The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Regarding SP: what I meant is that a successful action might cause a slight drop in the SP so I might as well get something back by joining the class action.
PS: Not trying to sway you, each to their own. But it looks as if weight of numbers are there for it to proceed to the next stage regardless. If you don't feel that it's right for you to do you will make your own choice.
I haven't decided myself fully yet, still mulling it over. I have a couple of days off this week and will look into it in more depth. HL have been very quick to reply to queries that had so will no doubt help you if you have any questions. GL.
Yes, I've spoken to HL about it. You don't need the HIN number and you'd just fill the form in.
I take your point about BHP but it seems that the CA suit involves 700,000 people so it's going to happen whether we want to protect the sp or not.
I came to the same conclusion. I was alerted to this in a message from HL. It seems to be genuine and follows on from a successful class action for US shareholders of BLT/BHP in the qualifying period.
I am in two minds to register. Not sure I’ll get a lot out of it but also concerned that if the class act is successful then the SP may suffer so I want something to offset that possibility 🤣
Scrap that, I've found what I need.
https://www.bhpclassaction.com/
There are only 2 outcomes. Success for the claim or failure. A failure results in no costs to shareholders and success results in fees for legal expertise, but it will never be more than any compensation awarded to you if successful.
You just need to register your details before the 31st of this month.
I've just come across this letter re: HL. I owned BHP in 2013 and have yet to read through it fully.
I'm guessing that by registering for the class action its free? At no cost to shareholders? Would there be any costs at znh stage or ard we exempt from that?
Cheers in advance.
Any thoughts?
Another advantage in the 'Woodsmith mine' is, as it is so deep in the earth, it would allow massive heat pumps to be installed and possibly leased out to local electricity companies. This cheap electricity move would service all Yorkshire and the profits accruing would cover any further mine expenses.
Long term this would really benefit BHP. China will buy the total POLY 4 hoard. Billions lie in wait for he who dares.
The era of big acquisitions in mining caused a lot of indigestion if I recall. Rio/ Alcan one prime example of the larger co grossly overpaying.
BHP should just concentrate on its own knitting, they do not need Anglo, they already overpaid for Oz.
I should have said, sage words, not advice by the way.
Thank you Londoner7, sage advice and appreciated. I have a small pot of cash, burning a hole, earning zero interest in my brokerage account. I think BHP will be its home, I already have some RIO and like yourself, have traded back and forth at various price points.
I shall take your advice on the suggested reading which sounds useful in terms of understanding the longer term.
Best regards
Reader61, if you're looking for advice on trading BHP today, I can't offer any.
But if you are looking for an entry point to a long-term holding in BHP then these bid situation opportunities don't come up very often. I like to invest in companies that offer me an interest in their activities. BHP is the largest miner in the world and at the forefront of the application of technology as the world transitions towards clean energy. This stuff fascinates me and BHP covers it well in their 'insights' publications. Want to know about the practicalities of the transition, then read what BHP has to say. These are the guys at the coal face, not the idealists sitting at a keyboard.
I've held a stake in BHP for decades and I trade - both sides - as the opportunity arises. If you wish to build a holding then take a small stake today - large enough to minimise trading costs - and pound average over time. In 10 years time, whether you average in at £21 or £23 will be an irrelevance.
Incidentally, you could make a similar case for RIO or other large miners. Take a look at their portfolios and direction of travel, and pick one that appeals to your interests.
If they engage in bid warfare, the BHP price will drop from here to offer a more attractive entry point. However, without knowing the bigger strategy alluded to by other posters do I jump or stick?
Nobody has considered the combined value of the two companies
Solomonkane, in answer to d)
I've no doubt the M&A team at BHP will have run the rule over all possible candidates. They'll understand the regulatory and local risk involved in the assets and the likely price of a successful bid. AAL has well publicised problems outside of the core copper and iron assets of interest to BHP, and I'd guess BHP sees those issues around AAL as providing an opportunity. Once in play there are a number of possible outcomes. I doubt BHP ever expected their initial bid to be successful, but rather it is part of a larger strategy.
I'm a long term holder in BHP (decades), trading when the opportunity presents but always maintaining a stake. I don't like the short term impacts on the BHP SP of these bid approaches but it is part of the game.
The FT has an excellent article on the merits of buy or build - worth a look if you can get access (subscription)- titled, The ‘build or buy’ copper maths that could guide BHP’s bid for Anglo.
a few thoughts.
a) bhp has not won hearts and minds on this at all- most of its institutions cannot see the merits / logic of this pick and mix approach - bhp has not done its home work on the merits of this at all.
b) why on earth does bhp want debeers? diamonds have had it -they are now being manufactured cheaply- the whole industry is in a slow death
c) reputational risk - bhp has an outstanding track record of investment returns. anglo does not, is cash poor, has some major capex to do, will dilute bhp earnings. bhp is taking a significant risk with its reputation. this is not like bhp/ oz minerals.
d) bhp wants copper assets, we have been informed - ok so why not anto***asta, first quantum minerals etc
e) other than modest corporate hq overlap, where are the synergies with this deal?
f) anglo am board are not going to approve without getting an over the top offer, which bhp if it has any sense is not going to offer- so who is pulling whose plonker here?
message to bhp; its not too late, withdraw honourably, deal was never there anyway, and it will be forgotten about in a few months. bhp does not need anglo am myriad of problems
It’s dropping because people in the know BHP will be paying over the odds while stockmarket indices are trading at roppy levels.
In US, everyone was under impression interest rates coujd be cut by May, that isn’t happening, maybe not in 2024 at all. That is a red flag, there’s gossip that FEDS could be looking at raising rates to bring down inflation as it has started to rise this yr.
Factors for BHP sp direction is not all about BHP, it’s the wider picture out in this big nasty world we’re now living..
Gla
I’m getting lots of alerts of investment institutions disclosing their holdings in BHP. Are they loading up,on BHP? Or am I getting it the wrong way round.
The advisers won’t be paid in shares. I don’t know what BHP are doing. They’ve already racked up tens of millions in advisory fees, payable in cash, on a bid that has zero chance of succeeding and a high risk of failure even if they bid 40% more. Did they not buy a small stake in AAL prior to their bid to mitigate part of the cost ?
If this firm is serious in its offer for AAL then bite the bullet and pay £45 per share and be done with it before the Chinese snap it up. With a lot of mouths to feed, it would be a rare opportunity to make a killing for a very large population.
Why is this share falling? They have made a paper offer .Paper is cheap. NO MONEY HAS BEEN LOST OR ASSETS.
quite an illogical reaction made by fools!
I think I’ll be buying more RIO this yr than BHP, i meant
The copper talk could be a red herring. The disguised target is POLY 4..Read between the lines.