London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Sorry but I had to say this. You do not (at least) represent me when you say "certain information has come to light which is not entirely to our liking." If this is in reference to posts that were referring to Coeur and its directors, then this is your own doing and others. You persist with this line of investigation and so does Neilin and maybe one or two others and then cause yourself headaches when you find something you are not happy with. You then try to link that in with Bould and then make wild assumptions we have been possibly had. Anyone can read back and see what I am talking about from your words.
The last part of your previous post is more optimistic and that is how we should think. They are working terribly hard, and they want us to remain calm and not to comment on every bulletin board rumor. In that is a clue for you ok?
Act professionally and people give back a professional's answer. M.Aurelius at least will understand what I am saying.
BTW MA someone has been trying to get hold of you. If I believe you are who you are I have met you as well. Take care.
Countingcards
I do not wish to degenerate this BB by getting into a petty argument but I think I have been positive here all the way through and not speculating, just trying discuss actual information
You have confused me before with your post from Dec 20 when you wrote
"I believe the post before by UKHeaven has hit a chord with me mate. I was trying to avoid posting for a very long time. I had three personal test in place with this stock and two failed, one being the target we need to know and secondly the suspension that was not supposed to really happen, so one was left, and if no news by 12.30pm Tuesday 24th December 2019 I know I have been played and the final test has failed. Remember I have been played does not mean you all have been played. I have been played.
With that in mind, I have no choice but to hold onto this now, but I will write this off and start rebuilding away from AIM and enjoy getting into the gym and eating like a normal person, and stop concerning myself with BS stringing us along. If BOU ever sees the light of day then fine, but I will not be celebrating since the delay has had immense impact on my own personal plans and it will be a case of rebuilding NOT enjoying the returns. "
From your comments today do you have contact with the people involved, who has played you?
Respectfully
Chris
Counting, when you say "you persist with this line of investigation", it very much sounds like you are advising to "look away, there is nothing to see here". Chrisz or anyone else did not create an alternative reality by highlighting facts that are in the public domain. Are you saying we should pretend facts don't exist if they are unpalatable or "negative"? I'm curious to how one could build up a profitable investment portfolio with this approach. It is as dangerous to be overly-positive and to keep betting on black and lose your fortune, especially when there is evidence this will happen, than it is to think overly-negative and never play your hand. With regards the comment "try to link that with Bould"... oh the irony! Was this not the same link that you relied upon to justify your investment in this share? Are you telling me you would have invested to the same extent had AG not been involved? Yet when the link is being shown to possibly work contrary to your interests, it's suddenly not worth consideration. Very interesting. It's as much your imagination they are working hard as it is ours that there is a serious issue. And quit playing the holier-more-positive-than-thou card, it's patronising.
Not speaking for him.
A few things are going on with that particular company. Those things are being dealt with properly by the team. Like many other companies will have issues especially in such an industry add to it geopolitics and past governments etc.
Such issues does not make everyone involved a criminal.
His point I believe lies on the fact that we do not yet KNOW exactly which company is the target. So let's start harping on about Coeur and this and that, then imagine what the board of already frustrated investors will turn into. Reason why I held back from posting back then. My vital questions regarding Coeur were answered and the issues were more or less expected and are being handled lawfully.
Now, if we do go into Coeur then all will be made clear by the BOD.
Again, Coeur is not the conformed target so to delve into some situations about it at this stage, that's being worked on and should be sorted out in the not too distant future would be pointless. A few people might focus on the issues and panic, it's not worth it at this point. Imo
Let's not take each other out for saying this and saying that and wait this bit more. Same boat after all.
A_milli
As usual you come up with an excellent post. Everything exactly as I would see it. Its time consuming wasting space on a BB, scaring the life out of those who do not have the resources to find out more. Some people need to take their fears elsewhere, and have a little more forethought before they write. Thank you for the post.
Milli will you still be believing all the way up to the de-list date or will it be mid february / mid march and no update will we see your adams apple begin to gulp as we head in to squeaky bum time
JT14
I am fully invested here. The risk I knew and understood from the beginning. When PH started their drama, it got really bad and made me think. I held through that and then Antos stepped in and restored my faith in in a fraction of humanity.
I said to myself. All can be lost, but so much stands to be gained. I never came to AIM for 5% or day trading.
A cash shell is Russian Roulette to an extent. I mean good companies are getting run into the ground by some greedy execs let alone a cash shell.
Whatever happens here, I hold myself responsible and I am happy with that. I took the risk and will hold no one else to it. This is the natural story for cash shells.
I don't do squeaky bum time, whatever that is.
JT14 Try and be calm and let what will be, be.
Wideglide, little tired of the obvious statements "nothing you can do", "just wait", "we are suspended", this doesn't mean we should all be muzzled in the meanwhile. Do I have to have a motive other than to unearth what may be going on? It's ironic that by the same logic you claim there is nothing consequential to anyone posting due to suspension, so that I have nothing to get agitated by, yet you yourself are clearly agitated by such posts.
Agitated enough to be the first degrade this down to insults. Nowhere have I attempted to insult or characterise anybody as being a "baby" simply because their statements didn't fit my desired/preferred reality. On the contrary I find it intriguing some on this BB hold such entrenched views, so much so it does make one think perhaps some here are privileged to information I am not.
I am not upset about losing my money if this goes to pot, this isn't a hail mary attempt at reviving a retirement fund, I can afford to lose what I have vested in this. What does annoy me, is mine and others postings (which you probably have not had chance to read), are taken down in spite of the fact they are simply referring to facts out there in the public domain, that throw light on what MAY be going on, (something partially due to a complete lack of update by the board I may add), because it is not fitting certain folk's agenda or prefer to keep heads in sand, there is only one thing I stay true to and that is the facts, no matter how uncomfortable they may be to me or anyone else.