We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Sorry I see the thread and who he is I thought you meant Sir Jim Ratcliffe of INEOS
Spud Who is “Radders”
Your 'topup' is 400k more shares than I have in total =D
Joined the fun here after reading up over the last few days. Been a while since I felt good about a share. Gla.
Decided it was time time cash in on my Apple shares and pump into INFA which now feels less of a risk
Yep definitely me and a buy (when it went up :) )
It's Radders I think?
Time of the 2.6 mln means a buy
This will continue to tick up today
What a bowl on the 4 year chart and look at the rise in volumes since the beginning of 2017. It looks amazing. Let's hope the news to come is decent enough to really push on
Thanks...I'll see if I can gt hold of a copy.
When it goes up a bit more ;)
Wondering when to tell my wife 😱
Decent "top up" Radders lol
Just brought 2.6m .. in very deep with fingers crossed ..but remain confident in the need for this project to succeed
John Wood
@JohnWoo64494325
John Wood Retweeted InfraStrata plc
Looking forward to sharing my vision for InfraStrata and providing a progress update. Finishing off with a Q&A session #INFA
Great chance to submit your questions.
Be good to hear our new CEO!
Great news today. I suspected there were some warrants being done. Likely all sold and have new homes now.
Its bringing more capital to the bottom line to pay for Corp costs. I suspect more good solid news on progress is coming. Think 0.8p will go today and then not that far to 1p.
Target 5-10p. I have some scenarios of how 5p will be reaches which I will post over the weekend. I think its not far away.
Great to see further engagement from the team, i wonder if the call will be post some expected news or at the conclusion of further major milestones with FEED. Excellent comms from the company as it progresses as planned. First batch of warrants exercised puts more cash in the coffers for INFA and likely already sold into market.
Yes, I sense substantive news flow to come, hopefully it's of a positive nature otherwise what would be the point of an Inv-conference call?
Real momentum building now both on the company front and on the share-price front
Snowman, i highly recommend you buy Jim Slater’s book The Zulu Principle. Your 3rd link quotes him. It is excellent and very understandable.
Seen RNS on conference call which should be very interesting indeed. See full dial in details in the RNS
‘Keep an eye on the buying and selling of shares granted under option schemes. If the purchase price of the options is say 30p and the shares are currently 200p, the purchase would not be meaningful – who wouldn’t buy shares at such a huge discount? The key point is whether any shares are being retained by the directors. Look for net retentions with some of the proceeds of option sales being held and added to ongoing holdings’.
‘Substantial buying by non-executive directors can be indicative. For example, I was attracted to ****, when I noticed in October that a non-executive director had bought 30,000 shares at 370p, adding to his existing holding of only 20,000 shares. Just four months later **** shares have risen to 465p and still look promising…..Be alert to whether or not the directors are buying shares just to show the flag. Sometimes when companies are known to be in trouble or are contentious, a cluster of the directors buy a few shares to try to reassure the market that all is well. Some of last year’s purchases by the directors of ****, the scandal-hit ****, probably came into this category’
‘Directors’ buying is more significant than directors’ selling. A director buying shares is in effect saying that he considers the shares to be undervalued and to be a better investment than cash. He or she will also be adding to an existing holding. Selling is different – a director may feel that the shares are overvalued but equally may require the money for a valid purpose such as buying a new or larger house or meeting an unexpected tax bill. However, if a cluster of directors are selling, that is very different and whatever the excuses is a clear signal to follow their lead’.
Just a bit of bedtime reading.....some things make you think though. Meeting of full board on site......huge purchase of shares by CEO.......whole host of stakeholders....etc.
Evening all.
Just for fun and interest, please read the following general comments.....something big just might be on the cards?....Many of you will probably know all these thimgs already, but I'm fairly new to the game, so bear with me.
Here are some scribblings from various sources regarding possible indications/signposts of takeovers/aquisitions
https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/03/17/3-signs-a-company-is-about-to-be-acquired.aspx
‘The surest way for a company to grab an acquirer's attention is to develop a lock on a market segment that a larger rival needs. It's also key in this scenario that it would be costly and/or time consuming for the bigger competitor to duplicate this success’.
‘If management says they are "exploring financial options," it's likely corporatespeak for "We're shopping our business around to potential buyers."’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2932150/Research-pins-down-tell-tale-signs-for-takeover.html (edition 23 Aug 2018)
‘Boards of hostile takeover targets also hold fewer shares in the companies which makes it harder for them to fend off bids.’ (with companies that will welcome an aquisition, the reverse is probably the case and the boards would buy more shares – my comment).
‘in hostile bids the ratio of the target company's market capitalisation to its tangible assets tends to be low. Companies with market valuations far above their tangible assets are usually highly dependent on employee talent which a bidder may have trouble retaining unless the offer is recommended by the board…… In the case of a business where employee talent is fundamental to the business, ……… it is more important that any acquirer's bid is recommended…..This is less important in a … business where the assets might be the most appealing factor.’
‘Hostile takeovers are also most likely to occur 86 days after the target company has published its accounts’.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/funds/11453951/Jim-Slater-This-is-the-most-reliable-sign-shares-will-rise.html (edition 22 Aug 2018)
‘Selling or buying by the chief executive and the finance director is a particularly powerful indicator. They are the two directors who are most likely to know the score…..The significance of share deals in relation to the number of shares held by a director is always relevant. A purchase of 20,000 shares by a chairman who owns more than a million shares is of no importance. However, the finance director doubling his holding of 20,000 shares is a very different kettle of fish. In a similar way, the sales director selling 20,000 shares out of a holding of 25,000 would put me on red alert…..Directors’ buying is more significant than directors’ selling. A director buying shares is in effect saying that he considers the shares to be undervalued and to be a better investment than cash’
Doesn't it make you just want to climb the steps for once --Skipity Skipity Skip with both arms flowing in the air...with joy !! What a load of cobblers but,hey, when you pass..075 in 4 easy steps during the day you can look forward to the next day ..will soon be there ! Should be positive tomorrow and on Tuesday !
John Wood
@JohnWoo64494325
Great couple of days onsite with the team, on top of our Internal discussions we also mange’s to meet with a whole host of stakeholders #INFA
11:46 AM - 23 Aug 2018