London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
ft article today
"Thomas Cook’s management team is facing a new challenge in its battle to save the 178-year-old travel group: credit default swaps.
The UK-based tour operator agreed the main terms of a £900m rescue deal with its biggest shareholders and lenders last month, after failing to adjust to a big shift by customers from the high street to the internet. But now the company is looking to push back a crucial meeting with its bondholders, originally set for tomorrow, partly out of fear that a group of hedge funds will block the deal.
The hedge funds are not resisting because they think the rescue plan is a bad one. Nor do they think the restructuring is too favourable to shareholders, rather than creditors. It is because they are worried the scheme might not trigger payouts on CDS. These are derivatives that behave like insurance contracts, protecting holders against the risk that a company does not repay its debts. Yet while a life insurance contract is simple to settle — a person is either alive or dead — the shades of grey in the death of a company make CDS much more unpredictable.
Thomas Cook is trying to reorganise its debt in a way that will trigger losses for bondholders. This is exactly the scenario where CDS should pay out. But they may not due to “reasons of almost theological complexity”, in the words of one bondholder.
The analogy evokes the high priests of the CDS market: an industry panel of in-house lawyers known as the “determinations committee”, drawn from nine banks and five fund managers, who decide whether swap holders get their windfalls. This committee’s reliance on highly complex legal arguments has led to a run of bizarre outcomes. The DC, as the committee is known in the trade, is widely seen as technocratic at best, or conflicted at worst.
In the Thomas Cook case, some bondholders worry that even if the company files for protection from creditors in the US courts, it may still not trigger the swaps.
When Spain’s Abengoa filed for protection from its creditors four years ago, for example, it led to a surreal scenario where CDS written under one set of contracts were triggered, but those under a newer set did not. This was because of a one-word difference in a single clause.
Earlier this year, the DC disregarded a strict interpretation of English law and voted in favour of fixing a technical glitch in telecoms company VodafoneZiggo’s CDS. Cynics noted the banks, whose representatives hold most of the seats on the committee, stood to lose from the decision going the other way. Perverse outcomes in the CDS market often provoke amusement among observers, because the victims are typically highly paid traders.
The joke seems less funny when the consequences spill over into the real world and, as with Thomas Cook, hold hostage the rescue of a group with more than 20,000 employees."
TC would make a great MBA thesis, you can never run out of words even if the thesis was 100,000 words
Thomas Cook’s Rescue Tests Reputation of Default Protection
(Bloomberg) -- The $10 trillion market for derivatives that pay out if a company goes bust faces a test of its credibility as U.K. travel agent Thomas Cook Group Plc heads toward a $1.1 billion rescue.Thomas Cook filed for Chapter 15 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. on Monday as part of a broader debt restructuring. But the filing stopped short of stating the company is insolvent, an ambiguity ambiguity that means hedge funds holding credit-default swaps insuring Thomas Cook debt may not get their money.
Investors holding the swaps are already battling against a technicality in the terms of Thomas Cook’s planned debt restructuring that threatens to make their CDS holdings worthless. The rescue centers on converting Thomas Cook debt into equity, which leaves the swaps with no bonds to insure.“Buying insurance against a default and then being unable to claim when the company does actually default de
Read more at: https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/thomas-cook-s-rescue-tests-reputation-of-default-protection
Copyright © BloombergQuint
Read more at: https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/thomas-cook-s-rescue-tests-reputation-of-default-protection
Copyright © BloombergQuint
Read more at: https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/thomas-cook-s-rescue-tests-reputation-of-default-protection
Copyright © BloombergQuint