Schroders Regulatory News (SOI)

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS

Schroder Oriental Income Fund Limited (the "Company") hereby submits its annual report and accounts for the year ended 31 August 2023. The Company's annual report and accounts for the year ended 31 August 2023 are also being published in hard copy format and an electronic copy will shortly be available to download from the Company's webpages schroders.co.uk/orientalincome. The annual report and accounts, containing the notice of annual general meeting, and the form of proxy will also be uploaded to the Financial Conduct Authority's National Storage Mechanism in the coming days, and a separate announcement will be released once this has taken place.

Please click on the following link to view the document:

http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/8598S_1-2023-11-8.pdf

Enquiries:

Matthew Riley

Schroder Investment Management Limited 

Chairman's statement

Dear Shareholder, I ended my last Chairman's Statement in the spring on a note of cautious optimism that the outlook for Asian equities was starting to brighten. Sadly, in the last six months anyway, the sun has not shone and the second half of our financial year saw modest declines in total returns. That brought the Net Asset Value ("NAV") total return for the full financial year to -3.5%, with a similar return from the share price. The bright spot is that this is, once again, a notable outperformance of the reference index, the MSCI AC Pacific ex Japan in sterling terms, which fell by 8.1% during the same period. It is also worth noting that the strength of sterling was a material contributory factor to the fall. After many years of decline, sterling strengthened significantly over the year and this erodes our total return once the local currency is translated back into sterling. Indeed, our underlying return in local currency terms was positive. We have cautioned in the past about the potential impact of sterling movements, which have often been favourable to our total returns. We do not seek to hedge or mitigate the influence of the sterling exchange rate; we see our job as investing in good quality Asian companies, not trading exchange rates. Since the summer, sterling has begun to weaken once again.

Before moving from performance, I need to commend our Investment Manager for achieving such consistent and considerable outperformance over recent years. The reasons for this year's outperformance are explained in the Investment Manager's Review on page 6. It is clear to me that Schroders apply considerable knowledge, experience and skill, as well as keeping a cool head. This is very valuable. The Board has recently had the benefit of seeing the substantial resources and expertise of Schroders in Asia when, for the first time since before the pandemic, we accompanied the Managers this summer to visit Schroders' offices and some of our investee companies in Hong Kong and Taiwan.

I hardly need to remind anyone of the various global macroeconomic and political headwinds which have troubled financial markets over the last year. Asia is not immune to any of these effects, especially with China now showing signs of economic strain. However, with the exception of some geopolitics and private sector debt issues in China, Asia is not at the epicentre of the pressures. The region is relatively well placed in terms of inflation, economic strength, interest rates, indebtedness and competitiveness. That Asia is vibrant and an economic powerhouse is something of a hackneyed phrase but the truth of this was brought home to the Board on our visit. It is too easy to slip into viewing Asia through a European lens.

Another interesting observation of our visit was the extent of meaningful implementation around sustainability amongst many of our portfolio companies. It was genuinely impressive. Perhaps it was, again, my European perspective but my impression prior to the visit was that Asia was, generally, lagging Europe and the US in this regard. This is far from the truth, at least as far as our portfolio companies are concerned.

In the same vein, shifting political sands in the US, enhanced regulatory scrutiny in Europe and a tougher economic environment has seen less enthusiasm from global investors for "pure play" Environmental, Social and Governance ("ESG") investing. However, as an integrated input to investment decision making, ESG factors remain valuable. Schroders has long had many aspects of ESG at the heart of their process, indeed before anyone thought of combining three disparate words into one concept and giving it an acronym. Today, their approach remains as valid as ever. The Company seeks to buy businesses that have an attractive income proposition as well as offering the opportunity for capital growth. Schroders' approach naturally guides us to invest in businesses that are truly sustainable in the broadest sense of the word, rather than ones that merely espouse targets for the future. Picking these quality companies is at the heart of what the team at Schroders seeks to do and is evidenced in our current portfolio. This integrated approach to ESG is also, I believe, a meaningful contributor to our strong long-term performance. More information around Schroders' approach to ESG can be found on pages 17 to 21.

Some of you will have seen our announcement on 3 August 2023 of the forthcoming retirement from the Board of Kate Cornish-Bowden. Schroders are being appointed as investment manager of the International Biotechnology Trust ("IBT") and her role as chair of IBT means that she has felt that she should resign from our board to ensure that perceptions of her independence are not compromised. We respect this but will really miss Kate, her experience, knowledge and good humour. I can also assure Shareholders of this company and of IBT that no one should doubt her independence of mind. The Board has commenced a succession process and we will make an announcement in due course.

In line with the broader investment trust industry, the Company's shares continue to trade at a discount to NAV. The Board believes that the discount is unwarranted given the Company's performance and the liquidity of our underlying portfolio. Perhaps, though, at a time of sharply widening discounts across the investment trust universe, we may have to be patient before we see ours eliminated once again. During the course of the year, a total of 8,010,000 shares were repurchased at an average discount of 5.2% to NAV, with further purchases of 2,220,000 shares since the financial year end. Please be assured that we remain committed to repurchasing shares at a discount when there is a notable imbalance in the market and it is in Shareholders' best interests.

I have already touched on the impact of sterling on our total return for the period. It has the same impact on our dividend receipts which in sterling terms have fallen a little this year, though were higher in local currency terms. We have continued to grow our own dividend to Shareholders progressively for 17 years and the current dividend yield on our share price is approximately 5%. As the global economy begins to slow, we may consequently see some slowdown in dividend growth from our portfolio companies. However, it is important to remember that payout ratios in Asia are modest so our companies are not under financial pressure. Our Manager is not forecasting notable falls in receipts. The Company also has considerable revenue reserves. Any slowing in our dividend receipts is likely to be transitory and we are comfortable, as and when we need to, to dip into our reserves for a short time to maintain or grow our own dividend to Shareholders. For this last financial year we have increased the dividend by 3.5% to 11.80 pence per share.

Finally, I wanted to touch on the merits of an income orientation to investment in Asia. Many managers seek to find the next big growth winner in the pursuit of returns. Some will succeed, for some of the time. I believe that an income orientation brings natural benefits, that this has contributed to the Company's strong long-term performance and that attractive income from growing companies need not come at the cost of reduced total return. The income universe available to our Managers provides fertile territory for their true strength - stock selection - and it is a universe that is less volatile than many of the low yielding, cyclical and growth areas of the market. The strong dividend income available in Asia, its low payout ratios and the current undemanding valuations across the region suggest to me that the attractive long-term performance achieved for Shareholders to date is sustainable in the future. Once again, I look forward with modest optimism. The vagaries of financial markets may prove me wrong for another six months, perhaps longer. But, eventually, the fundamentals of the region, its companies and their strong dividend growth will once again attract international capital. The Company is well placed to benefit from that trend when it arrives.

Our investment managers, Richard Sennitt and Abbas Barkhordar will be giving presentations at an investor webinar on Wednesday 29 November 2023 at 2.00 pm (which can be signed up to via the following link: https://www.schroders.events/SOI23).

The Company's Annual General Meeting ("AGM") will be held at 2pm on Monday 4 December at 1 London Wall Place, London, EC2Y 5AU.

The Company's Investment Managers and the Board will attend to make a presentation and answer questions from Shareholders. I encourage all of you to join us, and hope to meet you then. I also look forward to reporting to you again in the interim financial statements next spring.

Paul MeaderChairman

8 November 2023

Investment Manager's Review

The net asset value per share of the Company recorded a total return of -3.5% over the 12 months to end August 2023. Four interim dividends have been declared totalling 11.80p (11.40p last year).

Asian markets experienced huge swings in sentiment over the 12 months to end August, largely driven by gyrations in expectations for the Chinese domestic economy, the impact of geopolitics, including over Ukraine, Taiwan and US-China relations, and the outlook for the global economy, with the path of US interest rates of particular importance. Despite this litany of concerns, the region's markets rose by around 1.9% in local terms, albeit the strength of sterling meant they finished down some 8.1% over the period in sterling terms.

However, across the region there were large differences in returns. China and Hong Kong were very volatile but ended down the most over the period. We saw large falls in both markets during the fourth quarter of last year in the run up to, and post, the Communist Party Congress before seeing a dramatic recovery driven by the Chinese authorities' move away from 'Zero COVID'. However, optimism faded when economic data, whilst generally showing an improvement, disappointed expectations. High-end spending and services consumption did much better when compared to the wider economy, but even that was lacklustre. Residential property numbers continued to disappoint and renewed concerns over the state of the Local Government Financing Vehicles' ("LGFVs") finances, and some of the private residential developers' liquidity positions, weighed on the market. During July, the Chinese market recovered on expectations of a sizeable stimulus, but measures announced thus far have been modest.

US-China relations continued to be a driver of sentiment over the period but, on balance, did see some stabilisation during the year. Positives included the G-20 meeting in Bali, where presidents Xi and Biden met face-to-face, and progress from the US PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) inspection of Chinese accounts. Although "balloon gate", together with more restrictions on the export of high-end technologies to China, did sour relations, there has more recently been increased dialogue between the two, with meetings between US and Chinese officials at a number of levels.

Furthermore, domestically in China, there was a shift in tone around regulation towards the internet companies, together with further announcements of government support for the private sector, leading to hopes that the worst of the regulatory tightening had been seen.

The best performing markets over the period were Korea and Taiwan. These are markets that have high weightings in the information technology ("IT") sector, which was the best performing sector over the period. Post-COVID, the IT sector had seen a slowdown as demand for goods faded as people switched to consuming more services. This slowdown had led to an increase in inventories and acted as an overhang for the sector. However, this then elicited a supply-side response by these companies to the lower demand, seeing them cut both production and capital expenditure which has seen the inventory imbalance start to correct, lifting stock prices. More recently, some of these have benefitted from the hope that artificial intelligence ("AI") would drive a surge in demand for increased computing power.

Despite the deteriorating outlook for global growth, inflation pressures remained elevated for much of the year and financial conditions generally tightened. Of the major markets, Australia and Singapore proved defensive, with resource companies in Australia and financials in Singapore performing relatively well. From a sector perspective, materials were supported by higher-for-longer commodity prices, with higher interest rates supportive of financials. Defensive sectors generally underperformed over the period.

Turning to dividends - last financial year, there was a broad-based pick up in dividends, but this year has been more mixed, with dividends in some areas such as the Australian resource names (and other more cyclical1 areas) coming down as falls in underlying commodity prices saw profits retreat from high levels. Financials, on the other hand, saw the banks benefit as interest rates rose, helping both margins and earnings and enabling higher dividends. However, from a Company perspective, the main headwind for dividends came from the appreciation of sterling during the course of the year which made gains against most of the region's currencies, thus impacting the translation from local currencies back into sterling.

Positioning and Performance

Although the Company's NAV fell over the period, with a NAV total return of -3.5%, this compared favourably to the fall in the reference benchmark of -8.1%. Relative performance over the period was helped by the underweight to, and strong stock selection in, China. Stocks in the insurance sector there, such as our holdings in China Pacific Insurance and Ping An, were perceived to be beneficiaries of the move away from 'Zero COVID', as it would enable sales agents to conduct more face-to-face meetings which had been constrained during COVID. Also, although the private sector residential property developers had been hit hard by the weak property market, our holding in China Resources Land substantially outperformed, with its investment properties providing a recurring income stream which, together with its relatively robust balance sheet, proved defensive. An absence of the e-commerce names, who pay little or no dividends, was also a positive, as was not holding any of the healthcare names, given a large number derated meaningfully over the year.

Our stock picks in Taiwan added value, led by the IT names. These included semiconductor packaging company ASE, fabless design house Novatek, and power electronics company Delta Electronics, whose products have benefitted from the positive trends in AI and EVs. There was also a positive contribution from stocks in Australia, driven by the diversified resource names. The biggest drag on performance came from the overweight to, and stock selection in Hong Kong, albeit its negative impact was much smaller than the positive one derived from our positioning in China. The two biggest detractors in Hong Kong were our positions in Bank of China (Hong Kong) and telecom company HK Telecom.

From a sector perspective, stock picks in the financials sector did well, including banks in Singapore (Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation and United Overseas Bank ("UOB")), Bank Mandiri in Indonesia and our holding in out-of-benchmark SMFG in Japan. Our underweights to consumer discretionary and some of the more defensive sectors, such as healthcare, utilities and staples, all added value. Our overweight to IT names also contributed positively, as described earlier. Our overweight to real estate was a negative - although this was almost entirely offset by strong selection including from our holdings in Singapore, Australia and China. Our overweight to Hong Kong real estate was a drag, where our exposure is predominantly to landlords operating in mainland China as well as Hong Kong. Given their exposure to retail spend via their malls, disappointment in the consumer recovery weighed on share prices.

The geographic exposure in the Company's portfolio continues to be mainly spread between Taiwan, Australia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea and China. Over the period, we did add to positions in China and Hong Kong, including insurance (China Pacific Insurance Company) and other financial names (Hong Kong Exchange) which we believe would benefit from the ending of Chinese 'Zero COVID' policy, but which were not excessively valued in our view. China remains a substantial underweight but is, in part, offset by the overweight to Hong Kong. We believe the Hong Kong market, in general, looks more attractive from a valuation perspective, with several names set to benefit from the re-opening of the border with the mainland. Elsewhere, we reduced Singapore, reducing our exposure to some of the REIT names there which had performed well and will see costs rise along with interest rates, as well as cutting our position in UOB, a bank that had outperformed. However, we remain overweight the market. We also took some money out of some of the better performing Taiwanese IT names, as well as selling out of Far EasTone, a telecom company that had performed strongly.

We continued in aggregate to add to financials, where we are overweight, with valuations still looking relatively attractive given higher interest rates and subdued credit costs. Here, we added to Chinese names, as described earlier in this report. We also reduced the overweight to real estate, trimming names that had performed strongly across the region, and in IT as described above. Although near term earnings have been seeing downward revisions, we continue to see some strong long-term drivers for growth around digitisation, AI adoption, and the roll-out of 5G and 'Internet of Things'. In IT, our focus remains on the Taiwanese and Korean companies.

The other area where we have reduced exposure is in the materials sector. Here, sales have been focussed in the Australian names earlier in the period after the sector had performed strongly, in part helped by the surge in commodity prices.

Investment Outlook

The euphoria seen in markets at the beginning of 2023 over China's move away from its 'Zero COVID' policy feels like a distant memory, as China's long awaited post-COVID recovery has proved weaker than expected. Economic data out of China, and a lack of forceful policy response, has been disappointing, reigniting concerns over local government debts and the wider residential property sector. This has overshadowed more positive global developments stemming from more favourable US inflation data, its knock-on to the US interest rate cycle, and potential for a soft landing in the US. There are some signs that the inventory cycle has started to bottom, potentially pointing to a more favourable demand outlook. Rising demand for Asian manufactured product has historically led to a resurgence in Asian markets. However, as already highlighted, geopolitics remains an overhang to the region with areas of tension including US-China, Taiwan, Ukraine and the Middle East. The electoral cycle is a likely point of focus with both the US and Taiwan having elections next year. Overall earnings have continued to be revised down following a reset to China and global growth expectations, leaving aggregate valuations broadly in line with their longer-term averages. However, this masks a large variation across individual markets where Singapore and Hong Kong, amongst others, look relatively cheap versus history.

Although we did not have an optimistic view on the growth outlook for China, it has still managed to disappoint. This has brought renewed focus back on to the residential property sector, where private sector developers have seen a liquidity squeeze, as sales have continued to disappoint impacting cashflow for the whole sector. The recent negative headlines around Chinese property developers such as Country Garden could cause further deterioration in homebuyers' sentiment and financing capabilities for other private sector developers, indirectly raising the risk of more defaults in the industry going forward. We expect policy easing, both on the demand and supply sides, to intensify to avoid more defaults and any wider impact on the financial sector. Our long-term concerns around the structural headwinds for the residential sector remain - property is likely to be less of a driver for the economy than in the past, given the already high levels of residential investment combined with an ageing demographic. Near term, we believe it is a lack of consumer confidence that is the problem rather than an inability to spend due to high borrowings. In fact, household balance sheets have only strengthened over the last two years, due to high levels of precautionary savings, and it is measures to address this, such as progress on reforms, rather than a massive fiscal stimulus which is needed to give the consumer greater confidence to spend more. Nevertheless, in our view it is likely we will see further government stimulus, on top of the piecemeal measures we have seen so far. More positively, the regulatory backdrop doesn't appear to be getting worse and there are even tentative signs of re-engagement between the US and China. Despite this, we remain very underweight combined Hong Kong and China, albeit we have been selectively looking to add to holdings in both markets where valuations have come back. We are more positive on Hong Kong, where valuations are lower and the SAR should see a recovery as the border with the mainland has reopened. Although visitor numbers to Hong Kong and Macau have picked-up materially, one needs to remain cognisant of the potential for tighter capital controls by the Chinese government should external balances become too wide.

Sector-wise, IT stocks, where we have been overweight, are still trading at relatively attractive levels from a valuation perspective, in our view. While the visibility of demand remains low, the supply side adjustment is starting to take place as announcements on production and capital expenditure cuts have started to be seen and inventories appear to be peaking. Otherwise, we remain overweight to financials - a diverse sector spanning not only banks, but also insurers and exchange companies. Although we saw concern over banks earlier in the year following the Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse collapses, the banks we own are generally well-capitalised with strong deposit franchises and fall into two camps: those that are benefitting from increased credit penetration, such as in Indonesia, and the more domestically-focussed retail names in more mature markets, such as Singapore, that in general trade at attractive valuations and decent dividend yields.

We remain overweight real estate with our broad thesis around our holdings here remaining unchanged, focusing on landlords, rather than developers, and those names with strong recurring income growth and thus dividend appeal. We have, however, cut the size of our overweight during the year and we have roughly half our exposure coming from Hong Kong and China names, with the rest from a few other countries including Singapore and Australia. We do not own any of the Chinese private sector residential developers.

Underweights remain in those areas of the market generally perceived as more defensive, including consumer staples, healthcare and utilities, where valuations in our view still remain relatively full.

Near term, it is likely that we will see further downward revisions to earnings as global growth slows, and an ongoing period of inventory adjustment amongst companies to reflect this slower growth, which will hopefully put them in a position to start to grow earnings once more when demand recovers. Positively, we are starting to see early indicators of a potential bottoming in the global goods cycle with -purchasing managers' indices showing tentative signs of improvement in inventories and new orders which historically, with a lag, have been a good lead indicator of exports. The distortion in the goods cycle from COVID was significant, with goods demand collapsing, post its surge in 2020, as services recovered, meaning that the goods cycle is much progressed when compared to that of services. Given overall aggregate valuations for the region are now trading at or below long-term averages, this does set up a more constructive backdrop for Asian markets in the coming year, barring a global hard landing or a more extreme geopolitical risk event.

As we have discussed previously, it is our belief that Asia remains an attractive source of equity income, potentially providing diversification for some UK investors seeking income, as we saw through the initial wave of COVID. The dividend yield for the region looks relatively attractive at the moment versus a global benchmark. In the medium to long term, dividends tend to follow earnings and earnings have recovered materially from the COVID lows. However, earnings growth this year is likely to face some ongoing pressures, as has been seen in earnings revisions trends, which may impact dividends. Still, we believe overall payout ratios in Asia do not look extended versus some other markets and corporates in Asia remain relatively lowly geared. The arguably more significant impact on dividends received comes from the level of sterling, which was quite strong over the period, and thus a headwind. At the time of writing, we had seen some reversal in sterling's strength, partly due to an expectation that UK rates could potentially be peaking. This would reduce these pressures if the trend were to persist.

To conclude, it is worth remembering that as investors we buy companies, not countries. We are mindful of the impact political and macroeconomic factors can have on equities and returns, but we are bottom-up stock-pickers first and foremost, focusing on the company's return prospects and valuation. We do not try to pick companies which will do well based purely on a particular macro environment which we have forecast; rather we try to pick well-managed companies with attractive distribution profiles, which have structural advantages.

Sectoral breakdown of portfolio (gearing* at 4.4%)

*Borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash, expressed as a percentage of net assets.

Source: Schroders as at 31 August 2023

Regional breakdown of portfolio (gearing* at 4.4%)

*Borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash, expressed as a percentage of net assets.

Source: Schroders as at 31 August 2023

Schroder Investment Management Limited8 November 2023

Past Performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.

Schroder Oriental Income Fund Limited

Investment Portfolio At 31 August 2023

Investments are classified by the Manager in the region or country of their main business operations or listing. Stocks in bold are the 20 largest investments, which by value account for 57.9% (2022: 59.5%) of total investments and derivative financial instruments.

1 Listed in UK

2 Listed in Luxembourg

3 Listed in Hong Kong

4 Total investments comprises:

*NVDR means non-voting depositary receipts

^REIT means real estate investment trust

Ten-Year Financial Record

Investment Portfolio At 31 August 2023

1 Borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash, expressed as a percentage of net assets.

2 Ongoing Charges represents the management fee and all other operating expenses excluding finance costs, transaction costs and any performance fee payable, expressed as a percentage of the average daily net asset values during the year.

3 Source: Morningstar. Rebased to 100 at 31 August 2013.

Business Review

Business model

The Company is a listed investment trust that has outsourced its operations to third party service providers.

The Board has appointed the Manager, Schroder Unit Trusts Limited, to implement the investment strategy and to manage the Company's assets in line with the appropriate restrictions placed on it by the Board, including limits on the type and relative size of holdings which may be held in the portfolio and on the use of gearing, cash, derivatives and other financial instruments as appropriate.

The terms of the appointment are described more completely in the Directors' Report including delegation to the portfolio manager and their team. The Manager also promotes the Company using its sales and marketing teams. The Board and Manager work together to deliver the Company's investment objective, as demonstrated in the diagram above.

Investment objective

The investment objective of the Company is to provide a total return for investors primarily through investments in equities and equity-related investments, of companies which are based in, or which derive a significant proportion of their revenues from, the Asia Pacific region and which offer attractive yields.

Investment policy

The investment policy of the Company is to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments, primarily equities and equity-related investments, of companies which are based in, or derive a significant proportion of their revenues from, the Asia Pacific region. The portfolio is diversified across a number of industries and a number of countries in that region. The portfolio may include government, quasi-government, corporate and high yield bonds and preferred shares.

Equity-related investments which the Company may hold include investments in other collective investment undertakings (including real estate investment trusts and related stapled securities), warrants, depository receipts, participation certificates, guaranteed performance bonds, convertible bonds, other debt securities, equity-linked notes and similar instruments (whether or not investment grade) which give the Company access to the performance of underlying equity securities, particularly where the Company may be restricted from directly investing in such underlying equity securities or where the Investment Manager considers that there are benefits to the Company in holding such investments instead of directly holding the relevant underlying equity securities. Such investments may be listed or traded outside the Asia Pacific region. Such investments may subject the Company to credit risk against the issuing entity. The Company may also participate, subject to regulatory and tax implications, in debt-to-equity conversion programmes.

The Investment Manager may consider writing calls over some of the Company's holdings, as a low risk way of enhancing the returns from the portfolio. The Board has set a limit such that covered calls cannot be written over portfolio holdings representing in excess of 15%, of gross assets. However, the Company may only invest in derivatives for the purposes of efficient portfolio management. Investors should note that the types of equity-related investments listed in this paragraph are not exhaustive of all of the types of securities and financial instruments in which the Company may invest, and the Company will retain the flexibility to make any investments unless these are prohibited by the investment restrictions applicable to the Company.

Although the Company has the flexibility to invest in bonds and preferred shares as described above, the intention of the directors is that the assets of the Company which are invested (that is to say, which are not held in cash, money funds, debt securities, interest bearing gilts or treasuries) will predominantly comprise Asia Pacific equities and equity-related investments. The Company is required to obtain the prior approval of the Ordinary Shareholders to any material change to its published investment policy.

Status

The Company carries on business as a Guernsey incorporated, Guernsey Financial Services Commission authorised, closed-ended investment company. Its shares are listed and admitted to trading on the premium segment of the main market of the London Stock Exchange. The Company was added to the FTSE 250 index on 17 September 2019.

On 1 September 2020, following approval by the Company's Shareholders at a general meeting, the Company became tax resident in the United Kingdom and since then it has been approved by HM Revenue & Customs, by way of a one-off application, as an investment trust in accordance with section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. It is intended that the Company will continue to conduct its affairs in a manner which will enable it to retain this status. The Company is not a "close" company for taxation purposes.

It is not intended that the Company should have a limited life, and the articles of incorporation do not contain any provisions for review of the future of the Company at specified intervals.

Purpose, values and culture

The Company's purpose is to create long-term shareholder value, in line with the investment objective.

The Company's culture is driven by its values: transparency, engagement and rigour, with collegial behaviour and constructive, robust challenge. The values are all centred on achieving returns for Shareholders in line with the Company's investment objective. The Board also promotes the effective management or mitigation of the risks faced by the Company and aims to structure the Company's operations with regard to all its stakeholders and take account of the impact of the Company's operations on the environment and community.

Acting with high standards of integrity and transparency, the Board is committed to encouraging a culture that is responsive to the views of Shareholders and its wider stakeholders.

As the Company has no employees and acts through its service providers, its culture is represented by the values and behaviour of the Board and third parties to which it delegates. The Board aims to fulfil the Company's investment objective by encouraging a culture of constructive challenge with the key suppliers and openness with all stakeholders. The Board is responsible for embedding the Company's culture in the Company's operations. The Board recognises the Company's responsibilities with respect to corporate and social responsibility and engages with its outsourced service providers to safeguard the Company's interests. As part of this ongoing monitoring, the Board receives reporting from its service providers with respect to their anti-bribery and corruption policies; Modern Slavery Act 2015 statements; diversity policies; and greenhouse gas and energy usage reporting.

Key performance indicators ("KPIs")

The investment objective

The Board measures the development and success of the Company's business through achievement of the Company's investment objective, to provide a total return for investors primarily through investments in equities in the Asia Pacific region, which is considered to be the most significant key performance indicator for the Company.

Commentary on performance against the investment objective can be found in the Chairman's Statement.

At each meeting, the Board considers a number of performance indicators to assess the Company's success in achieving its investment objective. These are as follows: NAV total return; share price total return; share price discount/premium to NAV per share and ongoing charges. These are classed as Alternative Performance Measures ("APMs") and their calculations are explained in more detail on pages 75 and 76.

The performance against these indicators is reported on page 13.

Net asset value and share price total return

At each meeting, the Board reviews the performance of the portfolio in detail and discusses the views of the portfolio managers with them.

Share price discount/premium to net asset value per share

The Board reviews the level of discount/premium to net asset value per share at every board meeting and is alert to the value Shareholders place on maintaining as low a level of discount/premium volatility as possible.

The Board actively used its buyback authorities during the year under review and agreed to request renewal of the authorities to issue and buyback shares as described on page 72.

Ongoing charges

The Board reviews the Company's ongoing charges to ensure that the total costs incurred by Shareholders in the running of the Company remain competitive when measured against peer group funds. An analysis of the Company's costs, including management and performance fees, directors' fees and general expenses, is submitted to each board meeting. Management and any performance fees payable are reviewed at least annually.

Dividends payable

It is the Board's policy that, except for unforeseen circumstances, interim dividends on the Company's ordinary shares will be declared in respect of the quarters ended 30 November, 28 February, 31 May and 31 August in January, April/May, July and October/November each year.

Having already paid interim dividends amounting to 6.00 pence per share, the Board has declared a fourth interim dividend of 5.80 pence per share for the year ended 31 August 2023, which is payable on 1 December 2023 to shareholders on the register on 17 November 2023. Thus, dividends for the year amount to 11.80 pence (2022: 11.40 pence) per share. This represents an increase of 3.5% over the rate of dividends payable in respect of the previous year.

Total dividends declared in respect of the year amount to £30,059,448, which is 99% of the £30,398,792 revenue profit after taxation available for distribution. Accordingly, the Company will be able to add £339,344 to brought forward revenue reserves. However in accordance with accounting standards, the fourth interim dividend amounting to £14,685,195 will not be accounted for until it is has been paid.

Risk factors

In addition to the performance indicators set out above, the Board also monitors risk factors relating to investment performance on a quarterly basis.

Investment process

The chart below details the Manager's investment process.

Portfolio construction

Stock selection is at the heart of the investment approach for the Company. A key strength of the Manager is its network of analysts in Asia whose focus is on identifying companies able to grow shareholder value in the long term. Although the in-house analysts are the primary source of stock ideas, the portfolio managers also generate stock ideas through their own research and draw on a number of other sources including other investment professionals within Schroders, a proprietary quantitative screen and sell-side analysts.

The investment approach is primarily bottom-up, driven by an assessment of the financial and non-financial (including ESG) factors which influence company returns. In addition, there is a top-down regional allocation review process, carried out on a monthly basis, combining the output of an in-house quantitative model and the qualitative views of the Manager.

Stock research

The Manager believes that the best way to generate alpha over the long term is to focus on fundamental bottom-up stock analysis. In particular, the Manager's analytical focus is on the future trend in a company's return on invested capital ("ROIC") relative to its cost of capital, in the belief that this reflects the attractiveness and sustainability of the business model and serves as a predictor of long-term shareholder returns.

Given this focus on fundamental research, it forms a key input into the Manager's stock selection decisions. The Manager has 40 dedicated equity analysts across the Asia Pacific ex Japan region, who have an average of over 16 years' investment experience, 8 of which have been gained at Schroders (as at 30 September 2023). As a result of their level of experience, these analysts have an exceptional knowledge of Asian markets and the companies within them. The foundation of the Manager's internal research is a programme of regional company contacts each year (over 2,300 for calendar year 2022), with the majority of Schroders' analysis being done using internal research and company valuation models.

This is supplemented by other resources across the Schroders group including the ESG and Investment Insight Unit teams as well as other equity teams focussed on Global and Emerging markets.

Stock selection/portfolio construction

When constructing the portfolio for the Company, the Manager focuses on the following factors:

? conviction on investment thesis;

? upside to the internal estimate of fair value;

? any grade awarded by Schroders' analysts;

? ability to increase or sustain dividend payout;

? relative attractiveness of other available opportunities;

? the risks to the investment case;

? the ESG credentials of that company; and

? the sustainability of that company's profits.

Many of the stocks will already have attractive yields, but the Manager also looks to exploit opportunities in stocks which are set to benefit from improving capital efficiency, rising returns and increasing shareholder distributions. There is no minimum yield requirement applied to every stock, but portfolio construction is carried out with reference to the overall portfolio yield as a key part of the Company's total return investment objective.

Integration of ESG into the investment process

ESG is integrated into the investment process through three levels: The activities undertaken more widely by the Manager (Schroders), those undertaken by the Manager in the Asia region, and those undertaken by the Manager on behalf of the Company.

How are ESG factors incorporated into the investment process?

Schroders has been considering Environmental, Social and Governance ("ESG") issues, and sustainability generally, for over 20 years, as detailed in the timeline below

For a long time, the Manager has incorporated into its decision-making a thorough assessment of management quality, environmental, social and governance factors, whether implicitly or explicitly. The Manager recognises the importance of appraising both financial and non-financial factors when analysing a company and its security. The Manager believes that integrating an analysis and evaluation of ESG factors in the security valuation and selection process is key to enhancing and protecting long-term shareholder value. The appraisal of non-financial factors, including ESG considerations, contributes to a better understanding of a company's risk characteristics and return potential.

Schroders has a team of more than 50 dedicated ESG professionals (as at 30 September 2023) who develop proprietary ESG tools and oversee ESG analysis across Schroders. The ESG specialists will also engage directly with companies, prioritising those with exposure to higher ESG risk and low ESG ratings. They attend company meetings with portfolio managers and analysts to discuss specific sustainability issues directly with company management, in addition to financial performance, as well as engaging with company sustainability experts directly.

Corporate Governance Analysts in the team will also work alongside investors, and our internal compliance and legal teams to ensure our voting activities comply with our ESG policy.

Asia ex Japan ESG analysis in practice2

As long-term, bottom-up investors, assessing the sustainability of a company's returns and financial position has always been at the core of research and investment decisions the Manager makes in Asia. Consistent with this approach, Schroders engages with company management teams (Schroders conducted over 2,300 meetings with regional companies in 2022) as well as voting all proxies where practically possible. Analysts are directly responsible for assessing ESG risks and opportunities as we believe they are best placed to understand their companies and determine the impact of ESG issues on the sustainability of the business.

ESG analysis is an integrated and important part of the investment process, from initial screening through to final portfolio construction. ESG analysis impacts the investment process in four direct ways:

1. Initial screening - ESG helps determine which companies are considered to be investable as part of an initial screening.

2. Sustainability of earnings - ESG analysis helps assess the impact ESG externalities may have on the future earnings power of the business and with it the Manager's assessment of the return on invested capital ("ROIC") and shareholder return classification ("SRC") of the company.

3. Fair Value and recommendation - ESG is an indirect and direct input into our fair value estimate of a company. Indirect, to the extent that a company's SRC may influence the assumptions used in establishing the fair value estimate of a company; and direct, to the extent that analysts may apply an additional explicit discount/premium to that fair value estimate.

4. Portfolio construction - ESG helps shape portfolio construction and may influence position sizes. For example, poor ESG performance or heightened ESG risks may result in a decision to underweight a security, hold a smaller position size or avoid an investment completely. There is no automatic rule - each investment opportunity is assessed on a case-by-case basis, with the focus on the materiality of ESG factors on a company's valuation and risk profile.

In summary, ESG analysis helps determine which companies the Manager looks at, how their sustainability is assessed and hence how the Manager values them. While company valuations ultimately drive portfolio construction, ESG insights play a crucial role in the investment process and influence how we size position sizes within a portfolio. Furthermore, ESG analysis is broad-reaching: the Manager is not only interested in the potential downside risks but also the upside return implications.

Asian equity analysts are expected to provide written ESG analysis for all companies under coverage. This identifies and assesses the potential effect of ESG issues on the investment case.

Schroders uses its proprietary tools such as Context and Sustainex Asia Context. The latter of these, which is the principal tool employed, captures the Manager's ESG analysis in one template using a stakeholder-based framework and is a key step in the overall assessment of a company. In addition to separate rankings for 'E', 'S' & 'G', Asia Context generates an overall score for each company's ESG attributes.

Schroders has always engaged with investee companies, and direct company contact is an important component of the initial due diligence and ongoing monitoring process. The Asia Context template provides a clearer, and broader, roadmap on the issues requiring engagement. It also helps refresh the team's focus on ROIC and enhances appreciation of the downside and upside risks to a company's business model. The analysts have the option to apply an explicit discount or premium to their fair value estimate as a result of their ESG analysis.

One of the Asian Equities team's greatest strengths is experienced analysts working hand-in-hand with experienced fund managers - often involving discussions from the beginning to the end of the research on a company. Many of Schroders' fund managers are ex-analysts and they are heavily involved in the discussions that underpin ESG conclusions - especially given the inherent subjectivity of how certain ESG considerations will impact a company. Analysts are not expected to score our Asia Context templates in isolation - in many instances the team builds a consensus on which issues to address and how to score them.

The Context Framework:

Understanding how a company manages it relationships with stakeholders

To enhance the Asian team's ESG expertise, two members of the Sustainable Investment team are based in Asia, supporting the investment team and ensuring they are kept fully informed of the relevant output of the Sustainable Investment team in London. A Sustainable Equity Analyst on the team brings additional insight and perspective to ESG analysis and engagement.

In addition the Asian investment team collaborates with the Sustainable Investment team, both formally and informally participating, for instance, in a monthly ESG conference call together with other investors globally to discuss topical issues as well as ESG best practice.

So what is the outcome for the Company?

In the Manager's view, the Schroders approach to ESG described above results in a portfolio that is less likely to be exposed to areas that could be deemed 'sensitive' from an ESG perspective. Where there is 'sensitivity', it is more likely to be in markets that are generally well regulated and focused on the better practitioners. It should be noted that the Manager does not screen out all companies in sensitive sectors1, rather the process results in a much higher hurdle for stocks to get into the portfolio than might otherwise be the case. Below is a table that covers some of the more 'sensitive' sectors and our exposure to them. Exposure to the more sensitive areas is limited.

1 Schroders applies group-level exclusions to all Schroders funds that are directly managed. These group-level exclusions relate to controversial weapons and companies that generate more than 20% of their revenues from thermal coal mining. Details can be found at the following link Group exclusions | Schroders global

Several of these industries are traditionally prominent in income funds, as they typically contain many companies with high dividend yields. The portfolio managers' approach, however, has been to take a cautious approach to exposure in those companies which, while they may be paying attractive dividends currently, are not always operating in a sustainable way which could potentially impact future earnings and by extension dividend payments.

The Manager has tended, therefore, to take exposure to these industries through the higher quality names, operating in well regulated markets. For example, while they believe commodity resources will continue to be necessary in future (and indeed crucial for a transition to a lower carbon world), the exposure to this sector is through blue-chip Australian companies, rather than more marginal miners in emerging countries. Similarly, for the real estate sector, the exposure is largely through companies which have a focus on strong governance, operating in the most well-regulated markets in the region. For some sectors (e.g. tobacco or thermal coal), the Manager's requirement for operations to be sustainable in the long term is a high hurdle to clear, regardless of the governance or regulatory frameworks a company is operating under, so exposure has tended to be very limited there.

Active Ownership

Schroders has a long history of engagement and active ownership, engaging with companies on ESG related matters for the past two decades. Active ownership is a key channel of influence on management teams and a mechanism that allows for more sustainable practices to be properly considered in managing the investee companies. Schroders aims to drive change to better protect and enhance the value of clients' investments. Schroders is committed to leveraging its influence as an investor to change how a company operates for the better. These regular engagements form an important aspect of Schroders' role as stewards of clients' capital and allows deployment of capital in businesses with long-term sustainability of returns and shareholder value creation.

Engagement in practice

It should be remembered that the Manager is not an 'activist' investor, and in general is looking to buy into companies that are already well?managed with decent governance and attractive distribution profiles. However, this does not mean that there is not still room for engagement, particularly when thinking about sustainability issues and the evolution of a longer-term investment thesis. Where appropriate engagements can focus on a number of different areas, including Climate Change, Diversity and Inclusion, Natural Capital and Biodiversity, Human Rights, Human Capital Management and Corporate Governance.

As an illustration, although financial companies don't necessarily spring to mind when it comes to engagement on areas such as climate change, it is a relevant topic and Schroders engages with banks, for instance on their approach to lending to climate sensitive areas. For example, Schroders started engaging with United Overseas Bank ("UOB") in Singapore on this topic back in 2019 and the chart on the next page highlights those and other engagements with the company since then.

Further disclosures

Investment restrictions and spread of investment risk

Risk in relation to the Company's investments is spread as a result of the Manager monitoring the Company's portfolio with a view to ensuring that it retains an appropriate balance to meet the Company's investment objective. In order to comply with the Listing Rules, the Company will not invest more than 10%, in aggregate, of the value of its total assets (calculated at the time of any relevant investment) in other investment companies or investment trusts which are listed on the Official List of the Financial Conduct Authority (the "Official List") (save to the extent that those investment companies or investment trusts have stated investment policies to invest no more than 15% of their gross assets in other investment companies or investment trusts which are listed on the Official List). Additionally, the Company will not:

(i) invest more than 15% of its gross assets in other investment companies or investment trusts which are listed on the Official List;

(ii) invest, either directly or indirectly, or lend more than 20% (calculated at the time of any relevant investment or loan) of its gross assets to any single underlying issuer (including the underlying issuer's subsidiaries or affiliates);

(iii) invest more than 20% (calculated at the time of any relevant investment) of its gross assets in one or more collective investment undertakings which may invest more than 20% of its gross assets in other collective investment undertakings;

(iv) invest more than 40% (calculated at the time of any relevant investment) of its gross assets in another collective investment undertaking;

(v) expose more than 20% of its gross assets to the creditworthiness or solvency of any one counterparty;

(vi) invest in physical commodities; or

(vii) invest in derivatives except for the purposes of efficient portfolio management.

In the event of any breach of the investment restrictions applicable to the Company, shareholders will be informed of the actions to be taken by the Manager by notice sent to the registered addresses of the shareholders in accordance with the Company's articles of incorporation or by an announcement issued through a regulatory information service approved by the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"). No breaches of these investment restrictions occurred during the year ended 31 August 2023. The investment portfolio on page 12 and the Investment Manager's Review on pages 6 to 11 demonstrate that, as at 31 August 2023, the portfolio was invested in 12 countries and in 10 different industry sectors within such countries. There were 62 holdings in the portfolio at the year end. The Board therefore believes that the objective of spreading investment risk has been achieved.

Use of Gearing

The Company has a £100 million multi-currency revolving credit facility with Bank of Nova Scotia which was US$50.0 million (£39.5 million) drawn at the end of the financial year. The facility was taken out on 18 July 2022, renewed on 20 July 2023, and expires on 18 July 2024.

The Company's policy is to permit net borrowings (including foreign currency borrowings) of up to 25% of the Company's net assets (measured when new borrowings are incurred). It is intended that the Manager should have the flexibility to utilise this power to leverage the Company's portfolio in order to enhance returns where and to the extent that this is considered appropriate by the directors. Full details of the gearing employed by the Company are set out in note 20 on page 67.

Promotion and shareholder relations

The Company promotes its shares to a broad range of investors including discretionary wealth managers, private investors, financial advisers and institutions which have the potential to be long-term supporters of the investment strategy. The Board seeks to achieve this through its Manager and corporate broker, which promote the shares of the Company through regular contact with both current and potential shareholders. These activities consist of investor lunches, one-on-one meetings, webinars, regional road shows and attendances at conferences. In addition, the Company's shares are supported by the Manager's wider marketing of investment companies targeted at all types of investors. This includes maintaining close relationships with adviser and execution-only platforms, advertising in the trade press, maintaining relationships with financial journalists and the provision of digital information on Schroders' website.

Shareholder relations are given high priority by both the Board and the Manager. The Board also seeks active engagement with investors and meetings with the Chairman are offered where appropriate. In addition to the engagement and meetings held during the year the chairs of the Board and committees, as well as the other directors, attend the AGM and are available to respond to queries and concerns from Shareholders.

Shareholders are also encouraged to sign up to the Manager's Investment Trusts update, to receive information on the Company directly. https://www.schroders.com/en/uk/private-investor/fundcentre/funds-in-focus/investment-trusts/schroders-investmenttrusts/never-miss-an-update

Diversity

The below tables set out the gender and ethnic diversity composition of the Board (as at 31 August 2023 and at the date of this report).

Given that the Company is an investment trust with no executive board members, the columns and references regarding executive management have not been included.

The Board has adopted a diversity and inclusion policy. Appointments and succession plans will always be based on merit and objective criteria and, within this context, the Board seeks to promote diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, cognitive and personal strengths. The Board will encourage any recruitment agencies it engages to find a range of candidates that meet the objective criteria agreed for each appointment. Candidates for Board vacancies are selected based on their skills and experience, which are matched against the balance of skills and experience of the overall Board taking into account the criteria for the role being offered.

The Board also considers the diversity and inclusion policies of its key service providers.

Financial crime policy

The Company continues to be committed to carrying out its business fairly, honestly and openly operates a financial crime policy, covering bribery and corruption, tax evasion, money laundering, terrorist financing and sanctions, as well as seeking confirmations that the Company's service providers' policies are operating soundly.

Greenhouse gas emissions and energy usage

As the Company outsources its operations to third parties, it consumed less than 40,000 kWh during the year and so has no greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption or energy efficiency action to report under the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting requirements.

Taskforce for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures

On 30 June 2023, the Company's AIFM produced a product level disclosure consistent with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures ("TCFD") for the period 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022. This can be found here: https://mybrand.schroders.com/m/27644d68e529db89/original/TCFD-Schroder-Oriental-Income-20221231.pdf. The Board met with representatives from the Manager to review this report.

Responsible investment

The Company delegates to its Manager the responsibility for taking ESG issues into account when assessing the selection, retention and realisation of investments. The Board expects the Manager to engage with investee companies on social, environmental and business ethics issues and to promote best practice. The Board also expects the Manager to exercise the Company's voting rights in consideration of these issues.

Further detail on engagement and stewardship can be found on pages 17 to 21.

In addition to the description of the Manager's integration of ESG into the investment process and the details in this Business Review, a description of the Manager's policy on these matters can be found on the Schroders website at www.schroders.com.The Board notes that Schroders believes that companies with good ESG management often perform better and deliver superior returns over time. Engaging with companies to understand how they approach ESG management is an integral part of the investment process. Schroders has committed to the UN Global Compact, amongst codes and standards, and information about the application of Schroders' sustainability and responsible investment policies can be found at: https://www.schroders.com/en/sustainability/corporate-responsibility/.

The Board has received reporting from the Manager on the application of its policy.

Stakeholder engagement, section 172

During the year under review, the Board discharged its duty under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole, having regard to the interests of all stakeholders. As an externally managed investment trust, the Company has no employees, operations or premises. The Board has identified its key stakeholders as the Company's Shareholders, the Manager, other service providers, the Investee companies and the Company's Lender.

The below explains how the directors have engaged with all stakeholders and outlines key activities undertaken during the reporting period.

Shareholders

The Company welcomes attendance and participation from Shareholders at the Annual General Meeting, details of which are on page 73 of this report. This will provide an opportunity for Shareholders to engage with the Board and hear from the Portfolio Managers, Richard Sennitt and Abbas Barkhordar. Shareholders unable to attend the AGM are invited to submit questions to the Company Secretary in advance of the meeting, and will be able to view a presentation from the Manager online.

The annual and half year results presentations, as well as monthly updates are available on the Company's webpage with results announced via a regulatory news service.

The directors receive regular updates on the shareholder register, trading activity, and feedback received from investor meetings held by the Manager and Broker, as well as meeting with interested current and prospective Shareholders.

The Board is responsible for discount and premium management and is alert to the value Shareholders place on maintaining as low a level of discount volatility as possible. During the financial year, a total of 8,010,000 shares were bought back and a further 2,220,000 have been bought back since the period end. The Board will continue to buy back shares when it judges it is in the best interests of Shareholders to do so.

The Manager

The Board maintains a constructive and collaborative relationship with the Manager, encouraging open discussion.

The Board invites the Portfolio Managers to attend all Board and certain committee meetings and receives regular reports on the performance of the investments and the implementation of the investment strategy, policy and objective. The portfolio activities undertaken by the Portfolio Managers and the impact of decisions affecting investment performance are set out in the Investment Managers' Review on pages 6 to 11.

The Management Engagement Committee reviews the performance of the Manager, its remuneration and the discharge of its contractual obligations at least annually. During the year, the Board visited the Manager's teams based in Hong Kong and Taiwan and was impressed with the depth of resource and experience represented within the Manager's teams based in the region.

The Company's lender

During the year under review, the Board renewed its revolving credit facility agreement with The Bank of Nova Scotia. The Board is responsible for ensuring that the Company adheres to all loan covenants.

Other service providers

The Board maintains regular contact with its key service providers, both at the Board and committee meetings, and through ad hoc communication throughout the year. The need to foster business relationships with key service providers is central to the directors' decision-making as the Board of an externally managed investment trust.

During the period, the Management Engagement Committee undertook reviews of the third-party service providers and agreed that their continued appointment remained in the best interests of the Company and its Shareholders. The Committee periodically reviews the market rates for services received, to ensure that the Company continues to receive high quality service at a competitive cost.

During the year, directors attended a meeting to assess the internal controls of certain service providers including the Company's Depositary and Custodian HSBC, the Designated Administrator, Registrar and Schroder's Group Internal Audit. These meetings enable the Board to conduct due diligence on operations and IT risks amongst service providers; and to receive up to date information on changes in regulation and market practice in the industry. The Board also engaged with its service providers on their own commitments on ESG, Financial Crime, Modern Slavery, Whistleblowing, Diversity and Inclusion, Business Continuity and Cybersecurity.

Investee companies

The Board believes that it is in the interests of all stakeholders to consider ESG factors. The Board supports and encourages the policy of engagement on ESG matters which the Schroders investment team has implemented as part of the investment decision making process, details of which can be found on pages 16 to 21.

The Manager has discretionary powers to exercise voting rights on behalf of the Company and it reports on voting decisions to the Board. The Board monitors investment decisions and questions the Portfolio Managers' rationale for exposures taken and voting decisions made.

In addition to regular discussions with the Manager regarding the ESG aspects of portfolio companies, the Board met with Schroders engagement team to gain a more in depth understanding of the Manager's active engagement with investee companies. The Board also met with certain investee companies on its visit to the region.

Principal risks and uncertainties

Principal and emerging risks

The Board is responsible for the Company's system of risk management and internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. The Board has adopted a detailed matrix of principal risks affecting the Company's business as an investment trust and has established associated policies and processes designed to manage and, where possible, mitigate those risks, which are monitored by the Audit and Risk Committee on an ongoing basis. This system assists the Board in determining the nature and extent of the risks it is willing to take in achieving the Company's strategic objectives.

Although the Board believes that it has a robust framework of internal controls in place this can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material financial misstatement or loss and is designed to manage, not eliminate, risk.

Both the principal risks and the monitoring system are also subject to robust review at least annually. The last assessment took place in October 2023.

Actions taken by the Board and, where appropriate, its committees, to manage and mitigate the Company's principal risks and uncertainties are set out in the table below.

During the year, the Board also discussed and monitored a number of risks that could potentially impact the Company's ability to meet its strategic objectives. The Board recognised that there continues to be an elevated geopolitical risk relating to the region, which is closely monitored.

The Board considered in detail whether there were any material emerging risks and concluded that there were none at present.

\* The "Change" column on the right highlights at a glance the Board's assessment of any increases or decreases in risk during the year after mitigation and management. The arrows show the risks as increased, decreased, or stable.

Risk assessment and internal controls review by the Board

Risk assessment includes consideration of the scope and quality of the systems of internal control operating within key service providers, and ensures regular communication of the results of monitoring by such providers to the Audit and Risk Committee, including the incidence of significant control failings or weaknesses that have been identified at any time and the extent to which they have resulted in unforeseen outcomes or contingencies that may have a material impact on the Company's performance or condition.

No significant control failings or weaknesses were identified from the Audit and Risk Committee's ongoing risk assessment which has been in place throughout the financial year and up to the date of this report. The Board is satisfied that it has undertaken a detailed review of the risks facing the Company and that the internal control environment continues to operate effectively.

A full analysis of the financial risks facing the Company is set out in note 20 to the accounts on pages 65 to 69.

Viability statement

The directors have assessed the viability of the Company over a five year period, taking into account the Company's position at 31 August 2023 and 7 November 2023 and the potential impact of the principal risks and uncertainties it faces for the review period. The directors have assessed the Company's operational resilience and they are satisfied that the Company's outsourced service providers will continue to operate effectively, following the implementation of their business continuity plans.

A period of five years has been chosen as the Board believes that this reflects a suitable time horizon for strategic planning, taking into account the investment policy, liquidity of investments, potential impact of economic cycles, nature of operating costs, dividends and availability of funding. This time period also reflects the average hold period of an investment.

In its assessment of the viability of the Company, the directors have considered each of the Company's principal risks and uncertainties detailed on pages 24 to 26 and in particular the impact of a significant fall in regional equity markets on the value of the Company's investment portfolio. The directors have also considered the Company's income and expenditure projections and the fact that the Company's investments comprise readily realisable securities which can be sold to meet funding requirements if necessary.

The directors have also considered a stress test which represents a severe but plausible scenario along with movement in foreign exchange rates. This scenario assumes a severe stock market collapse and/or exchange rate movements at the beginning of the five year period, resulting in a 50% fall in the value of the Company's investments and investment income and no subsequent recovery in either prices or income in the following five years. It is assumed that the Company continues to pay an annual dividend in line with current levels and that the borrowing facility remains available and remains drawn, subject to the gearing limit.

The Company's investments comprise highly liquid, large, listed companies and so its assets are readily realisable securities and could be sold to meet funding requirements or the repayment of the gearing facility should the need arise. There is no expectation that the nature of the investments held within the portfolio will be materially different in the future.

The operating costs of the Company are predictable and modest in comparison with the assets and there are no capital commitments foreseen which would alter that position. Furthermore, the Company has no employees and consequently has no redundancy or other employment related liabilities.

The Board reviews the performance of the Company's service providers regularly, including the Manager, along with internal controls reports to provide assurance regarding the effective operation of internal controls as reported on by their reporting accountants. The Board also considers the business continuity arrangements of the Company's key service providers.

The Board monitors the portfolio risk profile, limits imposed on gearing, counterparty exposure, liquidity risk and financial controls at its quarterly meetings.

Although there continue to be regulatory changes which could increase costs or impact revenue, the directors do not believe that this would be sufficient to affect its viability. The Board also notes that certain geopolitical risks, if they materialise, would have a serious effect on the viability of the Company, but that it was not appropriate to conclude that the Company was not viable on the basis of these.

The Board has assumed that the business model of a closed ended investment company, as well as the Company's investment objective, will continue to be attractive to investors. The directors also considered the beneficial tax treatment the Company is eligible for as an investment trust. If changes to these taxation arrangements were to be made it would affect the viability of the Company to act as an effective investment vehicle.

Based on the above the directors have concluded that there is a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the five year period of their assessment.

Going concern

The directors have assessed the principal risks, the impact of the emerging risks and uncertainties and the matters referred to in the viability statement. The directors have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for the period assessed by the directors, being the period to 30 November 2024 which is at least 12 months from the date the financial statements were authorised for issue.

By order of the Board

Schroder Investment Management LimitedCompany Secretary

8 November 2023

Board of Directors

Paul Meader

Status: independent non-executive chairman

Length of service: 7 years - appointed a director in January 2016

Experience: Paul Meader is an independent director of investment companies, insurers and investment funds. Until 2012 he was Head of Portfolio Management for Canaccord Genuity based in Guernsey, prior to which he was Chief Executive of Corazon Capital. He has over 35 years' experience in financial markets in London, Dublin and Guernsey, holding senior positions in portfolio management and trading. Prior to joining Corazon he was Managing Director of Rothschild's Swiss private-banking subsidiary in Guernsey. He is a Chartered Fellow of the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investments, a former Commissioner of the Guernsey Financial Services Commission and past chairman of the Guernsey International Business Association. He is a graduate of Hertford College, Oxford. Paul also holds a number of directorships in other companies, one of which is publicly quoted: ICG-Longbow Senior Secured UK Property Debt Investments Limited.

Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement (chair), and Nomination and Remuneration Committees

Remuneration for the reporting period: £47,000 per annum

Number of shares held: 11,000*

Alexa Coates

Status: independent non-executive director

Length of service: 5 years - appointed a director in February 2018

Experience: Alexa Coates is a chartered accountant who brings 30 years of significant financial expertise to the Board. Alexa was a senior executive of HSBC for nine years, where she served as the global CFO for the group's asset management business and then led the finance function for commercial banking operations in Europe. Prior to joining HSBC, Alexa worked in senior roles in retail, healthcare and professional services at J Sainsbury plc, BUPA, Williams Lea Group Ltd and CIT Bank. She started her career at Ernst & Young, where she worked in the UK and France. Alexa is a non-executive director and audit committee chair of Marsh Limited, the insurance broker, Aviva Investors and its UK fund services company as well as a non-executive director and chair of the audit and risk committee of Polar Capital Holdings plc, a publicly quoted company.

Committee membership: Audit and Risk (chair), Management Engagement, and Nomination and Remuneration Committees

Remuneration for the reporting period: £42,000 per annum

Number of shares held: 10,000*

Kate Cornish-Bowden

Status: senior independent non?executive director

Length of service: 5 years - appointed in December 2018

Experience: Kate Cornish-Bowden is the chair of International Biotechnology Trust plc and a non-executive director of Finsbury Growth & Income Trust plc and CC Japan Income & Growth Trust plc where she is chair of the audit committee. Kate worked for 12 years as a fund manager for Morgan Stanley Investment Management, where she was managing director and head of the global equity team. Prior to Morgan Stanley she worked as a research analyst at M&G. Kate is a member of the Chartered Financial Analyst Institute (CFA), holds a Masters in Business Administration (MBA), and has completed the Financial Times Non-Executive Director Diploma.

Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement, and Nomination and Remuneration Committees

Remuneration for the reporting period: £37,000 per annum

Number of shares held: 29,000*

Isabel Liu

Status: independent non-executive director

Length of service: 2 years - appointed in November 2021

Experience: Isabel has 25 years' global experience investing equity in infrastructure. She started her investment career in Asia with the $1 billion AIG Asian Infrastructure Fund. She was Managing Director of the Asia Pacific investment business of John Laing plc. After relocating from Hong Kong to London, she was Investment Director for the ?1 billion ABN AMRO Global Infrastructure Fund. Most recently Isabel served as Board Director at Pensions Infrastructure Platform, sponsored by UK pension schemes. She has also been Chair of the Audit Risk Assurance and Remuneration Committee as a Board Member of Transport Focus. Isabel is a non-executive director of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust plc and Gresham House Energy Storage Fund Plc. Isabel holds a BA in Economics from the Ohio State University, a Masters in Public Policy from Harvard Kennedy School, and an MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement, and Nomination and Remuneration Committees

Remuneration for the reporting period: £37,000 per annum

Number of shares held: 18,634*

Nick Winsor

Status: independent non-executive director

Length of service: 3 years - appointed in March 2020

Experience: Nick is an independent consultant and non-executive director. He has more than 35 years of retail and commercial banking experience with HSBC Group in a number of international markets: Brunei; Channel Islands; Hong Kong; India; Japan; Qatar; Singapore; Taiwan; UAE and the UK. He was CEO of HSBC's businesses in the Channel Islands and Isle of Man, CEO and VP of HSBC Bank (Taiwan) Limited and a Director of HSBC Bank Middle East Limited. Before this, he was Head of Personal Financial Services for the Asia Pacific Region. Nick is a non-executive director of Metro Bank plc and Metro Bank Holdings plc and a member of the latter's Risk Oversight Committee. He is also the senior independent director of the States of Jersey Development Company, Chair of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee and member of the Audit and Risk Committee. Nick is a non-executive director of Bankers without Boundaries, a not for profit investment bank, and the Chair of Autism Jersey. He was awarded an MBE in the Queen's 2020 Birthday Honours list for services to the community. Nick holds a Masters in Physics from Oxford University and is a Fellow of the Institute of Directors.

Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement, and Nomination and Remuneration (chair) Committees

Remuneration for the reporting period: £37,000 per annum

Number of shares held: 20,000*

*Shareholdings are as at 7 November 2023, full details of directors' shareholdings are set out in the Remuneration Report on page 43.

Directors' Report

Directors and officers

Chairman

The Chairman is an independent non-executive director who is responsible for leadership of the Board and ensuring its effectiveness in all aspects of its role. The Chairman's other significant commitments are detailed on page 30. He has no conflicting relationships.

Senior Independent Director ("SID")

The SID is responsible for the evaluation of the Chairman, and also serves as a secondary point of contact for Shareholders.

Company Secretary

Schroder Investment Management Limited provides company secretarial support to the Board and is responsible for assisting the Chairman with Board meetings and advising the Board with respect to governance. The Company Secretary also manages the relationship with the Company's service providers, except for the Manager. Shareholders wishing to lodge questions in advance of the AGM are invited to do so by writing to the Company Secretary at the address given on the outside back cover.

Role and operation of the Board

The Board is the Company's governing body; it sets the Company's strategy and is collectively responsible to Shareholders for its long-term success. The Board is responsible for appointing and subsequently monitoring the activities of the Manager and other service providers to seek to ensure that the investment objective of the Company continues to be met. The Board also ensures that the Manager adheres to the investment restrictions set by the Board and acts within the parameters set by it in respect of any gearing. The Business Review on pages 14 to 29 sets out further detail of how the Board reviews the Company's strategy, risk management and internal controls and also includes other information required for the Directors' Report and is incorporated by reference.

A formal schedule of matters specifically reserved for decision by the Board has been defined and a procedure adopted for directors, in the furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice at the expense of the Company.

The Chairman ensures that all directors receive relevant management, regulatory and financial information in a timely manner and that they are provided, on a regular basis, with key information on the Company's policies, regulatory requirements and internal controls.

The Board meets at least quarterly and receives and considers reports regularly from the Manager and other key advisers and ad hoc reports and information are supplied to the Board as required.

Four Board meetings are usually scheduled each year to deal with matters including: the setting and monitoring of investment strategy, approval of borrowings and/or cash positions, review of investment performance, the level of discount of the Company's shares to NAV, promotion of the Company, and services provided by third parties. Additional meetings of the Board are arranged as required.

The Board has approved a policy on directors' conflicts of interest. Under this policy, directors are required to disclose all actual and potential conflicts of interest to the board as they arise for consideration and approval. The Board may impose restrictions or refuse to authorise such conflicts if deemed appropriate. No directors have any connections with the Manager, shared directorships with other directors or material interests in any contract which is significant to the Company's business.

Committees

In order to assist the Board in fulfilling its governance responsibilities, it has delegated certain functions to committees. The roles and responsibilities of these committees, together with details of work undertaken during the year under review, is outlined over the next few pages.

The reports of the Audit and Risk Committee, Management Engagement Committee and Nomination and Remuneration Committee are incorporated into and form part of the Directors' Report. Each committee's effectiveness was assessed, and judged to be satisfactory, as part of the Board's annual review of the Board and its committees.

Key service providers

The Board has adopted an outsourced business model and has appointed the following key service providers:

Manager

The Company is an alternative investment fund as defined by the AIFM Directive and has appointed Schroder Unit Trusts Limited ("SUTL") as the Manager in accordance with the terms of an alternative investment fund manager ("AIFM") agreement. The AIFM agreement, which is governed by the laws of England and Wales, can be terminated by either party on 12 months' notice or on immediate notice in the event of certain breaches or the insolvency of either party. As at the date of this report no such notice had been given by either party.

SUTL is authorised and regulated by the FCA and provides portfolio management, risk management, accounting and company secretarial services to the Company under the AIFM agreement. Part of the fund accounting and administration activities are currently performed by HSBC Securities Services (UK) Limited. The Manager also provides general marketing support for the Company and manages relationships with key investors, in conjunction with the Chairman, other Board members or the corporate broker as appropriate. The Manager has delegated investment management, marketing, administrative, accounting and company secretarial services to another wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc, Schroder Investment Management Limited. The Manager has in place appropriate professional indemnity cover.

The Schroders Group manages £726.1 billion (as at 30 June 2023) on behalf of institutional and retail investors, financial institutions and high net worth clients from around the world, invested in a broad range of asset classes across equities, fixed income, multi-asset and alternatives.

The Manager is entitled to receive a management fee of an amount equivalent to 0.75% per annum of the net assets of the Company, reducing to 0.70% per annum on net assets above £250 million and 0.65% per annum on net assets above £750 million. The fee is payable quarterly in arrears and calculated as at the last business day in February, May, August and November in each year.

The Manager is also entitled to receive a performance fee based on the performance of the Company's NAV per ordinary share. The performance fee is 10% of the amount in pounds sterling of any gains, being the amount by which the closing adjusted NAV per ordinary share (adjusted as described below) at the end of the relevant calculation period exceeds the highest of:

(i) A hurdle, being 108% of the NAV per ordinary share, taken from the audited balance sheet at the end of the previous calculation period;

(ii) The highest closing NAV per ordinary share (unadjusted) as per the audited accounts for any previous financial year in which a performance fee has been paid; and

(iii) 100p

Closing Adjusted NAV per ordinary share is the NAV per share on the last day of the financial year in respect of which the performance fee is being calculated, adjusted to add back any performance fee accrued during the year but not crystallised; to adjust for the deemed reinvestment of any dividends paid by the Company during the period; and to remove the impact on NAV per share due to any share buy-backs and issues.

The total amount of any performance fee payable in respect of any one accounting period has been capped at 0.65% of the net asset value, calculated at the end of the relevant accounting period.

Any investment management fees payable to the Manager or to other subsidiaries of Schroders plc in respect of investments by the Company in collective investment schemes and investment companies managed or advised by the Schroders Group are deducted from the fee payable to the Manager under the AIFM agreement. There were no such investments during the year ended 31 August 2023.

The management and performance fees payable in respect of the year ended 31 August 2023 amounted to £4,838,000 (2022: £5,149,000) and £nil (2022: nil) respectively. The Manager is also entitled to a fee for providing administrative, accounting and company secretarial services to the Company. For these services, it receives an annual fee, payable quarterly in arrears, of £150,000.

Details of all amounts payable to the Manager are set out in note 17 on page 64.

The Board has reviewed the performance of the Manager, and fees paid to it, during the year under review and continues to consider that it has the appropriate depth and quality of resource to achieve above-average returns in the longer term. Thus, the Board considers that the Manager's appointment under the terms of the AIFM agreement, is in the best interests of Shareholders as a whole.

Safekeeping and cashflow monitoring agent

HSBC Bank plc ("HSBC Bank"), which is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority, has been appointed to carry out certain duties of a safekeeping and cashflow monitoring agent specified in the AIFM Directive for the Company, including:

- safekeeping of the assets of the Company which are entrusted to it;

- cash monitoring; and

- oversight of the Company and the Manager to the extent described in the AIFM Directive.

HSBC Bank is liable to the Company for losses suffered by it as a result of any negligence, wilful default, fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation on its part.

The Company, the Manager and HSBC Bank may terminate the safekeeping and cashflow monitoring agent services agreement pursuant to which HSBC Bank provides these services at any time by giving 90 days' notice in writing. HSBC Bank may only be removed from office when a new safekeeping and cashflow monitoring agent is appointed by the Company.

Registrar

Computershare Investor Services (Guernsey) Limited ("Computershare") has been appointed as the Company's registrar. Computershare's services to the Company include share register maintenance (including the issuance, transfer and cancellation of shares as necessary), acting as agent for the payment of any dividends, management of company meetings (including the registering of proxy votes and scrutineer services as necessary), handling shareholder queries and correspondence and processing corporate actions.

Corporate Governance Statement

The Board of the Company has chosen to adopt the principles and provisions of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance (the "AIC Code"). The Code addresses the Principles and Provisions set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code (the "UK Code"), as well as setting out additional Provisions on issues that are of specific relevance to the Company as an investment company.

The Board considers that reporting against the Principles and Provisions of the AIC Code, which has been endorsed by the Financial Reporting Council and the Guernsey Financial Services Commission, provides more relevant information to Shareholders.

The Financial Conduct Authority requires all UK listed companies to disclose how they have complied with the provisions of the Code. This statement, together with the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities, viability statement and going concern statement set out on pages 26 and 27 respectively indicates how the Company has complied with the principles of good governance of the Code and its requirements on internal control. The Strategic Report and Directors' Report provide further details on the Company's risk management, governance and diversity policies.

The Company complied with the Principles and Provisions of the AIC Code during the year under review and to date.

The AIC Code is available on the AIC website (www.theaic.co.uk). It includes an explanation of how the AIC Code adapts the Principles and Provisions set out in the UK Code to make them relevant for investment companies.

The Guernsey Financial Services Commission's Finance Sector Code of Corporate Governance (the "GFSC Code") provides a framework which applies to all companies in the regulated finance sector in Guernsey. The Company reports against the AIC Code, which meets the requirements of the GFSC Code.

Share capital and substantial share interests

As at 7 November 2023, the Company had 271,233,024 ordinary shares of 1p in issue. 20,110,000 shares were held in treasury. 8,010,000 shares were bought back during the year ended 31 August 2023. 2,220,000 shares were bought back in the period from the year-end until 7 November 2023. Accordingly, the total number of voting rights in the Company at 7 November 2023 is 250,973,024. Details of changes to the Company's share capital during the year under review are given in note 13 to the accounts on page 62. All shares in issue rank equally with respect to voting, dividends and any distribution on winding up.

The Company has received notifications in accordance with the Financial Conduct Authority's ("FCA") Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 5.1.2R of the below interests in 5% or more of the voting rights attaching to the Company's issued share capital. The Company is reliant on investors to comply with these regulations, and certain investors may be exempted from providing these. As such, this should not be relied on as an exhaustive list of Shareholders holding above 5% of the Company's voting rights.

Since the year end and at the date of this report, Rathbones Investment Management Limited has on 22 September 2023 notified an increase in their notified holding to 38,128,821 ordinary shares and 15.08% of total voting rights, as driven by the all-share combination of Rathbones Group Plc with Investec Wealth & Investment Limited which completed on 21 September 2023. Subsequent to this, on 11 October 2023 Rathbones Investment Management Limited notified a decrease in their notified holding to 37,800,104 ordinary shares and 14.97% of total voting rights as at 6 October 2023.

Provision of information to the auditors

The directors at the date of approval of this report confirm that, so far as each of them is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's auditors are unaware; and each director has taken all the steps that he or she ought to have taken as a director in order to make himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's auditors are aware of that information.

Directors' attendance at meetings

The number of scheduled meetings of the Board and its committees held during the financial year and the attendance of individual directors is shown below. Whenever possible all directors attend the AGM.

Directors' and officers' liability insurance and indemnities

Directors' and officers' liability insurance cover was in place in respect of the directors throughout the year under review. The Company provides an indemnity to each director to the extent permitted by Guernsey law whereby the Company is able to indemnify such director against any liability incurred in proceedings in which the director is successful, and for costs in defending a claim brought against the director for breach of duty where the director acted honestly and reasonably.

By order of the Board

Alexa CoatesDirector

8 November 2023

Audit and Risk Committee Report

The responsibilities and work carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee during the year under review are set out in the following report. The duties and responsibilities of the committee, which include monitoring the integrity of the Company's financial reporting and internal controls, are set out in further detail below, and may be found in the terms of reference which are set out on the Company's webpages, www.schroders.co.uk/orientalincome.

All directors are members of the committee. Alexa Coates is the chair of the committee. The Board has satisfied itself that at least one of the committee's members has recent and relevant financial experience and that the committee as a whole has competence relevant to the sector in which the company operates. The AIC Code permits the Chairman of the Board to be a member of the audit committee of an investment trust. Recognising Paul Meader's significant experience, it is considered appropriate for the Chairman to be a member of the Audit and Risk Committee.

1 The Financial Reporting Council has asked us to draw readers' attention to the fact that the review was based solely on the annual report and accounts and did not benefit from detailed knowledge of the Company's business or an understanding of the underlying transactions entered into. It was, however, conducted by staff of the FRC who have an understanding of the relevant legal and accounting framework.

The table overleaf sets out how the committee discharged its duties during the year. The committee met three times during the year. Further details on attendance can be found on page 34. An evaluation of the committee's effectiveness and review of its terms of reference were completed during the year.

Significant issues that the committee considered in relation to the financial statements, and how these issues were addressed, are outlined below.

Recommendations made to, and approved by, the Board:

As a result of the work performed, the committee has concluded that the annual report for the year ended 31 August 2023, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for Shareholders to assess the Company's position, performance, business model and strategy, and has reported on these findings to the Board. The Board's conclusions in this respect are set out in the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities on page 44.

Having reviewed the performance of the auditors as described above, the committee considered it appropriate to recommend the firm's re-appointment. Resolutions to re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditors to the Company, and to authorise the Directors to determine their remuneration will be proposed at the AGM.

Alexa CoatesAudit and Risk Committee chair

8 November 2023

Management Engagement Committee Report

The Management Engagement Committee is responsible for (1) the monitoring and oversight of the Manager's performance and fees, and confirming the Manager's ongoing suitability, and (2) reviewing and assessing the Company's other service providers, including reviewing their fees. All directors are members of the committee. Paul Meader is the chair of the committee. Its terms of reference are available on the Company's webpages, www.schroders.co.uk/orientalincome.

Recommendations made to, and approved by, the Board:

? That the ongoing appointment of the Manager on the terms of the AIFM agreement was in the best interests of Shareholders as a whole.

? That the Company's service providers' performance remained satisfactory.

Nomination and Remuneration Committee Report

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is responsible for (1) the recruitment, selection, induction and remuneration of all directors, (2) their assessment during their tenure, and (3) the Board's succession. All directors are members of the committee. Nick Winsor is the chair of the committee. Its terms of reference are available on the Company's webpages, www.schroders.co.uk/orientalincome.

Recommendations made to, and approved by, the Board:

? That all directors continue to demonstrate commitment to their roles, provide a valuable contribution to the deliberations of the Board, contribute towards the Company's long-term success, and remain free from conflicts with the Company and its directors, so should all be recommended for re-election by Shareholders at the AGM, noting that Ms Cornish-Bowden has advised the Board that she does not intend to stand for re-election.

? That directors' fees per annum be increased to the following levels effective from 1 September 2023: chairman £50,000, Audit and Risk Committee chair: £45,000 and other directors: £40,000, with the senior independent director to receive an additional £2,000.

Directors' Remuneration

Introduction

The following remuneration policy is currently in force and is subject to a binding vote every three years. The next vote will take place at the forthcoming AGM and the current policy provisions will apply until that date. The below directors' annual report on remuneration is subject to an annual advisory vote. An ordinary resolution to approve this report will be put to Shareholders at the forthcoming AGM.

At the AGM held on 11 December 2020 when the policy was last voted on by Shareholders, 99.69% of the votes cast (including votes cast at the chairman's discretion) in respect of approval of the directors' remuneration policy were in favour, while 0.31% were against. 112,388 votes were withheld.

At the AGM held on 6 December 2022, 99.81% of the votes cast (including votes cast at the chairman's discretion) in respect of approval of the directors' remuneration report for the year ended 31 August 2022 were in favour, while 0.17% were against. 33,468 votes were withheld.

Directors' remuneration policy

The determination of the directors' fees is a matter dealt with by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and the Board.

It is the Nomination and Remuneration Committee's policy to determine the level of directors' remuneration having regard to amounts payable to non-executive directors in the industry generally, the role that individual directors fulfil in respect of Board and committee responsibilities, and time committed to the Company's affairs, taking into account the aggregate limit of fees set out in the Company's articles of incorporation (currently £300,000). Any increase in the level set out therein requires approval by the Board and the Company's Shareholders.

The chairman of the Board, the chair of the Audit and Risk Committee, and the senior independent director each receives fees at a higher rate than the other directors to reflect their additional responsibilities. The fees payable to directors are not performance related. They are set at a level to recruit and retain individuals of sufficient calibre, with the level of knowledge, experience and expertise necessary to promote the success of the Company in reaching its short and long-term strategic objectives.

The Board and its committees exclusively comprise non-executive directors. No director past or present has an entitlement to a pension from the Company, and the Company has not, and does not intend to, operate a share scheme for directors or to award any share options or long-term performance incentives to any director. No director has a service contract with the Company, although directors have a letter of appointment. Directors do not receive exit payments and are not provided with any compensation for loss of office. No other payments are made to directors other than the reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending to the Company's business.

Implementation of policy

The terms of directors' letters of appointment are available for inspection at the Company's registered office address during normal business hours and during the AGM at the location of such meeting.

The Board did not seek the views of Shareholders in setting this remuneration policy. Any comments on the remuneration policy received from Shareholders would be considered on a case-by-case basis.

As the Company does not have any employees, no employee pay and employment conditions were taken into account when setting this remuneration policy and no employees were consulted in its construction.

Directors' fees are reviewed annually and take into account research from third parties on the fee levels of directors of peer group companies, as well as industry norms and factors affecting the time commitment expected of the directors. New directors are subject to the provisions set out in this remuneration policy.

Directors' annual report on remuneration

This report sets out how the remuneration policy was implemented during the year ended 31 August 2023.

Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 August 2023

Fees paid to directors

The following amounts were paid by the Company to directors for their services in respect of the year ended 31 August 2023 and the preceding financial year. Directors' remuneration is all fixed; they do not receive any variable remuneration. The performance of the Company over the financial year is presented on page 13.

1 Comprise amounts reimbursed for expenses incurred in carrying out business for the Company, and which have been grossed up to include PAYE and NI contributions.

2 Appointed as a director on 4 November 2021.

The information in the above table has been audited.

Consideration of matters relating to directors' remuneration

Directors' remuneration was last reviewed by the Board in July 2023. The members of the Board at the time that remuneration levels were considered were as set out on pages 30 to 31. Information on fees paid to directors of investment trusts managed by Schroders and peer group companies provided by the Manager and corporate broker was taken into consideration.

Following annual review, the Board agreed that fees should be increased with effect from 1 September 2023 to the following levels: chairman: £50,000, Audit and Risk Committee chair: £45,000, the senior independent director: £42,000, and other directors: £40,000. Directors' fees were last increased from 1 September 2022. The Board will continue to review fee levels on an annual basis.

Expenditure by the Company on remuneration and distributions to Shareholders

The table below compares the remuneration payable to directors to distributions paid to Shareholders during the year under review and the prior financial year. In considering these figures, Shareholders should take into account the Company's investment objective.

Directors' share interests

The Company's articles of incorporation do not require directors to own shares in the Company. The interests of directors, including those of connected persons, at the beginning and end of the financial year under review are set out below.

The information in the above table has been audited. Since the year end, the shares held by Isabel Liu, including those of connected persons, has increased to 18,634.

Alexa CoatesDirector

8 November 2023

Statement of Directors' Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and Accounts

The directors are responsible for preparing the financial statements in accordance with applicable Guernsey law and generally accepted accounting principles.

Guernsey company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors should:

? select suitable accounting policies, and apply them consistently;

? present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;

? provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as adopted by the European Union is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity's financial position and financial performance;

? state that the Company has complied with IFRS as adopted by the European Union, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;

? prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business; and

? make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent.

The directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records that disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 (as amended). They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Directors' Statement

Each of the directors, whose names and functions are listed on pages 30 and31, confirms that, to the best of their knowledge:

? the financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the European Union and with The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 (as amended) and in accordance with the requirements set out above, and give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and the net return of the Company;

? the Strategic Review includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces; and

? the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for Shareholders to assess the Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.

So far as each of the directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's auditors are unaware, and each director has taken all the steps that he or she ought to have taken as a director in order to make himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's auditors is aware of that information.

On behalf of the Board

Alexa CoatesDirector

8 November 2023

Independent Auditor's Report to the members of Schroder Oriental Income Fund Limited

Report on the audit of the financial statements

Opinion

In our opinion, Schroder Oriental Income Fund Limited's financial statements:

? give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 31 August 2023 and of its loss and cash flows for the year then ended;

? have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union; and

? have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 (as amended).

We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual report and accounts (the "Annual Report"), which comprise: Balance Sheet as at 31 August 2023; Statement of Comprehensive Income, Statement of Changes in Equity and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended; and the notes to the financial statements, which include a description of the significant accounting policies.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) ("ISAs (UK)") and applicable law. Our responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence

We remained independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes the Financial Reporting Council's ("FRC") Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities in accordance with the requirements of the Crown Dependencies' Audit Rules and Guidance for market-traded companies, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

Our audit approach

Overview

Audit scope

? The company is a standalone authorised, closed ended investment company registered in the Bailiwick of Guernsey with its shares listed on the main market of the London Stock Exchange.

? The company engages Schroder Unit Trusts Limited (the "Manager") to manage the company's assets.

? The company engages HSBC Bank plc (the "Custodian") to carry out duties of safekeeping and cashflow monitoring agent.

? We conducted our audit using information provided by the Manager and Schroder Investment Management Limited (the "Investment Manager"), as well as HSBC Securities Services ("HSS") to whom the Manager has delegated the provision of certain administrative functions.

? We tailored the scope of our audit taking into account the types of investments within the company, the involvement of the third parties referred to above, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the company operates.

? We obtained an understanding of the control environment in place at both the Manager and HSS, and adopted a fully substantive testing approach using reports obtained from HSS.

Key audit matters

? Income from and losses on investments

? Valuation and existence of investments at fair value through profit or loss

Materiality

? Overall materiality: £6,482,000 (2022: £7,241,000) based on 1% of net assets.

? Performance materiality: £4,861,000 (2022: £5,430,000).

The scope of our audit

As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors' professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.

The key audit matters below are consistent with last year.

How we tailored the audit scope

We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.

The company is a standalone authorised, closed ended investment company that has outsourced the management and safekeeping of its assets to Schroders and HSBC respectively. The company's accounting is delegated to the Administrator who maintains the company's accounting records and who has implemented controls over those accounting records. We applied professional judgement to determine the extent of testing required over each balance in the financial statements and obtained our audit evidence which was substantive in nature from the manager and the administrator.

The impact of climate risk on our audit

In conducting our audit, we made enquiries of the Directors and the Investment Manager to understand the extent of the potential impact of climate change risk on the company's financial statements. The Directors and Investment Manager concluded that the impact on the measurement and disclosures within the financial statements is not material because the company's investment portfolio is made up of level 1 quoted securities which are valued at fair value based on market prices. We found this to be consistent with our understanding of the company's investment activities. We also considered the consistency of the climate change disclosures included in the Strategic Report with the financial statements and our knowledge from our audit.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% (2022: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting to £4,861,000 (2022: £5,430,000) for the company financial statements.

In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range was appropriate.

We agreed with those charged with governance that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £324,000 (2022: £362,000) as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.

Conclusions relating to going concern

Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:

? evaluating the directors' updated risk assessment and considering whether it addressed relevant threats;

? evaluating the directors' assessment of potential operational impacts, considering their consistency with other available information and our understanding of the business and assessed the potential impact on the financial statements;

? reviewing the directors' assessment of the company's financial position in the context of its ability to meet future expected operating expenses and debt repayments, their assessment of liquidity as well as their review of the operational resilience of the company and oversight of key third-party service providers;

? assessing the premium/discount at which the company's share price trades compared to the net asset value per share; and

? assessing the implication of significant reductions in Net Asset Value (NAV) as a result of market performance on the ongoing ability of the company to operate.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the company's ability to continue as a going concern.

In relation to the directors' reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Reporting on other information

The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors' report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.

Corporate governance statement

ISAs (UK) require us to review the directors' statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the corporate governance statement relating to the company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code, which the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority specify for review by auditors of premium listed companies. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are described in the Reporting on other information section of this report.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:

? The directors' confirmation that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;

? The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify emerging risks and an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated;

? The directors' statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material uncertainties to the company's ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements;

? The directors' explanation as to their assessment of the company's prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate; and

? The directors' statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.

Our review of the directors' statement regarding the longer-term viability of the company was substantially less in scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors' process supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit.

In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:

? The directors' statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the information necessary for the members to assess the company's position, performance, business model and strategy;

? The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and

? The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit and Risk Committee.

We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the directors' statement relating to the company's compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.

Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit

Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements

As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and Accounts, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors' report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.

Based on our understanding of the company and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations related to breaches of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the financial statements. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the financial statements such as Section 262 of The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008. We evaluated management's incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries to increase revenue (investment income and capital gains) or to increase net asset value. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included:

? discussions with the Manager and the Audit and Risk Committee, including specific enquiry of known or suspected instances of non-compliance with laws and regulation and fraud where applicable;

? reviewing relevant meeting minutes, including those of the Audit and Risk Committee;

? assessment of the company's compliance with the requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, including recalculation of numerical aspects of the eligibility conditions;

? identifying and testing journal entries, in particular any material or revenue-impacting manual journal entries posted as part of the Annual Report preparation process; and

? designing audit procedures to incorporate unpredictability around the nature, timing or extent of our testing.

There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.

Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors' report.

Use of this report

This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the company's members as a body in accordance with Section 262 of The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.

Other required reporting

The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 exception reporting

Under The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

? we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or

? proper accounting records have not been kept by the company; or

? the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records.

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.

Colleen Localfor and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPChartered Accountants and Recognised AuditorLondon

8 November 2023

Notes:

a. The maintenance and integrity of the Schroder Oriental Income Fund Limited website is the responsibility of the directors; the work carried out by the auditor does not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the website.

b. Legislation in Guernsey governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31 August 2023

The "Total" column of this statement represents the Company's Statement of Comprehensive Income, prepared in accordance with IFRS. The "Revenue and Capital" columns represent supplementary information prepared under guidance set out in the statement of recommended practice for investment trust companies (the "SORP") issued by the Association of Investment Companies in July 2022.

The Company does not have any income or expense that is not included in net profit/(loss) for the year. Accordingly the "Net profit/(loss)" for the year is also the "Total comprehensive income/(expenses)" for the year.

All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the year.

The notes on pages 56 to 70 form an integral part of these accounts.

Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31 August 2023

The notes on pages 56 to 70 form an integral part of these accounts.

Balance Sheet at 31 August 2023

The financial statements on pages 52 to 55 were approved by the Board of Directors on 8 November 2023 and signed on its behalf by:

Alexa Coates

Director

The notes on pages 56 to 70 form an integral part of these accounts.

Registered in Guernsey as a public company limited by shares

Company registration number: 43298

Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31 August 2023

Dividends received during the year amounted to £37,004,000 (2022: £41,682,000) and bond and deposit interest receipts amounted to £117,000 (2022: £15,000).

The notes on pages 56 to 70 form an integral part of these accounts.

Notes to the accounts for the year ended 31 August 2023

1. Accounting Policies

(a) Basis of accounting

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with The Companies Guernsey Law 2008 and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), which comprise standards and interpretations approved by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"), together with interpretations of International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") as adopted by the European Union.

Where consistent with the requirements of IFRS, the directors have sought to prepare the accounts on a basis compliant with presentational guidance set out in the statement of recommended practice for investment trust companies (the "SORP") issued by the Association of Investment Companies in July 2022.

The policies applied in these financial statements are consistent with those applied in the preceding year.

The Company's share capital is denominated in sterling and this is the currency in which its Shareholders operate and expenses are generally paid. The Board has therefore determined that sterling is the functional currency and the currency in which the accounts are presented. Amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousand.

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of investments held at fair value through profit or loss. The directors believe that the Company has adequate resources to continue operating to 30 November 2024, which is at least 12 months from the date of approval of these accounts. In forming this opinion, the directors have taken into consideration: the controls and monitoring processes in place; the Company's level of debt and other payables; the low level of operating expenses, comprising largely variable costs which would reduce pro rata in the event of a market downturn; and that the Company's assets comprise cash and readily realisable securities quoted in active markets. In forming this opinion, the directors have also considered any potential impact of climate change, inflation, high interest rates and the energy crisis on the viability of the Company.

Further details of directors' considerations regarding this are given in the Chairman's Statement, Portfolio Managers' Review, Going Concern Statement, Viability Statement and under the Principal and emerging risks on page 24.

The principal accounting polices adopted are set out below.

(b) Presentation of the Statement of Comprehensive Income

In order to better reflect the activities of an investment company and in accordance with the recommendations of the SORP, supplementary information has been presented which analyses items in the Statement of Comprehensive Income between those which are income in nature and those which are capital in nature.

(c) Investments at fair value through profit or loss

The Company's business is investing in financial assets with a view to profiting from their total return in the form of income and capital growth. This portfolio of financial assets is managed and its performance evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with a documented investment objective and information is provided internally on that basis to the Company's board of directors. Accordingly, investments are designated upon initial recognition as investments at fair value through profit or loss, and are measured at subsequent reporting dates at fair value, which are quoted bid market prices for investments traded in active markets.

Investments that are unlisted or not actively traded are valued using a variety of techniques to determine their fair value; all such valuations are reviewed by both the AIFM's fair value pricing committee and by the directors.

Investments are recognised and derecognised on the trade date where a purchase or sale is under a contract whose terms require delivery within a timeframe established by the market concerned.

(d) Accounting for reserves

Gains and losses on sales of investments, including the related foreign exchange gains and losses, are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and in capital reserves within "Gains and losses on sales of investments". Increases and decreases in the valuation of investments held at the year end, including the related foreign exchange gains and losses, are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and in capital reserves within "Holding gains and losses on investments".

Foreign exchange gains and losses on cash and deposit balances are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and in capital reserves within Gains and losses on sales of investments. Unrealised exchange gains and losses on foreign currency loans are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and dealt with in capital reserves within Holding gains and losses on investments.

(e) Repurchases of shares into treasury and subsequent reissues

The cost of repurchasing shares into Treasury is debited to "Treasury share reserve". The sales proceeds of Treasury shares reissued are credited back to Treasury share reserve until the debit balance on that reserve is extinguished and thereafter to capital reserves.

(f) Income

Dividends receivable from equity shares are included in revenue on an ex-dividend basis except where, in the opinion of the board, the dividend is capital in nature, in which case it is included in capital.

Income from fixed interest debt securities is recognised using the effective interest method.

Deposit interest outstanding at the year end is calculated and accrued on a time apportionment basis using market rates of interest.

(g) Expenses

All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are allocated wholly to revenue with the following exceptions:

- The management fee is allocated 40% to revenue and 60% to capital in line with the board's expected long-term split of revenue and capital return from the Company's investment portfolio.

- Any performance fee is allocated 100% to capital.

- Expenses incidental to the purchase or sale of investments are charged to capital. These expenses are commonly referred to as transaction costs and mainly comprise brokerage commission. Details of transaction costs are given in note 10 on page 61.

(h) Finance costs

Finance costs, including any premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accruals basis in profit or loss using the effective interest method.

Finance cost are allocated 40% to revenue and 60% to capital in line with the board's expected long-term split of revenue and capital return from the Company's investment portfolio.

(i) Other financial assets and liabilities

Cash and cash equivalents may comprise cash and demand deposits which are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. Other receivables are non interest bearing, short-term in nature and are accordingly stated at nominal value as reduced by appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts.

Interest bearing bank loans are initially recognised at cost, being the proceeds received net of direct issue costs, and subsequently at amortised cost.

(j) Taxation

The taxation charge is the total of both current taxation and deferred taxation.

Current taxation comprises of the tax withheld at the source on foreign income, with adjustments for any amounts recoverable under tax treaties. The taxation is recorded in the revenue section of the Statement of Comprehensive Income, except when it pertains to capital related items where it will be accounted for in the capital section of the statement.

Deferred taxation represents the taxation liability or asset arising from anticipated variations in the treatment of items for accounting purposes compared to tax purposes. The calculation is based on tax rates that have been officially approved or are highly likely for the period when the tax becomes payable. Deferred tax assets are recognised when there is an expectation of having future taxable profits.

(k) Foreign currency

The results and financial position are expressed in sterling. Transactions in currencies other than sterling are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transaction. At each balance sheet date, monetary items and non monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing at 1600 hours on the balance sheet date. Gains or losses arising on translation are included in net profit or loss for the year and presented as revenue or capital as appropriate.

(l) New and amended accounting standards

At the date of authorisation of these financial statements there are no new or revised Standards or Interpretations, which are in issue but which are not yet effective, which the board expects to have any significant effect on the Company's accounts.

(m) Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions

Other than the directors' assessment of going concern, no significant judgements, estimates or assumptions have been required in the preparation of these financial statements in accordance with IFRS.

(n) Dividends payable to Shareholders

Interim dividends to Shareholders are recorded in the Financial Statements when paid.

2. Gains/(losses) on investments held at fair value through profit or loss

3. Income

4. Management fee

The basis for calculating the investment management fee and any performance fee is set out in the Directors' Report on pages 32 and 33.

With effect from 1 September 2022, the board determined that the management fee will be allocated 40% to revenue and 60% to capital in line with the board's expected long-term split of revenue and capital return from the Company's investment portfolio. Prior to this date, these expenses had been allocated 30% to revenue and 70% to capital.

5. Other administrative expenses

1No amounts are payable to the auditor for non-audit services

6. Finance costs

With effect from 1 September 2022, the board determined that the finance costs will be allocated 40% to revenue and 60% to capital in line with the board's expected long-term split of revenue and capital return from the Company's investment portfolio. Prior to this date, these expenses had been allocated 30% to revenue and 70% to capital.

7. Taxation

(a) Analysis of tax charge for the year

The Company became resident in the United Kingdom for tax taxation purposes, with effect from 1 September 2020. The Company has no corporation tax liability for the year ended 31 August 2023 (2022: the same).

(b) Factors affecting tax charge for the year

The tax assessed for the year ended 31 August 2023 is higher (2022: lower) than the Company's applicable rate of corporation tax for that year of 21.5% (2022:19%).

The factors affecting the tax charge for the year are as follows:

(c) Deferred taxation

The Company has an unrecognised deferred tax asset of £3,713,000 (2022: £2,745,000) based on a main rate of corporation tax of 25%. In its 2020 budget, the UK government announced that the main rate of corporation tax would increase to 25% for the fiscal year beginning on 1 April 2023.

The deferred tax asset has arisen due to the excess of deductible expenses over taxable income. Given the composition of the Company's portfolio, it is not likely that this asset will be utilised in the foreseeable future and therefore no asset has been recognised in the accounts.

The Company was granted status as an investment trust company by HMRC effective from 1 September 2020, and intends to continue to meet the conditions required to retain that status. Therefore, no provision has been made for deferred UK capital gains tax on any capital gains or losses arising on the revaluation or disposal of investments.

8. Dividends

(a) Dividends paid and declared

Under The Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008, the Company may pay dividends out of both capital and revenue reserves, subject to passing a solvency test. However all dividends paid and declared to date have been paid, or will be paid, out of revenue profits. The Company has passed the solvency test for all dividends paid to date.

The fourth interim dividend declared in respect of the year ended 31 August 2022 differs from the amount actually paid due to shares repurchased and cancelled after the balance sheet date but prior to the share register record date.

(b) Dividends for the purposes of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 ("Section 1158")

The Company was granted status as an investment trust company by HMRC effective from 1 September 2020, and intends to continue to meet the minimum distribution requirements of Section 1158, in order to retain that status. Those requirements are considered on the basis of dividends declared in respect of the financial year as shown below. The revenue available for distribution by way of dividend for the year is £30,399,000 (2022: £34,105,000).