Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ffs , I am a strong Tomco holder. Tomco has nothing to do with Petroteq, they improved the posp and have now handed the keys back, they have a licence to use the tech. But NOW, they are nothing to do with Petroteq. Fact .
torreaguas: tomco persé no but as the major interest in greenfield they most certainly are as they are licenced users of petroteqs technology.
Stating that TomCo has nothing to do with Petroteq is just plain false. Whether it is from ignorance or intentional fraud, it is extremely poor form to post something so egregiously inaccurate.
Fingers crossed on going north
So a shareholder in tomco holds share son petroteq,
that is it. connection ends there. We dont need to be aligned with petroteq. We are going north anyway.
Well put,
For starters, Valkor own 16%of Petroteq and 29% of Tomco. A chain as strong as one connecting an anchor to the boat.
tomco has nothing to do with petroteq, simple. what do you not understand?
“”Tomco has nothing to do with Petroteq.””
Please explain. I’m having trouble seeing the joke.
Why is this now a Petroteq conversation? Tomco has nothing to do with Petroteq.
Vauch you need to chill a little, appreciate yah feed back though…enjoy the weekend
17/02/2020
The Royal Bank of Scotland is to stop financing oil majors such as Shell and BP, unless they can satisfy the bank that their businesses are in line with the Paris climate agreement.
And as I have said before RBS are not financing the offer as the money is already their
Their you go again.
RBS bank only deal with companies who adhere too the Paris climate agreement.
You need to get past this.
@vauch 17:47
Yes you are correct and apologies if I misled by not expanding the correct wording this afternoon.. RBS are only holding the FUNDS for the mystery buyer.. On another note i recommend rewatching dr Gerry bailey video a couple of times as it has some really useful info. He mentions a few things which i will highlight A: you CAN trade PQE in the USA via the OTC. B: the Ontario commission is fine and dandy and ok with the filings of PQE. C: the TSXV, Toronto Ex. is still reviewing the reinstatement of PQE. D: Gerry mentions the company is all good and fine and making plans for “Future growth” ( does that sound like someone ready to be bought out?)and almost promising/pledging a return to loyal shareholders. E: they have signed the NDA agreement and sent it back to the mystery buyer so until there lawyers reply we still don’t know who the mystery buyer is yet TBR? F: RBS bank only deal with companies who adhere too the Paris climate agreement, so that should whittle down a few from the short list somewhat..
Just some of my theories and thinking imho.
Another point is RBS are not purchasing the shares, they have the funds on deposit
PetroTeq’s operations dosn’t produce any greenhouse gases so it can be considered a net zero emissions company imo, and a really good reason why these’s investment companies can consider this too be an unique acquisition!
Correct me if I’m wrong and for those who are on the ball with other websites like reddit, stocktwits, ceo.ca and twitter to get the latest credible posts that people highlight. Isn’t RBS involved in regards to the proof of intent to buy 120 euros 270 million shares and that this transaction was posted on the page forums across the web…well I’ve been digging around and at this current climate rbs do not do dealings with oil, gas or coal companies that don’t hod up to specific conditions set out by the paris agreement see link: https://www.climateaction.org/news/rbs-to-withdraw-support-from-major-oil-producers-who-do-not-align-with-net
Although at one point rbs was the “oil and gas bank” under Fred the shred see link: https://platformlondon.org/p-article/the-oil-and-gas-bank/
They are now ( after a slap on wrist and made to clean up their reputation since 2008 bank crash ) changin their image and with it their ethos of not doing wrong but do right for the world and what better way than be eco -friendly and climate aware and conscious of the financial commitments to companies wanting to use rbs for loans that may now not adhere too the new way.
See link: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/17/rbs-pulls-fossil-fuel-investments-green-energy
Anyways my point being that who ever has deposited the funds to buy up PQE shares via RBS has to be committed to the Paris climate agreement which should narrow down the short list somewhat..