The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
RP
Let's hope so!
Should clarify my comment was in respect of the contradictory statements coming from DC and BJ - extraordinary times
Mick Jagger has something to say about this thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncRkWJmRzX8
Bermuda Shorts
Wish I'd spotted that!
How cross fertilisation of ideas can frequently be so productive!!!
AB124
From your 11.47 :- 'neverstatedit'
Sounds like a hashtag that should be trending on twitter ;)
RW
Apology accepted thankyou.
As to commenting on Scancell's science I am not needed for that as there are more than enough experts to cover the ground. I try and add a little balance on the market commentaries that might occasionally become less than objective.
Hope that explains.
ATB
Ratty,
i Think your spot-on with you're asesssmant. this defanetly will make £8 by next week.
There you go - you can call me Inan.
Here you go again - I said he 'expressed an opinion that it COULD be.' I think you'll find his post yesterday morning was in response to your apparent insistence that he had categorically labelled the trades as by Vulpes. Anyway, perhaps you would like to contribute something about the possible progress of Scancell's products in trials, or what other news may be forthcoming rather than misquoting C7 and strangely now putting a slant on my own posts. Awfully sorry if you aren't a duplicated Aimbig - you just post and react in an incredibly similar and consistent way and I am not the only long term follower of the company who is inclined to this thought. So, if we're all done there, back to Scancell maybe...?
RuckRover
I expressed a perfectly reasonable counter to claims by C7 that Vulpes were buying. Yesterday he stated that he had neverstatedit was them. If you read my last post at the weekend you'll see I suggested the thread should stop. Sadly it was resurrected by C7 onMonday. I have only replied in my own defence.
The insults are another matter!
RW
If you're going to support people get your "evidence" right.
C7 has stated that he didn't imply the buyer was Vulpes in a post yesterday morning.
Now you make out that he did suggest they were the buyers he was talking about. His Monday post has refuted his earlier post that said he did.
Perhaps it would be better if you let C7 make his points rather than making him out to not know his own mind. Once more you get involved inaccurately and unhelpfully.
AIMO
C11,
Are they a bit more substantial than paper trades?
AB,
A lesser cause of friction is you picking on C7.
He is entitled to speculate as much as anyone.
Pack it in!
Perhaps they were cardboard trades.
Ratty,
One of the underlying causes of friction is your MISTAKEN insistence that AB is someone else.
Once you are able to accept that we all should be able to get along a bit better.
Joking aside, I think it needs pointing out that C7's posts expressed an opinion that it COULD be a Vulpes buy, based I suspect on the fact that the buys shown look very similar to their previous buys the two most recent being in November, when on consecutive days they announced 100k and then 200k shares bought by Vulpes Life Science Fund. I now those buys were at 19p, not 21p, but hen again that is a great deal higher than their placing buys so maybe they still see value coming in the share price. I presume the rest of do or we wouldn't be here still.
I don't think C7 ever did more than express a perfectly reasonable belief that it COULD be Vulpes, and I think made plain some hope that it MIGHT. So he is perfectly entitled to express that opinion and hope, not have it thrown back at him misquoted as a firm statement, which it never was. I remember the trolls of yore who at the sight of a sell of any size would state categorically 'oooh it's forward selling, placing coming' or the wonderful quote many may remember that 'somebody knows something' - now those lines were stated as Gospel but were patently lies and fantasy, yet didn't get the sustained barracking that AimB124 has levelled at C7. Pretty well all of those posters ended up banned anyway - only those with a few spare duplicate identities have the ability to remain I suspect.
The fact is that we are just awaiting the interims for definite, and Covidity/Moditope news probably. They say no news is good news and I hope (please note - hope - not categorical, just a hope - saves certain folk a lot of keyboard bashing) that the lack of further news from South Africa indicates (note - indicates, not proves) that there have been at the very least no adverse effects from the P1 Covidity trial. I hope (you get the idea) that there may be further news on early efficacy indications, and the trial moves on to London and into P2 all being well. I also hope that something moves on with Moditope. There is also the possibility of news on the combination trial of SCIB1 - after all the first patient was dosed a while ago, and they don't RNS beyond first patient and subsequent dosing, so perhaps there may even be developments there. But until then, it gets a bit quiet. The benefit of quieter times is that it gives more opportunity to speculate, or for some to stake build- which may or may not be happening at Vulpes, but speculating it doesn't warrant post after post of apparently deliberate misquoting and hounding.
Just for balance, Ratty's theme tune.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhG1_7GshNc
Aibig is up and on the floor. https://youtu.be/E1o3cbLYoIY
OOOPS
lol
Ruck, think that's what I implied wasn't it?
If not Sorry everyone,
I see there's a new thread taken hold.
Don't worry about my last!
:-)
OK, see you have! Posts crossed.
AB,
Does it matter?
Might be best to just drop it eh?
Sorry everyone,
I see there's a new thread taken hold.
Don't worry about my last.
C7
So where's the idea that Vulpes were the buyers?
Is that no longer your stance?
TF, no not replying to your stance on the Governments handling of COVID, just could you explain this your first sentence?
""AB thanks for sticking to your guns on this topic, IMHO you do so patiently and helpfully. Interesting"".
All that was noted was we have somebody loading at 21p and the MMs have had to go high to gather shares, most recently 20.88. Pro rata to the low daily volumes the buying is significant and I am absolutely sure that with the interim results due on 26th which will show a loss, an other positive news will be og great help to daily volumes.
Are you agreeing that this is a ""dishonest" representation as AB suggests and so imossible to warrent 15 posts on the subject??
Lets have a good day
AB thanks for sticking to your guns on this topic, IMHO you do so patiently and helpfully. Interesting.
Ruck - whilst I agree with you on this - "I'm not that bothered about a fraction of a penny daily movements". Yes BUT I must say I always prefer to see blue than red !
Chester - luv your positivity and let's hope it all hangs together.
Re. the SP - wake me up when it gets back to 60 pence. GLA