We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
You'd be better served in my opinion, going down to Cheltenham (with some large angry placards) and protesting as severely aggrieved shareholders, outside the Superdry Plc Headquarters. You could well get local press coverage and perhaps even local TV coverage too. From there; who knows? Just an idea, but you would need to be there in shareholder force. . .ATB 😃
We can only try . odds are stacked against us as Julian is trying to get this for cheap.....
worth trying as it is the right thing.
it might motivate others to join and improve our chances.... i will not quit....
Hash
Are there enough of us though to cause a problem to the amount of votes he needs ?
Thoughts on how the larger shareholders might vote ?
Peel hunt are acting as advisers so they will vote for it I presume?
I lost last week with superdry i put .my last bit of cash in woodgroup up 8% over the week.
Still take a lot to claw back but there is options
Gla hope you get some cash back either way.
Me too....make sure Julian doesn't get this company even if i have to spend another 100K
Realistically that’s where I am at as not worth selling at this price
What are your thoughts on outcome? Are there enough of us shareholders to cast enough votes to affect this , as I’m sure he will have people telling the major shareholders to vote for it
Like people have mentioned we could get a hostile bidder in meantime who messes up jd plans and they could just clear high interest debt when allowed
Also if things get dragged on it could bring another ip sale in
All thoughts appreciated
No way am I selling at this price it’s a complete shafting they are trying to force upon us all
This is dead. I sold all my 360,000 in tranches today.
It’s a slam dunk-erton. Either way he wins and gets control of the business. The only thing that can stop him is a hostile bidder entering the fray but he’s saddled the company with high interest debt from lenders of last resort to make an approach less attractive to third parties.
A lot can happen before any vote.
Genuinely would prefer a hostile bidder for a premium of just 0.000001p per share to current options if it meant that Dunkerton was left high & dry
Definitely! Hostile takeover would be a God send right now. If nothing else it would push the sp up lol.
Even better, considering that with Option 1 we still get destroyed.
Best thing would be if we could get some huge shareholder and remove JD as CEO, hostile takeover fashion. I wish we did that with CINE before we found out that the CEO was negotiating his own exit payout to the detriment of the shareholders. Let’s see what happens.
I would vote no to all motions. Put JD in a corner. Let him claw it out of administration if he thinks he can. He’s clearly trying to avoid it going down that route so I vote for the route he doesn’t want. Lets see what he does then.
I posted yesterday saying next RNS may be wipeout warning, and this is what it is, just with different language.
Look at the options, either get diluted or get diluted for JD’s benefit. I’m tempted to sell but at 93% loss, I feel like staying and voting to approve only option 1 of the equity raise. Option 2 will give JD 70%+ of the company, at that stage you’re at the mercy of the ocean, anything is possible anywhere and at anytime, especially with delisting.
The funny part is that a decision will be made if we approve both equity raise options. Can you imagine? The same people that gave JD the choice to propose such a stupid option that gives him 70% will really choose the best option for shareholders?
I don’t even think it’s worth keeping my shares for the duration of the indefinite delisting. I’m going to vote for Option 1, against Option 2, and against delisting if I can. Once voted, just sell and out, very simple. I’ll take my money elsewhere, I’ve never experienced such nonsense on American markets…
All imo.
Chance this rallies into close...finishes between 6.5 - 7p?
MIKODX nice to see you after so long on the CINE boards. You’re spot on, this is another CINE just duplicated. This is even worse considering the so-called “options” that have been given for the equity raise, the shareholders are basically given the choice of being shafted or being shafted with reward to JD.
I learnt my lesson from CINE and only invested a small amount here, corrupt management all over the place…
As they are looking for very cheap shares as they have RNS to extremes…MMs as always will rain in as many as they can before they confirm!
R&Q - ps and it has a 33% spread!!! Utter Garbage. No wonder you're ramping it so hard over there!!
But it needs posting once not three times! There are FAR better companies than SDRY and R&Q for folk here, to make at least 'some' of their money back. The above named are both junk. . .
Sheltie.. I think there is more of a chance of getting some return more than you will here.
It’s my opinion and people on here are sensible enough to take a look and make their own decisions.
They may have a chance to claw back some of there losses.
This is done the other has still got a chance.
Didn't follow the signals and got bitten again.
Anyway here are a few expls of famous companies that went private. Who knows we could be one of them.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/073015/10-most-famous-public-companies-went-private.asp
Scmdcyp - no more please. That's three identical posts today. R & Q is down 98.22% in five years (and -70% since 1st January 2024), so people here, really do not want to be taking yet another silly punt; just this time on an equally disastrous AIM listed company!! Go pitch some place else. . .
In view of such a loss on this disastrous share.
Worth a look and R&Q Insurance this should rerate soon could claw back some of your loses seems very cheap at the price now.
It's not just the market capitalisation...it´s the debts as well....unless you put it in Administration....Or am I wrong? Just asking.