RE: KSV Advisory - New Documents Added25 Apr 2024 23:05
In my view I will simply say I have zero trust in COPL (all directors), Summit, Anavio, and KSV. The huge number of initial documents produced by KSV, some running into greater than a thousand pages, just had to have raised suspicion.
It seems totally improbable and implausible that such extensive documentation could have be prepared in mere days or weeks, suggesting a premeditated plan spanning months, obviously involving KSV as well.
I do believe there could be potential in garnering support from BP, but only if we can demonstrate a concerted and covert effort to defraud and strip shareholders of assets, which would ultimately impact BP adversely. If we can expose the true nature of COPL's actions, which I believe we can, then there may be a possibility of them aligning with us. they are after all now also in the victims enclosure.
However, I want to clarify that I am not directly involved with the CAG. While I trust them to be aware of all emerging avenues, there's always a possibility of oversights, thus I think we should all be comfortable providing suggestions.
It is though for me and I would hope for others, enough to have just voiced the opinions and know that they have been considered.
We should avoid disclosing our intentions to the opposition. Even acknowledging a good idea could potentially arm them with information. Maintaining discretion is crucial, as public affirmations could be detrimental.
While forums offer a platform for sharing ideas, we should imo refrain from expecting explicit endorsements from RBM here. It's a delicate balance to play, but I believe caution is warranted, even if it means sacrificing some immediacy or involvement. I trust RBM to navigate this balancing act with prudence and seek advice as needed. However as I say these are just my feeling and my opinions others may differ and as such everyone's opinion is equally valid.