The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hippo, please accept my apologies I didn't realise you was mentally incapacitated.
Another perpetual loser filtered... Anymore clowns want to out themselves ?
No mine producing Bushy? There are two mines already producing. The Vale venture was for copper. Not related to the two existing mines
My numbers are based on low end of expectations for the two existing mines
Your clown face was rude and unnecessary
Bushytailed. If you want a cheaper buy in you are wasting your time. This should be 150p on present fundamentals at this gold price and much more going forward with so much about to happen. Why waste time this has a tailwind and huge cash generation backing a rerate very soon.
Bushytailed. Your deramping is obvious to all holders.The board is doing a great job with a transformed outlook and huge cash generation. Your claims are ridiculous. Why bother yourself pretending you know the company when it is so clear you understand nothing?
The problem with this company is the bod have always lied about the status of the company, finances grades and actual gold. Everyone thought that they might have just taken their eyes off the ball previously, learned their lessons and turned it around. However we appear to be in a situation where a major global player has looked through the window and then turned away.
You really have to ask that if the pay grades where really there and In the quantities being shouted about then why did Vale walk away from a 5 million loss when they could have converted it to 75% of the project?
So a mine that isn't producing, isn't built and isn't even funded is the backbone of your DCF calculations 🤣🤣🤣
Stand back everyone, Hippo is going to show us all how it's done 🤡
I never said the share is worth £2. What I said is that my DCF calculation showed £2 based on current production. However we must discount the £2 as the Coringa license is for 3 years, and there is always a possibility it will not be renewed after that time. Against that however is that the gold price keeps racing ahead.
The DCF calculation assumed the following;
2023 33k oz @$1850 with mining cost of $1253 and overheads of $650k
2024 38koz @$2150 with mining cost of $1328 and overheads of $680k
2025 43koz @2300 with mining cost of £1408 and overheads of $716k
2026 50koz@2400 with mining cost of $1492 and overheads of $752k
Terminal value calculated FCF at a discount rate of 12% and multiplier of 6X.
You have seen it in the share price 300% in 6 months!
We now have an absolutely transformational gold price of $2398 and going higher...It must surely be seen in the s.p. very soon....gold fever will transfer from physical gold to the mining sector eventually.
Why 55p? You're dropping values without explanation again... I think 55p is possible but doubt it. This has the same chance to end the week at 68p and I expect you to un mute me at that level too and start having reasonable conversations. This was me trying to start that grown-up discussion you were asking for but I'm muted now so... 🤷🏼♂️
See you at 55p Gonzo, filtered now for the time being
33,000oz production is not worth £3.3 per share 👍
With that in mind is 40,000oz production worth £2 per share?
Discuss... 🫵 use calculators and show your workings as we need to get to the bottom of this value issue without resorting to childish behaviour or mindless exaggeration.
I'm still waiting for you to put your argument down in realistic numbers instead of reacting to the justified negativity to your random number generator mumbling rounded to the nearest quarter! Show me the math!
I don't need to read it again... Your comment imprinted instantly because it was so bad... You're in line with the £6 brigade when it had just breached 40p. Noone is going to use billion in an argument either way on this share yet some how you dropped a quarter of one using your divide by 4 resolution calculator to inform people on this chat that someone's valuation was crazy. Why would you do that? I wake up when people start swinging big unrealistic things at small realistic things. At £3.3 you are correct in your statement but £2 is high end realistic and £1.50 probably on the nose according to calculators capable of 1p resolution. You basically had a right to lay £2's worth of argument but decided to use more weight(£3.3) and bigger words(billion). You're just noise where a whisper is needed.
Why don't you stop crying as soon you see something you don't like, read my post again and then try to be an adult by discussing or contradicting something that I actually said?
Bushy... Please use a calculator and show your working out... 👍
As of the end of 2023 SRB had a net cash position of $5m after considerable investment that year, around 2500 oz stockpiled ready to be sold ($5.5m at current prices) and at an average price so far for 2024 heading towards $2150/oz are set to post ebitda of ~$30m. Low capex route to 60k oz by the end of 2025 and long term plans for 100k-200k operation.
What value do you think SRB should be, then?
Argh I note I've found the clown club.
We'll see ladies
£2 is justified,but,my target for this year is £1.50,as some leeway has to be given,and I would rather be realistic regarding valuation.
Bushy. Your 3 recent posts here all suggest you are short.
55p? Doubt it. 60p has been the floor after 71p last week with the sp bouncing back.
Over priced? Based on what? 75 million shares x 62p is £46 million Mkt Cap. Generating $800 x 40k oz = approx $32 million free cash flow this year.
Worth a quarter billion? 75 million shares x £2 is £150 million. Your maths are about as washed up as your analysis!
Bushy why argue over someone's £2 estimate using £3.3!?
It's not 33k ounces, guidance for 2024 is 38k-40k and the target is greater than 60k in eighteen or months from now (full year 2026).
Lol good luck if you think 33k ounces is worth a circa quarter billion.
My DCF calculation with current production and gold price says £2, so I dont understand the statement that SRB is overpriced.
They need to start adding some serious Coringa advancement updates. Even with gold at this level this is overpriced on current production.
Debt, placing or use the pog uplift to pay as you build. Without any kind of serious news,no one knows whether they're going to build cash accurals, get diluted or expect a higher EV ratio. So not at all unreasonable to expect people to start taking their 200% gains off of the table.