We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I Loved this statement.....Over a longer time horizon, I am also interested to see copper again being identified from drilling activity,
but this time at depth. With a resource open at around 1,000-1,200 metres depth, future exploration
outside of the existing resource area would potentially seek to understand if thickening of mineralisation
occurs and whether there is a significant copper presence in the deposit from a separate thermal event.
Sorry, there’s me ****ging people off and can’t even proof read my own post. It should be CBs statement
Has anyone else seen CBS statement from yesterday, it is the biggest load of old drivel Even one of the secretaries could have come up with a better statement to reassure investors. He basically said nothing that hadn’t been said months ago. I sometimes have to wonder at the standard of some of the so called senior management of companies. How do they get to where they are. We can only hope that this company moves forward on the merit of what’s underground, in spite of these people. Certainly if left to them it will be by luck. IMO of course
I also notice 2 big sell reversals went through under 30th Sept date today.......
Obviously not suggesting these figures have any bearing on what we could ultimately achieve here but this does illustrate just how easily Lundin can pick up huge assets....
"On July 5, 2019, the Company closed the acquisition of a 100% ownership stake in Mineração Maracá Indústria e Comércio S/A, which owns the Chapada copper-gold mine located in Brazil from Yamana Gold Inc. (“Yamana”). Total cash consideration paid at closing by the Company was $800 million, funded by cash on hand and the Company’s $550 million revolving credit facility".
TP posted old valuation of 0.095 on Vox 2 hours ago! Can anyone get anything right?
Showing .029 to buy a small amount
My buy showing as a sell on NEX
There is no way europa will be producing from Toral, is tending to Monday’s interview there were enough hints that the strategy is to fully prove up mineralisation and copper with the placing money mostly used for that, and the upcoming indicated grades via jorc, clear
Y the aim is to be taken out by a big boy miner when fully proved up. Today’s SP is ludicrously low and anticipate it being a lot higher by 2-3 weeks time for the Jorc
@Oiltap....many thanks for sharing. This puts everything into perspective for me now and connecting the dots further....am more convinced than ever they are beefing this up for Lundin.
Chief Executive of Lundin Marie Inkster….”The Toronto-based company is seeking a project where exploration is complete, which it can take over and build, Inkster said. Lundin prefers a copper asset, but would also consider a zinc poly-metallic mine, with nickel a distant third option”
I am now also more convinced if Copper "indicated" Jorc produced for Toral they will utilise their right of first refusal to buy back Toral or buy back in....
This augurs well imo moving forward and very positive we will all multibag.....DYOR....GLA
However most of the placing was already forward sold last week
Should rise to 0.4p over next few sessions before warrents start to come into the picture. Hard to gauge with the poor sentiment here since the placing, however I am interested to hear your thoughts on roughly where the sp will be in a couple of weeks for the jorc
Just been looking at grades with the giant Antofagasta. From their Q2 production report their Los Pelambres operation has returned 0.7%, Centinela 0.71%, Antucoya 0.38% and Zaldívar 1.23%.
By next fri we should know
For the last time :) it was 4 weeks to JORC, now three and the workshop with AMS could have saved two weeks.....
4 weeks til JORC (2012) and application for licence in 2020
I think it's certain that some part of the next drilling will try and establish the relationship between the shallow copper and that found recently at 640m, could be massive with 1.83% being significant (thanks Oil). With regards to the work going towards a mine plan I think it's becoming clearer that this creates value not only in moving the ball forward towards possible production (with partners I assume) but is a strong message to anyone eyeing the asset that they're going to have to get serious.
I find it I interesting how the title of the news item has focused on a negative, but the language and content of the main body of the article is quite positive .
Just an observation, that's all.
Gla
They have been good today
Noticed that too, I guess they're playing it straight - indicated will make a big difference.
Is no one else surprised that TP are taking the inferred-indicated as given?
Watson003, thanks that would appear to be mine
Not an RNS though just commentary.
Europa Metals' loss widens on higher exploration costs
(Sharecast News) - Europa Metals on Tuesday reported a deepened annual loss due to higher exploration costs, though the company said that it had enjoyed a successful drilling programme at its Toral zinc project in North West Spain.
0.095 did this share ever reach this while this was estimated and will it ever reach 0.071.