We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
fair enough, i had seen you talk about an 800,000 (£8K) pre-IPO
amount before, but happy to accept i may have misunderstood
you. (perhaps you were referring to another poster's top-up?)
you have very specifically stated before that you increased
your holding by ten times in the 'pre-IPO'. so when you did
hand over that hard-earned cash, who was headlining the
fundraising, & what credible commercial substance was there?
... am asking because although you state at 10:46 that punters
would only pump in more dosh depending on who headlines,
and on credible commercial substance, you yourself appear to
be the living proof that they can lure at least some peeps to cough
up more money without any credible commercial substance.
after all, you've clearly stated before that you knew it was amit
himself soliciting the funds in august 2018, and that you put in
more money on 'complete and utter blind faith' . (strangely.)
just going on what you posted previously, dougal.
... are you saying now that you did not take part in
the pre-IPO, or handed over a very different sum?
if you did invest something, who was headlining
that fundraising, and what credible commercial
substance or commercial partners were there then?
dougal, you've indicated before that you put
in an extra £8,000 in the 2018 'pre-IPO'. so who
was headlining that fundraising, & what credible
commercial substance was there back then?
''strongman, i have no reason to wish, or rejoice in, any pain
for ordinary shareholders''
Lets leave that open to debate for now....
On the rest of your comments, quite a few if not the majority may agree with you. Shareholders in the main have laid to rest their investment here many years/months ago. Believe it or not, some of us have a few brain cells and can figure it out for ourselves as well. BUT whilst we kind of accept defeat and losses, there is always a small part of us that wants to believe this could come good.
Watching and waiting...
(putting it another way, far from wishing the existing
shareholders to suffer pain, i would prefer it if innocent
but gullible punters were not persuaded to lose even more.)
strongman, i have no reason to wish, or rejoice in, any pain
for ordinary shareholders, although i think the painful end
has already happened. -- i would quite like that amit and
his associates get their just desserts, but unfortunately i
think that is vanishingly unlikely, given the nature of AIM,
& even more so privately listed cayman island companies.
they got away with it, but still might try to get some more.
your memory is deficient re my posting history on lse.
Spikeyj, Interesting comments. By the way I have known of you for a very long time. In your early days you were known as the paper round boy across lse, as you would post all RNS's for different company's on each relevant boards. Of course you were more eager in those ''special news'' posting's on shares you were positioned in for a trade. I guess you have given up the news express for a more dull life, hanging around on delisted share boards for some type of self imposed gratification LOL.
So going by your 09.49am post... I was a holder of stock here pre-delist / suspension. I have spoken to amit a few times in the past, but never purchased any cheaper shares in any ipo fund raise. In fact I would never do so, but that's my own choice (I have enough already).
I have already made my ctag losses back over the last couple of years, trading on aim. Although I would be right over the moon if it gave a payday in the end.
So where am I classed in your jack a nory story below, as it does not follow your professional conclusion below does it.
Like it or not, something is happening in ctag, for shareholder, we all wish it is a return on investment. For your types, you obviously wish for the end to be painful for shareholders, whilst you laugh out load with satisfaction of a well called end game.
Let's see what happens soon, how I would love for this to come good, not only for the financial side of things :)
yes, very vocal & supportive, but without actually
giving any meaningful data / information/ links etc.
to back up their faux matey 'optimism'. ... the most
that they seem to offer is the idea that some of them
have been chatting with amit. (yikes!! ... on the whole,
if amit said A is the case, then i would assume Z is true.)
it seems that a few LTHs were encouraged to
put in more money into 'pre-IPO' via grooming
in private twitter / whatapp groups or similar...
membership of such groups can be carefully
controlled to exclude any meaningful doubts,
to help maintain the illusions being constructed.
but now that money has been squirrelled away or
spent on maintaining the insiders' lifestyles, they
probably want to tap up those same LTHs for yet
more. and so there is a need to try to create a
positive buzz on the board, & dismiss sceptics.
? how about, buyout by a marvellous new company,
let's call it 'amitsfriendsothercompany' for short,
based somewhere with minimal disclosure rules,
with CTAGers being offered paper in this shinynewco
in exchange for their old shares (i.e. a paper 'buyout')
but with the lucky, lucky opportunity to double up
their stake at a low, low price, by putting in some hard
cash into extra shares in 'amitsfriendsothercompany'?
other variants possible, of course.
which weekend sometime in dec 2020 or dec 2030
Wouldn't want to be out over the weekend...!
In Amit we trust!
Soon news...
...that I find potentially significant is the number of brand new and all of a sudden very vocal and supportive bulletin board IDs that pop up out of nowhere on CTAG, assuring one and all that things are about to become good. I note that this board newly has at least two of these, one joining 22 days ago on 30th June and the other even more fresh-faced, joining just 9 days ago on 13th July.
The last time this happened was just at the time of Amit's last "amazing pre-IPO opportunity" back in August last year.
Can't possibly imagine what's liable to happen next...