Listen to our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode 'Uncovering opportunities with investment trusts' with The AIC's Richard Stone here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
....... not having a very good day !!! Babbers !!
Infa isn't an incompetent company, unlike bab****, so I really doubt their day will be as bad. 1000 job losses coming at bab**** as part of "restructuring", i.e attempting to save money because the company isn't efficient. Bab**** won't make a bid for infa anyway, so doubt anyone who is actually invested here is losing any sleep over that possibility. Unlucky to any bab**** bagholders
Currently Bab**** is 29.5% up this morning not bad for someone.
Chris hopefully we will be soon !!:)
If only we bag-holders of INFA were as unlucky!
BlairPeach if I remember one of your last post you have claimed to have sold up ... So why are you still posting negative comments??
Yes thought you had gone,all the better for holding on if you did gl.
Bab**** being up 29% isn't impressive if you look at the 3 year or 5 year price for it. I should imagine their long term holders are somewhat pleased, but if you bought in around those highs then it has a long way to go.
INFA on the other hand is a much less mature company, achieved maiden revenues shortly ago, numerous projects in the pipeline, great management team, and is progressing forward. Bab**** is just a big bloated blue chip that's mostly heard about in the news when one of its big contracts goes belly up
Trailor028,
You appear to be another of INFA's confused. I maintain my +/-60,000 holding.
Tailor028, apologies for mis-spelling your user name.
My apologies if im wrong but I can definitely remember the post you got removed because you were insulting a very good and informative real investor and in that post you thanked him because you had sold your shares and bought into another company... ill not ask why your so negative about a company your supposedly invested in because that just gives you fuel for your agenda !
Good luck everyone and thank you very much to all the genuine investors and thanks for all the information yous have been providing, Exciting times
Tailor,
I remember the post to which you refer.
Your apology is accepted.
Speedy, it was actually 57,000, allowing for the 100:1 consolidation. ;)
So +/-60,000 would be consistent with what was previously stated.
Just sayin'
Si_Derman,
Thank you. As stated below, I continue to maintain my position in INFA.
Despite the continual abuse that I receive here, I have never reciprocated, although I did question stokey12's grasp of the English language, simply because many of his/her/their posts are so muddled as to be unintelligible. The same could be said of others', to be fair...I have never stated that INFA is not currently revenue-generating, merely that the use of the term "revenue-generating", in this context is, at best, disingenuous.
Similarly, unlike many other frequent posters on this board, I have never predicted a movement in the share price of INFA, either positive or negative; in my view, that way madness lies.
My criticisms have always lain at the door of the directors, who, I maintain, are entirely self-serving and whose actions certainly do not align with the interests of shareholders. The continued absence of the marine licence for IslandMagee, given the arrogance on public display from the board at the end of 2018 and the beginning of 2019, when INFA's share price rocketed (as a result of a blatant pump-and-dump campaign on social media, involving a former TR1 holder) can only be put down to either incompetence or, to be politely euphemistic, "mis-information." Neither instills confidence.
I do not recall making any reference to JW's "shaft" - though I will state that his history as a phoenix (of which, I admit, I was ignorant until it was posted here), his "amusing" recent bonus and the payment by INFA for services to a company owned by our erstwhile CEO, make me inclined to suggest that he may be carrying out a "shafting" of his own...
I suspect my professional knowledge and experience of shipyards and of the wider shipping industry surpass that of most who post on this forum; it is on this basis that I continue to add my own thoughts.
As to why I continue to hold (yes, Speedy_Gonzalez, I continue to hold), I have also stated here in the past that my own investment philosophy is never to sell at a loss. Not the most efficient of plays, I acknowledge, but I hold only 2 dogs in my portfolio - one of which is INFA (the other having dropped out of the FTSE100 not long ago, so at the other end of the risk/investment spectrum).
Let the insults commence...
Speedy_Gonzalez,
I have only ever one post to be deleted that was when a new poster, assuming my name, proceeded to post a blatant and non-informed post in my user-name.
This was quickly acknowledged, and deleted, by the moderators - to their immense credit.
Speedy you are replying to someone I filtered long ago for talking rubbish and being a purposeful deramper. BP is not interested in having a good faith discussion, I suggest you do the same
Speedy_Gonzalez,
Don't worry, if and when I get my exit point (here's hoping), I might well stick around.
Do INFA's directors enjoy a round of golf? I believe the courses in Florida are quite something...
Here's hoping you get your entry point.
Nobody really cares BP, only you mate.
Do you get paid per word?
Stifler I dont believe BlairWitch is a paid de-ramper but worse a protester that won't stop whats coming and only thing they can do now is wind investors up !! Better to just green bin them for recycling ??
A protester who has only ever posted in support of IslandMagee (and against H&W)?
OK...