Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Posts: 6,248
Why do think that thousands of scientists don't believe in MMGW, including Dr Patrick Moore (the co-founder of Greenpeace. He has put his life on the line for environmental issues, such as when he was driving the RIB when the Rainbow Warrior was attacked in NZ {see first link below}); Dr David Bellamy, who never worked in TV again after calling MMGW 'poppy****' (see second link below); Dr William Happer, Professor of Physics at Princeton (see third link below); and John L. Casey ( Author of Dark Winter and Dark Sun. Former President of SSRC and acting CEO of IEVPC. {see forth link below})?
1)There are 31,000 US scientists and professionals opposed to Kyoto (see the video in the first link below @ 05:03).
2)Carbon Dioxide has never been in correlation with temperature (see the Geological Timescale: Concentration of CO2 and Temperature Fluctuations @ 06:27 in the same link).
3) Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant, but a chemical essential for life and there's currently a dearth of Carbon Dioxide, which is why it is pumped into Market Gardener's greenhouses (see the third link below).
4) Increased temperatures on the planet will increase farming yields and in some parts of the globe a second or even a third crop each year becomes possible (see the first link below).
5) Global cooling will result in lower yields for farming and could result in famine (see the first, third and fourth links below).
If MMGW isn't happening, why is there so much support? Dr Shiva Ayyadurai, the inventor of Email, explains the money making scheme in the fifth link below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFHX526NPbE
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-bellamy-i-was-shunned-they-didnt-want-to-hear-8449307
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8iEEO2UIbA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Casey_(climate_change_author)
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1176506786414825473?lang=en
Posts: 2,908
Even NASA do not believe in Man Made Climate Warming, according to this article.
"NASA admits that climate change occurs due to changes in Earth's solar orbit, not because of SUV's and fosil fuels."
https://www.sott.net/article/420049-NASA-admits-climate-change-occurs-because-of-changes-in-Earths-solar-orbit-not-because-of-SUVs-and-fossil-fuels
I remember Dr David Bellamy, who died recently. He was a first rate scientist with a common touch. He had the ability to explain difficult things clearly, simply, and with a sense of humour. I was appalled when the BBC dropped him because he spoke out against climate change. The BBC, to this day, refuse to discuss climate change, as they regard it as a proven fact. Arrogant t0$$ers!
Posts: 8,053
Here's a thing. Anyone else notice the clear blue skies and warmer temperatures now the planes have virtually stopped flying . Ditto the lack of water falling from the sky?
I recall much was made on the change in weather in america on the days following 9/11 and i expect much analysis will be completed following the lockdown. It will be interesting to see how stories are constructed around the data to support current thinking. My personal observation is burning lots of fossil fuels causes cooling as it has been exceptionally warm since we stopped ! We shall see what the 'experts' say.
Posts: 229
THat is untrue. It just seemed that way at the beginiing of lockdown becasue the weather was good.
Posts: 6,248
Record Cold of 2021 Reminds Us: Be Wary of Climate Predictions and Energy Priorities
https://townhall.com/columnists/vijayjayaraj/2021/01/17/record-cold-of-2021-reminds-us-be-wary-of-climate-predictions-and-energy-priorities-n2583143
Save our wine! Big freeze spells disaster for French vineyards
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-56688031
Posts: 6,248
UK weather: April set to be frostiest in UK for 60 years
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56903882
Posts: 6,248
If MMGW is taking place then carbon trading business will expand. Estimates have put this as trillions of dollars world wide over next few decades. Why has Al Gore sold his carbon trading companies for $200m now? Surely it couldn't be that we're actually into a Grand Solar Minimum and heading for colder climate worldwide? Strange that so many scientists could get their methodology wrong for decades, deducting 1.8 degrees Centigrade from weather stations in city centres due to Heat Island Effect? When they realised their mistake and they revised the figures, they got the average global temperature to rise from 14 to 14.64 by the end of the last century, instead of a drop from 15 to 14.64 (all degrees Centigrade). Must have been a right bunch of liars those monks who wrote about the Medieval Warm Period. No the IPCC have sorted out that anomaly, the Tropical Pacific got colder at the same time to balance out global temperatures. I wonder if the hidden email about having to discredit the MWP had anything to do with this, surely not?
Posts: 6,248
Dr Shiva Ayyadurai link, as the twitter link no longer works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYD0doql-5k
Posts: 6,248
In COP21 it has been reported that coral is declining due to MMGW increasing the acidity of the oceans. Yet if the oceans warm up they lose Carbon Dioxide and become less acidic. The fact that the coral is dying is due to Global Cooling which causes the oceans to absorb more Carbon Dioxide.
'As we burn fossil fuels and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels go up, the ocean absorbs more carbon dioxide to stay in balance. But this absorption has a price: these reactions lower the water’s pH, meaning it’s more acidic. And the ocean has its limits. As temperatures rise, carbon dioxide leaks out of the ocean like a glass of root beer going flat on a warm day.'
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/OceanCarbon
Well if the oceans are getting colder and The Great Barrier Reef is getting more acidic, then there will be more sea ice in Antarctica.
Increasing Antarctic Sea Ice
'In fact, it’s recently broken a record for maximum extent.'
http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/changing-antarctica/antarctic-sea-ice/
As this doesn't tie-in with the IPCC's agenda, it's apparently due to errors in the algorithms used to collect the data.
'Two algorithms for estimating sea ice extent from these measurements were developed in the 1980s. The ‘Bootstrap’ algorithm is one of the most widely used ice-concentration products, and forms the basis of the observations of sea ice made in the IPCC reports.
A change in the inter-calibration across two different sensors on successive satellites caused a substantial change in the long-term trend in sea-ice extent[5]. There is apparently an error in either the current dataset or the one used prior to the mid-2000s. The authors of this particular study suggest that observations should be re-examined to determine the sensitivity of observations to this change in the dataset.'
http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/changing-antarctica/antarctic-sea-ice/
Strange that whenever the IPCC doesn't get the results it wants it's down to data error by the algorithms.
The IPCC stated that the average temperature of the Earth was 15 degrees Centigrade in the late 80's, and that it would increase by at least half a degree by the year 2000. The temperature dropped to 14.64 degrees Centigrade and the IPCC blamed the algorithms. They returned to the figures and manipulated the data to get the average to drop from 15 to 14 degrees Centigrade to give the result that they wanted.
Fourteen Is the New Fifteen!
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/11/fourteen_is_the_new_fifteen.html
Posts: 1,521
Posts: 5
Overall, positive consequences of lockdown have been a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, improved water quality, reduced noise pollution, improved air quality and, in some cases, the recovery of wildlife. Negative impacts have included an increase in medical waste, haphazard disposal of personal protective equipment, an increase in household waste, and a worsening recycling problem.