London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
and we're yet to receive any further bad news yet, does not look good!
Anyone seen the Q AND As. Should have been published prior to meeting.
Nope, I looked on the website this morning to see if I could find them, they've hidden them very well if they have been published......
So typical of successive boards ofthis company and so sad.
Tried ringing company twice and phone is switched off.
Guess they are all down the pub celebrating our latest shafting
Perhaps the didn't like our line questioning, why we small shareholders have been continually royally shafted??
Looks like they were only going to be sent to those who registered. Makes sense not to publish them generally before the meeting.
That's not good enough Rich. The Q&A was set up specifically because shareholders have not had the opportunity to question the board personally due supposedly to the pandemic.
They promised to publish the results prior to the meeting and nowhere did it say, only to those who registered. Besides they haven't even done that.
I take your point but I had a quick look and the requirement was to submit id's with questions so it would be reasonable that only those people would get responses before the meeting. Essentially to put them in the same position as they would have been if they had been able to attend. It only said a response would be made before the meeting not that they would be published to all.
It's a moot point now, but if they didn't send them to those registered that then clearly it's a poor show. I expect to see the Q&A on the website as soon as possible as no doubt you do too.
Emails were sent to me in answer to my questions at about 9.30am. Replies were solid and helpful. But, yes, agree - it would be good if they now compiled a list of these questions and replies for all to review, and put them up on their website.
Mr.Sparrow, as you seem to be the only one thus far who has posted receiving 'solid and helpful' replies from the company, do you feel they are looking to perhaps turn a corner?
If anyone else had received a reply this morning, it certainly hasn't prompted them to fill their boots with cheap shares as yet, strangely enough.
Is tomorrow the last day for them to publish the delayed interims, or have I just made that up?
Danno - interims should be tomorrow. This was from the RNS of 30th September:
5. Interim Results to 30 June 2020 - VOG announces that, pursuant to the guidance issued by AIM Regulation in the Inside AIM notification dated 9 June 2020, the Company is utilising the one month extension to the date by which it is required under AIM Rule 18 to publish its interim results for the six-month period ended 30 June 2020. Accordingly, the Company will be publishing its 2020 interim results by 31 October 2020.
I did not enquire about this, but assume all is well.
Regards turning a corner, I don't think Roy would have taken on the job otherwise.
"Emails were sent to me in answer to my questions at about 9.30am."
Care to share the response to your question:
a) to clarify who is paying for the pipeline;
b) and if it's GDC, to ask what progress they have made on arranging debt funding.
Lea - I appreciate you originated this question. However, the company chose to respond to me in a personal email, and didn't publish these responses widely. Thus I regard the correspondence as 'in confidence'. My advice would be to contact the company directly and ask that question. Their response was solid and helpful; and it would be of interest to you.
Apologies that my answer is limited.
I think it is likely that the interims tomorrow may include a trading update; and so, it seems likely that now the company knows what needs to be clarified, these matters will be addressed in tomorrow's update.
If I were you I would read that update tomorrow, and if it doesn't answer your question, or indeed raises more questions, then I would contact them directly.
I though their replies were forthright and responsive.
'thought'
Ok, happysparrow will await tomorrow's news with interest - if it arrives. Additionally, following what was for them an unusually positive trailer, BLVN are announcing their Results next Thursday, Bonfire Night, and seemingly having sufficient confidence in what they will be saying , holding a shareholder conference call on that day, so the issue could be raised then.
As a BLVN holder, it does seem remarkable to me that with FEED well advanced, c P50 50-60mboe, c$9/10m in cash and a realistic glidepath to FID when $25m becomes to them from their partners, BLVN market cap remains stubbornly at just £12m. Too many past disappointments, I guess, a situation many here will no doubt be familiar with
Sorry sparrow but I feel your answer to Lea was a tad disingenuous.
I can't imagine anyone on this board , yourself included, didn't think the Q&A would be published. To therefore refuse to share based on confidentiality seems hard to swallow.