Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Fulmar29
"The Chinese import over 50% of all the raw materials they use and are reliant on mineral imports and processing for their strength. "
What is stopping the West from doing the same?
What prevents the West from doing the same?
Lack of technology, specialists, or...
1. "The mixed carbonate concentration of REEs is an impressive 91.9%, with very high content of DyTb (4.7%) and NdPr (26.4%), facilitating further separation and recoveries."
2. "..low average production cost of US$13.1 per tonne."
Https://www.proactiveinvestors.com/companies/news/1039144/aclara-resources-unveils-robust-pea-for-carina-module-rare-earths-project-1039144.html
" In the first quarter of 2024, the company aims to produce REE carbonate samples by processing ionic clays at its pilot plant located in Chile. "
It's not just RBW that's important. Western production of REE is important and the Chinese are doing their best to destroy the grass roots of Western REE production by reducing prices and ironically at the same time limiting exports so it doesn't cost them too much money. The Chinese import over 50% of all the raw materials they use and are reliant on mineral imports and processing for their strength. They are vulnerable on many fronts REE, Copper to name just two. It is important for pollution purposes that China do not keep their stranglehold on REEs, let alone Western security.
Mumbles I realise the We doesn't represent you and it's why I read your comments. I haven't denigrated PRE on Hive, just pointed out simple verifiable facts. You can challenge those facts with evidence, if I'm wrong I am happy to admit.
I really don't want to discuss this any more its dead and done.
BTW, no-one wants to discuss RBW either on Hive, far more interested in endless talk about why xzy sheitshow is not going bankrupt just yet.
My posts don't get deleted because they are fact based, yours do because they are not.
Maybe you should reassess your concept of reality.
SP, I like the hive. Unfortunately, you also frequent it. I post sensible, fact-based comments. They are immediately denigrated with the total bias that you exhibit on LSE. If LSE is the pits, as you suggest, what value do you get posting unverified, uninformed and incorrect data on another board? I don't have shares in RBW, having heavily invested in PRE and recently moderately so in HZM. (I admit that was a punt at what looks like a bargain price; we'll see how that goes and whether the price is a true reflection of the risk associated with the stock) but most of the comments on the RBW LSE board seem well-informed and balanced, including your own, except for one poster recently. I am tempted. I firmly believe in Critical mineral stock events, though they are getting a bashing. But it doesn't do any harm to diversify within the same sector. I'll also point out the comment "WE" in the post you paraphrased, is the royal WE, I certainly don't subscribe to it, as I've said before
"Our policy about returning any crap posted on Pensana now also applies to you."
Challenge accepted.
Lewis, join The Hive on Telegram.
It's moderated do the nut jobs cannot post their crap.
LSE is a joke, unfortunately.
You're seeing ghosts and chasing shadows. My views on PRE come from being a previoys holder. I have earned my opinion, not that it needs to be earned. I post how I see it, not sure what exactly you deem as crap? You need to look inward, your rantings to theorist are borderline concerning.
Reet-It is your trolling that is "Crude" You try and get others to supply info which you then try and pick holes in,you copy and paste articles which you think proves something but you also post incorrect articles that prove you are an ignorant fool. Best not conversed with.
You are ridiculous
Research yourself you fecking idiot, its in the interviews, presentations and RNS.
"RBW, on the other hand, have 20 to 100 DFS's on their CV's."
Please provide 20 projects REE
Based on your lack of education and knowledge of the RBW process, sure.
RBW, on the other hand, have 20 to 100 DFS's on their CV's.
I'll trust them over a feckwit.
RBW's business case is good. The technology is crude and will require a lot of time to fine-tune. Not to mention its industrial implementation, in the form in which it now exists.
I love it when the gormless idiot posts articles that support RBW 's business case.
Yes that confirms the production date hasn't changed from 2026.
The timeline was DFS then the rest of 2024 fund raising, with construction starting in 2025.
The original plan gave 9months for fund raising and now there is maybe 6months or less.
As George said after raising the $50m, the timeline would not be brought forward from 2026 production but the funding would guarantee that it happened to schedule.
https://www.rainbowrareearths.com/investors/results-reports-presentations/
"There will be no crap articles." I presume you mean "no more"! Still not tooooooo embarrassed ? And for someone with the industry and technical knowledge of a gerbil, and for you to be calling the tech RBW are using "crude" is hilarious ....!
RBW's project for processing phosphogypsum and extracting REE is interesting, but the technology is "crude".
There will be no crap articles.
I'm very glad you lack critical thinking.
Https://transforming-economies.de/seltene-erden-warum-sie-fuer-die-transformation-recycelt-werden-sollten/
I predict a flurry of crap articles now from reetech. Thankfully I will only see green blocked boxes.
Https://copperbeltkatangamining.com/south-african-rare-earths-project-receives-u-s-support/
commissioning date: 2026
Https://investornews.com/critical-minerals-rare-earths/technology-metals-report-01-19-2024-rainbow-rare-earths-discovery-middle-east-critical-minerals-chess-play-and-ansto-invests-in-critical-minerals-research/
"The project is set to start in 2026 .."
It's a 3month delay in the DFS.
Where does it say the plant construction has been delayed?