Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
"Right issue issue is a media gossip. Few people's are making unesserey comments. IAG does not wants right issue and company have enough funds to withstand the trading downturn"
Really? you a lil high there ?
Right issue issue is a media gossip. Few people's are making unesserey comments. IAG does not wants right issue and company have enough funds to withstand the trading downturn
"Share price will start rising from next week once the market uncertainty is resolved ."
So you reckon the RI uncertaintly will be gone next week ?
Media gossip and COVID-19 infection increases affect the share price drops.Share price will start rising from next week once the market uncertainty is resolved .
again, what is it with this obsession about people posting who are not currently holding? It is genuinely bewildering.
BB ..... 457 posts in last 30 days for someone who owns no IAG shares. That's odd and don't believe anyone who tells you otherwise! Well played... you must be pleased...
As of 2020 the material with the highest accepted superconducting temperature is an extremely pressurized carbonaceous sulfur hydride with a critical transition temperature of +15°C at 267 GPa.[1]
At 267 GPa. The clue is GPa
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room-temperature_superconductor
Enlighten yourself
And? What has this to do with room temperature superconductivity? A only briefly glanced at the abstract because there is a lot if work done on liquid hydrogen due to superfluid states trying to understand them and material behavior. Nothing to do with ceramic superconductors or high temperature (as in liquid nitrogen) superconducting which may pave the way to room temperature superconducting.
BB
https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1176942
It might keep you quiet for an hour or two
R8pilot, I suggest you read up on superconductors before trying to make a point. I have no idea why you think pressure has anything to do with room superconductors. They don't need any 'pressure' environment to function. Many are a type of ceramic. All conductors will superconduct if their temperature is lowered enough, right next to absolute zero which is impractical (hence hydrogen fueled aircraft is a nonsense). The first practical ones operate at liquid helium and are used in the early medical scanners, still to this day but the liquid helium is expensive. Then a new type of conductor was found which operates at liquid nitrogen temperature which is much higher and easily manageable. You will almost certainly seen on TV somewhere the demonstration of a disc levitating in air above some superconductor in a shallow bath of liquid nitrogen. I've played with one two. This is all at room temperature. Some experimental cables of superconductors in pipes of liquid nitrogen have been tested in California and Japan, several km long with success. The amount of research to develop superconductors to work at higher temperatures, such as room temperature so they can replace at the very least HV transmission cables, is very small - virtually no money. Yet this technology is solvable and stop 40% of transmission power loss. And power could be transmitted over far greater distances, such Icelandic volcanic thermal power to UK!
I have no idea why you think pressure has anything to do with it. Conductors are solids, how would increasing atmospheric pressure have any impact?
DYOR, next time!
“ Room temperature superconductors would solve that at a stroke and all the coal fired and oil burning power stations could be closed and co2 emission reduction targets blasted to pieces.”
Do you know what pressure the room would have to be at for this to happen at room temperature? Superconductors have little / zero resistance in either very cold temps or high pressures.
What’s that Chinese saying about fools??!
Contrails are the one single measurable impact of human activity in the atmosphere because the contrails are a cascade effect rather like the coalescence mechanism during cloud creation. One 'seed' changes the charge distribution which changes the neighbour, then the next, then the next.
Before the big claims of reducing contrails can be verified, the climate change models need to include cloud cover in the models. Yup, that is a remarkable fact, most of the climate change models do not include cloud cover in the models. Yet reflection of radiation in both directions is cited as critical in assessing the extent of climate change (as in references to polar regions loosing reflectivity ect.). The article is also fundamentally wrong in a key point, " because CO2 is the most important greenhouse gas for most sectors." By several orders of magnitude, water vapour (not condensed cloud vapour) is much more important as a heat retaining blanket. Next is methane, again several orders of magnitude above co2, then various gases such as iodine. At the lowest impact level is co2. Well think it through, co2 is less than one tenth of one percent, it is so rare it is officially listed in the category 'other' in the composition of the atmosphere. Argon is the fourth gas listed.
Will this non-co2 method of managing the climate see the light of day? No. Because nobody will be making money out of selling turbines or solar cells or ev cars or light bulbs or new heaters or heat pumps or insulation. If money can not be made out of a solution, lots of money, it will not be considered.
40% of the electricity generated in the world is lost in transmission over national grids. Room temperature superconductors would solve that at a stroke and all the coal fired and oil burning power stations could be closed and co2 emission reduction targets blasted to pieces. When was the last time you heard of research in this area? Compared to billions, billions, in fact getting into trillions spent of climate change, how much is spent achieving room temperature superconductivity? Practically nothing. If there had been a proper research push to achieve RTSC when also this global warming nonsense kicked off, most of the power grids, if not all, would have been replaced by now. But then nobody would be making money selling solutions that require the consumption of resources, materials and energy which can be given a profit margin. Is the penny dropping with anybody yet? Are you beginning to see what this is really all about yet?
Intersting read:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58769351?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA