London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The chiller There's an obvious flaw to your post. Bloch posts are cut and paste from another site its plagiarism. The majority of his posts are not his own so I'm unable to judge his level of intelligence. Maybe if he actually constructed his own posts it would be worth discussing. GLA
bloch is playing with you and all other investors, 90% of investors lose money, so he tries to fit in , , by saying he has lost everything as well,* so come here son *..sad part is there is no one here intelligent enough to counteract his arguments. Its that or there really is nothing to counteract with lol
In his Mansion House speech published on 17 June, the Governor of the Bank of England announced that the Bank is launching a FinTech Accelerator to work in partnership with FinTech firms on challenges that we, as a central bank, uniquely face. The Accelerator will work with new technology firms to help us harness FinTech innovations for central banking. You will find Fintech technology been endorsed by the big and small players - do your research and avoid the noise on this BB - as all are losers in every sense of the word. Enjoy your holding in BGL going to be a great ride once the RTO happens.
Bruce Lee is a legend no disagreement there. But it WAS allowed so Fintech it is as stated in the Admin Doc. GLA
Washer - "Another cut and paste from your idol " They say its a sign of immaturity, inferiority and insecurity to have idols. But I can put my hand on my heart and say I do have an idol. Only one idol and that is Bruce Lee. From the ADULT CONTENT below this is the key paragraph. "How this was allowed to be described as a Fintech business in the admission document is beyond me as it seems to me that its only purpose was to try to seduce investors who couldn’t be arsed to read a bit more information."
Another cut and paste from your idol that's one you can savour for the W**k bank. It clearly shows what a bitter person you are, you lost all your money tough who cares, no sympathy from me. You obviously invested more than you could afford to loss which is the golden rule. Finished well yesterday I'm very happy life is good. Now the sun is out so go for a walk that's free. GLA
Bloch, I haven't lost anything. Lol You only lose when you sell and I ain't planning to sell for some considerable time. ;0) I only holiday in Barbados. The weather is guaranteed there. Anyway speak Monday.
Thanks for your advice Socrates but I have no money for hobbies. Lost it all in companies like FTE....And you will be joining me shortly if you have invested here what you claim you have. How about a trip to Butlins together one weekend after the RTO has wiped you out?
Good god man, seriously go get yourself a hobby. It's Saturday pal. One life, live it!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Forte Energy – For the love of God, can we drop this Fintech nonsense! As the share price of Forte Energy (FTE) keeps dropping as the BOS Global RTO approaches, as even long-suffering shareholders think some cash today is worth more than nothing tomorrow, I’ll have one last dig (for now) at something really riling me with this stock and that is the total misuse of the term “Fintech”. I’m not one for labels at the best of time as believe they are often lazy tools used to put a positive spin on a business avoiding the hard work of looking at the actual business model, how it makes its money, who it competes against etc. The Fintech label seems to be flavour of the month; in part, I guess, because of the few of the “unicorns” and other venture capital backed success stories that get bandied around from time-to-time but let’s take a closer look and the different types of businesses that fall in this category. Peer-to-peer lenders – these disrupt the banking sector by enabling individuals to lend to each other or to lend to businesses directly thereby earning a better yield on their savings and providing better rates for the borrowers. These include Zopa and Ratesetter in the C2C space and the likes of Funding Circle, Market Invoice, LendInvest and countless others in variants of the C2B space. The majority are VC-backed and have raised hundreds of millions between them. Not entirely sure how many make money though but they get a lot of press coverage as it is an easy story for the Money section of one of the broadsheets every weekend. Peer-to-peer currency exchange – a similar idea to the above but using technology to enable individuals to swap currencies with each other avoiding the dreadful rates on offer on the high street. Transferwise is the unicorn here but there are others such as Currencyfair. Similarly well covered in the press. Payment solutions – countless web and mobile solutions here, starting with the likes of PayPal but more recently, companies like Square and Boku play in this space. Avoiding the need to use banks directly but this time to transfer funds. Insurance services – technology has probably disrupted this space most significantly over the last twenty years with the high-street personal broker now pretty much disintermediated by technology, with a few niche exceptions; first by the phone with Direct Line and then the internet more gernaerlly, facilitated more recently by the comparison sites, such as GoCompare and Confused.com that have then broadened into other financial products from insurance. Data and other services – the real profits are probably from the Fintech companies no-one has heard of which provide data and services into banks to facilitate trading. In fact, following the recent Tullet Prebon deal, Icap is now probably one of the biggest, most successful, Fintech businesses out there in this space.
Anyway, I digress, but the point I wanted to painstakingly make is that all of the companies above have one thing in common. They use technology to provide services normally provided by traditional financial services businesses such as banks and insurance companies. Let’s take a look at the technology provided by BOS Global. Well, strictly speaking, I should say “the technology to be provided” when someone actually agrees to pay for the technology. Its software is Meetingly and Kronologica transforming the way businesses run meetings and organise timesheets. Meeting notes and timesheets. That’s it. What has that got to do with financial services? Nothing. How this was allowed to be described as a Fintech business in the admission document is beyond me as it seems to me that its only purpose was to try to seduce investors who couldn’t be arsed to read a bit more information. If one wanted to give it a label, it should be HRTech, although that isn’t particularly catchy and sounds like medicine for women of a certain age, so let’s just call it plain-old-boring-tech. The issue is that these software applications and platforms are not trying to disrupt and exploit the excess margins and inefficiencies of an historic financial services sector where in theory you are knocking on an open door and there is a pot of money to shoot for. This is just bog standard software that has to be sold face-to-face with an extremely long sales cycle sold in to time-pressed and budget-poor HR executives at global corporations. It is a hugely labour-intensive and time-consuming exercise with no guarantee of success. Ask yourself - if you were in that senior HR role, would you want to pitch to the CEO that you’ve got a new bit of technology that’s going to cost quite a few quid that will change the way meetings are run forever? Exactly. To be fair I did find one positive testimony for Meetingly on its website: "After 30 years in business, more than 50,000 meetings attended and having tried every known process and tool to prepare, capture and act on meeting outcomes, it became evident that note taking tools, paper based systems and workaround’s had failed me and the 1000’s of people I have worked with around the world. Now, meetingly has changed all that. With one easy to use online system I have saved 10’s of hours per month, become more productive, communicative and achieved outcomes never before imaginable.” Sounds good. Which CEO of a huge global corporation is that from? “My name is Michael Travia, proud co-founder and paying subscriber of meetingly. Join me in the challenge to be the most productive and results driven business person and team member you can be" Oh, it’s from the founder………..that’s a bit disappointing. If there’s any of you left, keep selling.
You just reminded me of Bruce forsyth, play your cards right phase. Im the joker full of jest, I play my cards close to my chest, but here's a pair worth revealing, ok dollies do your dealing. Chukers would be to young to remember that lol. He is the joker thou.
I bought more at 0.0036 and again at 0.003 I also have an order in for more. So yes I could have got in lower. I'm guessing your childish post is purely because your the board Jester but personally I think your just a clown.
lol i remember you posted about buying more, when the price was around 0.04, how is that working out for you...but no worries it will get there :)
It hasn't been that price to sell let alone buy. Please pay attention.
considering you have filtered me, i think it is someone else with their rear end before you...0.002 did anyone manage to get a top up at that price..what is your average btw :)
TC- sorry but your rear end keeps leaking onto this BB still entertainment for us holders until the RTO.
Jarv55 - "Deltalo no offence but Darwin have made thousands and thousands of pounds out of this company, they certainly don't give a hoot about this company" Jarv55 no offence but Darwin haven't made a single penny out of this company they've made thousands and thousands of pounds out of the shareholders of this company.
Chukers your just pi**ing about here like its some kind of alternative to facebook. We are talking big money here not just a few hundred quid dole money. Your posts are nieve to whats really happening and should stop messing about.
i think bgl are already ****ed, because my 5 year old cousin sells notebooks, and they are cheap as **** lol :P
aim is not such a hard place to make money in, however the only shares you see on the risers and fallers board, are either being ramped to death, or deramped to death...also by that i mean, most of them are filled with hot air...if you invest in those, make sure you are out in a week or so..but if you want to invest, pick shares that have a nice steady rise, and pays a dividend..it is easier and less riskier to trade them as well..or you can do like graham advided and start researching...look how sou will behave f.or look at hnr, afpo-cpx had a killer chart imo atb
i hope people are not confusing warrants with clns, i am positive that there were a lot of warrants coming. however they were all at a higher price then the current or post rto sp is gonna be...i wouldn't get my hopes up by that , because just like with director deals, i have seen shares go down regardless of the warrants exercise price- clns are what to worry about..might be a good entry price, but why bother with this pile of POO lol
And its down think this is being played to be honest.
The buys now well outweighed the sells and so they should. All who have sold today would have lost loads. The sp should rise fro this level and may see it blue by the end of trading.