The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Observer, all your posts are very useful. I am still backing the product, its a fair point that products go through numerous trials and with all good intention and hardwork, luck plays a decent role. Eventually hardwork pays off. Setting technical members aside, if the boiler is good then to present it better or wrap it beautifully - outsource selling to a professional agency, offer them equity, make some noise then perhaps further funding might get easier
My take on the time issue @BrownAdder is that we very likely didn't get accreditation the last time round, which meant back to the drawing board addressing their concerns - which so happened gave us an opportunity to improve the efficiency and lower the costs. However, we then needed to test it for many many hours! So we tread water, waiting for it all to come together. Which it might be about to if you take a read through all my posts and connect the dots... I'm still buying and very happy to do so at these prices - but I know it's a gamble! ;-)
JG cant buy and not disclose. All director buys have to be made public immediately after the purchases - correct me if I am wrong. Unless someone is buying on his say - so which is even worse. This company is a good learning case for anyone new to markets. All the shades in business development are here to be studied and understood. If product is good then management is guilty (yes guilty) of not valuing TIME over money. Time must take priority or whole idea of efficiency goes out of window. It raises serious doubts on the mind of any prospective investor - To this end Banks / Angels / VCs will be seeking much much higher return. Then comes Equity or Loan ? Who would really partake money with Equity in INSP ? Loan ? Secured loans against what ? Company Property ? How much is that worth ? Not millions nothing cost millions in sheffield. Having said - There is still ways to mend this - get rid of useless expensive existing team - hire vibrant new blood at much less wages. Take the boiler to Scandinavia. Take it to rich sensible people who value life and see beyond others. Take it to Japan and South Korea. Sadly Europe and UK is rotten with paperwork, bureaucracy and mid-of-the-road mentality. Get some Young Blood FFS. SEND A SAMPLE TO UNHCR Chief ! SEND ONE to Governor of ALASKA. SEND ONE to Missuaga and Manitoba Board in Canada.
In terms of funding estimates and resulting market cap - it's worth taking a read through the align report - which I'm sure all long-term holders have: "Inspirit Energy - On the cusp of cogeneration commercialisation & trading at a fraction of replacement IP cost" (13th June 2016) http://www.alignresearch.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Inspirit-Energy-Align-Research-13th-June-2016-Final.pdf Bear in mind the share price when that was published has shrunken significantly from 0.41p. i.e. the upside is an order of magnitude greater than what even they were suggesting! In terms of amounts, they estimated around �1.5-2m would be sufficient to get to initial production leading to a market cap of potentially around �15m a year or two later. And in the years beyond that: $$$! Just one sniff of good news and this share will fly @FallingKnife. I hope you have you finger on the buy button should the day come: you might manage to get your hands on a few sell orders that don't get cancelled quickly enough on the rocket up, especially if it comes during trading hours, but other than that: who would sell anywhere near these levels on good funding news? :-) John Gunn, personally owns 30.95% of the company - and therefore has a very strong incentive to make it a success using whatever means available to him. Of course despite my optimism I should point out that the whole dream could have a rude awakening and us PI's lose everything. Though I think the win is sufficiently probable to continue to buy at these crazily low prices - which will only seem crazily low in hindsight to most if we get that all important funding! ;-) Fingers crossed all. Ob.
brexit was holding funding back .... shouldn't be a problem now me thinks :) then boom !!!!!!!
There's still unimaginable (read stupid) liquidity available for even half efficient products. Let's say boiler is better than others in its current stage of R+D. Either previous funding and its use has botched the directors of INSP. Its easy to back half a good product with view to improvement but impossible to back half decent management. Problem lies in management and not product. Any new finance would expect a much greater return and thus time-wasting management would worry about losing 10% equity ......and end up losing 100%. Thanks observer for the previous link regarding presentation of Marketing person, awaiting to see its public release.