We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
All very interesting, but quite what has it got to do with SNG and share prices? Keep monitoring the situation and let us all know the sucessful tendering contractor. Might be worth a punt.
Doubling down on your stupidity rather than apologising and insulting folk when you don’t have a leg to stand on is straight out of the Trump playbook.
Well done you.
The Baby Trump is strong with this one today!
If anybody sees Eeor or his congratulators on their travels
When someone starts with
‘Credit to Stoney40 for picking this up and the following : ......
It is telling you in no uncertain terms that the poster has reposted someone else’s interesting find.
It is not a trick - it’s a not really that difficult a concept. Please read the clear direction before getting your knickers in a twist.
Welsh Donkey the entire post was entirely someone else’s musings. Not my thoughts or conclusions nadda.
The Govt link was also not mine but I really don’t think I can help you anymore.
Not my spin text or conclusions.
You can actually now apologise as when you are in a hole best to stop digging.
Unbelievable.
Err, you posted it.
You ended it with "Either way, this is a very bad sign. Stay safe".
2 points, by posting this, you reveal your mindset.
second point, it is not a 'very bad sign' completely the opposite. They are doing what any governing body is expected to do with proper forward contingency planning.
Perhaps you didn't complete your 'Trump school of misinformation and misdirection correspondence course'?
It would be wonderful to think that they were stockpiling SYG, but don’t forget that once they have a viable treatment, they can no longer press on with the vaccines. That probably explains why they are instead stockpiling a drug used in lethal injections.
https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/supplies-of-sedative-used-for-covid-19-patients-diverted-from-france-to-avoid-potential-shortages.
Yes you did. You intimated that 'they KNOW something' They don't, it's just forward contingency planning.
You pose the question: Naturally, one wonders what "excess deaths situation" the London City government is anticipating? Oh, and why does the contractor need to be able to provide "rapid deployment?"
Again just forward contingency planning, which you try to highlight in a negative fasion.
We can all read what you wrote.
If you read again I haven’t ‘spun’ anything.
But no need to apologise.
This I find very encouraging. Yes, we can all spin a negative out of it, as you have tried to do, but it is indicative of an awakening in forward planning.
Quote: "This will be a contingency contract, only called upon in the event that an excess deaths situation arises in the future and existing local body storage capacity needs to be augmented."
So they are beginning to plan ahead to have all the pieces in place for the if/when/maybe another pandemic or other event causing excess deaths. Excellent, learning lessons from experience.
Now, as and when SNG gets through it's phase 3 and is proven to be the only real effective therapeutic for Covid (and virus agnostic for all respiratory viruses, including the Flu), this sort of mindset will produce a need to stockpile SNG. It is certainly an argument that our BOD can put forward and can back up with this kind of contingency planning.
Perfect.....
Credit to Stoney40 for picking this up and the following :
UK Govt contract for dead body storageToday 07:23
Hi All - this is looking dodgy......
The local government in London, England (UK) is letting a Contract valued at £6 Million, for Temporary Dead Body Storage.
The Westminster City Council is seeking:
"The Authority seeks to procure a framework agreement for temporary body storage in the event of an excess deaths situation for the 32 London boroughs and the City of London, led by Westminster City Council. The framework agreement will appoint a single provider and will be for a period of 4 years. This will be a contingency contract, only called upon in the event that an excess deaths situation arises in the future and existing local body storage capacity needs to be augmented."
the Request for Bids also outlines:
"The over-arching aim of this tender is to provide a single framework supplier that will be able to provide temporary body storage facilities to house deceased in the event of an excess deaths situation. The deceased will be stored with dignity and respect, at locations to be determined based on local London needs at the time and will require some design elements to accommodate local site conditions and constraints, while being capable of rapid deployment, construction and commissioning to an agreed standard. This framework will be procured by the Authority as the pan-London lead, but all London local authorities may call-off against the framework.
Naturally, one wonders what "excess deaths situation" the London City government is anticipating? Oh, and why does the contractor need to be able to provide "rapid deployment?"
Below is a direct link to the actual London Tender Request on the official government web site.
If government is looking to spend money for "dead body storage" it is not unreasonable to think they KNOW something, or are planning something that will require that capacity.
https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/013120-2021?origin=SearchResults&p=1
Either way, this is a very bad sign. Stay safe