REMINDER: Our user survey closes on Friday, please submit your responses here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
complete and utter tosh ...... I bet your the sort of person that finds this whole situation vexatious.
whereas the current BoD are what?
Well there we have it - a forced confession, wow.
Not only does this prove a cavalier attitude to confidentiality and governance but a lengthy period of dithering and attempted damage limitation.
Talk about credibility, who in their right mind would fund these proposed new guys let alone work with them, what a disaster.
I foresee another Paragon here if this change is voted in - be very careful!
There we go then.
Write to the requisitioners ..... it’s quite simple ask the person that knows the answer!
Would be nice to know orangeite
We can assume all we want but the report was published by the requisitioners on their own website. Surely they are the ones who should be able to answer this?
Where is their transparency from the proposed board? Seems a little bit hypocritical to me
I really wish I did Steve but nobody seems to want to talk about it - why?
Surely it’s in the interest of holders to know, especially since there’s an EGM on the horizon.
why don't you tell us.
You clearly know why !!!
Nobody seems to want to discuss it on here which is odd, especially given they complain about apparent lack of transparency being a big part of their reasoning for change.
Half the document was removed but why?
Nice try again. I take issue with your reference to a few missing paragraphs. It’s only a matter of 14 pages - half of report!
Where is this transparency the proposed new board talk of?
This doesn’t look good
Why are so concerned about missing paragraphs .
Surly the company can clarify ???
Or not ??
Why are so concerned about missing paragraphs .
Surly the company can clarify ???
Or not ??
Nice try but let’s not deflect from my initial point...
Why has the report been half removed? Was confidential material published for the world to see without permission?
This (without credible explanation) looks very damaging for the proposed new board members and in particular the ex employee.
My point is how long does it take to deliver a going concern not 13 years
Where is the future taking us ?
What plans
Funding ?
Rtz agreement runs out next June ?
Still 50% down on consolidation?.
Why did we consolidate in the first place?
We have been brilliant when we record discovering new kimberlight and even Green diamond.
We then move on and prove up nothing.
In the meantime sinking the SP
Need I go on??
All the while 2 years after lahtojoki when I visited and knowing it's the best chance of the European Frist Diamond mine.
Nothing. Except a few sampling from the shed and I guess permission land permits.????
Water still in lake I guess.
Vote for change. !!
My point is, how can the proposed new board members be trusted when they seem to have a cavalier attitude to important things like confidentiality and governance
yep for your company !!I Its secret
Vote for another 13years of placings ,Wonder if the RTZ agreement will be still going or have they lost the will to live with the existing board also???
I just went onto the karelianshareholders website again to read the Lahtojoki Report published by Mr Grimmer. When I first looked at the scoping study it was 30 pages but now it’s only 16 pages - why?
Section 4 looks to have completely gone, what happened there? Did someone publish confidential information acquired from an ex employee?
I must admit, when I first read this report I did think it a little strange that something like this would be posted for the world to see. This is not the level of competence I wish to have in charge of the company I invested in, be mindful of this if you intend to vote in favour of these resolutions.