The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I'm assuming there's so few unrepresented cases as in the past it was easy to just instruct a solicitor to pursue a claim even if you weren't injured, it's slightly different now if you have to do all the paperwork yourself knowing all the you are doing it you are pursuing a fraudulent claim or, if you have suffered a minor whiplash injury, it's simply not now worth all the effort for just a few hundred pounds. Although I can't see the general public being too impressed if they past on the savings to their shareholders rather than their policyholders.
Thanks for this sufc. I read back in May that they were hoping to save about £1818 per claim. Based on the Jul-Sep portal usage my very rough back of an envelope calculation is that direct line should have about 59,000 fewer claims per annum - based on 12% of total motor insurance market. That equates to £109 million but have to allow for claims over £5k. This should mean cheaper policies and reduced costs for Direct line. The 9 November update should be very good news.
A few years ago someone heavily rear ended me such that my car was also shoved into the car in front and written off. I got mymoney fro the car no problem but within a few days, one of the thieving injury claims merchants began to phone me and suggest that I must have been injured and they could help me get more money. Well I wasn't injured at all but they persisted for some weeks phoning me and telling that they could get me some "damages" if I would sign up despite me saying that I was not injured. Now that behaviour demonstrates just many £millions worth of fraudulent claims must have been made over the years costing all of us higher premiums; so glad it has now stopped.
Where have they gone? Perhaps driving behaviours have altered and there are fewer crashes, but it wouldn’t explain such a big drop.
It is possible – though unlikely – that some who might have claimed a year ago might not bother now the potential damages are so much lower. This would apply especially to those who might have been prepared to exaggerate their injuries.
If we assume that traffic and therefore accidents are not much greater than a year ago, the only explanation must be that people are less able or inclined to make a claim. The number of firms offering their services in lower-value claims has dwindled, and those that have stayed in the market have had to grapple with technology issues on the new portal.
The biggest concern is the relatively small number of unrepresented people making claims. Just 10% of cases were from this group, despite considerable efforts to make the system user-friendly. It was envisaged that this proportion would be much higher, so potentially thousands of injured people with a legitimate claim are not able to make it.
The MoJ is pretty content with how the new system has worked on a technical level. Officials won’t admit it, but they must be happy too with these numbers. Claims have fallen, and insurers are sated. Whether justice is being done is another matter altogether.
The whiplash reforms were really about one thing only: reducing the number of claims and in turn the costs of car insurance. Any pretence at cutting fraud was undermined by the almost total lack of evidence that fraud was a particular problem. Any attempt to paint the changes as benefitting consumers was highly questionable – and in any case the mooted insurance savings won’t be scrutinised for years.
If the purpose was to reduce claims, then the MoJ should pour itself a glass of bubbly (perhaps the insurers could supply the booze). In the first three months that the Official Claims Portal – the site for all whiplash claims valued less than £5,000 – has been in operation, it received 45,718 claims overall. It’s an eye-catchingly low number.
Comparisons with pre-portal years are fraught, but we’ll have a go anyway. From June to September 2020, 104,782 motor claims were recorded by the Compensation Recovery Unit (CRU - the government’s yardstick for claims figures). Some of these will have been worth more than £5,000 and so would not have qualified for the portal, but not many – and certainly not enough to account for the 50,000-plus difference. This period of higher figures was, it should also be noted, the height of the pandemic when roads were relatively empty and car crashes were accordingly reduced. This year’s opening three months of the portal covered a period in which more vehicles were back on the road, and many more people than usual were driving to UK-based holidays than would have done before, yet the numbers are low.
The comparison with pre-pandemic figures is staggering. From June to September the CRU recorded 168,217 motor claims. Set against the numbers accessing the claims portal (and appreciating this is far from an exact comparison) suggests that claims figures have dropped significantly