Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
People use the terms, he or she has a short position or close your short you'll get badly burnt to counter anyone who is not 100% positive to try and discredit them to any potential punters that are looking in, along with your a paid deramper or your a Market Maker trying to get people to sell to get the price down and Sharedealers favourite you work for a company trying to do the RTO and are trying to get the shares as cheap as possible
Has anyone out there even been able to take a short on this?
I'm on IB, TStation & HL... there's no short position available. Never has been since end of 2019.
Just wondering if it's my tech or if people rave about shorts being doomed for the sake of it.
My apologies, I didn't realise Mark wielded that much power over you or the share price.
Subtle negatives? Or honest concerns?
Seems you're only a ramper or a de-ramper and nothing in between on a BB when people can't take the pressure.
Keep it up Mark, I'll be here regardless.
Eileen, getting emotionally attached to a share is very dangerous, people on these boards are not your friend and most of them would tell you the sky is green if it made them money.....
The Italian, great post i don't think the debt has been paid off either and i don't think there will be a RNS tomorrow i said on Friday it looks like an old document that had been signed off, it's just the document from Motif Bio Inc passing the debt on to Motif Bio Ltd in the form of warrants to satisfy the debt....imo
Watched many Boards for a long time and seen many back stabbers, and depending on what position they are "IN or OUT". totally changes their views on what they post .
I personally have traded in many other shares but never tried to bring a share down with subtle negative posts in the hope of getting back in at a lower entry..... I leave that to the Scumbags!!!
I believe Mark's said a few times he has a main holding & another that's traded... and rightly so on this.
How's his attitude changed?
Does him being in or out change your position?
Mark@1973 - Always thought you were one of the good guys on these Boards, but you have also openly said a few times you occasionally trade this share. Can you tell us now if you are in or out? as your whole attitude seems to have completely changed.
In that rns the forebearance period runs until June 2020 so it might be because of that ending.
pleasure.
Thanks@the.italian.
mark@1973 MR05 if it's been released or the property the subject of the charge no longer belongs to the company.MR04 if it's been "satisfied".ive delved a little deeper (shows the folly of posting without looking at all the available information).if you refer to the RNS of 28th jan you will see it refers to a loan amendment and release agreement with hercules regarding certain actions which fully"satisfy" the conditions attached to the hercules agreement.the loan was made to MOTIF INC the us subsidiary.the charge now satisfied is the subsidiary agreement under which motif bio(our company)in effect pledged all its interest in Motif bio inc as security for the performance of the obligations under inc' loan agreement. the amendments in january effectively satisfied motif bios obligations under the hercules agreement but the notice of satisfaction has only now been registered at companies registry.thats my analysis,.imo it doesn't mean the loan has been repaid it simply means that motif bio's responsibilities in relation to it, which were released in january ,have now been formally recorded as satisfied.this would be consistent with the absence of an RNS as nothing has actually changed since 28th jan.what is interesting is the timing.why file it now/ok gold my not be very busy and is doing a bit of admin,but if motif is going to the wall why bother.for me it suggests tidying things up before the RTO announcement. i hope I'm right. all just my opinion of course.
MrNation. Once again less is more. Just buy what you can/if able to on Monday!
Mark a 'coin flip' is a tell tale of a gamble. That's what a coin flip is.
Mr Nation. You are in. Job done. Let's see what happens. Otherwise you and a few others will make this bb seem desperate. Let's wait until monday. Then we can chew the fat on what is speculation. Not good to get too excited about a share, it's a share, a speculative gamble. If you seem nervous and multiple posts are a red flag to me. If you lose so be it. But you were part of the journey of the risk/reward scenario. If you talk too much you show weakness.
So Mark if you are happy being in, then relax, otherwise you seem to be a ramper. Just sit back and see what happens.
What will be will be folks....its a gamble and i do love a gamble....thats why im here long before the herd and bobby arrived i did my research....it may pay off it may not...life is a risk imo.
Eagerly awaiting the magicians final magic trick.
He who dares wins and all that jazz.
Good fortune to the brave or the stupid whichever we are.
I’m not desperate it’s a coin flip for me and has been from day one however the one thing I haven’t taken into account is there being some kind of debt for equity stitch up prior to the rto! I expected dilution during the rto and took into account the Hercules warrants but I’m concerned until I see details which I suppose will come Monday
Hi Mark, please elaborate, too many posts on here seem cryptic and hiding behind a blanket of paddling in a pond surrounded by those who hold the cards. If you are happy just sit back and dont fret. Otherwise you make the statement 'less is more' a distant memory. Never seem desperate. It's an Achilles heel.
Steadydanny £3k give or take. It was more at one point.
@the Italian
So MR05 is it’s been sold and no longer property of the company and MR04 it’s been satisfied by other means?
Mark how deep are you? Those invested now I'm pretty sure are hardened speculators. Can afford a loss and welcome a rise. This pond has received more attention than any I can recall.
Truthfactory. What would you make of it if there was no rns Monday just supposing?
now had a chance to look into this a little further (probably should have done so before my last post) and now not so sure the charge has not actually been repaid. the term "satisfied "results from lodging form MR04, which is the one to be used when the charge has been satisfied in full or in part.where it has been released or where the charged property no longer forms part of the borrower's property form MR05 is appropriate. this would suggest the charge has actually been repaid (contrary to my initial thought) .i suppose it depends on what is meant by "satisfied" but it would certainly appear that something more than a release has been involved. either way it still looks to me like a significant move and hopefully a positive one. no further speculation now from me until we get some definitive comment or announcements from motif.
Best case scenario at this point is that this AMR action fund ( google it) has purchased iclaprim from us and at a premium to the money owed.
Worst case is the debt for equity settlement if it’s equity in MTFB that’s then carried into the rto
Middle ground would be equity arrangement in the new company but if that’s the case I don’t see why they would mark the charge as settled now and not deal with it with everything else at the point of suspension.
It’s odd to say the least but I’ve got my fingers crossed for option one!
MarkRPT a question if it’s ok as you do seem knowledgeable about the charges.
Could it be that the new RTO company is cash rich and as part of the Reverse Takeover they have agreed to and then brought the Hercules charge, thus clearing the debt and allowing the new entity to be cleaner and better for future investments on AIM?
The reason for asking 20 years ago I worked for a small company of 8 people who did a RTO with a larger company (100 people+) the deal went through as the new entity wanted our chairman to run the board but also due to the potential with a new concept we had. The company I worked for had debts (not charges) that were paid off as part of the deal.