We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Last one I promise. Candy's average on his Boom holdings....226.9p
His average on his 1.4mln.....194.34p coz he's NEVER done a single trade to change his holdings since 18th Dec 2020. He has some fantastic timing that Peter coz straight after he got that position they rallied for 17mths straight but he never did a single thing with it. Odd. Guess he couldn't have sold any if he had already lent them out
I'm just looking at Bloomberg data so don't shout at me if u disagree coz I'm only going by that. Tobin declared his first holding in Boom on the 31st Dec 2018 when they were just over £1. Would u like to guess what his average is on his total holding? 980.16p!! What really fvcked him was when he increased his position by 33k shares on the 28th March 2022 at nearly £19. All those silly purchases ruined his average. So on a positive, no one wants these back up to £10 than Michael Tobin
I'll give u 3 words "u are wrong." According to Bloomberg he had 343k shares on the 31st Dec 2020. He now has 316k. So he might have bought 3 times last year but over that stated period he's been a net seller. Why didn't u tell the board about the sells he's done?
There are many things Z7795 is wrong about.
One example... three words... Roger Charles Maddock. A NED of Audioboom. Holds almost 2% of BOOM. Added 3 times last year.
I have np agenda. As I've said 1mln times I'm long. I'm just pointing out a few things I've noticed. If I was short I would hardly call it "increasingly desperate" while the stock sits at 235p Profitable maybe, but definitely desperate :-)
"increasingly desperate?"....these are 235p no? haha
What am I wrong about Rifkin?
Wrong again Z7795.
You're either ignorant of the facts or lying to suit your increasingly desperate agenda.
Acast the only real podcast firm we can compare against Boom as its listed in Sweden. Since 1st Jan 2023 its up +62%. Boom in the same period.....down -44.5%. We are in the wrong stock haha. That's the Bonnier/Candy effect for u. Boom will come good one day but not while all that crap is still hanging over it.
If u go by the Bloomberg holders list do you know that there is only one of the top 30 holders in Boom who has increased their stake in Boom in the last 3yrs and that's obviously Tobin. In 3yrs! None and I mean none of the other 29 major holders have increased their stakes in Boom while the stock has dropped from £22 to to Friday's 235p. U would have thought at least one of them might of wanted to average down no? I wonder why none of them fancy buying more? Don't you find that odd?
Evidence of Bonnier selling down in Boom? The latest TR1 filing on the 19th March from Mrs Bonnier where she no longer holds Boom. Sold 599,467 shares. E&L holding down from 1.3mln shares to 150k as of the 19th March as well. Will that do?
I laughed because it makes no sense. Bonnier family hold around 500m AAA shares, recent placing at 2p. Debt owed is 1.4m. In the requisition they have committed to pay 1.4m in escrow until the EGM process is completed. This does not suggest Bonnier family are bankrupt and AB is not “the go to”. It is abundantly clear the real shorters&manipulators are using the Bonnier family to hide their illicit activities. It may have worked if they refrained from spreading FUD.
I don’t think I have missed anything. If 30m was used to open short positions (suggested in court documents I read) the money is not off the table and there is a monthly payment on the borrow. “Buy shares as cheaply as possible” if party A was hoping to destroy party B, they would be banking on party B to capitulate at the lows.. short covered, return shares to BOS and live happily ever after. Now it seems party B has deep pockets and no intentions to capitulate AB shares. This would leave the shorting party in a right pickle. AB going from strength to strength, making record numbers, stronger backdrop, ad spend on the upturn, MT buying like a dog on heat and M&A activity looming in the next 12 months is a recipe for disaster for these shorting manipulators. Now if the shorting party was leveraged to hilt, the monthly payments on the borrow can become very painful. Could this be the reason NC is liquidating his MTL shares?
Anyway, enough conspiracies for one day, I am sure the truth will surface sooner rather than later. One thing we can both agree on “massive manipulation”. I for one would rather be long than short. I had a very good week on Tesla, profits into AB next week. I strongly believe Stuart Last and Mike Tobin will lead us to victory.. slight sniff of a incoming bid and these manipulators will be blown to smithereens.
This spat between certain shareholders has no bearing on the business and I am confident the share price will return to fair value sooner rather than later.. said our esteemed leader Stuart Last.
It was merely conspiracy theory number 2. You could laugh it off, or accept that’s there’s some truth within there. I don’t see that 192 could be shorting, they seem to be caught with their pants down already. What you seem to miss is that if there was a deal with BOS, then 30M has already been taken off the table. There’s no upside for a shareholder if they’ve already collected on the upside, what they need to do is just hand over the shares (as cheaply as possible). The outstanding debacle remains irrespective between 2 parties whose claim against each other could easily wipe one another out if judged. Is it better to keep the delays going on and on until someone capitulates ? I remember not so long ago that the share price rallied on rumours of a settlement of this case. it was unfounded and the share price slipped again. It is so simple what’s going on here and it could point in the direction of massive manipulation.
Zak the contradictions and holes in your posting history are abysmal. A blind man can see you play a key role in manipulating AB’s share price. I just hope AB board and regulators act fast to track you down. Your posts strongly suggest you are conspiring with a number of parties to manipulate AB’s share price. I don’t believe you have anything against the company, but you certainly have something personal against this Bonnier family. Your motive is clearl.. you are manipulating AB’s share price to destroy your enemies Bonnier family.
From research and speaking to reliable sources. How do you know he didn’t save aaqua?
Zak what evidence do you have the Bonnier family have been selling down?
You have pushed this narrative for a good part of 18 months. On one hand you are saying Bonnier family have lent their shares to short AB, on the other you claim he is or was a distressed seller.. which is it?
“The stock is going no where until the court case is resolved” we have witnessed this statement from you in the past. If I was a investigator, you would be top of the list. The conviction in your statement confirms you play a key role in conspiring to manipulate the share price for the last two years.
I don’t know how you came to the conclusion I like Robert Bonnier, I don’t know him or your history with him from AAA. I reached out to my contacts after you persistently spammed this board with FUD and justifying it by blaming the Bonnier family and AAA. I proved you wrong as a liar many times. Do you remember when you intentionally misled this board by thinking AAA were dumping shares? I posted a statement by AAA director “they have not sold a single share and have no intention to sell”
Zak has gone above and beyond to spread FUD in order to keep the share price suppressed. I think in the very near future the chap hiding behind the avatar zak7795 will be globe trotting to avoid authorities in many jurisdictions.
why have none of u ever question 192 pte's position? why while the stock got pumped up to 2223p he never sold a share. why when they collapsed they never did a thing? don't any of u think that's strange? boom doesn't trade on fundamentals we all know that. the company even stated their concerns on that last week. the business is doing great and what's just happened? they have gone from 320p back down to 235p. these scumbags control boom at present. that's why no proper fund wants to buy in even though boom is a great little company. before u **** me off bearhunter if u don't agree with that i know ur intentions aren't genuine in boom cos some of the +ve stuff u say about bonnier is very concerning. the super rich bonnier, a man who's only ever run firms to insolvency. fact! the super rich bonnier who has only sold boom in recent years even at these stupid low prices. so is he broke? super rich and doesn't care or stupid? he's certainly one of them. the super rich fella getting sued by anyone whos ever done business with him. aaqua.....i presume are in insolvency. what's the receiver gonna do with their 403k shares? anyone ever wondered that? according to the tr1's mrs bonnier now out. e&l (mr bonnier) has 150k left. this is my theory. candy wants to ruin bonnier for conning him and knows he's got no money so the last thing he wants to boom shares rallying so bonnier can raise more cash. candy doesn't want boom shares down here but maybe he can wait longer than bonnier can. just my thoughts
I agree with growing balls. This stock is going no where until that court case is resolved.
If Bonnier had all this money why's he sold down his Boom shares if Boom is so great. Doesn't it make more sense that he's sold down coz he needs cash. Doesn't that make more sense. I'm getting the impression u like Robert Bonnier and if that's the case ur the only man who does. Why do u guys always forget to mention 192 PTE Peter Antonioni. He's got 1.4mln shares. He's Bonnier's mate. Anyone ever wonder what he does with his shares? If anyone is loaning out his shares to short its him
Bearhunter...where do u get the idea Bonnier has all this money? He didn't fancy saving Aaqua with it then?
I agreed with soundman&Dogging, very fitting.
LOL, TB!!! I've got Darktrace on the brain today, obviously I mean MT.
I'd never question MT's motives, in fact his contribution to the past, present and future success is immeasurable.
BBB - It would be insane for NC to trade them as you say, he would have to notify. Simply lending them out though, that's another matter... Lots of IIs do it, get a 'short' fee in the immediate term with a 'long' gain strategy in the medium plus term.
Also, I'd never questions TB's motives, maybe he doesn't want to move the market. Maybe he just wants more shares, and under 250 who can blame him.
Has some very shady recent history, i do not think a few regulations would prevent him opening a short, especially if he knew he was going to accuse RB of all sorts. you could make lovely gain.
I can’t fathom the logic in these shorting theories. All I would say is Candy could not be behind anything as he’s a major shareholder and has a representative on the board. Any trading in the company’s shares would have to be advised to the board and reported in a TR1 to the stock exchange. He has market sensitive information which limits his ability to trade.