Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/profiles/dc29
not an economist, so some of his comments are out of his field
Mmmmm well I would not use such a long term searching on pornhub for something that has other names lol. Skin a cat more ways than 1....or shave a pussy. The good thing about innuendos is that any misconception is ultimately in your own mind and therefore not rudeness on the posters behalf . Im just trying to cheer myself up in a collapsing sp !
Ah well you know what the say about most "experts" they are generally a has been twit under pressure"
Where Prof Cebon's analysis goes wrong is it supposes that all our energy in the future has to be home grown e.g. offshore wind, and is therefore a precious resource that must not be wasted. Along with the principle that electrification should be prioritised where practical (which I agree with) leads to the conclusion that there's no role for hydrogen in the larger energy cases such as heating and transport. If instead you consider that green hydrogen can also be imported from North Africa, Middle East and Australia then heavy use cases like transport can still be considered, and actually is preferable over battery vehicles. That simple argument is just the start, there are other reasons why it makes sense, but Cebon obviously isn't taking any of it into consideration.
I'm surprised to hear hydrogen isn't being endorsed. The Future Energy Scenarios published by National Grid suggests Hydrogen will account for 21-59% of consumer energy needs by 2050. That is the range across the 4 different scenarios and this document is used to inform the industry and government, it is essentially what drove me to invest I hydrogen based companies.
I'm surprised to hear hydrogen isn't being endorsed. The Future Energy Scenarios published by National Grid suggests Hydrogen will account for 21-59% of consumer energy needs by 2050. That is the range across the 4 different scenarios and this document is used to inform the industry and government, it is essentially what drove me to invest I hydrogen based companies.
Lfclfc5, your post really made me chuckle this morning, in fact I am still laughing, just what I needed after a difficult few days, not just because the share price keeps falling!
Trader87 - it does make you wonder what he spends the rest of his time taking about on his phone!
Maybe Cebons has a load of Oil shares.
Wasted wind or solar is worthless , the green hydrogen it could be producing is priceless in the benefits of getting us to " net zero carbon " is my simplistic view.
It's a win win , unless you are heavily invested in oil and have no vision.
Love that your phone autocorrected to vaginally. Lol
Thanks for posting tm.....I'm only half way through, think Prof Cebons numbers were iffy.
Virtually although vaginally is funnier
Wow. That pain from Cambridge gives green hydrogen a right kicking. Pricing it out of the market saying it is not sustainable on the dregs of electricity surplus alone.
As an energy 'salesman' myself of 3.5 decades he is obviously overlooking the wind we can't use or store throughout the night and for example all the French nuclear that is vaginally free through tbe interconnector if required ?
Maybe I'm wrong....but green hydrogen could easily be more economical using this off peak energy.
He also slates it for transportation. I think he is plain wrong. He is a professor but an expert tends to know more and more about less and less!
Did you watch today's parliament tv discussing hydrogen? I'm only half an hour into it so far and Professor Cebon is giving hydrogen a real kicking. He's an 'efficiency is the only consideration' evangelist, so he's putting a lot of effort into pointing out that green hydrogen really has no place in heating, electricity and transportation. As is often the case with that point of view he's missing vital points of consideration. Professor Shah appears more balanced in his views but isn't getting much of a hearing.
https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/eb6151f0-5ed0-4add-a0e6-a4ee825bddbc