The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Let me qualify my earlier post:
some of your research is of benefit to us all, Ja51, some of your questions, too.
That is how it should be. One doesn't want to be given the impression you are simply pursuing a personal vendetta.
Don't remember any misunderstanding re costs (but can always be mistaken, of course).
Think you are being unreasonable, Ja51, don't want management time to be too absorbed by answering the questions of a shareholder of 1 share in the company, currently valued at the princely sum of 0.675% of a penny.
I think you find you thaught they were liable for the costs at Balcombe also ocelot?
Just offering them an opportunity to correct a mistake I may have made......I don't think I could be any fairer really do you?
Ja51,
You were right about the 2nd Riverfort facility replacing the 1st one, agreed.
But it isn't reasonable on your part to ask:
"Could you please correct anything I have posted which you feel is wrong and warrants an explanation.
Ja51".
They have Saltfleetby and Balcombe to progress and an annual report to produce, let them get on with making a success of those 2 projects and answer any specific questions you may wish to submit.
Ocelot
A couple of the questions I asked related to discussions we had and as you know, the
answers supplied turned out not as you had expected. This illustrates how easy to interpret poor information issued in RNS'S perfectly!
I not aware that I have got anything wrong and given them an opportunity to correct something they must feel pretty strongly about to publish the comments they made!
Your question is much too broad, Ja51, you are not at war with Angus management, ... as far as I am aware!
If they felt strongly enough to actually publish and respond to that ridiculous question regarding myself I'm sure they will welcome the chance to put the story straight.It seems only fair to give them the opportunity to correct anything I may have posted incorrectly. You know I tend to attach links to back up my position and would welcome any information even if it proves me wrong.
Q&A Response
AS far as I'm aware I have not posted anything that is wrong on this BB!
I have had more than my fair share of discussions and the share price is where it is for a reason. I have submitted the
attached to the Q&A for the company to respond to anything they think i have got wrong.
It seems only fair that if you feel I have posted wrong information on LSE you have the opportunity to correct it.
Could you please correct anything I have posted which you feel is wrong and warrants an explanation.
Ja51.
My first name is quite obviously not Ja51 by the way offtheball and definitely not trying to get in lower...lol
mist the S "out
yorky/ there is such a thing as one to eat there own word and be as sick as a dog,
March should be a busy month: Saltfleetby CPR, Balcombe planning committee meeting + annual report for Y/E 30/09/19.
I am more concerned with the Saltfleetby CPR, as I have posted a couple of times before, and see here (rather than Balcombe) as where we are most likely to see a more sustainable boost to the SP. Still feel we are looking at September, or Q4 before anything operational there though.
Hopeful that the March planning for Balcombe does not get postponed and a favourable outcome will see a return of some interest for any currently watching from the sidelines, and any potential new investors.
Meanwhile, will continue to hold
I wouldn't worry Crocqman, I've been called much worse lol
That's fine by me Crocqman, Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I see it as this person having no investment here and is constantly posting negativity wether on this board or in the investor questions for his own gain ( A lower entry price ). This isn't helping my investment or the view of possible new investors looking in here. This share isn't going to be 0.6p if and when Balcombe gets the go ahead or we receive the CPR regarding Saltfleetby. A last ditch attempt to get in lower if you ask me. GLA genuine investors.
Apologies offtheball, I misread the name (and added an extra 'l' for good measure)
Disagree ontheballl,
I don't see the benefit of referencing a bb poster in a question. I know they may be trying to be transparent, but feel they should be able to exercise their discretion and have a process to edit a question (without changing it's intent) in certain circumstances.
For the Q submitted on 20 Feb (currently 4th one down), why not just leave it as 'a poster on the LSE forum chat board', and why respond directly to name the question submitter in the one seen above it?
imo, that question (4th down) should not even have been put up on their IQ section as what is the relevance of posting that someone holds 1 share, or how many posts they put on a public BB? What would this even mean to anyone outside of the LSE forum? It does just seem really petty and unprofessional for the company to act this way.
Additionally, the latest question (added 28 Feb) starts 'An eagle eyed board poster'. Outside of this BB, what relevance does the phrase 'board poster' have to anyone else? An analyst, media person or some other interested party would most likely not have a clue what this is meant to be about.
The IQ forum is not the exclusive domain of LSE members so far as I am aware, although it may seem that way at times!
What started as an interesting idea to be open and create a dialogue to investors outside of official news, could quickly degenerate into something no different to what is often seen on these very boards.
The company needs to take some care in how they utilise this IQ initiative going forward, otherwise I can see them taking it down citing abuse of the spirit of the initiative from outside sources which would be a shame.
What's the issue YorkshireLife ? JA51 was obviously his first name.
Under the question tab, It highlights:
Please note:
Personal details associated with submitted questions will not be made public.
Questions will be attributed to the author on a FIRST NAME basis only, during the call.
Management will do its best to answer all validated questions but for commercial reasons reserves its right to exclude a validated question.
You lot really are being pedantic if you ask me. It's getting boring......
The Investor Question concerned Ja51.
Sorry LL,
Apologies, only I couldn't resist after reading the Q & A on the Angus website last night!
Really?!?!?!?!
Never read anything quite so amateurish and immature - answering back and calling out a poster on a BB... Even for Angus... this really is AN ALL TIME LOW!
Has "Tidswell" written all over it... what a sad state of affairs...
YL :-(
ANGS BOD: "Success at Balcombe and Saltfleetby is the only thing which will silence such detractors."
True! But will any investor still be alive to celebrate Angus's "FIRST EVER" success? It will have been a very, Very, "VERY" LONG WAIT after all!
YL ;-)
just sit back and wait Q3 8p
Hopefully, the Saltfleetby CPR.
Holding fire an a Q submission to allow a few days after their own Feb deadline.
Too early for a loan conversion, Riverfort still working through the last one.
The last time they answered Investor Questions on a Sunday it was to clear the decks for an RNS on the Monday.
Not saying that will happen on this occasion, but it might.
Lets not forget the other link Riverfrort. With Forum buying the AAOG stake directly from them!!