?

Until those exist, “testing” is just another vague promise in a long chain of vague promises.

3. “Going concern wording is standard.”

Yes — and it is standard for the same reason it appears here: the company’s survival depends on raising more money.

The fact that Mikey tries to normalise this risk instead of addressing it only highlights how fragile the business is.

4. “Healthy scepticism is fine…”

What Mikey calls “healthy scepticism” is simply reading their filings.

If the company believes that pointing out its own numbers is unfair, that says more about the numbers than the analysis.

5. “The only thing that matters is live testing.”

This is the most telling line of all.

When a company reduces its entire future to a single unverified internal test, it is signalling that there is nothing else of substance to point to.

In short: Mikey’s response doesn’t refute the thesis — it validates it.

Just ask copilot... RKB

Quantum Blockchain Technologies PLC (QBT) is not a misunderstood innovator. It is a masterclass in how an AIM‑listed micro‑cap can weaponise buzzwords to mask a business model that has never progressed beyond PowerPoint. While the company proclaims itself a pioneer in quantum‑ and AI‑enhanced Bitcoin mining, its filings reveal a far less glamorous truth: no revenue, no customers, no product, and no credible path to commercialisation.

For years, QBT has issued a conveyor belt of breathless RNS announcements touting “breakthrough algorithms” and “quantum‑inspired methods”. Yet despite this torrent of self‑promotion, the company has failed to produce a single independently validated result or secure even one paying client. The only thing QBT has consistently generated is share dilution. Its survival depends entirely on issuing new stock to retail investors drawn in by the promise of a technological revolution that never arrives.

Governance only deepens the concern. The CEO provides his services through a related‑party consultancy arrangement with his own company — an arrangement that would raise eyebrows in any serious institutional setting. Meanwhile, QBT continues to burn cash on legacy legal disputes from its previous incarnations, a reminder that this is not a focused tech firm but a corporate relic endlessly reinventing itself to fit the zeitgeist.

With just four employees, multi‑million‑pound annual losses, and an auditor‑flagged material uncertainty over going concern, QBT resembles less a research company and more a perpetual funding vehicle. The “quantum” narrative is a convenient distraction from a balance sheet that relies on hope and dilution rather than innovation and revenue.

In our view, QBT is not an emerging leader in blockchain optimisation. It is an AIM‑listed illusion — a story stock built on buzzwords, not substance — and one whose valuation is dangerously detached from reality.

I wonder whether we'll get to hear from these experts. Perhaps FG could reignite the YT channel and give some interviews.