The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.

Less Ads, More Data, More Tools Register for FREE

Pin to quick picksAFRB.L Regulatory News (AFRB)

  • There is currently no data for AFRB

Watchlists are a member only feature

Login to your account

Alerts are a premium feature

Login to your account

Preliminary statement of results

19 Mar 2013 07:00

RNS Number : 2926A
AFI Development PLC
19 March 2013
 



 

THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION

IN OR INTO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AUSTRALIA OR JAPAN

 

 

19 March 2013

 

AFI DEVELOPMENT PLC

("AFI DEVELOPMENT" OR "THE COMPANY")PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012Strong operational results, with increased cash flow from completed projects and disposals

 

 

AFI Development, a leading real estate company focused on developing property in Russia, has today announced its preliminary audited financial results for the year ended 31 December 2012.

 

Financial highlights:

·; Revenues for 2012, including net proceeds from the sale of trading properties, up 21% year-on-year to US$163 million driven by higher rental income

- AFIMALL City contribution at US$81.4 million

·; Gross profit for 2012 up by 203% year-on-year to US$59 million on stronger revenues, mainly attributed to AFIMALL City

·; Strong cash position with US$178 million in cash and cash equivalents as at 31 December 2012, compared to US$85 million as at 31 December 2011

- Increase in cash balance attributed to the disposal of Westec Four Winds Ltd. and parking areas at AFIMALL City to JSC VTB Bank

·; Gross Asset Value, based partially on the valuation of our projects portfolio independently verified by Cushman & Wakefield and partially on book cost, at US$2.5 billion as at 31 December 2012, compared to US$2.7 billion as at 31 December 2011

·; Successful refinancing of AFIMALL City project loans (circa US$449 million), maturing in August 2013, with a new credit line from VTB Group totalling RUB21 billion (US$666 million ), maturing in April 2018

 

Operational Highlights:

·; AFIMALL City firmly established as one of the most attractive retail centres in Moscow

- Growing footfall and tenant turnover

- Integrated parking fully constructed and operational

- Successful disposal of part of the parking space to VTB Bank for US$57.1 million

·; Successful disposal of 50% interest in Westec Four Winds Limited ("Westec") for US$103.4 million

·; In negotiations with potential buyers and tenants of class A office project, Ozerkovskaya III, in central Moscow, following receipt of operations permit

·; Significant progress in development projects, securing land lease in Tverskaya Plaza Ic and obtaining town-planning and zoning documentation (GPZU) for Bolshaya Pochtovaya and Paveletskaya II projects

·; AFIMALL City and Aquamarine III (Ozerkovskaya III) recognised at the prestigious "International Property Awards Europe" for excellence in development quality and highest level of customer experience

 

Commenting on today's announcement, Lev Leviev, Executive Chairman of AFI Development, said:

 

"Our strong operational results for 2012 demonstrate the significant progress we have made in our key projects during the year. AFIMALL City, our flagship project, showed a steady increase in footfall and tenant turnover during its first year of operation, supported by our marketing initiatives and the successful completion of the underground parking. Our efforts have been recognised with AFIMALL City receiving an award at the "International Property Awards Europe", alongside our Aquamarine III project. We believe that the Mall is now able to fully capitalise on its position as one of the most attractive retail establishments in Moscow.

 

During 2012, we successfully put into operation our Ozerkovskaya project and subsequently acquired the 50% share held by our JV partner Super Passion, allowing us to become the sole owner of this project. We also put into operation the Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk, which successfully completed its maiden summer season.

 

The disposal of our 50% stake in Westec Four Winds Limited will allow us to realise a US$50 million capital gain on the project and serves to highlight our commitment to disposing of assets at opportune moments, to maximise profit. We will continue to seek such opportunities in the future.

 

We have had a good start to 2013, and look forward to the rest of the year with confidence. The Russian economy is performing well compared to other European nations and we expect the demand for high quality real estate in attractive Moscow locations to continue through 2013. We look forward to progressing with our new developments as well as building upon the successful foundations we created for AFIMALL City during 2012. We will seek opportunities for AFI Development to increase its cash flow, to enhance its position in the Moscow real estate market and to generate positive returns for shareholders".

 

FY 2012 Results Conference Call

 

AFI Development will hold a conference call for analysts and investors to discuss its full year 2012 results, following their publication.

 

The details for the conference call are as follows:

 

Date:

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

 

Time:

18:00 Moscow (14:00 GMT)

 

Dial-in Tel:

International:

UK toll free:

US toll-free:

Russia toll-free:

+44 (0) 20 3003 2666

 0808 109 0700

 1 866 966 5335

 8 10 8002 4902044

 

Please dial in 5/10 minutes prior to the commencement time giving your name, company and stating that you are dialling into the AFI Development conference call quoting the reference AFI.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

AFI Development +7 495 796 9988

Ilya KutnovEkaterina Shubina

 

Citigate Dewe Rogerson, London +44 20 7638 9571

David Westover

Sandra NovakovReena Mavjee

 

 

About AFI Development

 

AFI Development is one of the leading real estate development companies operating in Russia. Established in 2001, AFI Development is a publicly traded subsidiary of Africa Israel Investments Ltd.

 

AFI Development is listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange and aims to deliver shareholder value through a commitment to innovation and continuous project development, coupled with the highest standards of design, construction, and quality and customer service.

 

AFI Development focuses on developing and redeveloping high quality commercial and residential real estate assets across Russia, with Moscow being its main market. The Company's existing portfolio comprises commercial projects focused on offices, shopping centres, hotels and mixed-use properties, and residential projects. AFI Development's strategy is to sell the residential properties it develops and to either lease the commercial properties or sell them for a favourable return.

 

AFI Development is a leading force in urban regeneration, breathing new life into city squares and neighbourhoods and transforming congested and underdeveloped areas into thriving new communities. The Company's long-term, large-scale regeneration and city infrastructure projects establish the necessary groundwork for the successful launch of commercial and residential properties, providing a strong base for future.

 

 

Forward-looking Statements

This document and the documents following may contain certain "forward-looking statements" with respect to the Company's financial condition, results of operations and business, and certain of the Company's plans and objectives with respect to these items.

Forward-looking statements are sometimes, but not always, identified by their use of a date in the future or such words as "anticipates", "aims", "due", "could", "may", "should", "expects", "believes", "intends", "plans", "targets", "goal" or "estimates." By their very nature forward-looking statements are inherently unpredictable, speculative and involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future.

There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the economies and markets in which the Company operates; changes in the regulatory and competition frameworks in which the Company operates; changes in the markets from which the Company raises finance; the impact of legal or other proceedings against or which affect the Company; and changes in interest and exchange rates.

Any written or verbal forward-looking statements, made in this document or made subsequently, which are attributable to the Company or persons acting on their behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the factors referred to above. The Company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements.

 

 

 

Chairman and Executive Director's Joint Statement

 

The year 2012 has been one of major achievements for AFI Development. Most notably, AFIMALL City, our flagship project, has become firmly established as one of the leading retail schemes in Moscow. Our operational initiatives to increase footfall to the Mall have borne fruit and we have seen an increase in footfall levels. At the same time, we restructured our financing arrangements as part of our long-standing commitment to reducing costs.

In line with our strategy, the Company has continued to dispose of mature yielding properties, where appropriate, in order to realize a capital gain. In 2012, the Company sold its 50% holding in the Westec Four Winds Limited (holding company of the Four Winds project), for a total consideration of US$103.4 million, expecting to realise a net profit of around US$50 million. The improvement in our operational results during 2012 is evidenced by the threefold increase in gross profit for 2012 to US$59 million compared to approximately US$20 million in 2011.

During 2012 we also completed and put into operation two other projects within our development portfolio - Ozerkovskaya III, an office complex forming part of the "Aquamarine" mixed-use development, and Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk.

The Company currently has several projects in various stages of development. The Otradnoe (Odintsovo) project is scheduled to begin construction in Q2 2013 and the development process continues for the Kossinskaya, Bolshaya Pochtovaya and Paveletskaya II projects. Significant progress was made at the Tverskaya Zastava projects, where the Company signed a land lease agreement with the Moscow city authorities for the Tverskaya Plaza IC development.

The Russian economy continues to perform well in a European context, with 2012 GDP growth of 3.4%[1], although inflation has remained high at 6.6%[2]. Although GDP growth presented slight slowdown, the Russian market has continued to perform well with further expansion in private consumption and investments.  The consumer sector continues to be a major economic driver, while solid growth in real incomes and consumer loans translated into an increase in real retail sales of 6.3% year-on-year in 2012[3]. As a result, the trends of domestic and international retail brand expansion in Moscow's malls have continued, leading vacancy rates at quality shopping malls in Moscow to remain close to zero. Moscow remains the preferred location for real estate investors and prime yields here remained at 9%[4] for both prime retail and offices during 2012. Prime office rents reached US$1,000-1,150[5] sq.m. per annum in the fourth quarter, slightly below that of the previous year.

Thanks to strong growth in rental income, our revenues for 2012 recorded a 21% year-on-year increase to US$163 million. This trend was further supported by successful sales of properties, including the above-mentioned 50% holding in the Four Winds project. We were consequently able to achieve a significant, three-fold year-on-year increase in gross profit to US$59 million, whilst further building on our strong cash position with cash and cash equivalents up by 109% to US$178 million as at 31 December 2012.

 

Our progress during 2012 has shown that the demand for high quality projects in attractive Moscow locations remains strong. The Company maintained its commitment throughout the year to excellence in development quality and the highest level of customer satisfaction. We are very pleased that recognition of this commitment has been expressed not only in the interest in our properties but also in the form of two of the prestigious "International Property Awards Europe" for the AFIMALL City and Aquamarine III (Ozerkovskaya III) projects.

We believe that our strategy of focusing on high quality projects in Moscow is producing good results that will generate both strong cash-flow and significant capital returns over future years. In 2013 we intend to continue implementing this strategy, benefiting from our completed projects and advancing the progress of our new developments.

 

Management Update

 

Mr Izzy Cohen, non-executive director, resigned from the Company Board of Directors on 17 July 2012 (effective as of 22 July 2012). Mr Cohen's resignation followed his stepping down as CEO of Africa Israel Investments Ltd, the Company's majority shareholder.

 

On 21 August 2012, the Board of Directors of AFI Development, following recommendation by the Nomination Committee, appointed Mr Avraham Novogrocki, the new CEO of Africa Israel Investments Ltd, as Company non-executive director to replace Mr Cohen.

 

On 22 November 2012, the Board of Directors of AFI Development, following the recommendation of the Nomination Committee, appointed Mr Lev Leviev, previously non-executive director and Chairman, to the position of Executive Chairman of the Company.

 

The appointment of Mr Leviev has no impact on the functions and responsibilities of the Executive Director of the Company and CEO of OOO AFI RUS, Mr Mark Groysman. Mr Groysman remains responsible for the on-going operations of AFI Development, while Mr Leviev concentrates on managing government relations of the Company, leading strategic transactions and originating and managing strategic international partnerships.

 

On 28 February, the Board of Directors received a resignation notice (effective as of 1 March 2013) from Mr Michalis Sarris, non-executive director, following his appointment as Minister of Finance in the new government of the Republic of Cyprus. The Company intends to seek a new non-executive director to replace Mr Sarris, and will update the market as and when a replacement has been found.

 

 

Valuation

 

As at 31 December 2012, based on Cushman & Wakefield LLC ("C&W") independent appraisers' report, the value of AFI Development's portfolio of investment properties stood at US$1.5 billion, while the value of the portfolio of investment property under development stood at US$0.7 billion. Additionally, C&W's combined valuation of Westec Four Winds Limited office and retail projects was US$176.5 million (based on the 50% share of AFI Development).

 

Consequently, the total value of the Company assets, based predominantly on independent valuation as of 31 December 2012, was US$2.5 billion. This figure represents an 8% decrease in the value of the portfolio compared to the balance value as of 31 December 2011.

 

The decrease in the value of the Company's assets is mainly attributable to a reduction in value of the Company's Bolshaya Pochtovaya, Kossinskaya, Tverskaya Plaza Ib and Tverskaya Plaza II investment projects under development as a result of changes in master planning and development policies of the Moscow government. As a result of these changes, a reduction in the value of the Company's assets of US$179 million was recognised in Q2 2012. The Company also recognised an impairment loss on real estate inventory of US$65 million as a result of its decision to write off the Botanic Garden project in Q2 2012.

 

For additional information, please refer to the "Portfolio Valuation" section in the Management Discussion and Analysis (the "MD&A").

 

 

Liquidity

We completed 2012 with a strong liquidity position of approximately US$178 million cash and cash equivalents on our balance sheet and a debt[6] to equity level of 35%. This strong position reflects the Company's ability to successfully balance liquidity requirements from a number of sources.

Our financing strategy aims to maximize the amount of debt financing for projects under construction while maintaining healthy loan-to-value levels. After delivery and commissioning we aim to refinance the properties at more favourable terms, including longer amortisation periods, lower interest rates and higher principal balloon payments. Property rights and shares of property holding companies are mainly used as collateral for the debt. We strongly prefer, whenever possible, to use non-recourse project level financing.

For additional information, please refer to the "Liquidity" section of the MD&A.

 

Key developments since financial year end

In January 2013, AFI Development entered into an agreement to purchase the remaining 50% interest and to settle all outstanding liabilities of AFI Development to its partner in Krown Investments LLC (the holding company with the rights to the Ozerkovskaya project) from its joint venture partner, Super Passion Limited, for a total cash consideration of US$227.5 million. As a consequence of the acquisition, the Company became the sole owner of the Ozerkovskaya project at completion of the transaction.

On 28 January 2013, the Company's subsidiary Krown Investments Ltd refinanced its construction costs for Ozerkovskaya III project with a credit line from JSC VTB Bank. The credit line totalling US$220 million carries an annual interest rate of 3 months LIBOR + 5.7%. The credit line was fully drawn down in two tranches in February and in March 2013.

As a result of negotiations with the Moscow city authorities, the Company's development rights to the Botanic Garden project were recognised on 4 February 2013. After thorough assessment of risks to the Company's development rights in respect of the project, AFI Development agreed to make payments to the City of Moscow in return for additional development rights. The total aggregate amount of the payments for additional development rights is approximately US$18.5 million, which will be paid in several instalments.

 

Portfolio Update

 

AFIMALL City

 

In 2012, AFIMALL City passed the milestone of 12 months of operation. During this time the Mall has continued to see increases in footfall, growing at the rate of 5% per month, with average daily footfall reaching 40,000 visitors in December 2012. The underground parking space, purchased by the Company in December 2011 has supported this momentum, creating an integrated parking area serving the shopping centre with a total of 2,075 parking spaces.

During 2012, we streamlined operations of AFIMALL City by improving the quality of the tenant mix, rent collections and overall profitability of the centre. Though the occupancy remained stable at 77% throughout the year, the revenues, NOI and rent collections demonstrated growth. The increased customer footfall ensures AFIMALL City is well placed to sustain high levels of rental income over the coming years.

While these factors have led to increased revenues from the Mall, we have maintained our commitment to reducing costs. We have refinanced the project with a total credit line of RUR21 billion (around US$666 million), reducing the average interest rate from 9.62% to around 8.22%. This refinancing was provided by VTB Group. The large size and favourable terms of the lending arrangement are strong evidence of confidence of leading Russian lenders in AFI Development and in AFIMALL City in particular.

OZERKOVSKAYA III

At the start of 2013, AFI Development acquired the 50% share held by its joint venture partner, Super Passion Limited, in the Ozerkovskaya III (Aquamarine III) project, for a total cash consideration of US$230 million. The transaction was completed in February 2013, when AFI Development exercised its right under the agreement with Super Passion Limited to pay the consideration ahead of schedule applying a discount, which resulted in total consideration paid under the transaction in the amount of US$227.5 million.

 

During 2012, the Company received the operations permit for the property and it continues negotiations with potential purchasers and tenants for the project. In Q4 2012, Ozerkovskaya III was reclassified from Investment Property under Development to Investment Property in the Company's projects portfolio.

HOTELS

During 2012, the Company put into operation the Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk (former Kalinina hotel), adding a second operating property in the Caucasus Mineral Waters region in southern Russia. The two operating hotels, Plaza Spa Hotel Kislovodsk and Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk now operate under a single brand.

Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk successfully completed its first summer season. The hotel won the "Best Resort Hotel 2012" award in the Russian "My planet" hotel awards competition.

The Aquamarine Hotel in Moscow and the Plaza Spa Hotel in Kislovodsk continued to achieve their operational targets for the year.

 

FOUR WINDS

In December 2012, AFI Development announced the sale of its 50% stake in Westec Four Winds Limited, the developer and operator of the Four Winds Office and residential project in Moscow. The deal was completed in January 2013 for a total consideration of approximately US$103 million. The Company's profit from the transaction is expected to amount approximately US$50 million, which was partially booked in Q4 2012 with the remainder to be booked in Q1 2013. The underlying gross enterprise value of Westec Four Winds Limited, based on which the transaction consideration was calculated, was circa US$370 million (for 100%), while the last valuation by JLL stood at US$310 million.

This transaction is in line with our strategy to dispose of our completed developments, at an opportune time and for favourable consideration.

 

TVERSKAYA ZASTAVA PROJECTS

During 2012, the Moscow authorities progressed with the implementation of the non-binding agreement with AFI Development, reached in November 2011.

 

The focus of the Company's activities at the Tverskaya Zastava is represented by the Plaza Ic project. Following the issue of the land plot master plan ("GPZU") by the Moscow city authorities, in November 2012 the Company registered a 10 year land lease for construction of the project, a major milestone in the progress of the project.

 

BOTANIC GARDEN

In August 2012, AFI Development wrote-off its rights to the project following initiation of bankruptcy proceedings against the "main investor" under the investment contract, OAO "Novoe Koltso Moskvy" ("NKM"), while continuing its efforts to recover its costs and/or receive development rights to the project.

As a result of negotiations with the Moscow city authorities, the Company's development rights to the project have been recognized through an addendum to the investment contract for the Botanic Garden project. According to this addendum, NKM shall not have any claims to the investments made by AFI Development in the Botanic Garden project and its subsidiary, OOO "Nordservice", will become the only investor under the investment contract. In line with its decision on the investment contract, the city authorities have agreed to change the lessee in the short term land lease agreement from "NKM" to OOO "Nordservice".

The addendum to the investment contract of 4 February 2013 granted the Company development rights to gross buildable area of 247,705 sq.m. of office, residential and parking space (including 165,578 sq.m. of gross residential space) and to 21,120 sq.m. of on-ground parking space.

After thorough assessment of risks to the Company's development rights in respect of the project, the Company has agreed to make payments to the City of Moscow under the addendum to the investment contract in return for additional development rights. The total aggregate amount of the payments for additional development rights is approximately US$14.2 million plus Nordservice is to compensate the indebtedness of NKM under the investment contract in the amount of approximately US$4.3 million. Both will be paid in several instalments. The decision was based on the opinion of external legal advisers of the Company that, in the event that the addendum is declared void or is cancelled (following a claim by the creditors of NKM), the amounts paid would be repayable back to the Company. It should be noted that the provision to write-off the Botanic Garden (made in August 2012) will not be cancelled at this stage.

 

BOLSHAYA POCHTOVAYA

The Company is currently working on design and planning of the project and aiming to secure the land lease for construction in accordance with the new permitting documentation from the Moscow architectural authorities, issued in the second quarter of 2012, which stipulated that the construction density of the project must be reduced, compared to previous development plan.

Despite the reduction of total buildable area, the city authorities approved the predominant residential use of the areas in this mixed-use development (versus the previously predominant office component), thus improving the potential profitability profile of the project.

 

PAVELETSKAYA PHASE II

During 2012, the Company made significant progress in further securing the development rights for this project. Permitting documentation for the project was received during the second half of the year from the town-planning land committee ("GZK") and the land plot master-plan ("GPZU") with new parameters for the future development of the project.

The Company is working on securing the land lease agreement to allow construction in accordance with the new development documentation as well as on the planning and design of the project.

 

Market Overview - General Moscow Real Estate

 

Macroeconomic environment

According to the Ministry of Economic Development, Russia enjoyed a real GDP growth rate of 3.4% in 2012, driven by strong domestic demand supported by revenues from oil exports. This compares favourably to the average Eurozone GDP growth where continued economic uncertainties continued to dampen growth.

 

At an average price of US$111 per barrel of Urals in 2012, the strong oil price contributed positively to the stable Russian economy. At year-end, the country's negative balance on its financial account was 10 times lower than at the same time in 2011, at US$3 billion. At the same time, the rouble appreciated by 2.4% on average versus the US dollar.

 

The consumer sector, which has traditionally been a key driver of Russian economic development, continued to drive growth in retail sales, which were up by 6% year-on-year. At the same time, inflation increased to 6.6% by December 2012, driven by food price growth and higher utility tariffs.

 

[Source: Commercial Real Estate Report, JLL; Cushman & Wakefield Report; EIU Russia, Rosstat]

 

Moscow office market

At approximately 567,000 sq.m., 2012 was characterised by record low new completions of office buildings over the past 10 years. Limited supply, caused by the 2011 construction restrictions and an increase in developers' constructions cycles, led to a continued decline in vacancy rates to 13.5% overall, or 10.6% for Moscow's Central Business District.

 

Robust demand for high quality space coupled with limited supply also supported stable prime rental rates at US$1,000 - US$1,200 per sq.m., ranking Moscow as the second most expensive office market in Europe. Depending on building class, sales prices for sq.m. of gross building area (excluding VAT) ranged up to US$12,000 (for prime assets).

 

In line with these trends, prime capitalisation rates for Moscow-based office buildings remained unchanged at 9% for prime assets.

 

[Source: Moscow Office MarketView Q4 2012, CBRE; Marketbeat Office Snapshot Q4 2012, Cushman & Wakefield]

 

Moscow Retail Market

The Moscow retail market saw the opening of two shopping centres (GLA of 58,000 sq.m.) and four classical shopping centres (GLA of 102,000 sq.m.) in 2012.

 

Demand from international brands, looking to extend their presence in Moscow remained healthy, boosted by continued volatility in the Eurozone.

 

As a result, by year-end average vacancy rates declined to one of the lowest among cities in Europe at just 2.5%, or between 1% and zero at the most successful properties. At the same time, average rental rates in shopping centres remained stable throughout the year at a level of US$3,000 - US$4,500 per sq.m. per year (for smaller galleria areas).

 

Capitalisation rates for the Moscow prime retail sector also remained unchanged year-on-year at 9%.

 

[Source: Marketbeat Retail Snapshot Q4 2012, Cushman & Wakefield; Moscow Retail Overview - Q4 2012, Jones Lang LaSalle]

 

Moscow and Moscow Region Residential Market

The supply of primary market business class housing doubled in 2012 to 335,000 sq.m. compared to 2011 while demand increased by 12% compared to 2011, reaching 148 primary deals per month.

In 2012, the area weighted average price for primary business-class residential real estate reached US$7,400 per sq.m., with prices in the Central Administrative district of Moscow up by almost 30% to US $8,770 per sq.m.

 

[Commercial Real Estate Report, JLL; Cushman & Wakefield Report; EIU Russia, Rosstat]

 

Board of Directors

The Directors of AFI Development as at the date of this announcement are as set out below:

 

Mr. Lev Leviev, Executive Chairman of the Board

Mr. Mark Groysman, Executive Director

Mr. Avraham Novogrocki, Non-Executive Director

Mr. Christakis Klerides, Senior Non-Executive Independent Director

Mr. Moshe Amit, Non-Executive Independent Director;

Mr. John Porter, Non-Executive Independent Director

Mr. Panayiotis Demetriou, Non-Executive Independent Director

 

 

 

Lev Leviev

Executive Chairman of the Board

Mark Groysman

Executive Director

 

 

19 March 2013

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Overview

 

As at 31 December 2012, the Company's portfolio consisted of 7 investment properties, 8 investment properties under development, 2 trading properties, 5 hotel projects, 2 trading properties under development/non-current inventory and 2 assets for sale at various stages of development. The portfolio comprises commercial projects focused on offices, shopping centres, hotels, mixed-use properties and residential projects in prime locations in Moscow. The total value of the Company's assets, based predominantly on independent valuation as of 31 December 2012, was US$2.5 billion[7]. About 60% of the assets book value is attributed to yielding properties.

 

Revenues for 2012 increased by 21% year-on-year to US$163 million driven predominantly by strong rental income. Successful sales of properties, including the disposal of the 50% holding in the Four Winds project, also contributed to the positive revenue trend. Consequently, AFI Development recorded a significant, 203% year-on-year increase in gross profit to US$59 million. At the same time, cash and cash equivalents increased by 109% to US$178 million as at 31 December 2012.

 

However, primarily as a result of a revaluation loss of US$246.1 million on our investment portfolio, the Company recognized a net loss of US$275.5 million in 2012, compared to a profit of US$171.5 million in 2011. The decrease in the value of AFI Development's assets is mainly attributable to a reduction in value of the Company's Bolshaya Pochtovaya, Kossinskaya, Tverskaya Plaza Ib and Tverskaya Plaza II projects as a result of changes in master planning and development policies of the Moscow government. As a result of these changes, a reduction in the value of the Company's assets of US$173.5 million was recognized in Q2 2012. The Company also recognized an impairment loss on real estate inventory of US$65 million as a result of its decision to write off the Botanic Garden project.

 

Key Factors Affecting our Financial Results

 

Our results have been affected, and are expected to be affected in the future, by a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

Macroeconomic Factors

 

Our properties and projects are mainly located in Russia. As a result, Russian macroeconomic trends and country-specific risks significantly influence our performance.

 

The following table sets out certain macroeconomic information for Russia as of and for the dates indicated:

 

Year ended 31

December 2012

Year ended 31

December 2011

Real Gross Domestic Product growth

3.4%

4.3%

Consumer prices

6.6%

6.1%

 

Source: European Intelligence Unit, State Statistics Agency of the Russian Federation

 

Company Specific Factors

 

The following factors affected our performance in 2012:

 

·; In 2012, AFIMALL City completed its first full year of operations. As the main yielding asset of AFI Development, the mall was the largest contributor to operating revenue and cash flow from operations for the Company.

·; During the year, construction work to finalise the underground parking space at AFIMALL City resulted in additional incurred capital expenditures.

·; In Q2 2012, the Company recognised a valuation loss on investment properties under development in the amount of US$173.5 million, mainly due to a decrease in the value of the Company's four projects: Bolshaya Pochtovaya, Kossinskaya, Tverskaya Plaza Ib and Tverskaya Plaza II. The decrease in value resulted from changes in master planning and development policies of the Moscow government.

·; In Q2 2012, AFI Development recorded an impairment loss on inventory of real estate amounting to US$65 million due to its decision to write-off the Botanic Garden project.

·; During Q4 2012, the Company disposed of part of parking space in the AFIMALL City to JSC VTB Bank, receiving consideration of US$57.1 million. The consideration was partially used to finance the construction of the parking.

·; The disposal of 50% stake in Westec Four Winds Limited in Q4 2012 contributed US$100 million to the 31.12.2012 cash balance.

·; Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk (former Kalinina Hotel) began operations in Q2 2012.

 

 

Key Portfolio Updates

 

YEILDING ASSETS:

AFIMALL City:

AFIMALL City is a retail and entertainment development, located in the high-rise business district of Moscow, "Moscow-City". With a total GBA of nearly 304,205 sq.m. (including parking), and GLA of nearly 107,000 sq.m., the project has a shopping gallery of nearly 400 shops and an 11-screen movie theatre with a number of additional outstanding leisure facilities. AFIMALL City is one of Europe's largest and most ambitious retail developments in recent years. The Mall introduces a new standard of quality to the Russian retail sector and offers visitors a combined shopping, dining and entertainment experience unmatched in any other retail development in Moscow.

During 2012, AFIMALL City reported a strong increase in footfall with average daily footfall for December 2012 reaching approximately 40,000 visitors, compared to 28,000 in December 2011, a significant 36% increase year-on-year. This success was driven by our substantial marketing campaign, the launch of our integrated parking lot and increasing awareness of the Mall amongst our target customers.

During 2012, the Company made special efforts to increase weekend footfall to the Mall, by focusing on advertising and organizing special weekend events. As a result, the monthly average daily week-end footfall in December 2012 was approximately 36,000, compared to approximately 23,000 in December 2011, a 57% increase year-on-year.

In June 2012, AFIMALL City loans were refinanced by a bank of the VTB Group. The total credit line of RUR21 billion (around US$666 million), reduced the average interest rate from 9.62% to around 8.22% and extended the maturity of the facility to April 2018.

In November 2012, Bellgate Construction Limited ("Bellgate"), the Company subsidiary owning and operating AFIMALL City, disposed of approximately 643 parking lots to JSC VTB Bank, which will use this parking space for its office headquarters located next to AFIMALL City. The transaction is structured in two stages. The first stage entailed a sale-purchase transaction between Bellgate and VTB Bank on 21,354 sq.m. of parking space. During the second stage 9,247 sq.m. owned (at completion) by VTB Bank will be exchanged for 7,847 sq.m. owned by Bellgate. This two-tier transaction structure stemmed from the fact that part of the parking space that VTB Bank is interested in purchasing is located on a land plot to which Bellgate has not yet registered leasehold rights. The resulting estimated total net cash flow for AFI Development is US$54.5 million and net profit is circa US$20 million. As of 31 December.2012, the Company received 90% of the total consideration in the amount of US$51.4 million (net of VAT), while the remaining 10% are expected to be received at completion, when Bellgate registers the title to the parking to VTB Bank.

During 2012, Bellgate finalised the construction and put into operation all the three phases of integrated underground parking of the shopping centre, acquired in November 2011. All parking lots are now fully constructed and operational. The amount of parking (more than 2,000 lots) is sufficient for smooth and convenient operations of the centre.

During 2012, the City of Moscow progressed with the construction of the new metro station "Delovoi Center" on the "Kalininsko-Sontsevskaya" line, which will be connected to the existing "Vystavochnaya" station. The new station will have direct access to AFIMALL City. The "Kalininsko-Sontsevskaya" line (which is currently only partially operational) is planned to connect the eastern and south-western areas of Moscow and, according to officially published information of the Moscow Metro, the new station is planned to become operational by the end of 2013. The new station will further improve the accessibility of AFIMALL City by the most popular method of public transportation in Moscow and will increase the catchment area of the Mall.

The general construction of high-rise towers of Moscow-City has also seen progress. By the end of 2012, almost 500,000 sq.m. of office space was completed. According to a report prepared by Jones Lang LaSalle, the following buildings are expected to be completed by the end of 2013 (308,000 sq.m. of office leasable area in total): CityPoint, Mercury City Tower, Federation Tower (Vostok) and Eurasia Tower. Employees of office tenants within Moscow City represent a significant percentage of the Mall's footfall and these further completions and let office space in Moscow City is expected to further enhance footfall at AFIMALL City.

Based on the independent valuation of the Company portfolio by Cushman & Wakefield as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of AFIMALL City was US$1,160 million.

FOUR WINDS:

The Four Winds project is a completed development in central Moscow consisting of a residential building, fully let class A office centre and fully let retail and fitness zones. Four Winds is a modern class A office centre with lettable area of 21,495 sq.m. leased to well-known international tenants, such as Barclays Capital, Morgan Stanley and Total SA. The project was co-developed by AFI Development (50%) and Snegiri Development (50%). 

In December 2012, the Company disposed of its 50% of stake in Westec Four Winds Limited (along with its partner, Snegiri Development), which had developed and operated Four Winds. The deal was completed in January 2013 with total consideration received by the Company of circa US$103.4 million. The transaction also resulted in reduction of overall debt of AFI Development following the removal of the project loan by Nordea Bank from its consolidated balance sheet.  

Based on the disposal transaction, the fair value of the Company share in Four Winds (including the office building, retail/fitness zone and remaining unsold apartments and parking lots) as of 31 December 2012 was US$178.3 million.

OZERKOVSKAYA III:

Ozerkovskaya (Aquamarine) III is an office complex forming part of the "Aquamarine" mixed-use development, located on the Ozerkovskaya embankment in the very heart of the historical Zamoskvorechie district of Moscow. The project consists of four Class A buildings of 55,422 sq.m. of combined lettable space and common underground parking for 557 cars. The project creates very attractive working conditions through state-of-the-art architecture, innovative design and efficient use of space. Due to these characteristics "Aquamarine III" sets new standards for quality and an aspirational environment among Moscow's commercial developments. The project was designated as "Highly Commended Office Development Russia" by International Property Awards in 2012.  

In January 2013, the Company agreed to purchase the remaining 50% interest and to settle all outstanding liabilities from its joint venture partner, Super Passion Limited, for a total cash consideration of US$227.5 million (the transaction was completed in February 2013). As a result of the acquisition, the Company became the sole owner of the project.   

AFI Development is negotiating with potential buyers and tenants on selling/leasing the project either in full or in parts.  

Based on the independent valuation of the Company portfolio by Cushman & Wakefield as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Ozerkovskaya III was US$389 million (for the 100% share).

 

PLAZA SPA HOTEL ZHELEZNOVODSK (FORMER KALININA HOTEL): 

The project involves the renovation of an existing building to a modern hotel with sanatorium facilities on a site of approximately 0.1 hectares with 134 guest rooms, of which 14% are suites. A spa area occupies approximately 1,100 sq.m., which includes 45 treatment rooms, saunas, jacuzzi, an indoor swimming pool and extensive medical and diagnostic facilities. 

During Q2 2012, the development of the Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk was successfully completed and the hotel was put into operation in June 2012. During the first months of operation, the hotel experienced significant demand from customers and has already obtained positive feedback from its guests. Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk is on track to establish itself as one of the leading hotels in its region. 

The project's value on the Company balance sheet was US$24.3 million as of 31 December 2012.

 

DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

TVERSKAYA PROJECTS:

Following the non-binding agreement between AFI Development and the City of Moscow, the City is progressing with renewing and re-approving the Company's development rights and leasehold interests in land plots at the Plaza Ic (part of Plaza I), Plaza IIa and Plaza IV projects. In Q2 2012, the Company reclassified Tverskaya Plaza Ib and Tverskaya Plaza II from "investment properties under development" to "investment properties". This was also reflected in a change of valuation approach, implemented by the independent appraiser (Jones Lang LaSalle) by valuing the assets as yielding properties, rather than as development projects.  

Plaza Ic

The project is a class A office complex with a Gross Building Area of 51,200 sq.m. (including underground parking of approximately 519 parking spaces) located at 50/2, 2nd Brestskaya street. The estimated gross lettable area is expected to amount to 32,454 sq.m. One key attraction of this project is the excellent access both by public and private transport, and its location in a well-developed and established business district.  

The Company is progressing with planning works and approval of the project with City authorities. The registration of the 10 year land lease for construction in November 2012 represents a significant milestone in the development process.  

Plaza Ic is the most advanced among the three Tverskaya Zastava projects, which were part of the non-binding agreement with the Moscow authorities in November 2012.  

Based on the independent valuation of the Company portfolio by Cushman & Wakefield as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Plaza Ic was US$106.6 million.  

Plaza IIa

The project is class A office complex with a Gross Building Area of 10,500 sq.m (including underground parking), located at 1, Butyrsky Val. The estimated gross lettable area is 7,600 sq.m. The project is located on the land plot facing the Belorussky railway station on the opposite side of the Tverskaya Zastava Square.  

Following the review of general transportation scheme of the Tverskaya Zastava Square, the exact borders of the land plot of Tverskaya IIa have to be aligned with the new transportation scheme, which is currently being developed by the Moscow authorities. 

Based on the independent valuation of the Company portfolio by Cushman & Wakefield as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Plaza IIa was US$32 million.

 

Plaza IV

The project is a class A office complex with supporting ground level retail zones, having a Gross Building Area of 108,000 sq.m. (including underground parking), located at 11, Gruzinsky Val. The estimated gross lettable area is 61,350 sq.m. Plaza IV is the largest of the three Tverskaya Zastava projects.  

According to the non-binding agreement with the Moscow authorities of November 2011, in order to receive the land plot master plan ("GPZU") for Plaza IV, the Company has to waive its ownership to seven land plots with a total area of 2,145 sq.m. The Company is in discussions with the city regarding the technicalities of waiving its rights to the land plots while trying to secure its development rights in line with the agreement.  

Based on the independent valuation of the Company portfolio by Cushman & Wakefield as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Plaza IV was US$168 million

KOSSINSKAYA:

Kossinskaya project is planned as a mixed-use complex with a unique concept for accommodation of small DIY shops and offices (architecture and engineering bureaus etc.). The immediate proximity to a dense residential area and convenient access to the main motorways and metro station make this project attractive to retailers and convenient for office employees. Active construction of residential properties in the Southeast region of Moscow region creates significant regional demand for quality construction services and products. 

Following the decision of the Russian Parliament to extend the borders of Moscow to the South-West in June 2012 and the gradual move of development interest to the Western parts of Moscow, the Company had to re-visit the development concept of the project to sustain its competitiveness and to build a property of higher quality. As a result, the fair value of the project was reduced from US$146.1 million in December 2011 to US$102.7 million in December 2012. 

The Company is now performing capital repair works on the property. The works entail the installation of additional lifts, escalators, construction of additional ventilation shafts and an increase in common space, which makes the property more attractive for customers. However, it results in a reduction of the gross leasable area and higher projected costs.  

Based on the independent valuation of the Company portfolio by Cushman & Wakefield as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Kossinskaya was US$102.7 million.

 

OTRADNOE (ODINTSOVO):  

The Otradnoe residential district is located in the town of Odintsovo, a modern area considered to be one of the best and most environmentally clean towns in the Moscow region. The entire residential district takes up an area of 33.14 hectares, which will host eight 8-to-25 story buildings. The residential element will offer almost 9,000 Economy-Plus class apartments and a total sellable area of 450,208 sq.m. (Company share). The development of the residential district will include multi-functional infrastructure comprising of 2 schools, 2 kindergartens, a medical centre, a library equipped with a computer lab, sport centres, a beauty salon, a club for teenagers, and a children's sport school amongst other facilities.  

According to the development strategy, the project involves a construction of a multi-storey residential micro district consisting of two phases:

Phase I - construction of a 22-section residential building, named Korona (Crown), construction of infrastructure (Kindergarten, School) with total sellable area of 149,432 sq.m. (2,620 apartments);

Phase II - construction of 8 residential buildings, construction of infrastructure (Kindergarten, school, outdoor multi-level parking) with total sellable area of 319,775 sq.m. (6,247 apartments):

Each phase includes commercial premises on the ground floor that are planned to be disposed to end users. 

The design of the "Otradnoe" micro district has been approved by the government of the Moscow region. During 2012, the Company received approval for the design documentation and the construction permit for phase I which is valid until May 30 2017.  

Since the project involves significant amounts of space to be offered to the market, the construction of Phase I is planned to be carried out in four stages. The Company is planning to start the construction of the first stage of Phase I in Q2 2013. 

The Company is planning to finance the construction partially through a bank loan. The negotiations with potential financing banks are in process. 

The balance sheet value of the project as of 31 December 2012 amounted to US$112 million.

 

BOLSHAYA POCHTOVAYA: 

Bolshaya Pochtovaya is a mixed-use project with dominant residential use and a total gross building space of 170,350 sq.m. on a land area of 5.65 hectares. The future development is located in the Central Administrative district of Moscow. The land plot borders a river which will significantly enhance the views from the project. The project is located in an attractive neighbourhood, which benefits from developed social infrastructure: transport, shops and cultural/leisure amenities.  

During the second quarter of 2012, the Moscow architectural authorities had a series of internal discussions relating to the new master-planning policy in the area of Bolshaya Pochtovaya. The Company initiated discussions with the authorities to influence the decision relating to the planned construction density for the project, however, the city indicated that the construction density of the project should be reduced. The development permitting documentation, obtained by the Company as a result of the policy change (the decision of the town-planning land committee "GZK" and the land plot master-plan "GPZU") in respect to the property, anticipates the development of a total gross building area of 170,350 sq.m., including 67,800 sq.m of residential area, 39,150 sq.m of commercial area and 62,200 sq.m. of underground area.  

The Company is currently working on the design and planning of the project as well as on securing the land lease for construction in accordance with the new permitting documentation.  

Based on the independent valuation of the Company portfolio by Cushman & Wakefield as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Bolshaya Pochtovaya was US$141.3 million.

PAVELETSKAYA PHASE II:

Paveletskaya Phase II is planned as an ultramodern residential complex in proximity to the Moscow city centre on Paveletskaya Embankment, with the total gross building area of 151,373 sq.m. The project is located in Danilovsky Subdistrict (the South Administrative district of Moscow), between the Garden ring and the Third Transportation Ring and can be easily accessed by private or public transport.

During the second half of 2012, the Company obtained permitting documentation for the project, namely the decision of the town-planning land committee ("GZK") and the land plot master-plan ("GPZU") with new parameters for future development. The gross building area of the project is 151,373 sq.m, including 61,401 sq.m of residential area, circa 15,000 sq.m. of commercial area and 57,310 sq.m. of underground space. 

During the course of 2012, the Company made significant progress in further securing the development rights for this project and is currently working on obtaining a land lease agreement for construction in accordance with the development plan.  

The balance sheet value of the project as of 31 December 2012 amounts to US$11.6 million, which is based on the project's cadastral value and it is now classified as Investment Property under Development.

 

LAND BANK

In addition to yielding assets and projects under development, AFI Development has an extensive land bank, or projects that the Company is currently not developing.

Whilst retaining full flexibility regarding future development of these projects, the Company remains well placed to benefit from further recovery in the regional real estate markets. Given its strong track record in bringing projects to completion, this represents a significant competitive advantage for AFI Development. 

The Company's strategy with respect to its land bank is to activate projects upon securing necessary financing and gaining full confidence in the levels of demand from prospective tenants or buyers.

 

 

 

Key Events Subsequent to 31 December 2012

 

Following the year-end the following key events occurred:

 

·; In January 2013, AFI Development entered into an agreement to purchase the remaining 50% interest and to settle all outstanding liabilities of AFI Development to its partner in Krown Investments LLC (the holding company with the rights to the Ozerkovskaya project) from its joint venture partner, Super Passion Limited, for a total cash consideration of US$230 million. The transaction was completed in February 2013, when AFI Development exercised its right under the agreement with Super Passion Limited to pay the consideration ahead of agreed schedule of payments applying a discount. Total consideration paid in this transaction was US$227.5 million. Following the transaction completion, the Company became the sole owner of the Ozerkovskaya project.

·; On 28 January 2013, the Company's subsidiary Krown Investments Ltd signed a loan facility agreement with JSC VTB Bank to refinance its construction costs related to the development of Ozerkovskaya III, which were initially financed by intra-group loans provided by companies within the AFI Development group. The new loan facility offers a credit line totalling US$220 million and carries an annual interest rate of 3 months LIBOR + 5.7%. The credit line can be drawn down in US Dollars in two tranches: the first tranche of US$150 million can be drawn down within 14 days from execution of the loan facility agreement, while the second tranche of US$70 million can be drawn down between 1 March 2013 and 14 March 2013. Both tranches of the loan were drawn down in February and March 2013.

·; As a result of negotiations with the Moscow city authorities, the Company's development rights to the project were recognized through an addendum to the investment contract for the Botanic Garden project dated 4 February 2013. According to this addendum, NKM shall not have any claims to the investments made by AFI Development in the Botanic Garden project and its subsidiary, OOO "Nordservice", became the only investor under the investment contract. After thorough assessment of risks to the Company's development rights in respect of the project, AFI Development agreed to make payments to the City of Moscow under the addendum to the investment contract in return for additional development rights. The total aggregate amount of the payments for additional development rights is approximately US$18.5 million, which will be paid in several instalments. It should be noted that the provision to write-off the Botanic Garden (made in August 2012) was not cancelled at this stage, due to remaining legal risks related to the on-going bankruptcy proceedings of NKM.

 

Disposals and Acquisitions

 

During 2012 the Company made the following disposals:

 

In March 2012, the Company disposed of its subsidiary Roppler Engineering Inc. and its Russian subsidiary Tsentr Dosuga Molodezhi LLC, which were part of the "Kuntsevo" project, for nominal value, to unrelated third party. The disposal was driven by cost cutting considerations, as the Russian subsidiary was party to an expensive lease contract of a building in the "Kuntsevo" area of Moscow. Following the decision of the Moscow government dated 20 September, 2011 to cancel the reconstruction programme of the transportation hub near the "Kuntsevskaya" metro station, the Company did not see further possibilities to secure any development rights to the disposed subsidiaries.

In March 2012, the Company completed the disposal of the "Ozerkovskaya Phase IV" project for a total consideration of US$6 million. The project, consisting of a freehold title to an office building with a total area of 1,864.3 sq.m. and leasehold rights to underlying land plot, located at 3, Ozerkovsky Lane, Moscow, had a book value of US$3.16 million as at the date of disposal.

In December 2012, the Company disposed of its 50% interest in the subsidiary Westec Four Winds Limited ("Westec") to an unrelated third party, Capricornus Investments Limited. Westec has developed and is currently operating the Four Winds office and residential project in Moscow. The Four Winds Project was co-developed by AFI Development and S&T Equity (Overseas) Limited (of the "Snegiri Development" Group), with each holding a 50% stake in Westec. Both AFI Development and S&T Equity (Overseas) Limited agreed to dispose of their respective shares in Westec to Capricornus Investments Limited. The transaction was successfully completed on 16 January 2013. The total consideration received by the Company was US$103.4 million.

During 2012, the Company did not make any acquisitions.

 

The following acquisition was made after the end of financial year 2012:

In January 2013, AFI Development entered into an agreement to purchase the remaining 50% interest and to settle all outstanding liabilities of AFI Development to its partner in Krown Investments LLC (the holding company with the rights to the Ozerkovskaya project) from its joint venture partner, Super Passion Limited, for a total cash consideration of US$227.5 million.

Presentation of Financial Information

 

Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), as adopted by the European Union ("EU"), which were in effect at the time of preparing our consolidated financial statements, and the requirements of the Companies Law of Cyprus, Cap. 113. IFRS differs in various material respects from US GAAP and UK GAAP.

 

Financial policies and practices

 

Revenue Recognition

The key elements of our revenue recognition policies are as follows:

 

·; Rental income. We recognise rental income from investment properties leased out under operating leases in our statement of comprehensive income on a straight line basis over the term of the lease.

 

·; Construction consulting and construction management fees. We recognise revenues from construction consulting and construction management services in our statement of comprehensive income, in proportion to the stage of the project as at the relevant reporting date. We assess the stage of completion by reference to the amount of work performed.

 

·; Sales of trading properties. We recognise revenue from the sale of trading properties in our statement of comprehensive income when the risks and rewards of ownership of the property are transferred to the buyer. When we receive down payments in connection with the sale of trading property that is under construction, we record this figure in the current liabilities on our balance sheet at the time of sale.

 

 

Operating expenses

Operating expenses consist mainly of employee wages, social benefits and property operating expenses, including property tax, which are directly attributable to revenues. We recognise as expenses in our statement of comprehensive income the costs of those employees who have provided construction consulting and construction management services with respect to our investment and trading property. We also recognise property operating costs (including outsourced building maintenance), utilities, security and other tenant services related to our properties that generate rental income, as expenses on our statement of comprehensive income.

 

Administrative expenses

Our administrative expenses comprise primarily of general and administrative expenses such as, audit and consulting, marketing costs, charity, travelling and entertainment, office equipment as well as depreciation expenses related to our office use motor vehicles, bad debt provisions and other provisions.

 

Profit on disposal of investment in subsidiaries

We recognise profit or loss from the sale of interests in our subsidiaries when the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the buyer in the transaction.

 

Revaluation of investment property

An external, independent valuation company, having appropriate recognised professional qualifications and recent experience in the location and categories of properties being valued, values the Company's investment property portfolio every six months. The fair values are based on market values, being the estimated amount for which a property could be exchanged on the date of the valuation in a transaction between a willing buyer and a willing seller after proper marketing, wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion. The difference between revalued fair value of investment property and its book value is recognised as gain or loss in the statement of comprehensive income.

 

Operating profit before net finance costs

Operating profit before net finance costs is calculated by adding revenue, other income, profit on disposal of investment in subsidiaries and valuation gains on investment property, and subtracting operating expenses, administrative expenses and other expenses.

 

Finance income

Our finance income comprises net foreign exchange gain, if any, and interest income. We recognise foreign exchange gains and losses, principally in connection with US Dollar or other foreign currency denominated payables and receivables of our Russian subsidiaries, whose functional currency is the Rouble. Our interest income is derived primarily from interest on our bank deposits and interest on loans to our joint ventures, including Crown Investments LLC.

 

Finance expenses

Our finance expense comprises net foreign exchange loss, if any, and interest expense on outstanding loans less interest capitalised. We recognise foreign exchange gains and losses principally in connection with US Dollar denominated payables and receivables of our Russian subsidiaries, whose functional currency is the Rouble. We capitalise our interest expense with respect to our development projects that are under construction, for which amounts are not reflected as expenses in our statement of comprehensive income. When funds are borrowed specifically for a particular project, we capitalize all actual borrowing costs related to the project less income earned on the temporary investment of such borrowings and when funding for a project is obtained from our general funds, we capitalise only funding costs related to the particular project based on the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to our general funds.

 

Income tax expense

Income taxes are calculated based on tax legislation applicable to the country of residence of each of our subsidiaries and, as a company based and organised in Cyprus, we are subject to income tax in Cyprus. We and our Cypriot subsidiaries are currently subject to a statutory corporate income tax rate of 10% in Cyprus. Our Russian subsidiaries were subject to corporate income tax at a rate of 20%. Profits on revaluation gains of investment property in companies based in Russia, from which we have derived the vast majority of our profits to date, are subject to deferred income tax at a rate of 20%.

 

Capitalisation of Costs for Properties under Development 

We capitalise all costs directly related to the purchase and construction of properties being developed as both investment properties and trading properties, including costs to acquire land rights and premises, design costs, permit costs, costs of general contractors, costs relating to the lease of the underlying land and the majority of our employee costs related to such projects.

 

In addition, we capitalise financing costs related to development projects only during the period of construction of the projects. We do not, however, commence the capitalising of financing costs related to expenditures on a project until construction on each project begins. Since the Company's adoption of IAS 40 from 1 January 2009, upon completion of construction works, property classified as investment property under development (which are those properties that are being constructed or developed for future use to earn rental income or for capital appreciation) is appraised to market value and reclassified as an investment property and any gain or loss on appraisal is recognised in our statement of comprehensive income. Trading properties, which include those projects where we intend to sell the entire project as a whole or in part (this principally includes our residential development projects), are represented on our balance sheet at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and sale.

 

Exchange Rates

Our consolidated financial statements are presented in US Dollars, which is our functional currency. The functional currency of our Russian subsidiaries and joint ventures and one Cyprus company is the Rouble. The balance sheets of our Russian subsidiaries are translated into US Dollars in accordance with IAS 21, whereby assets and liabilities are translated into US Dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date and income and expense items are translated into US Dollars at the average exchange rate for the period. All resulting foreign currency exchange rate differences are recognised directly in our shareholders' equity under the line item "translation reserve." When a foreign operation is sold, the cumulative amount of the exchange differences deferred in the separate component of equity relating to that foreign operation is recognised in our statement of comprehensive income when the gain or loss on disposal of the foreign operation is recognised. The monetary assets and liabilities of our Russian subsidiaries that are denominated in currencies other than Roubles are initially recorded by our subsidiaries at the exchange rate between the Rouble and such foreign currency prevailing at such date. Such monetary assets and liabilities are then retranslated into Roubles at the exchange rate prevailing at each subsequent balance sheet date. We recognise the resulting exchange rate differences between the dates at which such assets or liabilities were originally recorded and at subsequent balance sheet dates as foreign exchange losses and gains in our statement of comprehensive income. In particular, during the period under review, we have recognised foreign exchange rate gains and losses in connection with US Dollar denominated payables and receivables of our Russian subsidiaries.

 

Recovery of VAT

We pay VAT to the Russian authorities with respect to construction costs and expenses incurred in connection with our projects, which, according to Russian tax law, can be recovered upon completion of construction. Under a revised Russian VAT legislation, VAT can also be claimed during the period of construction provided that all required documentation is presented to the VAT authorities. We have accordingly included recoverable VAT as an asset on our balance sheet, the size of which we expect will slightly decrease as the development of our projects advances and necessary documents will be obtained. 

 

Deferred Taxation

As we continue to advance the development of our projects, we also expect to record higher deferred tax liabilities and assets. Under Russian tax law, we are not allowed to capitalise certain of the costs in relation to the design, construction and financing of projects that we capitalise for the purposes of our consolidated financial statements under IFRS. As a result, our tax bases in the related assets may be lower than our accounting bases for IFRS purposes, which would result in deferred tax liabilities. However, the recognition of such costs as expenses may result in accumulated tax losses for Russian tax purposes that we may be able to carry forward against estimated future profits, resulting in deferred tax assets. We expect these deferred tax liabilities and assets to grow as our major projects reach more advanced stages. However, such tax losses may only be carried forward to offset gains for a ten-year period under Russian tax law and they may only be utilised in the Russian subsidiary/branch in which such tax losses were generated.

 

Fair Value Calculation  

Our future results of operations may be affected by our measurement of the fair value of our investment properties and changes in the fair value of such properties. Upon completion of construction, the projects that we have classified as investment property under development are reassessed at fair value and reclassified as investment property, and any gain or loss as a result of reassessment is recognised in our statement of comprehensive income.

 

Any change in fair value of the investment property under development is thereafter recognised as a gain or loss in the statement of comprehensive income. Accordingly, fair value measurements of investment properties under development may significantly affect results of operations even if the Company does not dispose of such assets.

 

 

Results of Operations

 

 

Description of Statement of comprehensive income Line Items

 

Summary of statement of comprehensive income for 2012 and 2011

 

US$ million

2012

2011

Change 2012 / 2011

Revenue

Construction consulting/management services

2.5

1.0

1.5

151.2%

Rental income

146.0

117.0

29.0

24.8%

Sale of residential

14.1

15.9

(1.8)

(11.4)%

162.6

133.9

28.7

21.4%

Expenses

Other income

3.3

0.7

2.6

359.3%

Operating expenses

(74.4)

(72.1)

(2.3)

(3.2)%

Administrative expenses

(19.8)

(30.3)

10.5

34.7%

including Bad debt provisions and write-offs

(3.6)

(13.3)

9.7

72.9%

Cost of sales of residential

(9.2)

(10.4)

1.2

11.3%

Other expenses

(3.3)

(2.3)

(0.9)

(39.8)%

(103.4)

(114.4)

11.0

9.6%

Gross profit

59.2

19.5

39.7

203.4%

Impairment of prepayment for investments

-

(1.2)

1.2

100%

Valuation gains on investment property

(246.1)

268.0

(514.1)

(191.8)%

Negative goodwill

-

-

-

Impairment loss for trading property and hotels

(65.4)

1.0

(66.4)

(6640)%

Results from operating activities

(252.2)

287.3

(539.6)

(187.8)%

Profit on sale/disposal of properties/investment

2.7

2.7

100%

Finance income

11.6

8.2

3.4

40.6%

Finance expense

(61.4)

(43.3)

(18.1)

(42.0)%

FX Gain/( Loss)

15.9

(5.6)

21.5

383.3%

Impairment of financial asset

-

-

-

Net finance income/(costs)

(33.9)

(40.7)

6.8

16.5%

Profit before income tax

(283.5)

246.6

(530.1)

(215)%

Income tax expense

8.0

(75.1)

83.1

110.7%

Profit from continuing operations

(275.5)

171.5

(447.0)

(260.6)%

 

Revenue - General Overview

 

To date, we have derived revenues from three sources: rental income, sale of investment property, sale of residential properties and construction consulting and construction management fees.

 

Rental income

 

We derive rental income from our investment properties and hotels that we acquired or developed in the past.

 

US$ million

For the year ended 31 December 2012

For the year ended 31 December 2011

Change 2012/2011

US$ million

%% 

Investment property

AFIMALL City

81.4

65.1

16.3

25.1%

4 Winds office building

16.2

17.2

(1.0)

(5.8)%

4 Winds street retail

1.6

1.6

0.0

0%

H2O office building

3.1

2.8

0.3

11.2%

Berezhkovskya office building

5.0

4.9

0.1

2%

Paveletskaya I

4.7

2.9

1.8

59.3%

Ozerkovskaya IV

0.0

0.0

(0.0)

0%

Premises at Bolshaya Pochtovaya

5.6

5.4

0.2

4.4%

Premises at Plaza IV (Gruzinsky Val)

0.2

0.2

(0.0)

(2.8)%

Premises at Tverskaya Zastava Square

3.5

2.8

0.7

26.2%

Other land bank assets

0.1

0.7

(0.6)

(85.7)%

Hotels

Aquamarine hotel

10.0

9.3

0.7

7.8%

Plaza Spa Hotel (Zheleznovodsk)

3.5

0.0

3.5

100%

Sanatoriy Plaza (Kislovodsk)

11.1

4.1

7.0

172.9%

Total

146.0

117.0

29.0

24.8%

Sale of residential properties

 

US$ million

For the year ended 31 December 2012

For the year ended 31 December 2011

Change 2012/2011

US$

%%

'thousands

Revenue

Ozerkovskaya II

12.1

13.2

(1,1)

(8.5)%

4 Winds residential

2.0

2.7

(0.7)

(25.6)%

Total

14.1

15.9

(1.8)

(11.5)%

 

 

Operating expenses. Our operating expenses increased with a net change of US$2.3 million from US$72.1 million in 2011 to US$74.4 million in 2012. The increase of 3.2% year-on-year is attributable to overall market inflation of expenses.

 

Administrative expenses. Our administrative expenses decreased by US$10.5 million, 34.7% year-on-year, from US$30.3 million in 2011 to US$19.8 million in 2012. The decrease was achieved by significant improvement in rent collections at AFIMALL City and other yielding assets, which resulted in decreased bad debt provision. The bad debt provision for 2012 was US$3.6 million compared to US$13.3 million in 2011.

 

Other expenses.Other expenses increased by US$1.0 million, or 43.4% year-on-year, from US$2.3 million in 2011 to US$3.3 million in 2012 mainly due to write-off of overdue non-recoverable VAT and accounts receivable, which were not accounted for in previous periods.

 

Net valuation gain/(losses) on investment property. Net result of investment property valuation decreased from a gain of US$268.0 million in 2011 to a loss of US$246.1 million in 2012. For additional information, please refer to "Portfolio Valuation".

 

Net finance costs. Net finance costs are finance income less finance expense. Our net finance costs decreased by US$6.8 million, or 16.3% year-on-year, from US$40.7 million in 2011 to US$34.0 million in 2012. On one hand, our finance expenses increased in respect of interests accrued on outstanding loans (new loan facility drown down by Bellgate Constructions Limited), however on the other hand this loan gave us a foreign exchange gain for 2012 due to Rouble appreciation in Q2 2012.

 

Income tax expense. Our current tax expense decreased to US$5.3 million compared to US$13.6 million in 2011 - the main driver for decreased current tax expenses was group financing restructuring completed in 2012.

 

Profit/Loss for the year. Due to the factors described above we recorded a US$275.5 million net loss for 2012 compared to net profit of US$171.5 million for 2011.

 

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Cash flows

Summary of cash flows for 2012 and 2011

 

US$ 'thousands

For the year ended 31 December 2012

For the year ended 31 December 2011

Net cash from operating activities

57,956

27,821

Net cash from investing activities

78,354

(179,555)

Net cash used in financing activities

(36,693)

118,246

Effect of exchange rate fluctuations

(1,551)

(11,531)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

98,066

(45,019)

Reclassification to assets held for sale

(4,691)

-

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January

84,820

129,839

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

178,195

84,820

 

 

Net cash from operating activities

Net cash from operating activities increased to US$58 million in 2012 from US$27.8 million in 2011. This increase was primarily attributable to the increase of gross profit to US$59.2 for 2012 from US$19.6 million for 2011.

 

Net cash from investing activities

Net cash from investing activities amounted to US$78.4 million reflecting the advance payment US$100.0 million for disposal of our share in Westec Four Winds Limited. Additionally, a part of the investment activities cash outflows were ongoing investments into Ozerkovskaya III and construction of parking at AFIMALL City.

 

Net cash used in financing activities

Net cash sourced from financing activities decreased to negative US$36.7 million in 2012 from positive US$118.2 million in 2011. The Company decreased its net borrowings to US$22.1 million in 2012 as opposed to US$179.0 million upturn in 2011. The prevailing part of debt decrease relates to the repayment of loan from JSC VTB Bank for 25% city share acquisition at AFIMALL City project RUR1,333 million principal plus RUR 7.9 million interest. All necessary funds for the AFIMALL Parking acquisition and construction works financing have been provided for in the new loan facility provided by the VTB Group. The remainder relates to repayment in full of loans taken from Sberbank to finance construction of Ozerkovskaya III and Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre project.

 

 

Capital Resources

Capital Requirements

We require capital to finance capital expenditures, consisting of cash outlays for capital investments in active real estate development projects; repayment of debt; changes in working capital; and general corporate activities. 

 

Real estate development is a capital-intensive business, and we expect to have significant ongoing liquidity and capital requirements in order to finance our active development projects.

For the foreseeable future, we expect that we will continue to rely on our financing activities to support our investing and operating activities. We also expect that our capital expenditures in connection with the development of real estate properties will comprise the majority of our cash outflows for the foreseeable future.

 

We completed 2012 with a strong liquidity position comprising US$178.2 million cash and cash equivalents on our balance sheet as at 31 December 2012.

Our financing strategy is to balance the amount of debt financing for projects under construction while maintaining healthy loan-to-value levels. After delivery and commissioning, we refinance the properties at more favourable terms including longer amortisation periods and lower interest rates.

Generally, the collateral for this project level debt are property title and shares of property holding companies.

 

As of December 31, 2012 our debt portfolio was as follows:

 

Project

Lending bank

Max debt limit

Principal balance as of Dec-31, 2012

Available (US$ mn)

Nominal Interest rate

Currency

Maturity

(US$ mn)

(US$ mn)

(dd.mm.yy)

AFIMALL

VTB Group Bank

666.3

226.4

130.6

9.5%

RUB

01.04.2018

309.4

3-month LIBOR + 6.7%

US$

Plaza Spa Hotel Zheleznovodsk (Kalinina Hotel)

Sberbank

20

19.9

0

 

(13.5% under Credit facility minus 6.75% subsidy)

RUB

20.12.2014

The total balance of Debt financing reached US$555.9 million as at 31 of December 2012, including US$ 555.7 million for the Principal Debt and US$ 0.2 million for Accrued Interest with Average Interest Rate 8.07% per annum as at 31.12.2012 (10.67% respectively as at 31.12.2011) (for more details see notes 23 and 24 to our consolidated financial statements). 

 

As at 31 December 2012, our loans and borrowings were payable as follows:

 

USD 'million

As at 31 December 2012

As at 31 December 2011

Less than one year

 

17,347

 

98,973

Between one and five years

 

554,551

 

469,254

More than five years

0

58,862

Total

 

571,898

 

627,089

 

 

 

Portfolio Valuation

 

As at 31 December 2012, based on Cushman & Wakefield LLC ("C&W") independent appraisers' report, the value of portfolio of investment property stood at US$1.5 billion and our portfolio of investment property under development - at US$0.7 billion. Additionally, C&W estimated the value of Four Winds office and retail projects as US$176.5 million (50% AFI Development share).

 

Consequently, the total value of Company assets, based mostly on independent valuation, as of 31 December 2012, was US$2.5 billion. This figure represents an 8% decrease in the value of portfolio compared to the balance value for 31 December 2011.

 

Major drivers of the portfolio revaluation were the following:

1. Significant decrease in value:

Tverskaya Plazas

In Q2 2012, the Company reclassified Tverskaya Plaza Ib and Tverskaya Plaza II from "investment properties under development" to "investment properties". This was also reflected in the change of valuation approach, implemented by the independent appraiser (Jones Lang LaSalle) by valuing the assets as yielding properties, rather than as development projects. As a result, the value of these two projects decreased by US$59 million during Q2 2012. Based on valuation as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Tverskaya Plaza Ib was US$10.0 million and the fair value of Tverskaya Plaza IIwas US$30.6

Kossinskaya

Following the decision of the Russian Parliament to extend the borders of Moscow to the South-West and the gradual move of development interest to the Western parts of Moscow, the Company had to re-visit development concept of the project to sustain its competitiveness and to build a property of higher quality.

The capital repairs concept envisages installation of additional lifts, construction of additional ventilation shafts and an increase in communal space, resulting in a reduction of the gross leasable area and higher projected costs. While the independent appraiser, Jones Lang LaSalle, assumed the same level in rental income as in previous valuations, the value of Kossinskaya decreased from US$152.6 million as at 31 March 2012 to US$ 102.3 million as at 30 June 2012. Based on valuation as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Kosinskaya was US$102.7 million.

Bolshaya Pochtovaya

During the second quarter of 2012, the Moscow architectural authorities had a series of internal discussions relating to the new master-planning policy in the area of Bolshaya Pochtovaya. AFI Development initiated discussions with the authorities to influence the decision relating to the planned construction density for the project, while the city indicated that the construction density of the project would be reduced.

Based on the new projected gross buildable area of the project, the independent appraiser, Jones Lang LaSalle, decreased the project value from US$ 213.6 million as at 31 March 2012 to US$ 140.5 million as at 30 June 2012. Based on valuation as of 31 December 2012, the fair value of Bolshaya Pochtovaya was US$141.3 million.

2. Significant write-off:

Botanic Garden

Having consulted its legal advisers, AFI Development took the decision to write-off its Botanic Garden project in Q2 2012, which resulted in the impairment loss on inventory of real estate. A subsidiary of the Company, Nordservice LLC, is a "co-investor" in the project together with a company fully owned by the City of Moscow (Novoe Koltso Moskvy OJSC), which is the main investor and beneficiary of land lease rights for the Botanic Garden project. A claim filed with a Moscow court on 2 August 2012 by a third party creditor is seeking to declare the main investor bankrupt, while its assets were arrested for the benefit of the same creditor. AFI Development has concluded, based on the opinion of its legal advisers, that the recovery of the Company's costs relating to its investments in the project is unlikely. Given the current circumstances, the Company has decided to write-off its rights in the project. Notwithstanding this, AFI Development continues its efforts to recover its costs and/or receive the development rights to the project.

 

Property

Valuation 31/12/2012, US Dollars

Valuation 31/12/2011, US Dollars

Change in valuation, %

Balance sheet value 31/12/2012, US Dollars

Balance sheet value 31/12/2011, US Dollars

Investment property

1

H2O

18,800,000

18,550,000

1%

18,800,000

18,550,000

2

Ozerkovskaya Phase III

194,127,221

177,600,000

9%

194,127,221

177,600,000

3

Ozerkovskaya IV

n/a

2,850,000

-

-

2,850,000

4

Berezhkovskaya[8]

31,524,000

28,000,000

13%

42,600,000

37,837,838

5

AFIMALL City

1,160,000,000

1,160,000,000

0%

1,160,000,000

1,160,000,000

6

Paveletskaya I

30,300,000

27,750,000

9%

30,300,000

27,750,000

7

Plaza II

30,600,000

76,900,000

-60%

30,600,000

76,900,000

8

Plaza Ib

10,000,000

23,800,000

-58%

10,000,000

23,800,000

Total

1,475,351,221

1,515,450,000

-3%

1,486,427,221

1,525,287,838

Investment property under development

9

Plaza Ic

106,600,000

115,900,000

-8%

106,600,000

115,900,000

10

Plaza IIa

32,000,000

34,700,000

-8%

32,000,000

34,700,000

11

Plaza IV[9]

159,600,000

156,400,000

2%

168,000,000

164,631,579

12

Paveletskaya Phase II[10]

116,425,580

47,800,000

146%

11,593,379

11,475,117

13

Kosinskaya

102,700,000

146,120,000

-30%

102,700,000

146,120,000

14

Bolshaya Pochtovaya

141,300,000

213,200,000

-34%

141,300,000

213,200,000

15

Ozerkovskaya IV

422,779

n/a

422,779

n/a

16

AFIMALL parking for sale (665 lots)

n/a

50,100,000

-

29,771,814

23,173,759

Total

660,022,779

764,220,000

-14%

592,387,972

709,200,455

Trading property

17

Otradnoye

n/a

105,300,000

-

112,014,885

106,424,570

18

Botanic Garden

n/a

68,300,000

-

-

66,220,728

19

Four Winds Residential

n/a

n/a

-

1,127,016

2,592,988

20

Ozerkovskaya II

n/a

30,000,000

-

985,257

8,145,002

Total

-

203,600,000

-100%

114,127,158

183,383,288

Land Bank Properties

21

Ruza

n/a

63,700,000

-

3,665,000

3,921,763

22

St. Petersburg

1,830,000

1,850,000

-1%

1,830,000

1,850,000

23

Boryspol (Ukraine)

n/a

13,500,000

-

-

13,500,000

Total

1,830,000

79,050,000

-98%

5,495,000

19,271,763

Hotels

24

Aquamarine Hotel

n/a

45,000,000

-

34,333,252

33,168,320

25

Plaza Spa Hotel in Kislovodsk

n/a

29,550,000

-

26,352,350

25,253,993

26

Kalinina Hotel in Zheleznovodsk

n/a

13,500,000

-

24,261,386

13,800,000

27

Park Plaza hotel developments in Kislovodsk*

n/a

10,000,000

-

7,737,544

8,979,629

28

Versailles project in Kislovodsk*

9,200,000

6,900,000

33%

8,789,447

8,800,000

Total

9,200,000

104,950,000

-91%

101,473,979

90,001,942

Held for sale

29

Four Winds Office

153,400,000

137,500,000

12%

160,495,899

137,500,000

30

Four Winds Residential (incl. fitness & retail)

23,050,000

22,000,000

5%

17,821,997

19,407,012

Total

176,450,000

159,500,000

11%

178,317,896

156,907,012

Grand Total

2,322,854,000

2,826,770,000

-18%

2,478,229,226

2,686,960,253

 

 

Principal Risks and Uncertainties Affecting the Company

 

This section presents information about the Company's exposure to each of the risks listed below, the Group's objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risks.

 

Risk management framework

 

The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Company's risk management framework and is responsible for developing and monitoring the Company's risk management policies.

 

The Company's risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Company, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Company's activities. The Company, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to develop a disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.

 

The Company's Audit Committee overseas how management monitors compliance with the Company's risk management policies and procedures, and reviews the adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group. The Company's Audit Committee is assisted in its oversight role by Internal Audit. Internal Audit undertakes both regular and ad hoc reviews of risk management controls and procedures, the results of which are reported to the Audit Committee and the whole Board of Directors. The Board of Directors requests the management to take corrective actions as necessary and make follow up reports to the Audit Committee and to the Board on addressing deficiencies found.

 

Credit risk

 

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to AFI Development if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations and arises principally from the Company's receivables from customers and investment securities.

 

Trade and other receivables

 

Financial assets that are potentially subject to credit risk consist principally of trade and other receivables. The carrying amount of trade and other receivables represents the maximum amount exposed to credit risk. Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents as well as credit exposures with respect to rental customers, including outstanding receivables. The Company has policies in place to ensure that, where possible, rental contracts are made with customers with an appropriate credit history. Cash transactions are limited to high-credit-quality financial institutions. The utilisation of credit limits is regularly monitored.

 

AFI Development has no other significant concentrations of credit risk. Although collection of receivables could be influenced by economic factors, the management team believes that there is no significant risk of loss to the Company.

 

Investments

 

The Company limits its exposure to credit risk by investing only in liquid securities and only with counterparties that have a high credit rating. Management actively monitors credit ratings and given that the Group only has invested in securities with high credit ratings, management does not expect any existing counterparty to fail to meet its obligations, except as disclosed in note 29 to the Company's Audited Financial Statements for year 2012.

 

Guarantees

 

The Company's policy is to provide financial guarantees only to wholly-owned subsidiaries in exceptional cases. In negotiations with lending banks the Company is aiming to avoid recourse to AFI Development on loans taken by subsidiaries. As at 31 December 2012, there were three outstanding guarantees: one of AFI Development Plc for the amount of US$1 million in favour of a bank of the VTB Group under a loan facility agreement of Bellgate Construction Limited and two solidary guarantees by Stroyinkom-K LLC and AFI RUS LLC. for the amount of RUR606.77 million (circa US$19.98 million) under a loan facility agreement of Eitan-K LLC. As at 31 December 2011, there was one guarantee outstanding under two separate non-revolving credit lines from JSC VTB Bank for a total value of RUR 13.448 billion.

 

Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. AFI Development's approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Company's reputation. Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. Due to the dynamic nature of the underlying businesses, the Company aims to maintain flexibility in its funding requirements by keeping cash and committed credit lines available.

 

AFI Development's liquidity position is monitored on a daily basis by the management, which takes necessary actions if required. The Company structures its assets and liabilities in such a way that liquidity risk is minimised.

 

Market risk

 

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the Company's income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the available returns for shareholders. We are exposed to market risks from changes in both foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We do not use financial instruments, such as foreign exchange forward contracts, foreign currency options and forward rate agreements, to manage these market risks. To date, we have not utilised any derivative or other financial instruments for trading purposes.

 

Interest rate risk

We are subject to market risk deriving from changes in interest rates, which may affect the cost of our current floating rate indebtedness and future financing. As of 31 December 2012, 44% of our financial liabilities were fixed rate. For more detail see note 30 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Currency risk

The Company is exposed to currency risk on future commercial transactions, recognised monetary assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign operations that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional currencies of AFI Development's entities, primarily the US Dollar and Russian Rouble.

 

Operational risk

 

Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect loss arising from a wide variety of causes associated with the Company's processes, personnel, technology and infrastructure, and from external factors other than credit, market and liquidity risks such as those arising from legal and regulatory requirements and generally accepted standards of corporate behaviour. Operational risks arise from all of the Group's operations.

 

The Company's objective is to manage operational risk so as to balance the need to avoid financial losses and damage to the Group's reputation with overall cost effectiveness.

 

The primary responsibility for the development and implementation of controls to address operational risk is assigned to senior management within each business unit. This responsibility is supported by the development of overall Company standards for the management of operational risk. Compliance with Company standards is supported by a programme of periodic reviews undertaken by way of internal audits. The results of the internal audit reviews are discussed with the management of the business unit to which they relate, with summaries submitted to the Audit Committee and senior management of the Company.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Critical accounting policies are those policies that require the application of our management's most challenging, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Critical accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties that are sufficiently sensitive to result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our most critical accounting policies are those described below.

 

A detailed description of certain of the main accounting policies we use in preparing our consolidated financial statements is set forth in note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Estimates regarding fair value

 

We make estimates and assumptions regarding the fair value of our investment properties that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the amounts of assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. In particular, our investment properties under development (which currently comprise the majority of our projects) are remeasured at fair value upon completion of construction and the gain or loss on remeasurement is recognised in our income statement, as appropriate. In forming an opinion on fair value, we consider information from a variety of sources including, among others, the current prices in an active market, third party valuations and internal management estimates.

 

The principal assumptions underlying our estimates of fair value are those related to the receipt of contractual rentals, expected future market rentals, void/vacancy periods, maintenance requirements and discount rates that we deem appropriate. We regularly compare these valuations to our actual market yield data and actual transactions and those reported by the market. We determine expected future market rents on the basis of current market rents for similar properties in the same location and condition.

 

Impairment of financial assets

 

We recognise impairment losses with respect to financial assets, including loans receivable and trade and other receivables, in our income statement if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset. We test significant financial assets for impairment on an individual basis and assess our remaining financial assets collectively in groups that share similar credit characteristics. Impairment losses with respect to financial assets are calculated as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows of the asset discounted at the original effective interest rate of that asset.

 

Estimating the discounted present value of the estimated future cash flows of a financial asset is inherently uncertain and requires us both to make an estimate of the expected future cash flows from the asset and also to choose a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value of those cash flows. Changes in one or more of these estimates can lead us to either recognizing or avoiding impairment charges

 

Impairment of non-financial assets

 

We recognise impairment loss with respect to non-financial assets, including investment property under development and trading properties under construction, if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of an asset is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, we discount estimated future cash flows of the asset to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. The carrying amounts of impaired non-financial assets are reduced to their estimated recoverable amount either directly or through the use of an allowance account and we include the amount of such loss in our income statement for the period.

 

We assess at each reporting date whether there is any indication that a non-financial asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, we then estimate the recoverable amount of the asset. Estimating the value in use requires us to make an estimate of the expected future cash flows from the asset and also to choose a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value of those cash flows. The development of the value in use amount requires us to estimate the life of the asset, its expected cash flows over that life and the appropriate discount rate, which is primarily based on our weighted average cost of capital, itself subject to additional estimates and assumptions. Changes in one or all of these assumptions can lead to us either recognizing or avoiding impairment charges

 

Deferred income taxes

 

We are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction estimation of actual current tax exposure and the assessment of the temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as capitalization of expenses, among others, for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must assess, in the course of our tax planning process, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to obtain the benefit of deferred tax assets based on expected future taxable profit and available tax planning strategies. If, in our management's judgment, the deferred tax assets recorded will not be recovered, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the deferred tax asset.

 

Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets, deferred tax liabilities and valuation allowances to reflect the potential inability to fully recover deferred tax assets. In our consolidated financial statements the analysis is based on the estimates of taxable income in the jurisdictions in which we operate and the period over which the deferred tax assets and liabilities will be recoverable.

 

If actual results differ from these estimates, or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to establish an additional valuation allowance which could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.

 

Share-based payment transactions

 

The fair value of employee stock options is measured using a binomial lattice model. The fair value of share appreciation rights is measured using the Black-Scholes formula. Measurement inputs include share price on the measurement date, exercise price of the instrument, expected volatility (based on weighted average historic volatility adjusted for changes expected due to publicly available information), weighted average expected life of the instruments (based on historic experience and general option holder behaviour), expected dividends and the risk-free interest rate (based on government bonds). Service and non-market performance conditions attached to the transactions are not taken into account in determining fair value.

 

 

Related Party transactions

 

There were no related party transactions in the financial year ended 31 December 2012 or in the period since 31 December 2012.

 

AFI DEVELOPMENT PLC Annex A to the MD&A Below is additional information regarding the Company's business and portfolio. Terms not expressly defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the MD&A.  Real Estate Development

 

General Information on this Area of Activities

 

The Company's group plans, develops and constructs residential units held for sale. The Company's revenues from real estate development in Russia derived, mainly, from the development, renovation and sale of residential units and/or properties designated for residential purposes, alone or together with partners in joint ventures.

 

Products and Services of the Company's group

 

A. General - the projects the Group plans and constructs in CIS are mostly zoned for mixed uses and/or commercial use, while some also include residential units intended for sale. The following tables present the Group's projects including, among others, construction for residential purposes. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company decided to change its strategy in light of the economic situation. The Company is focusing on the construction and completion of a number of projects and it will decide on the construction of additional projects out of its inventory of projects based on the situation prevailing in the market. With respect to these projects, the Company will formulate a business plan including a forecast relating to the project budget and its completion date (and obviously relating to additional project components) when a decision to begin its construction is made. Therefore, the tables do not include any forecasts in connection with these projects.

It is noted that based on Russian law, upon completion of the construction of projects, the owner of the building (the construction of which was completed) is permitted to receive lease (including long-term lease), generally for 49 years, or ownership rights for the state or municipality-owned land on which the said building stands and that is needed for purposes of its use. In order to realize the ownership or lease right as stated, the owner of the building must submit a request to the relevant authority including the required documents, and within about one month from the submission date of the said request, the relevant authority will make a decision regarding provision of the lease or ownership rights.. It is noted that under the new long‑term lease agreement to be signed between the parties, the lessee of the land (who up until now had been merely the owner of the building) to pay the City lease fees (generally on a quarterly basis)[11]. Should the owner acquire ownership right to the land, it becomes payer of the land tax calculated based on the cadastral value of the land plots.

B. Set forth below are details in connection with the Company's projects in CIS, which include residential areas, the execution of which had not yet been started as at December 31, 2012:

Date of

acquisition

Cost of

of the

Additional

Write-

land

Rate of

rights in

Recorded

primary

downs

per

holdings

the land/

Type of

in the

Expected

area

Original

made

books

in project

in the

rights

Real

Amount of

commercial

cost of

Costs

up to

as at

Project

Project

Holding

(of the holding

holding

in the

Estate

Residential

or for

the land

accrued

31/12/2012

31/12/2012

name

location

company

company)

company

project

Register[12]

Units

offices

(USD '000)

(USD '000)

(USD '000)

(USD '000)

Otradnoye[13]

Odintsovo, Moscow Region

RAPO LLC

94% of residential premises;

90% of the non-residential premises[14]

2004/2005[15]

Land lease/ Ownership[16]

Recorded

8,867

18,776

USD68,151

 

43,864[17]

 

-

112,015

C. Set forth below are details in connection with projects the Company has executed in CIS, which include residential areas, and which were completed as at December 31, 2012:

(1) As at the date of this statement, the Company's group has completed the projects "Four Winds II" and Ozerkovskaya Phase II. The Company's group has sold the majority of residential units in the both of the residential complexes.

(2) As at December 31, 2012, the Company's group holds (indirectly) all the rights in 2 residential units in "The Four Winds II" project and in 4 residential units in "Ozerkovskaya Phase II" project.

Customers

In its residential real estate development activities in Russia, the Group targets mainly private customers with a high socio‑economic background.

 Marketing and Distribution

In this area of activities, the Group markets its projects through independent agents as well as by means of Company employees.

 

 

Income Yielding Properties in Russia and the CIS

 

General Information regarding the Activity Segment

The Company's group plans, develops and constructs commercial properties held for rent. The group's revenues from its activities in the rental property area in Russia derive mainly from the development, re‑development and sale of commercial properties, alone or together with partners in joint ventures, as well as from rental of the group's rental properties. In addition, in the past the Company's group had insignificant revenues from management of projects not owned by it.

General Parameters Regarding the Russian Market:

 

Macro-economic parameters:

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.10

Gross domestic product (US$ billion)

2,053

1,850

1,487

Per capita product (PPP)

17,687

16,746

15,788

Rate of growth in domestic product

3.4%

4.3%

4.3%

Rate of growth in per capita product

5.6%

6.1%

5.6%

Rate of inflation (end period)

6.6%

6.1%

8.8%

Rate of return of long-term local government bonds

2.62%

4.55%

4.65%

Rating of long-term government bonds

BBB (S&P)

BBB (S&P)

BBB (S&P)

Rate of exchange of the local currency in relation to the dollar on the last day of the year

30.4

32.2

36.5

 

 

Products and Services

The following tables present information in connection with the Group's projects included in its property portfolio. Certain information included in the tables includes estimates and forecasts relating to projects in the advanced stages of development, that is, the concept or design stages. Such information is "forward looking" information based on the existing data and facts in the Company's possession as of the date of this statement. It is hereby clarified that the estimates and forecasts in connection with each of the Group's projects may change in the future.

 

 

 

1. Summary of Aggregate Results of the Investment Properties Activity made by the group in the CIS (sums are in US dollars unless otherwise specified):

 

 

(a) Breakdown of the rental property areas based on regions and uses as at 31.12.12 (sq.m.)

 

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Parking facilities

Total

Percentage of the areas

Russia

Consolidated

78,066

111,647

60,809

250,522

100%

Company share

75,277

111,647

60,809

247,733

100%

Total

Consolidated

78,066

111,647

60,809

250,522

100%

Company share

75,277

111,647

60,809

247,733

100%

Percentage of the total area

Consolidated

31%

45%

24%

100%

Company share

30%

45%

25%

100%

 

 

 (b) Breakdown of the rental property areas based on regions and uses as at 31.12.11 (sq.m.)

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Parking facilities

Total

Percentage of the areas

Russia

 

Consolidated

53,759

115,586

13,008

182,353

100%

company share

44,646

111,354

10,416

166,416

100%

Total

 

Consolidated

53,759

115,586

13,008

182,353

100%

company share

44,646

111,354

10,416

166,416

100%

Percentage of the total area

Consolidated

29%

63%

7%

100%

company share

27%

67%

6%

100%

 

 

(c) Breakdown of the rental property value based on regions and uses as at 31.12.12

 

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Total in USD '000

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Russia

Consolidated

 486,923

 1,177,500

 1,664,423

100%

USD '000

company share

 475,580

 1,177,500

 1,653,080

100%

Total

Consolidated

 486,923

 1,177,500

 1,664,423

100%

USD '000

company share

 475,580

 1,177,500

 1,653,080

100%

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Consolidated

29%

71%

100%

company share

29%

71%

99%

 

 

 

 

(d) Breakdown of the rental property value based on regions and uses as at 31.12.11

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Total in USD '000

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Russia

Consolidated

224,488

1,179,692

1,404,180

100%

USD '000

company share

214,406

1,179,692

1,404,180

100%

Total

Consolidated

214,406

1,179,692

1,394,098

100%

USD '000

company share

214,406

1,179,692

1,394,098

100%

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Consolidated

16%

84%

100%

company share

15%

84%

99%

 

 

(e) Breakdown of the group's yielding real estate in the CIS NOI based on regions and uses for the year ended 31.12.12

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Total in USD '000

Percentage of the total NOI of the properties

Russia

Consolidated

 25,553

 49,165

 74,718

100%

USD '000

company share

 24,613

 49,165

 73,778

100%

Total

Consolidated

 25,553

 49,165

 74,718

100%

USD '000

company share

 24,613

 49,165

 73,778

100%

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Consolidated

34%

66%

100%

company share

33%

67%

100%

 

(f) Breakdown of the NOI based on regions and uses for the year ended 31.12.11

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Total in USD '000

Percentage of the total NOI of the properties

Russia USD '000

Consolidated

16,062

33,917

49,979

100%

company share

15,136

33,917

49,053

100%

Total USD '000

USD '000

Consolidated

16,062

33,917

49,979

100%

company share

15,136

33,917

49,053

100%

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Consolidated

29%

71%

100%

company share

27%

73%

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(g) Breakdown of the NOI based on regions and uses for the year ended 31.12.10

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Total in USD '000

Percentage of the total NOI of the properties

Russia USD '000

Consolidated

18,972

198

19,170

100%

company share

18,067

198

18,265

100%

Total USD '000

USD '000

Consolidated

18,972

198

19,170

100%

company share

18,067

198

18,265

100%

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Consolidated

99%

1%

100%

company share

99%

1%

100%

 

(h) Breakdown of the revaluation income (losses) based on regions and uses for the year ended 31.12.12

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Total in USD '000

Percentage of the total revaluation income

Russia USD '000

Consolidated

21,935

(52,989)

(31,054)

100%

company share

20,950

(52,989)

(32,039)

100%

Total USD '000

USD '000

Consolidated

21,935

(52,989)

(31,054)

100%

company share

20,950

(52,989)

(32,039)

100%

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Consolidated

(71%)

171%

100%

company share

(65%)

165%

100%

 

 

(i) Breakdown of the revaluation income (losses) based on regions and uses for the year ended 31.12.11

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Total in USD '000

Percentage of the total revaluation income

Russia USD '000

Consolidated

39,684

207,980

247,664

100%

company share

38,324

207,980

246,304

100%

Total USD '000

USD '000

Consolidated

39,684

207,980

247,664

100%

company share

38,324

207,980

246,304

100%

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Consolidated

5%

95%

100%

company share

4%

96%

100%

 

 

 

  

 

(j) Breakdown of the revaluation income (losses) based on regions and uses for the year ended 31.12.10

 

Region

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Total in USD '000

Percentage of the total revaluation income

Russia USD '000

Consolidated

30,792

(1,285)

29,506

100%

company share

29,236

(1,285)

27,951

100%

Total USD '000

USD '000

Consolidated

30,792

(1,285)

29,506

100%

company share

29,236

(1,285)

27,951

100%

Percentage of the total value of the properties

Consolidated

104%

(4%)

100%

company share

105%

(5%)

100%

 

 

 

(k) Breakdown of the actual average rent per sq.m. per month/year in the functional currency

 

For the year ended

 

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Parking facilities

 

Regions

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.12

31.12.11

 

Russia - USD/sq.m/annum

755*

800

1,177

1,097

5,923

848

 

 

* Not including newly introduced Ozerkovskaya III project

 

 

(l) Range of annual rent per square meter offices in USD

 

Minimum

Maximum

2012

307

1,604

2011

372

1,325

 

(m) Breakdown of the actual average rent per sq.m. with respect to contracts signed in the below period, in the functional currency, based on regions and uses

 

 

Contracts signed in year ending on

Regions: [Russia]

31.12.12

31.12.11

Offices

516

603

Commercial

1 303

1,204

Parking facilities

5,884

2,116

Range of annual rent per sq.m. offices, USD:

 

Minimum

Maximum

2012

307

1,604

2011

372

1,325

 

(n) Breakdown of the average occupancy rates

 

Uses

In %

Offices

Commercial

Regions

As at 31.12.12

Year 2012

Year 2011

Year 2010

As at 31.12.12

Year 2012

Year 2011

Year 2010

Russia

96%*

96%*

94%

96%

75%

75%

78%

91%

 

* Not Including newly introduced Ozerkovskaya III project

 

(o) Number of properties based on regions and uses

 

As at

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Regions

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.11

31.12.12

 Russia

6

5

2

2

 

(p) Breakdown of the actual average rates of return (based on year-end value) for regions and uses

 

For the year ended on (in %)

Uses

Offices

Commercial

Regions

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.12

31.12.11

 Russia

9%*

6%

4%

4%

 

* Not Including newly introduced Ozerkovskaya III project

 

(q) Expected revenues in respect of signed rental agreements

 

 

Assuming tenant option not exercised

Assuming tenant option exercised

Period of Recognition of Revenue

Revenues from fixed components ($ '000)

Number of agreements completed

Area of related agreements (sq.m. '000)

Revenues from fixed components ($ '000)

Number of agreements completed

Area of related agreements (sq.m. '000)

Quarter 1/13

 29,192

 489

 112,809

 29,192

 489

 112,809

Quarter 2/13

 28,068

 446

 103,249

 28,068

 446

 103,249

Quarter 3/13

 27,329

 372

 99,501

 27,329

 372

 99,501

Quarter 4/13

 26,120

 325

 91,728

 26,120

 325

 91,728

2014

 97,482

 288

 86,668

 97,482

 288

 86,668

2015

 82,625

 217

 64,010

 82,625

 217

 64,010

2016

 74,612

 170

 60,026

 74,612

 170

 60,026

Thereafter

 57,461

 40

 31,689

 57,461

 40

 31,689

 

2. Summary of aggregate assets designated for development of income yielding properties

 

(a) Investment projects under development

 

Period (year ended on)

Region

Parameters

 31.12.2012

31.12.2011

 31.12.2010

Russia- office

Number of properties under construction at end of the period

4

6

6

Total areas under construction (planned) at end of the period (in sq.m. '000)

281,470

364,177

403,086

Total costs invested in current period (consolidated) (USD '000)

7,784

24,479

26,143

The amount at which the properties are presented in the financial statements at the end of the period (consolidated) (USD '000)

409,300

600,089

501,826

Total balance of the estimated construction budget for completion of the construction work (consolidated) (estimate as at the end of the period) (USD '000)

408,574

461,641

461,098

Rate of the built-up area regarding which lease agreements have been signed (%)

 

-

-

-

Russia - Commercial

Number of properties under construction at end of the period

1

2

5

Total areas under construction (planned) at end of the period (in sq.m. '000)

170,350

558,892

829,969

Total costs invested in current period (consolidated) (USD '000)

1,649

1,354

157,676

The amount at which the properties are presented in the financial statements at the end of the period (consolidated) (USD '000)

141,300

353,062

1,153,300

Total balance of the estimated construction budget for completion of the construction work (consolidated) (estimate as at the end of the period) (USD '000)

318,419

909,471

1,191,494

Rate of the built-up area regarding which lease agreements have been signed (%)

-

-

15%

 

(b) Data on land of the company in the CIS designated for the construction of yielding property

 

Area

Parameters

Period (year ending on)

31.12.2012

31.12.2011

Russia

The amount at which the land is presented in the financial statements at the end of the period (consolidated) (functional currency)

17,088

17,246

Total area of the land at the end of the period (sq.m. '000)

3,933,332

3,933,332

Total construction rights in land according to approved building plans, by uses (USD thousands)

-

-

Ukraine

The amount at which the land is presented in the financial statements at the end of the period (consolidated) (functional currency)

-

13,705

Total area of the land at the end of the period (sq.m. '000)

-

1,310,000

Total construction rights in land according to approved building plans, by uses (USD thousands)

-

-

 

 

3. Significant Investment Properties

 

 

 

 

 

Information Item

Additional Data Required by Regulation 8B(I) (as applicable)

Property name and characteristics

Year

Book value at end of the period (consolidated) $ '000

Fair value at end of the period (consolidated) (in the functional currency)

Revaluation

$ '000

Rental income in the period (consolidated) (in the functional currency)

Actual NOI in the period of the report - consolidated - in the functional currency

Yield (%)

Adjusted yield (%)

Occupancy rate for the end of period

Average rent $/sq.m/annum

Identity of the appraiser (name and experience)

Valuation model used by the appraiser

Additional assumptions serving as the basis for the valuation (discount rate, number of comparable properties, average price per sq.m. of the comparable properties)

W4W Office building (presented data is for 50%)

Region

Russia

2012

160,496

160,496

16,702

17,800

15,165

9.9%

9.9%

100%

1,428

Cushman & Wakefield

Income Approach

(DCF)

Cap rate-9 %; Discount rate-12%; Average market rent (after contracts renewal) - $1100-1200

Note functional currency

$

2011

137,500

137,500

24,561

18,822

8934*

4.8%

10.8%

100%

1,468

JLL

Income Approach

(DCF)

Cap rate-9.5%; Discount rate-10.85%; Average market rent (after contracts renewal) - $900-950

Office

Office

2010

119,300

119,300

20,067

16,447

13,401

11.2%

11.2%

100%

1,358

JLL

Income Approach

(DCF)

Cap rate-10.0%; Discount rate-12.5%; Average market rent (after contracts renewal) - $850-900

Original cost / original construction cost (in the functional currency)

30,789

Company's share (%)

50%

Area (sq.m.) -GLA

10,982

Ozerkovskaya III[18]

Region

Russia

2012

194,127

194,127

2,723

-

-

-

-

0%

-

Cushman & Wakefield

Income Approach

(DCF)

Cap rate - 10%

Discount rate - 14%

Average market rent $750 for office and $500 for retail

Note functional currency

$

2011

177,500

177,500

-

 

-

 

-

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

JLL

Income Approach

(DCF)

Cap rate - 9.5%

Discount rate - 9.8%

Main use

Office

2010

140,450

 

140,450

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

JLL

Income Approach

(DCF)

Cap rate - 10%

Discount rate - 10.7%

Original cost / original construction cost (in the functional currency)

85,948

Company's share (%)

50%[19]

Area (sq.m.) -GLA

55,420

* The NOI includes extraordinary expenses. Normalized NOI is 14,882 USD thousands

 

 

 

 

4. Information Regarding a Very Substantial Investment Property - AFIMALL City

 

(a) Presentation of property:

 

Detail as at December 31, 2012

Name of the property:

AFIMALL CITY[20]

Location of the property:

2 Presnenskaya emb., Moscow

Areas of the property broken down by use:

GBA (gross built area) - 165,714.2 sq.m (GBA together with the underground parking - 304,205sq.m)

GLA (gross leasable area) - 107,208 sq.m

Gross Leasable Retail Area - 96,800 sq.m

Areas leased as of December 31,2012 - 74,353 sq.m

2,075 additional underground parking units[21]

 

Structure of holdings in the property (description of holding through investee companies, including the rates of holdings therein and the rates of their holdings in the property):

The Company holds the asset through a wholly-owned Cypriot subsidiary, Bellgate Construction Ltd

Effective share of the Company in the property (if the property is held by an investee company - multiplication of the company's share in the investee company by the share of the investee company in the property):

The Company holds 100% in Bellgate Construction Ltd which bears 100% of construction expenses and has 100% in AFIMALL CITY[22]

 

State the names of the partners in the property (if the partners hold more than 25% of the rights in the property or if the partners are related parties as defined in this Directive)*:

Not relevant

Acquisition date of the land (if relevant):

 2005/2012[23]

Detail of the legal rights in the property (ownership, lease, etc.)

Ownership of AFIMALL CITY and the underground parking

Lease rights to the underlying land plot

Status of registration of the legal rights[24]:

Registered

Significant unused building rights

None

Special matters (significant non‑conforming construction, ground contamination, etc.):

 Certain premises of the AFIMALL CITY with total area of 5,829.71 sq.m and of the underground parking with the total area of 16,318.3 sq.m are located beyond the boundaries of the land plot co-leased by Bellgate Construction Ltd. Bellgate Construction Ltd. will have to procure lease rights to the land underlying such premises.

 

Method of presentation in the financial statements [consolidation / proportionate consolidation / equity method]:

Consolidation

 

(b) Significant Data:

 

(Data based on 100%. AFI Dev. Share - 100%) Property classified as investment real estate in March 2011

Q4 2012

Q3 2012

Q2 2012

Q1 2012

2011

On property purchase date

Fair value at end of period (USD'000)[25]

1,160,000

1,160,000

1,160,000

1,205,014

1,160,000

Purchase/construction cost (USD '000)

600,585

Valuation profit or loss (USD '000)

(12,697)

(44,874)

22,181

(17,598)

210,701

If property valued by rise-fall (cancellation of fall) in value for period (USD '000)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Purchase date

July 2005

Average occupancy rate (%)[26]

77%

77%

76%

77%

78%

Actual rented areas (m2)[27]

74,353

75,738

74,599

76,616

75,799

Total revenue (USD '000)

19,249

20,129

20,297

21,715

65,058

Average rent per meter (monthly/annual) (USD k)

1,243

1,254

1,245

1,278

1,147

Average rent per meter in contracts signed in period (USD k)

1,214

2,651

2,026

2,408

1,622

NOI for period (USD k)

9,482

12,506

12,509

13,749

35,560

NOI adjusted for period (USD k)

9,482

12,506

12,509

13,749

35,560

Actual return rate (%)

4,2%

4.4%

4.5%

4.6%

3.1%

Adjusted return rate (%)

4,2%

4.4%

4.5%

4.6%

4.2%

Number of renters at end of period[28]

254

241

232

229

239

Average revenue per sq.m. (annual)

1,094

1,086

1,124

1,134

4,508[29]

 

 

 (c) Breakdown of Structure of Revenues and Expenses:

 

(Data based on 100%, AFI Development's share in the property - 100%)

2012

2011

2010

in USD '000

Revenue:

From rent - permanent

74,079

57,991

NA

From rent - changing

5,841

7,774

NA

From management fees

0

0

NA

From parking garage operation

974

146

NA

Miscellaneous

518

4,147

NA

Total revenue:

81,412

65,058

NA

Costs:

Management, maintenance and operation

33,166

29,498

NA

Depreciation (if recorded)

-

-

NA

Miscellaneous costs

-

-

NA

Total costs:

33,166

29,498

NA

Profit

-

-

NA

NOI

48,246

35,560

NA

 

 

 

(d) Major Tenants in the Property

 

(Data

based on 100%.

Share of company

in the property - 100%)

Rate of

property areas (%)

Does the

tenant constitute an anchor?

Is the

tenant expected to be responsible for more than 20% of the revenue from the property?

Industry

to which the tenant belongs

Description of the rental property

Entry date of tenants as agreed in the agreement

Period of the undertaking (years)

Options to extend (years)

Indexation

Detail of guarantees (if any)

Indicate special dependency

Tenant 1

6,7%

yes

no

cinema

Centre Opening Date

10

no

5%

Security Deposit

no

Tenant 2

3,0%

yes

no

entertainment

Centre Opening Date

10

no

5%

Security Deposit

no

Tenant 3

2,3%

yes

no

electronics

Centre Opening Date

10

no

Step Rent

Security Deposit

no

Tenant 4

2,3%

yes

no

fashion

Centre Opening Date

10

no

5%

Bank Guarantee

no

Tenant 5

2,2%

yes

no

fashion

Centre Opening Date

5

no

5%

Security Deposit

no

Tenant 6

1,9%

yes

no

fashion

Centre Opening Date

10

no

5%

Security Deposit

no

Tenant 7

1,7%

yes

no

fashion

Centre Opening Date

10

no

-

Bank Guarantee

no

Tenant 8

1,4%

yes

no

fashion

Centre Opening Date

5

no

5%

Security Deposit

no

Tenant 9

1,4%

yes

no

supermarket

Centre Opening Date

10

no

5%

Security Deposit

no

Tenant 10

1,3%

yes

no

jewelry

Centre Opening Date

5

no

5%

Security Deposit

no

Tenant 11

1,3%

yes

no

fashion

Centre Opening Date

5

no

7%

Bank Guarantee

no

Tenant 12

1,3%

yes

no

fashion

Centre Opening Date

10

no

4%

Security Deposit

no

Total major tenants

26,8%

 

 

(e) Projected Revenues in respect of Signed Lease Agreements

 

Data

based on 100%.

Share of company

in the property -100%

(USD '000)

For the year ending in 2013

For the year ending in 2014

For the year ending in 2015

For the year ending in 2016

For the year ending in 2017 and onwards

Fixed components

98,745

95,381

81,487

73,474

57,016

Variable components (estimate)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total

98,745

95,381

81,487

73,474

57,016

 

 

(f) Planned Improvements and Changes for the Property

 

Details:

Nature of improvement

Construction of underground parking

Additional areas added (in underground parking spaces)

2,075[30] (originally designed 2,718 out of which 643 were sold)

Statutory situation

Ownership

Construction budget (USD '000)

Includes additional planning not yet actually invested

10,772[31]

Outstanding budget as if at 31.12.2012

847

Rate of the areas with respect to which rental agreements have been signed out of the additional areas

The underground parking serves the AFIMALL CITY

Expected addition to 2014 NOI (USD '000) from added parking spaces

2,660[32]

Execution status

 Completed, put into operation and ownership registered[33]

 

 

(f) Specific Financing:

 

Specific Financing

Credit facility:

 

Balances in the statement of financial position

31.12.2012

(USD '000)

Presented as short-term loans:

-

Presented as long-term loans:

535,755

31.12.2011

(USD '000)

Presented as short-term loans:

-

Presented as long-term loans:

-

Fair value as at 12. 31.2012 (end of the report year) (USD '000)

535,755

Original credit facility date

 June 22, 2012[34]

Original credit facility sum (USD '000)

 Up to approx. 688,524.59 (RUB 21,000 million)

Effective interest rate as at 31.12.2012 (%)

9.5% in RUB/ 3M Libor + 6.7% in USD

Repayment dates principal and interest

Quarterly interest;

Schedule of repayment will start on March, 31 2014 ($6.5 million quarterly in 2014, 2015 and 2016).

Final repayment date is April, 01 2018.

Main financial conditions

 

Preliminary banking consent for any disposal of Project' assets which value exceeds 10% of total Borrower' Assets.

Liquidation value of Collateral must cover the total Amount of the current Debt and Interests accrued for the period of six months

The Borrower (Bellgate Constructions Limited) is obliged to support the following levels of Revenue on the Quarterly basis:

from RUB 651 million in 3Q 2012 to RUB 1,139 million in 1Q 2018 (VAT not included)

Consequences following the breach of the covenant:

increase of current interest rate by 0.5 % per ann. since the month next after non-fulfillment of financial covenant

 

Other financial conditions

N/A

State whether main conditions or financial covenants have been violated as at the end of the report year

 The Company is in line with all financial covenants

Is it non-recourse

Yes, except the suretyship agreement between the Company and the Bank for USD 1 million

 

 

 

 

(g) Liens and other Significant Legal Restrictions in the Property:

 

 

Type

Detail

Amount secured by the lien

(at the end of the report year)

31.12.2012

(USD/RUB)

Liens

First priority

Based on the sale and purchase agreement executed between the Company's subsidiary, Bellgate Construction Ltd. ("Bellgate") and GUP of the City of Moscow "Tsentr City" (the "Seller") in respect to the uncompleted underground parking, until the purchase price is paid in full the underground parking is mortgaged in favor of the Seller. According to the agreement, the purchase price will be paid in four installments with the last installment to be paid by February 28, 2014.

RUB 4,000 million (approx. USD 131 million)

Second priority

On June 22, 2012 Bellgate and a bank of the VTB Group (the "Bank") entered into a credit facility agreement for a total principal amount of up to RUB 21,000 million (approx. USD 689 million). The total amount of outstanding liability as of December 31, 2012 is approx. USD 0.5 billion.

The credit facility agreement is secured by:

(i) a pledge of all of the shares in Bellgate;

(ii) a suretyship agreement between the Company and the Bank for USD 1 million;

(iii) subsequent mortgage of AFIMALL CITY;

(iv) subsequent mortgage of the underground parking and the project land lease rights;

(v) mortgage of Aquamarine Hotel premises;

(vi) suretyship agreement between Semprex LLC (the holding company having registered ownership to the Aquamarine Hotel) and the Bank.

Up to RUB 21,000 million (USD approx. 689 million)

In 2012 Bellgate has fully repaid the outstanding amounts under credit facility agreements with Bank VTB OJSC executed in 2008, 2011 and 2012 which were secured, inter alia, by mortgage of AFIMALL CITY.

The mortgage of AFIMALL CITY is still registered in the Real Estate Register and needs to be removed from it by a joint application of Bellgate and Bank VTB OJSC.

 

Other

N/A

 

 

(h) Details with respect to the Valuation:

 

 

 

(Data based on 100%. Share of company in the property - 100% in 31.12.2012 and 75% in 30.06.2011 and 2010)[35]

31.12.2012

30.06.2012

31.12.2011

30.06.2011

31.12.2010

Value determined (USD '000)

1,160,000

1,160,000

1,160,600

819,700

732,400

Identity of appraiser

Cushman & Wakefield

JLL

JLL

JLL

JLL

Is the appraiser independent?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Is there an indemnification agreement?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Effective date of the valuation (the date to which the valuation relates)

31.12.12

30.06.12

31.12.11

30.6.2011

31.12.10

Valuation model (comparison / income / other / cost)

DCF

DCF

DCF

DCF

DCF

Main details used for purposes of the valuation

(to be provided specifically based on the valuation provided) (the list is illustrative only):

If the valuation is by the Sales Comparison Approach

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sale price per sq.m. of leasable area used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Range of prices per sq.m. of leasable area of comparable properties used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Number of comparable properties (#) used in the calculation

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Regarding the main relevant properties used for comparison indicate: the name/identity of the property, location, area

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Net rate of return reflecting the property's current NOI (current NOI divided by value of the property)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters (annual rent growth rate)

2.5%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

If the valuation is by the Sales Income Approach

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

107,208

107,142

107,121

107,132

107,080

Occupancy rate in the year + 1 (%)

70%

70%

65%

70%

74%

Occupancy rate in the year + 2 (%)

75%

80%

80%

75%

N/A

--

Representative occupancy rate out of the leasable area for purposes of valuation (%)

97%

97%

97%

97%

97%

Average annual rent per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation in the year + 1

1,304

1,200

1,227

1,270

1,256

Average annual rent per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation in the year + 2

1,386

1,269

1,290

1,306

1,256

Representative average annual rent per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation (USD)

1,421

1,287

1,313

1,337

1,256

Representative NOI for purposes of valuation (USD'000)

156,950

132,658

133,877

103,744

94,272

Average periodic expenses for maintenance of the existing situation (USD'000)

12,194

15,928

15,676

3,678

The NOI presented net of OPEX

Capitalization rate / rate of return / multiplier used for purposes of the valuation (%)

Capitalization - 10.0%

Discount rate - 15%

Capitalization - 10.0%

Discount rate - 11.1%

Capitalization - 10.0%

Discount rate - 11.1%

Capitalization - 11.0%

Discount rate - 11.9%

Capitalization - 11.5%

Discount rate - 11.96%

Time until deemed realization

5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

15 month

Multiplier / reversionary rate

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sensitivity analysis for value (based on the method chosen):

Change in USD "000

Occupancy rates

Increase of 2% (abs)

30,774

30,600

30,900

21,500

N/A*

Decrease of 2% (abs)

(30,693)

(30,600)

(30,800)

(21,500)

N/A*

Capitalization rates

Increase of 1% (abs)

(70,581)

(71,600)

(72,200)

(48,900)

N/A*

Decrease of 1% (abs)

86,266

87,500

88,400

59,700

N/A*

Average rent per meter

Increase of 5% (rel)

45,338

64,900

65,700

42,400

78,800

Decrease of 5% (rel)

(45,338)

(64,900)

(65,700)

(42,400)

(79,100)

 

 

5. Information Regarding a Very Substantial Investment Property under Development - Tverskaya Plaza IV

 

(a) Presentation of property:

 

Details as at December 31, 2012

Name of the property:

Tverskaya Plaza IV

Location of the property:

Gruzinsky Val, 11 Moscow

Area of the land to be provided for lease:

0.17 hectares

Areas of the property planned to be built up:

GBA - 108,000 sq.m of office multifunctional complex including above ground premises of 72,000 sq.m and underground premises of 36,000 sq.m

 

Structure of holdings in the property (description of holding through investee companies, including the rates of holdings therein and the rates of their holdings in the property)

Beslaville Management Limited ("Beslaville"), a Cypriot corporation controlled by the Company by 95%, has a 100% interest in OOO "Zheldoruslugi", a Russian limited liability company. Renewed development rights[36] are expected to be granted to OOO "Avtostoyanka Tverskaya Zastava" ("ATZ"), a Russian limited liability company, 100% owned by the Company.

Effective share of the company in the property (if the property is held by an investee company - multiplication of the company's share in the investee company by the share of the investee company in the property):

95% in Beslaville, 100% in ATZ

State the names of the partners in the property (if the partners hold more than 25% of the rights in the property or if the partners are related parties as defined in this Directive):

N/A

Acquisition date of the land (if relevant):

 Lease rights to the land allowing development not yet granted[37]

Commencement date of the construction work:

N/A

Detail of the legal rights in the property (ownership, lease, etc.):

OOO "Zheldoruslugi" holds ownership to 8 non-residential buildings and 7 underlying land plots with a total area of 2,145 sq.m[38]

Rights to develop the Tverskaya Plaza IV project are expected to be granted to ATZ

Status of registration of the legal rights:[39]

Ownership of OOO "Zheldoruslugi" to land plots and buildings registered.

State whether there are sources of financing for continued construction of the property [included herein, note the main contingent conditions for provision of financing as stated, and whether the company is in compliance with these conditions as at the date of the report]:

N/A

Special matters (significant non‑conforming construction, ground contamination, etc.):

N/A

Method of presentation in the financial statements [consolidation / proportionate consolidation / equity method]:

Full consolidation

Identity of the executing contractor:

N/A

Calculation method (fauschly / quantities certificate / other):

N/A

Details with respect to a property sold:

N/A

 

 

 

(b) Significant Data:

 

(Data based on 100%. Share of company in the property subsidiary -95%[40])

2012

2011

2010

Initial acquisition cost (USD '000)

125,897

125,770

125,442

Current cost invested during the period (USD '000)

306

127

328

Total accumulated cost as at the end of the period (USD '000)

126,203

125,897

125,770

If the property is measured at cost - impairment in value (cancellation of impairment in value recorded in the period) (USD '000)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Fair value at end of the period (USD '000)

168,000

164,632

110,526

Valuation profit or loss (USD '000)

2,886

53,978

9,925

Expected completion date (as reported at the end of each period)

Apr-16

Dec-15

Dec-14

Total expected cost of the investment (as reported at the end of each period) (USD '000)

348,766

365,349

426,459

Cost of the investment not yet invested (as reported at the end of each period) (USD '000)

222,563

240,563

301,717

Budgeted percentage of completion (%)

36%

34%

29%

NOI from interim uses (non‑core) (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

 

(c) Details with respect to the Valuation:

 

 

(Data based on 100%. Share of company in the property company - 95%)

 

2012

2011

2010

Value determined (USD '000)

168,000

156,400

105,000

Identity of appraiser

Cushman & Wakefield

JLL

JLL

Is the appraiser independent?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Is there an indemnification agreement?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Effective date of the valuation (the date to which the valuation relates)

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.10

Valuation model (residual / replacement cost / other)

DCF

DCF

DCF

Main details used for purposes of the valuation (to be provided specifically based on the valuation provided) (the list is illustrative only):

 

If the valuation is by the Residual Approach

Construction

Estimated completion date of the construction taken into account in the valuation (date)

Apr-16

Dec-15

Dec-14

Total capital investment required for construction of the property, net yet expended (USD '000)

222,563

240,563

301,717

Discount rate for purposes of discounting construction costs (%), up to completion of construction of the property (if it is different than the discount rate used after completion of the construction)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Rate of developer's margin (%)

N/A

22%

24%

The costs regarding which the developer's margin was taken [remaining costs / total construction costs / other]

N/A

240,563

301,717

Value after construction (residual) (based on method)

If the value after construction is estimated by the Sales Comparison Approach

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sale price per sq.m. of leasable area used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Range of prices per sq.m. of leasable area of comparable properties used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Number of comparable properties (#) used in the calculation

N/A

N/A

N/A

Regarding the main relevant properties used for comparison indicate: the name/identity of the property, location, area

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters

N/A

N/A

N/A

If the value after construction is estimated by the Income Approach

(Discounted Cash Flows)

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

Office - 58,650

Retail - 2,700 parking - 1,210 spaces

 

Office - 65,550

Retail - 2,850 parking - 1,210 spaces

Office - 80,397 parking -32,668; hotel - 10,502 (GBA) sq.m

Occupancy rate in the year + 1 (%)

Office - 65%

Retail - 70%

50%

50%

Occupancy rate in the year + 2 (%)

Office - 85%

Retail - 85%

95%

95%

Representative occupancy rate out of the leasable area for purposes of valuation (%)

Office -95%

Retail - 100%

95%

95%

Average annual rent per sq.m. (USD) leased for purposes of valuation in the 1st operation year

985 - office;

1656 - retail

963-office; 1,100- retail

840

Average annual rent per sq.m. (USD) leased for purposes of valuation in the year 2nd operation year

1014 - office;

1697 - retail

963-office; 1100- retail

840

--

Representative average rent annual per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation (USD)

1045 - office;

1740 - retail

963 -office; 1100- retail

840

Representative NOI for purposes of valuation (USD '000)

71,974

69,744

68,843

Average periodic expenses for maintenance of the existing situation (USD '000)

2,831

3,671

 

The NOI presented net of OPEX

Capitalization rate / discount rate / multiplier used for purposes of the valuation (%)

Capitalization - 9%

Discount rate - 20%

Capitalization - 9.5%

Discount rate - 14.1%

Capitalization - 10.0%

Discount rate - 13.7%

Time until deemed realization

6 years

24 months

24 months

Multiplier / reversionary rate

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters (annual rent growth rate)

3% for office and 2.5% for retail

N/A

N/A

 

Sensitivity analysis for value (based on the method chosen) (USD'000):

Discount rates

Increase of 1% (abs)

(12,508)

(19,535)

(16,100)

Decrease of 1% (abs)

13,322

21,558

18,100

Capitalization rates

Increase of 1% (abs)

(26,648)

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 1% (abs)

33,310

N/A

N/A

Construction costs

Increase of 10% (rel)

(15,169)

(20,300)

(17,500)

Decrease of 10% (rel)

15,169

20,000

24,500

Average rent per meter

Increase of 10% (rel)

32,298

35,200

30,700

Decrease of 10% (rel)

(32,298)

(35,200)

(30,600)

 

 

 

 

6. Information Regarding a Very Substantial Investment Property - Tverskaya Plaza II

 

(a) Presentation of property:

 

Detail as at December 31, 2012

Name of the property:

Plaza II

Location of the property:

3 Tverskaya Zastava Square; 29 Gruzinskiy Val; 31 Gruzinskiy Val, Moscow

Area of the property - broken down by use

5,510.9 sq.m GBA comprising 5,371.7 sq.m of non-residential premises and 138.9 sq.m of residential premises; and 497.5 sq.m [41]

Structure of holdings in the property

The Company holds the assets through Bugis Finance and OOO "Avtostoyanka Tverskaya Zastava" ("ATZ")

Effective share of the company in the property

The Company holds 100% in Bugis Finance and ATZ which own 100% of the project

State the names of the partners in the property

N/A

Acquisition date of the property:

2006-2008 and 2012

Detail of the legal rights in the property (ownership, lease, etc.)

Ownership[42]

 

Status of registration of the legal rights:

Ownership to the premises registered

 

Special matters (significant non‑conforming construction, ground contamination, etc.):

N/A

Method of presentation in the financial statements

Consolidation

Details with respect to a property sold:

N/A

  

 

(b) Significant Data:

 

(Data based on 100%.

Share of company

in the property - 100%)

2H 2012

Fair value at end of period (USD '000)

30,600

If the property is measured at cost - impairment in value

N/A

Average occupancy rate (%)

90%

Areas actually leased out (sq.m.)

5,410

Total revenues (USD '000)

1,362

Average rent per meter (per / per year) (USD )

493

Average rent per meter in agreements signed in the period (USD )

991

NOI (USD '000)

1,140

Adjusted NOI (USD '000)

1,140

Actual rate of return (%) annualized

7.2%

Adjusted rate of return (%) annualized

7.5%

Number of tenants at the end of the year of the report (#)

12

 Average revenue ($ per square meter annual)

493

 

(c) Breakdown of the Structure of the Revenues and Expenses

 

(Data based on 100%.

Share of company

in the property - 100%)

H2 2012

Revenues:

From rents - fixed

1,362

From rents - variable

-

Management fees

-

From operation of parking facilities

-

Other

-

Total revenues:

1,362

Costs:

Administration, maintenance and operation

(222)

Depreciation (if recorded)

-

Other expenses

-

Total costs:

(222)

NOI

1,140

 

 

 

(d) Details with respect to the Valuation:

 

 

(Data based on 100%. Share of company in the property - 100% in 31.12.2012

31.12.2012

30.06.2012

31.12.2011

31.12.2010

Value determined (USD '000)

30,600

31,500

76,900

72,800

Identity of appraiser

Cushman & Wakefield

JLL

JLL

JLL

Is the appraiser independent?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Is there an indemnification agreement?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Effective date of the valuation (the date to which the valuation relates)

31.12.12

30.06.12

31.12.11

31.12.10

Valuation model (comparison / income / other / cost)

DCF

DCF

DCF

DCF

Main details used for purposes of the valuation

(to be provided specifically based on the valuation provided) (the list is illustrative only):

If the valuation is by the Sales Comparison Approach

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sale price per sq.m. of leasable area used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Range of prices per sq.m. of leasable area of comparable properties used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Number of comparable properties (#) used in the calculation

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Regarding the main relevant properties used for comparison indicate: the name/identity of the property, location, area

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Net rate of return reflecting the property's current NOI (current NOI divided by value of the property)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

If the valuation is by the Sales Income Approach

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

6,007.6[43]

5,510

33,279

35,030

Occupancy rate in the year + 1 (%)

95%

97%

70%

Office - 50%

Retail - 70%

Occupancy rate in the year + 2 (%)

95%

97%

95%

Office - 95%

Retail - 100%

--

Representative occupancy rate out of the leasable area for purposes of valuation (%)

95%

97%

95%

Office - 95%

Retail - 100%

Average annual rent per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation in the year + 1

595

516

Office -1,375

Retail - 1,021

Office - 420

Retail - 341

Average annual rent per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation in the year + 2

653

648

Office -1,375

Retail - 1,021

Office - 839

Retail - 682

Representative average annual rent per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation (USD)

742

648

Office -1,375

Retail - 1,021

Office - 839

Retail - 682

Representative NOI for purposes of valuation (USD'000)

4,320

3,389

32,497

29,226

Average periodic expenses for maintenance of the existing situation (USD'000)

29

27,5

137

144

Capitalization rate / rate of return / multiplier used for purposes of the valuation (%)

Capitalization - 11.5%

Discount rate - 16%

Capitalization - 9,5%

Discount rate - 13,4%

Capitalization - 9%

Discount rate - 15,1%

Capitalization - 9,5%

Discount rate - 14%

Time until deemed realization

5 years

2 years

5 years

5 years

Multiplier / reversionary rate

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters (annual rent growth rate)

3%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sensitivity analysis for value (based on the method chosen) (USD'000):

Occupancy rates

Increase of 2% (abs)

529

N/A

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 2% (abs)

529

N/A

N/A

N/A

Capitalization rates

Increase of 1% (abs)

(1,402)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 1% (abs)

1,669

N/A

N/A

N/A

Average rent per meter

Increase of 5% (rel)

1,420

N/A

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 5% (rel)

(1,420)

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

 

7. Information Regarding a Very Substantial Investment Property under Development - Kosinskaya

 

 

(a) Presentation of property:

 

Details as at December 31, 2012

Name of the property:

Kosinskaya

Location of the property:

bld. 21, 9 Kosinskaya st., 34 Moldagulovoy st., Moscow

Area of the land:

80,697 sq.m

Areas of the property planned to be built up[44]:

GBA - 111,770 sq.m[45] of non-residential use

Structure of holdings in the property (description of holding through investee companies, including the rates of holdings therein and the rates of their holdings in the property)

The Company holds 100% of Rognerstar Finance Ltd, which owns 100% of Titon LLC

Effective share of the company in the property (if the property is held by an investee company - multiplication of the company's share in the investee company by the share of the investee company in the property):

100%

State the names of the partners in the property (if the partners hold more than 25% of the rights in the property or if the partners are related parties as defined in this Directive):

N/A

Acquisition date of the land (if relevant):

Lease rights to two land plots acquired in 2006 and 2009

Commencement date of the repair works:

2013

 

 

 

 

 (b) Significant Data:

 

(Data based on 100% share)

2012

2011

2010

Initial acquisition cost (USD '000)

220,899

220,899

220,379

Current cost invested during the period (USD '000)

984

-

520

Total accumulated cost as at the end of the period (USD '000)

221,883

220,899

220,899

If the property is measured at cost - impairment in value (cancellation of impairment in value recorded in the period) (USD '000)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Fair value at end of the period (USD '000)

102,700

146,120

144,250

Valuation profit or loss (USD '000)

(45,330)

971

(18,941)

Expected completion date (as reported at the end of each period)

Sept-2013

Q1-2013

Q1-2012

Total expected cost of the investment (as reported at the end of each period) (USD '000)

279,102

252,899

252,899

Cost of the investment not yet invested (as reported at the end of each period) (USD '000)

57,219

32,000

32,000

Budgeted percentage of completion (%)

79%

87%

87%

NOI from interim uses (non‑core) (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

  

 

 

 

(c) Details with respect to the Valuation:

 

(Data based on 100% share)

2012

2011

2010

Value determined (USD '000)

102,700

146,120

144,250

Identity of appraiser

Cushman & Wakefield

JLL

JLL

Is the appraiser independent?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Is there an indemnification agreement?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Effective date of the valuation (the date to which the valuation relates)

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.10

Valuation model (residual / replacement cost / other)

DCF

DCF

DCF

Main details used for purposes of the valuation (to be provided specifically based on the valuation provided) (the list is illustrative only):

 

If the valuation is by the Residual Approach

Construction

Estimated completion date of the construction taken into account in the valuation (date)

Sept-13

Q1-13

Q1-12

Total capital investment required for construction of the property, net yet expended (USD '000)

57,219

32,000

32,000

Discount rate for purposes of discounting construction costs (%), up to completion of construction of the property (if it is different than the discount rate used after completion of the construction)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Rate of developer's margin (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

The costs regarding which the developer's margin was taken [remaining costs / total construction costs / other]

N/A

N/A

N/A

Value after construction (residual) (based on method)

If the value after construction is estimated by the Sales Comparison Approach

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sale price per sq.m. of leasable area used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Range of prices per sq.m. of leasable area of comparable properties used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Number of comparable properties (#) used in the calculation

N/A

N/A

N/A

Regarding the main relevant properties used for comparison indicate: the name/identity of the property, location, area

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters

N/A

N/A

N/A

If the value after construction is estimated by the Income Approach

(Discounted Cash Flows)

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

90,317

100,962

100,962

Occupancy rate in the year + 1 (%)

60%

80%

80%

Occupancy rate in the year + 2 (%)

70%

90%

90%

Representative occupancy rate out of the leasable area for purposes of valuation (%)

80%

90%

90%

Average annual rent per sq.m. (USD) leased for purposes of valuation in the 1st operation year

Retail- $473

Office - $265

Retail- $396

Office - 225

Retail- $396

Office - 225

Average annual rent per sq.m. (USD) leased for purposes of valuation in the year 2nd operation year

Retail- $485

Office - $273

Retail- $396

Office - 225

Retail- $396

Office - 225

--

Representative average rent annual per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation (USD)

Retail- $497

Office - $281

Retail- $396

Office - 225

Retail- $396

Office - 225

Representative NOI for purposes of valuation (USD '000)

25,912

26,400

27,100

Average periodic expenses for maintenance of the existing situation (USD '000)

2,660

1,236

1,138

Capitalization rate / discount rate / multiplier used for purposes of the valuation (%)

Capitalization - 12.0%

Discount rate - 17%

Capitalization - 12.25%

Discount rate - 14.1%

Capitalization - 12.75%

Discount rate - 14.1%

Time until deemed realization

5 years

18 month

18 month

Multiplier / reversionary rate

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters (annual rent growth rate)

3% for office and 2.5% for retail

N/A

N/A

 

Sensitivity analysis for value (based on the method chosen) (USD'000):

Discount rates

Increase of 1% (abs)

(3,892)

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 1% (abs)

4,037

N/A

N/A

Capitalization rates

Increase of 1% (abs)

(9,921)

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 1% (abs)

11,725

N/A

N/A

Construction costs

Increase of 10% (rel)

(5,409)

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 10% (rel)

5,409

N/A

N/A

Average rent per meter

Increase of 10% (rel)

17,009

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 10% (rel)

(17,009)

N/A

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

8. Information Regarding a Very Substantial Investment Property under Development - Pochtovaya

 

(a) Presentation of property:

 

Detail as at December 31, 2012

Name of the property:

Pochtovaya Bol. Str.

Location of the property:

24, 30, 34 Pochtovaya Bol. Str., Moscow

Area of the land:

4,73 hectares

Areas of the property planned to be built up, broken down by use:

GBA - 170,350 sq.m., including 67,800 sq.m. of residential area, 32,950 sq.m. of office area, 6,200 sq.m of retail area and 1,200 sq.m of kindergarten. The remaining 62,200 sq.m is underground part of the building held for parking[46]

Structure of holdings in the property (description of holding through investee companies, including the rates of holdings therein and the rates of their holdings in the property):

The company holds 100% of its Cypriot subsidiaries and 99.7% of its Russian subsidiary.

 

Effective share of the company in the property:

99.7%

State the names of the partners in the property

Private investors

Acquisition date of the land (if relevant):

Lease rights to 4 land plots intended to be used for the project were acquired by the holding company in 2007 and 2012[47]

Commencement date of the construction work:

N/A

Detail of the legal rights in the property (ownership, lease, etc.)

Ownership to the buildings upon construction; ownership of 2 uncompleted constructions[48]; lease rights to the underlying land plots[49]

Status of registration of the legal rights:

Lease rights to the underlying land plots registered[50]

State whether there are sources of financing for continued construction of the property

N/A

Special matters (significant non‑conforming construction, ground contamination, etc.):

N/A

Method of presentation in the financial statements

Full consolidation

Identity of the executing contractor:

N/A

Calculation method (fauschly / quantities certificate / other):

N/A

Details with respect to a property sold

N/A

 

 

(b) Significant Data:

 

(Data based on 100%. Share of company in the property -99,7%)

2012

2011

2010

Initial acquisition cost (USD '000)

202,828

202,828

201,714

Current cost invested during the period (USD '000)

1,649

-

1,114

Total accumulated cost as at the end of the period (USD '000)

204,477

202,828

202,828

If the property is measured at cost - impairment in value (cancellation of impairment in value recorded in the period) (USD '000)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Fair value at end of the period (USD '000)*

141,300

213,300

212,400

Valuation profit or loss (USD '000)

(74,603)

871

7,996

Expected completion date (as reported at the end of each period)

Jul-17

Jan-20

Jan-19

Total expected cost of the investment (as reported at the end of each period) (USD '000)

522,897

818,328

766,828

Cost of the investment not yet invested (as reported at the end of each period) (USD '000)

318,420

615,500

564,000

Budgeted percentage of completion (%)

39%

25%

26%

NOI from interim uses (non‑core) (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

*For detailed explanation see Valuation section of the MD&A

 

  

 

 (d) Details with respect to the Valuation:

 

 

(Data based on 100%. Share of company in the property -99,7%)

2012

2011

2010

Value determined (USD '000)

141,300

213,300

212,400

Identity of appraiser

Cushman & Wakefield

JLL

JLL

Is the appraiser independent?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Is there an indemnification agreement?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Effective date of the valuation (the date to which the valuation relates)

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.10

Valuation model (residual / replacement cost / other)

DCF

DCF

DCF

Main details used for purposes of the valuation

(to be provided specifically based on the valuation provided) (the list is illustrative only):

If the valuation is by the Residual Approach

Construction

Estimated completion date of the construction taken into account in the valuation (date)

Jul-17

Jan-20

Jan-19

Total capital investment required for construction of the property, net yet expended (USD '000) - the difference is explained by the change in methodology when the appraiser has included fit-out cost into the budget

318,420

615,500

564,000

Discount rate for purposes of discounting construction costs (%), up to completion of construction of the property (if it is different than the discount rate used after completion of the construction)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Rate of developer's margin (%) - the difference is mainly due to different approach

N/A

25%

25%

The costs regarding which the developer's margin was taken [remaining costs / total construction costs / other]

N/A

615,500

564,000

Value after construction (residual) (based on method)

If the value after construction is estimated by the Sales Comparison Approach

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sale price per sq.m. of leasable area used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Range of prices per sq.m. of leasable area of comparable properties used in the calculation (USD)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Number of comparable properties (#) used in the calculation

N/A

N/A

N/A

Regarding the main relevant properties used for comparison indicate: the name/identity of the property, location, area

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters

N/A

N/A

N/A

If the value after construction is estimated by the Income Approach

(Discounted Cash Flows)

Gross leasable area used in the calculation (sq.m.) -presented for 100% of the property

Commercial GLA - 34,208

Residential apartments sellable area - 56,952

Parking lots - 1,771

GSA - 217,725

GLA - 13,400

Parking lots(sale)- 3,094

 

GSA - 217,725

GLA - 13,400

Parking lots(sale)- 3,094

 

Average annual rent /sale priceper sq.m. (USD) for purposes of valuation in the 1st operation year

Apartments Sales - $6,615

Office rent - $563

Retail Sales - $5,519

Sales - $5,292

 

Sales - $4,961

 

Average annual rent rent /sale per sq.m. (USD) leased for purposes of valuation in the year 2nd operation year

Apartments Sales - $6,946

Office rent - $580

Retail Sales - $5,657

Sales - $5,557

 

Sales - $5,209

 

--

Representative average rent annual per sq.m. leased for purposes of valuation (USD)

Office rent - $615

Retail Sales - $5,943

Retail - $326

Retail - $261

Representative cash flow / representative NOI for purposes of valuation (USD '000)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Average periodic expenses for maintenance of the existing situation (USD '000)*

580

331

265

Capitalization rate / discount rate / multiplier used for purposes of the valuation (%)

10%

11,5%

11,5%

Time until deemed realization

6 years

10 years

10 years

Multiplier / reversionary rate

N/A

N/A

Other main parameters (annual price/rent growth rate)

5% for residential

3% for office and 2.5% for retail

N/A

N/A

Sensitivity analysis for value (based on the method chosen) (USD'000):

Discount rates

 

Increase of 10% (abs)

(12,508)

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 10% (abs)

13,323

N/A

N/A

Capitalization rates

 

Increase of 10% (abs)

(26,648)

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 10% (abs)

33,310

N/A

N/A

Construction costs

 

Increase of 10% (rel)

(15,170)

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 10% (rel)

15,170

N/A

N/A

Average rent per meter

Increase of 10% (rel)

32,299

N/A

N/A

Decrease of 10% (rel)

(32,299)

N/A

N/A

 

 

9. Data regarding Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre

During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company reached a non-binding agreement with the City of Moscow to transfer development rights to the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre to the ownership of the City of Moscow in exchange for re-approval and renewal of the Company's rights required for development of Plaza Ic, Plaza IIa and Plaza IV projects. It was further agreed that the holding company carrying out the project will not be charged municipal development costs other than the rent for the land used for construction. The Company estimated such municipal development costs to be equal to USD 95 million and to be sufficient to cover the construction under the project. Following this non-binding agreement, the City of Moscow decided not to proceed with the plans to construct the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre and the Company wrote-off the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre project from its books in an amount valued at USD 74.8 million (determined according to valuation of the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre project dated June 30, 2011).

Based on JLL valuations for Plaza Ic, Plaza IIa and Plaza IV projects dated December 31, 2011, the Company believes that the above non-binding agreement (if executed in full) will provide full compensation for the development costs regarding the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre project.

On August 8, 2012, the Company repaid the remainder of the loan it had taken for the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre project, totalling USD 71 million.

Following the arrangements with the City of Moscow, on October 10, 2012 a wholly owned Company's subsidiary OOO "Avtostoyanka Tverskaya Zastava" ("ATZ") entered into the lease agreement in relation to the land plot intended for construction of Plaza Ic. The lease for 10 years was registered with the Real Estate Register on November 2, 2012.

The process of provision of the land plots for Plaza IIa and Plaza IV to ATZ for development purposes was initiated in the last quarter of 2011. The land plots are being prepared to be provided to the holding company for lease for a term of 10 years.[51]

In August 2012 the City of Moscow notified the Company in writing that development of Plaza Ib and Plaza II was only possible within the existing areas of premises owned by the Company. This triggered a devaluation of the projects for USD 59 million as of the second quarter of 2012.

10. Information Regarding a Very Substantial Investment Property under Development - Serebryakova (Botanic Garden)

The project envisaging construction of a high rise multi-functional building with underground parking space and a separate multi-storey garage was based on an investment contract entered into on December 30, 2005 between the City of Moscow, Novoe Koltso Moskvy OJSC ("NKM"), a wholly - owned subsidiary of the City of Moscow, and Nordservice LLC, the holding company. The holding company was a "co-investor" in the project together with NKM, which was the main investor and beneficiary of land lease rights for the Botanic Garden project.

On August 2, 2012 a claim by a third party creditor seeking to declare NKM bankrupt was filed with the Moscow commercial court, while the assets of NKM were previously attached for the benefit of the same creditor. The impairment loss on inventory of real estate resulted in the Company's decision to write-off its Botanic Garden project in Q2 2012 Financial Statements. Notwithstanding, the Company continued its efforts to recover its costs and/or receive the development rights to the project.

In particular, on December 24, 2012 the holding company replaced NKM in the land lease agreement in relation to the potential construction site through an addendum to the lease agreement.[52] The Company's negotiations with the Moscow City authorities resulted in the execution of an addendum to the investment contract for the Botanic Garden project on February 4, 2013. Through this addendum the holding company became the only investor under the investment contract and NKM confirmed absence of any financial and other claims to the City of Moscow and Nordservice.

After thorough assessment of risks to the Company's development rights in respect of the project, the Company has agreed to make payments to the city of Moscow under the addendum to the investment contract in return for additional development rights. The total aggregate amount of the payments for additional development rights is approximately USD 14.2 million plus Nordservice is to compensate the indebtedness of NKM under the investment contract in the amount of approximately USD 4.3 million, both will be paid in several instalments. The decision was based on the opinion of external legal advisers of the Company that, in the event that the addendum is declared void or is cancelled (following a claim by the creditors of NKM), the amounts paid by Nordservice under the investment contract would be repayable back. It should be noted that the provision to write-off the Botanic Garden (made in August 2012) will not be cancelled at this stage.

 Human Resources - Employees

The following table details the number of employees in the Group's real estate operations in Russia, broken down by the business sectors in which they are employed:

Number of Employees as at

31.12.12

31.12.11

31.12.10

Management

6

7

6

Financial

31

26

27

Marketing and sales

6

5

4

Business development, including

 project management division

55

52

77

Legal

9

9

8

Administrative

42

39

48

Total

149[53]

 138[54]

170[55]

 

Total amount of 149 employees do not include:

·; 54 of employees, who currently belong to AFIMALL CITY project. Compared to 2011 the total amount increased to 8 persons due to rising marketing activity;

·; 122 of employees in Semprex LLC (vs 117 members in 2011). Increase is within the staff employment sheet.

·; 270 Plaza SPA Zheleznovodsk project

·; 500 Plaza SPA Kislovodsk project

Since December 31, 2012 to the date of this periodic report, there have been no significant changes in the number of the Group's employees employed in Russian real estate operations, specified in this article above.

 

Financing 

In June 2012 the new loan facility from a bank of the VTB Group with a purpose to refinance AFIMALL CITY project was arranged. The total amount of the credit line reached RUB 21,000 million embracing 5 tranches, multicurrency choice for each tranche utilization (Libor3M +6.7% per ann. for the USD denominated tranches, 9.5% per ann. for the RUB denominated) with term of maturity April 1, 2018.

 

Two early prepayments had been successfully executed for the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre project in August 2012 for the amount of USD 70 million and the Ozerkovskaya III project for the amount of USD 62 million in November 2012 (the both credit lines in Sberbank).

 

New loan facility deals has been started on 3Q and 4Q 2012 with the biggest Russian financial institutions and on December 17, 2012 a new loan facility for the Ozerkovskaya III project refinancing was approved with the following terms: loan facility amount USD 220 million , interest rate 3MLibor + 5.7% per ann., maturity - 731 days.

 

The Company has agreed to sell their respective shares in Westec to Capricornus Investments Limited. The transaction also led to reduction of overall debt of the Company following the removal of the Nordea debt from its consolidated balance sheet.The total balance of debt financing reached USD 555.9 million as of December 31, 2012, including USD 555.7 million for the principal debt and USD 200,000 for accrued Interests with average interest rate 8.07 % per annum as of December 31, 2012 (10.67% respectively as of December 31, 2012).

 

 

 

Annex B to the Management Discussion and Analysis

 

Below is additional information regarding the Company's very significant loans. Terms not expressly defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the MD&A.

 

Balance as of 31.12.2012

Lender type: Bank, Institutional etc.

Indexation/ currency exposure & interest rate

Liens and material legal restrictions on the property

Covenants

Cross default mechanism

Any other covenants or restriction that might increase the cost of debt

In-case it is a credit line facility - what are the terms&conditions for draw downs

The methods/way that the covenant is calculated

Covenant calculation results

The date of 2012 financial statement were reported

The date that the lender is checking the borrower is line with the covenants

USD 309,385,605 and RUR 6,875,445,333.33 (USD 226,369,250). Total amount in USD as of 31.12.2012 is 535,754,855.

Specific project financed by a Bank, member of the VTB Group

RUR/USD loan provided in five tranches totalling RUR 21 billion. Each tranche can be drown down either in US Dollars or in Rubles (at Company's discretion). The loan facility has differentiated interest rates which are currency dependent: 9.5% for loans drawn down in Russian rubles and 3 months LIBOR + 6.7% for loans drawn down in US dollars. The interest on the loans is payable on a quarterly basis, throughout the term of the credit line. The principal is due to be fully repaid in April 2018. The RUR interest rate may be unilaterally increased by the lending bank, should one of the interest indicators stipulated by the Russian Central Bank and specified in the loan agreement be increased; the interest rate will be increased by the amount of the interest indicator increase.

1. Liens over all the Bellgate's shares2. AFI Development PLC company guarantee, limited to USD 1,000,0003. Mortgage over 100% of the premises of AFIMALL City4. Mortgage over the premises in the Parking owned by Bellgate, upon registration of Bellgate's rights to land plot under the Parking5. Permission to debit Bellgate's account held in the lending bank 6. Additional mortgage over the premises of the "Aquamarine" Hotel in Moscow, to be removed in case Bellgate (the borrower) redeems USD 20 million of the principal 7. Additional guarantee by Semprex LLC, a Russian Company - an indirect subsidiary of AFI Development Plc, to be removed in case Bellgate (the borrower) redeems USD 20 million of the principal

(1) Bellgate'(the Borrower) should have minumum quarterly revenues, ranging from RUR 651,000,000 in Q3 2012 to RUR 1,139,000,000 in Q1 2018. Penalty: 1% per annum extra charge to the interest rate applicable under the loan agreement- applicable only for the quarter when the aforesaid revenue threshold was not achieved;(2) Liquidation Value of the property should be higher than sum of the outstanding principal and six months interest. 

N/A

N/A

The loan is given in five tranches: 1st tranche drawn down on 29 June 2012, 2nd tranch draw down on 3 August 2012 on the amount USD 69, 385,604.64 (RUR 2,252,000,000), 3rd tranche of RUR 1,300,000,000 is available during the period from 15.01.2013 till 1.02.2013, 4th tranche of RUR 1,333,333,333 is available during the period from 15.02.2013 till 28.02.2013 , 5th tranche of RUR 1,333,333,333 is available during the period from 14.05.2013 till 28.05.2013 . After the expiration of the aforesaid drowdown periods, the tranches, which were not claimed, cannot be drown down.

(1) The total of revenue, including VAT , calculated quarterly; (2) The Liquidation Value is determined by an external valuer appointed by the Bank.

(1) The minimum quarterly revenue for Q3 2012 was 803M Rubbles and for Q4 2012 was 823M Rubbles; (2) Liquidation Value determined by an external valuer appointed by the Bank is USD 822 billion.

18 March 2013

(1) Borrowers revenues are checked quarterly; (2) Liquidation value is checked twice a year, on 22 December and on 22 June.

 

Note: During February 2013 the Company has financed the 3rd installment of consideration for acquisition of underground car park at AFIMALL City by additional drawdown of RUR1.33 billion (US$43.5 million). In addition, during February 2013 the Company has made a drawdown of RUR1.3 billion (US$43.3) to finance construction costs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFI DEVELOPMENT PLC

 

REPORT AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

For the year ended 31 December 2012

 

 

 

 

C O N T E N T S

 

 

Page

 

Board of Directors and Professional Advisers 1

 

Board of Directors' Report 2 - 4

 

Directors' Responsibility Statement 5

 

Independent Auditors' Report 6 - 7

Consolidated Income Statement 8

 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 9

 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 10

 

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 11

 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 12

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 13 - 59

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND PROFESSIONAL ADVISERS

 

 

 

Board of Directors Lev Leviev - Chairman

 

Mark Groysman

 

Moshe Amit

Avraham Noach Novogrocki (appointed on 21 August 2012)

 

Izzy Cohen (resigned on 22 July 2012)

 

Christakis Klerides

 

John Robert Camber Porter

 

Panayiotis Demetriou

 

Michalakis Sarris (resigned on 1 March 2013)

 

 

Secretary Fuamari Secretarial Limited (appointed on 5 September 2012)

 

Emerald Secretarial Limited (resigned on 5 September 2012)

 

 

Independent Auditors KPMG Limited

 

 

Bankers Joint Stock Company VTB Bank

 

Joint Stock Commercial Savings Bank of the Russian Federation

 

Bank Leumi (UK) plc

Citibank N.A.

 

Registered Office Spyrou Araouzou 165,

Lordos Waterfront Building,

3035 Limassol,

Cyprus

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORT

 

 

The Board of Directors of AFI Development Plc (the "Company") presents to the members its annual report together with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2012.

 

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES

 

The principal activities of the Group, which remained unchanged from last year, are real estate investment and development. The principal activity of the Company is the holding of investments in subsidiaries.

 

EXAMINATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT, POSITION AND PERFORMANCE OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE GROUP

 

AFI Development is one of the leading real estate development companies operating in Russia. Established in 2001, AFI Development is a publicly traded subsidiary of Africa Israel Investments Ltd.

 

AFI Development is listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange and aims to deliver shareholder value through a commitment to innovation and continuous project development, coupled with the highest standards of design, construction, and quality and customer service.

 

AFI Development focuses on developing and redeveloping high quality commercial and residential real estate assets across Russia, with Moscow being its main market. The Company's existing portfolio comprises commercial projects focused on offices, shopping centres, hotels and mixed-use properties, and residential projects. AFI Development's strategy is to sell the residential properties it develops and to either lease the commercial properties or sell them for a favourable return.

 

As at 31 December 2012, the Company's portfolio consisted of 7 investment properties, 8 investment properties under development, 2 trading properties, 5 hotel projects, 2 trading properties under development/non-current inventory and 2 assets for sale at various stages of development. The portfolio comprises commercial projects focused on offices, shopping centres, hotels, mixed-use properties and residential projects in prime locations in Moscow.

 

FINANCIAL RESULTS

 

The Group's results are set out in the consolidated income statement on page 8. The loss of the Group for the year before taxation amounted to US$283,537 thousand (2011: profit US$246,641 thousand). The loss after taxation attributable to the Group's shareholders amounted to US$269,098 thousand (2011: profit US$170,870 thousand).

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORT

 

 

DIVIDENDS

 

The Board of Directors does not recommend the payment of a dividend and the loss for the year is transferred to retained earnings.

 

MAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

 

The most significant risks faced by the Group and the steps taken to manage these risks are described in note 5 of the consolidated financial statements.

 

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

 

The Group is one of the leading real estate development companies operating in Russia. It focuses on developing and redeveloping high quality commercial and residential real estate assets in Moscow and the Moscow Region. The strategy during the reporting period and for the future periods is to sell the residential properties that the Group develops and to either lease the commercial properties that the Group develops or sell them if the Group is able to achieve a favourable return.

 

SHARE CAPITAL

 

There were no changes to the share capital of the Company during the year. As at the year end the share capital of the company comprised:

·; 523,847,027 "A" shares of US$0.001 and,

·; 523,847,027 "B" shares of US$0.001

 

All "A" shares are on deposit with BNY (Nominees) Limited and each "A" share is represented by one GDR listed on the London Stock Exchange ("LSE").

 

All "B" shares were admitted to a premium listing of the Official list of the UK Listing Authority and to trading on the main market of LSE.

 

BRANCHES

 

The Group operates seven branches and/or representative offices of Cypriot and BVI entities in the Russian Federation. These are Bellgate Construction Ltd branch, which operates AFIMALL City project. The Dulverton Ltd branch and the Westec Four Winds Ltd branch, which operate Four Winds I and II projects respectively. Amerone Ltd branch and Bugis Finance branch operating investment properties and Bastet Estates Ltd branch and Falgaro Investments Ltd branch acting as sale agents for residential properties.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORT

 

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The members of the Board of Directors as at 31 December 2012 and at the date of this report are shown on page 1. The directors' date of appointment and resignation, if applicable, is indicated on page 1. The term of those that have not resigned will expire on the date of the next annual general meeting of the shareholders but all of them are eligible for re-election. There were no significant changes in the assignment of responsibilities of the Board of Directors during the year.

 

POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS

 

Events which took place after the reporting date and which have a bearing on the understanding of the financial statements are described in note 40 of the consolidated financial statements.

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

The independent auditors, KPMG Limited, have expressed their willingness to continue offering their services. A resolution reappointing the auditors and giving authority to the Board of Directors to fix their remuneration will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting.

 

 

By order of the Board

 

 

Fuamari Secretarial Limited

Secretary

Nicosia, 18 March 2013

 

DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT

Each of the directors, whose names are listed below confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:

·; the consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation as a whole; and

·; the adoption of a going concern basis for the preparation of the financial statements continues to be appropriate based on the foregoing and having reviewed the forecast financial position of the Group; and

·; the Board of Directors' reports include a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.

The Directors of the Company as at the date of this announcement are as set out below:

The Board of Directors

Executive directors

Lev Leviev - Chairman .............................................................

 

 

Mark Groysman .............................................................

 

 

Non-executive director

 

Avraham Noach Novogrocki .............................................................

 

 

Non-executive independent directors

 

Moshe Amit .............................................................

 

 

Christakis Klerides .............................................................

 

 

John Robert Camber Porter .............................................................

 

 

Panayiotis Demetriou .............................................................

 

 

 

 

 

Independent Auditors' Report

 

 

To the Members of AFI Development Plc

 

Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of AFI Development Plc ("the Company") and its subsidiaries (together with the Company, the "Group"), which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2012, and the consolidated statements of income statement, comprehensive income and changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

 

Board of Directors' Responsibility for the consolidated Financial Statements

 

The Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (EU) and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113, and for such internal control as the Board of Directors determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

 

Auditors' Responsibility

 

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the Board of Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

 

 

Opinion

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2012, and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113.

 

Report on Other Legal Requirements

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Auditors and Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts Law of 2009, we report the following:

·; We have obtained all the information and explanations we considered necessary for the purposes of our audit.

·; In our opinion, proper books of account have been kept by the Company.

·; The consolidated financial statements are in agreement with the books of account.

·; In our opinion and to the best of the information available to us and according to the explanations given to us, the consolidated financial statements give the information required by the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113, in the manner so required.

·; In our opinion, the information given in the report of the Board of Directors is consistent with the consolidated financial statements.

 

Other Matter

 

This report, including the opinion, has been prepared for and only for the Company's members as a body in accordance with Section 34 of the Auditors and Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts Law of 2009 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving this opinion, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whose knowledge this report may come to.

 

 

 

 

 

Marios G. Gregoriades CPA

Certified Public Accountant and Registered Auditor

 

For and on behalf of

 

KPMG Limited

Certified Public Accountants and Registered Auditors

 

14 Esperidon Street

1087 Nicosia, Cyprus

 

18 March 2013

 

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

 

For the year ended 31 December 2012

 

 

2012

2011

Note

US$ '000

US$ '000

Revenue

8

162,639

133,924

Other income

9

3,281

754

Operating expenses

11

(74,443)

(72,102)

Carrying value of trading properties sold

22

(9,218)

 (10,345)

Administrative expenses

10

(20,410)

(30,315)

Other expenses

12

(2,622)

(2,343)

Total expenses

(106,693)

(115,105)

Gross Profit

59,227

19,573

Profit on disposal of investments in subsidiaries

7

2,729

-

Impairment of prepayment for investments

-

(1,178)

 

 

Valuation (loss)/gain on investment property

16,17

(246,096)

267,978

Impairment loss on inventory of real estate

20

(65,445)

-

Impairment loss on trading properties

22

-

(414)

Impairment loss reversal on property, plant and equipment

 

18

 

-

 

1,320

Net valuation (loss)/gain on properties

(311,541)

268,884

 

 

Results from operating activities

(249,585)

287,279

Finance income

26,590

8,234

Finance costs

(60,542)

 (48,872)

Net finance costs

13

(33,952)

 (40,638)

(Loss)/profit before tax

(283,537)

246,641

Tax benefit/(expense)

14

8,010

 (75,098)

 

 

(Loss)/profit for the year

(275,527)

171,543

Profit attributable to:

Owners of the Company

(269,098)

170,870

Non-controlling interests

(6,429)

673

Profit for the year

(275,527)

171,543

Earnings per share

Basic and diluted earnings per share (cent)

15

(25.68)

16.31

 

The notes on pages 13 to 59 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

For the year ended 31 December 2012

 

 

2012

2011

US$ '000

US$ '000

(Loss)/profit for the year

(275,527)

171,543

Other comprehensive income:

Realised translation difference on disposal of subsidiaries transferred to income statement

 

(161)

 

-

Foreign currency translation differences for foreign operations

33,608

 (35,870)

Total comprehensive income for the year

(242,080)

135,673

Total comprehensive income attributable to:

Owners of the parent

(235,217)

135,011

Non-controlling interests

(6,863)

662

(242,080)

135,673

 

 

 

 

The notes on pages 13 to 59 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

 

For the year ended 31 December 2012

 

 

 

Attributable to the owners of the Company

Non-controlling interests

 

Total

 

Share

 Share

Translation

Retained

 

 

 

 

Capital

Premium

Reserve

Earnings

Total

 

 

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at 1 January 2011

 1,048

1,763,409

(142,632)

 106,571

1,728,396

3,225

1,731,621

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Profit

-

-

-

170,870

170,870

673

171,543

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation differences

 

-

 

-

 

(35,859)

 

-

 

(35,859)

 

(11)

 

(35,870)

Total comprehensive income for the year

 

-

 

-

 

(35,859)

 

 170,870

 

135,011

 

662

 

135,673

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transactions with owners of the Company, recognised directly in equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share option expense

-

-

-

62

62

-

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at 31 December 2011

1,048

1,763,409

(178,491)

 277,503

1,863,469

3,887

1,867,356

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at 1 January 2012

 1,048

1,763,409

(178,491)

 277,503

1,863,469

3,887

1,867,356

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss

-

-

-

(269,098)

(269,098)

(6,429)

(275,527)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation differences

 

-

 

-

 

33,881

 

-

 

33,881

 

(434)

 

33,447

Total comprehensive income for the year

 

-

 

-

 

33,881

 

(269,098)

 

 (235,217)

 

(6,863)

 

 (242,080)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transactions with owners of the Company, recognised directly in equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share option expense

-

-

-

1,256

1,256

-

1,256

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at 31 December 2012

1,048

1,763,409

(144,610)

9,661

1,629,508

(2,976)

1,626,532

 

 

 

 

 

The notes on pages 13 to 59 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2012

 

 

 

2012

2011

 

Note

US$ '000

US$ '000

Assets

 

 

 

Investment property

16

1,486,427

1,403,580

Investment property under development

17

568,160

983,598

Property, plant and equipment

18

102,910

92,034

Long-term loans receivable

19

759

739

Inventory of real estate

20

-

66,221

VAT recoverable

21

574

5,370

Goodwill

 

153

153

Non-current assets

 

2,158,983

2,551,695

Trading properties

22

2,112

11,053

Trading properties under construction

23

141,787

129,598

Inventories

 

1,139

665

Short-term loans receivable

19

92

81

Trade and other receivables

24

78,548

107,170

Current tax assets

14

2,877

-

Cash and cash equivalents

25

178,195

84,820

Assets held for sale

26

185,888

-

Current assets

 

590,638

333,387

Total assets

 

2,749,621

2,885,082

Equity

 

 

 

Share capital

27

1,048

1,048

Share premium

27

1,763,409

1,763,409

Translation reserve

27

(144,610)

(178,491)

Retained earnings

27

9,661

277,503

Equity attributable to owners of the Company

 

1,629,508

1,863,469

Non-controlling interests

 

(2,976)

3,887

Total equity

 

1,626,532

1,867,356

Liabilities

 

 

 

Long-term loans and borrowings

28

554,551

528,116

Long-term amounts payable

29

38,324

71,627

Deferred tax liabilities

30

104,593

142,093

Deferred income

32

20,163

22,622

Non-current liabilities

 

717,631

764,458

Short-term loans and borrowings

28

17,345

98,973

Trade and other payables

31

273,516

154,092

Current tax liabilities

14

-

203

Liabilities held for sale

26

114,597

-

Current liabilities

 

405,458

253,268

Total liabilities

 

1,123,089

1,017,726

Total equity and liabilities

 

2,749,621

2,885,082

 

The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 18 March 2013.

 

........................ ...............................

Lev Leviev Mark Groysman

Chairman Director

The notes on pages 13 to 59 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 

For the year ended 31 December 2012

 

 

2012

2011

 

Note

US$'000

US$'000

Cash flows from operating activities

(Loss)/Profit for the year

(275,527)

171,543

Adjustments for:

Depreciation

18

2,316

1,829

Interest income

13

(9,310)

(8,234)

Interest expense

13

54,825

40,126

Share option expense

1,256

62

Net valuation loss/gain on properties

311,541

(268,884)

Impairment of prepayments for investments

-

1,178

Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment

846

56

Negative goodwill on acquisition of joint venture

(1,929)

-

Profit on disposal of investment in subsidiaries

7

(2,729)

-

Unrealised (profit)/loss on foreign exchange

13

(17,280)

6,154

Tax (benefit)/expense

14

(8,010)

75,098

55,999

18,928

Change in trade and other receivables

(1,870)

4,596

Change in amounts receivable from related companies

24

(218)

6,432

Change in inventories

(142)

(89)

Change in trading properties and tr. properties under construction

(1,142)

9,507

Change in trade and other payables

31

12,862

1,649

Change in amounts payable to related companies

31

(487)

5,142

Change in deferred income

32

646

(5,617)

Cash generated from operating activities

65,648

40,548

Taxes paid

(7,692)

(12,727)

Net cash from operating activities

57,956

27,821

Cash flows from investing activities

Receipts in advance for the sale of an investment

31

100,000

-

Net cash inflow from the disposal of subsidiaries

7

5,789

-

Net cash inflow from the acquisition of joint venture

4,035

-

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

59

39

Interest received

2,395

677

Change in advances to builders

(1,543)

5,219

Payments for construction of investment property under development

16,17

(27,455)

(66,463)

Payments for the acquisition of investment property

16

(43,967)

(113,922)

Change in VAT recoverable

21

46,508

4,541

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

18

(7,467)

(9,646)

Net cash from/(used in) investing activities

78,354

(179,555)

Cash flows from financing activities

Payments for loan receivable

(102)

(740)

Proceeds from repayment of loans receivable

102

43

Proceeds from loans and borrowings

577,507

268,251

Repayment of loans and borrowings

(555,440)

(89,220)

Interest paid

(58,760)

(60,088)

Net cash (used in)/from financing activities

(36,693)

 118,246

Effect of exchange rate fluctuations

(1,551)

(11,531)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

98,066

(45,019)

Reclassification to assets held for sale

(4,691)

-

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January

84,820

 129,839

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

25

178,195

84,820

 

The notes on pages 13 to 59 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
For the year ended 31 December 2012

 

1. INCORPORATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY

 

AFI Development PLC (the "Company") was incorporated in Cyprus on 13 February 2001 as a limited liability company under the name Donkamill Holdings Limited. In April 2007 the Company was transformed into public company and changed its name to AFI Development PLC. The address of the Company's registered office is 165 Spyrou Araouzou Street, Lordos Waterfront Building, 5th floor, Flat/office 505, 3035 Limassol, Cyprus. The Company is a 64.88% (31/12/2011: 63.7%) subsidiary of Africa Israel Investments Ltd ("Africa-Israel"), which is listed in the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange ("TASE"). The remaining shareholding of "A" shares is held by a custodian bank in exchange for the GDRs issued and listed in the London Stock Exchange ("LSE"). On 5 July 2010 the Company issued by way of a bonus issue, 523,847,027 "B" shares, which were admitted to a premium listing on the Official List of the UK Listing Authority and to trading on the main market of LSE. On the same date, the ordinary shares of the Company were designated as "A" shares.

 

The consolidated financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended 31 December 2012 comprise of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the "Group" and individually as 'Group entities') and the Group's interest in jointly controlled entities. The principal activity of the Group is real estate investment and development.

 

The principal activity of the Company is the holding of investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures as presented in note 39 "Group Entities".

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

Statement of compliance

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union (EU) and the requirements of the Companies Law of Cyprus, Cap. 113.

 

The consolidated financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 18 March 2013.

 

Basis of measurement

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis as modified, up to 31 December 2003, by the provisions of IAS 29 "Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies" which provides for the restatement of non-monetary assets and liabilities to account for the inflation. The historical cost basis is also modified in regard to investment property and investment property under development which are presented at fair value.

 

 

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION (continued)

 

Functional and presentation currency

These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States Dollars which is the Company's functional currency. All financial information presented in United States Dollars has been rounded to the nearest thousand, except when otherwise indicated.

 

Use of estimates and judgements

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRSs requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.

 

Information about critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated financial statements is included in the following notes:

 

·; Note 14 - provision for tax liabilities

·; Note 16 - valuation of investment property

·; Note 17 - valuation of investment property under development

·; Note 18 - valuation of land and buildings and buildings under construction

·; Note 22 - valuation of trading properties

·; Note 23 - valuation of trading properties under construction

·; Note 24 - recoverability of receivables

·; Note 30 - utilisation of tax losses

·; Note 37 - contingencies

 

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements and have been applied consistently by Group entities.

 

Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.

 

Basis of consolidation

Acquisitions of non-controlling interests

Acquisitions of non-controlling interests are accounted for as transactions with owners in their capacity as owners and therefore no goodwill is recognised as a result and no gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss. Adjustments to non-controlling interests arising from transactions that do not involve the loss of control are based on a proportionate amount of the net assets of the subsidiary.

 

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.

 

The accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed when necessary to align them with the policies adopted by the Group. Losses applicable to the non-controlling interests in a subsidiary are allocated to the non-controlling interests even if doing so causes the non-controlling interests to have a deficit balance.

 

Acquisitions from entities under common control

Business combinations arising from transfers of interests in entities that are under the control of the shareholder that controls the Group are accounted for as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented or, if later, at the date that common control was established; for this purpose comparatives are restated. The assets and liabilities acquired are recognised at the carrying amounts recognised previously in the Group controlling shareholder's consolidated financial statements. The components of equity of the acquired entities are added to the same components within Group equity and any gain/loss arising is recognised directly in equity.

 

Jointly controlled operations

A jointly controlled operation is a joint venture carried on by each venturer using its own assets in pursuit of the joint operations. The consolidated financial statements include the assets that the Group controls and the liabilities that it incurs in the course of pursuing the joint operation and the expenses that the Group incurs and its share of the income that it earns from the joint operation.

 

Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Intra-group balances and transactions and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Foreign currency

Foreign currency transactions

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of Group entities at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. The foreign currency gain or loss on monetary items is the difference between amortised cost in the functional currency at the beginning of the year, adjusted for effective interest and payments during the year, and the amortised cost in foreign currency translated at the exchange rate at the end of the year.

 

Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured based on historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency differences arising on retranslation are recognised in profit or loss.

 

Foreign operations

Each entity of the Group determines its own functional currency and items included in the financial statements of each entity are measured using its functional currency. Where the functional currency of an entity of the Group is other than US Dollars, which is the presentation currency of the Group, then the financial statements of the entity are translated in accordance with IAS 21 'The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates'. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations, both monetary and non-monetary are translated to US Dollars at exchange rates at the reporting date. The income and expenses are translated to US Dollars at the exchange rate at the reporting date or average rate for the year for practical reasons.

 

Foreign currency differences are recognised in other comprehensive income and presented in the foreign currency translation reserve (translation reserve) in equity. However, if the foreign operation is a non-wholly owned subsidiary, then the relevant proportion of the translation difference is allocated to non-controlling interests. When a foreign operation is disposed of (in part or in full) the cumulative amount in the translation reserve related to that foreign operation is reclassified to profit or loss as part of the gain or loss on disposal. When the Group disposes of only part of its interest in a subsidiary that includes a foreign operation while retaining control, the relevant proportion of the cumulative amount is reattributed to non-controlling interests.

 

When the settlement of a monetary item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation is neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future, foreign currency gains and losses arising from such item are considered to form part of the net investment in a foreign operation and are recognised in other comprehensive income, and presented in the translation reserve in equity.

 

 

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Foreign currency (continued)

Foreign operations (continued)

The table below shows the exchange rates of Russian Roubles which is the functional currency of the Russian subsidiaries of the Group:

 

Exchange rate

Russian Roubles

As of: for US$1 % Change

31 December 2012 30.3727 (5.7)

31 December 2011 32.1961 5.6

 

Average rate during:

Year ended 31 December 2012 31.0930 5.8

Year ended 31 December 2011 29.3760 (3.3)

 

Financial Instruments

 

Non derivative financial assets

The Group initially recognises loans and receivables on the date that they are originated. All other financial assets (including assets designated as at fair value through profit or loss) are recognised initially on the trade date, which is the date that the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

 

The Group derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive contractual cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred. Any interest in such transferred financial assets that is created or retained by the Group is recognised as a separate asset or liability.

 

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when, the Group has a legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realised the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

 

The Group classifies non-derivative financial assets into the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans receivable, trade and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents.

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

A financial asset is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is classified as held for trading or is designated as such upon initial recognition. Financial assets are designated at fair value through profit or loss if the Group manages such investments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with the Group's documented risk management or investment strategy. Attributable transaction costs are recognised in profit or loss as incurred. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value and changes therein, which takes into account any dividend income are recognised in profit or loss.

 

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Financial Instruments (continued)

 

Non derivative financial assets (continued)

Loans and receivables

Loan and receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are recognised initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment losses.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise of cash in hand, cash at banks and short-term highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the acquisition date that are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in their fair value, and are used by the Group in the management of its short-term commitments.

 

Non derivative financial liabilities

The Group initially recognises debt securities and subordinated liabilities on the date that they are originated. All other financial liabilities (including liabilities designated as at fair value through profit or loss) are recognised initially on the trade date, which is the date that the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

 

The Group derecognises a financial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expire.

 

The Group classifies non-derivative financial liabilities into the other financial liabilities category. Such financial liabilities are recognises initially at fair value less any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, these financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

 

Other financial liabilities comprise loans and borrowings and trade and other payables.

 

Share capital

Ordinary shares

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.

 

Investment Property

Investment property is property held either to earn rental income or for capital appreciation or for both, but not for sale in the ordinary course of business, use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administration purposes. Investment property is measured at fair value. The fair values are based on market values, being the estimated amount for which a property could be exchanged on the date of the valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm's length transaction after proper marketing, wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably. Any gain or loss arising from a change in fair value is recognised in profit or loss.

 

 

 

3. SIGNIFIcANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Investment Property (continued)

When the use of a property changes from owner-occupied to investment property, the property is remeasured to fair value and reclassified as investment property. Any gain arising on remeasurement is recognised in profit or loss to the extent that it reverses a previous impairment loss on the specific property, with any remaining gain recognised in other comprehensive income and presented in the revaluation reserve in equity. Any loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss.

 

When the use of a property changes such that it is reclassified as property, plant and equipment, its fair value at the date of reclassification becomes its cost for subsequent accounting.

When the Group begins to redevelop an existing property for continued use as investment property, the property remains an investment property, which is measured based on fair value model, and is not reclassified as property plant and equipment during the redevelopment.

 

Investment property under development

Property that is being constructed or developed for future use as investment property is classified as investment property under development and accounted for at fair value until construction or development is complete, at which time it is reclassified as investment property.

 

Certain development assets within the Group's portfolio that are in very early stages of development process were categorised as "land bank" without ascribing current market value to them. Any value ascribed to such land bank projects other that their cost, would result in a gain or loss to be recognised in profit or loss. This approach was adopted due to abnormal market volatility and will be reviewed in the future once market conditions are more stable.

 

All costs directly related with the purchase and construction of a property, land lease payments, and all subsequent capital expenditure for the development qualifying as acquisition costs are capitalised.

 

Capitalisation of financing costs

Financing costs are capitalised if they are directly attributable to the acquisition or production of a qualifying asset. Capitalisation of financing costs commences when the activities to prepare the asset are in process and expenditures and financing costs are being incurred. Capitalisation of financing costs may continue until the assets are substantially ready for their intended use. If the resulting carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognised. The capitalisation rate is arrived at by reference to the actual rate payable on borrowings for development purposes or, with regard to that part of the development cost financed out of general funds, to the average rate. The capitalised financing cost is limited to the amount of borrowing cost actually incurred.

 

Property, plant and equipment

Recognition and measurement

Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.

 

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Property, plant and equipment (continued)

Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials and direct labour, any other costs directly attributable to bringing the assets to a working condition for their intended use, the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they are located, and capitalise borrowing costs. Purchased software that is integral to the functionality of the related equipment is capitalised as part of that equipment.

 

All hotels are treated as property, plant and equipment due to our significant influence on their management.

 

When parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.

 

Any gain or loss on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment (calculated as the difference between the net proceeds from disposal and the carrying amount of the item) is recognised in profit or loss.

 

Subsequent costs

Subsequent expenditure is capitalised only when it is probable that the future economic benefits associated with the expenditure will flow to the Group. Ongoing repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred.

 

Depreciation

Items of property, plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis in profit or loss over the estimated useful lives of each component. Leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their useful lives unless it is reasonably certain that the Group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term. Land is not depreciated.

 

Items of property, plant and equipment are depreciated from the date that they are available for use, or in respect of self-constructed assets, from the date that the asset is completed and ready for use.

 

The annual depreciation rates for the current and comparative years are as follows:

 

Buildings 1-2%

Office equipment 10-33⅓%

Motor vehicles 33⅓%

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if appropriate.

 

Intangible assets

Goodwill

Goodwill arises upon the acquisition of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures. Goodwill arising on acquisition represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group's interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquiree. When the excess is negative (negative goodwill), it is recognised immediately in profit or loss.

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Intangible assets (continued)

Goodwill (continued)

Subsequent measurement

Goodwill is measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. In respect of equity-accounted investees, the carrying amount of goodwill is included in the carrying amount of the investment, and any impairment loss is allocated to the carrying amount of the equity-accounted investee as a whole.

 

Trading Properties

Trading Properties are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the properties and bringing them to their existing condition. In the case of constructed trading properties, cost includes an appropriate share of direct and financing costs. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.

 

Trading properties under construction

Trading properties under construction are defined as projects in which the Group participates as a contractor or as a promoter, and which include construction work with the intention to sell the entire building as a whole or parts thereof. Each project represents one building or a group of buildings.

 

A group of buildings is considered one project when the buildings at the same building site are being constructed according to one building plan and under one building license, and are offered for sale at the same time. Trading properties include cost of land or of rights to the land that constitutes the relative portion of the area, on which the construction work on projects is performed, plus the cost of the work executed on the projects as well as other costs allocated thereto, less the cumulative amounts recognised in profit or loss as cost of trading properties sold up to the end of the reported period.

 

Direct costs and expenses are charged to projects on a specific basis, whereas borrowing costs are allocated among the projects based on the relative proportion of the costs. Non-specific borrowing costs are capitalised to such qualifying asset, or portion thereof which was not financed with specific credit, by weighted-average rate of the borrowing cost up to the amount of borrowing cost actually incurred. Where the estimated expenses for a building project indicate that a loss is expected, an appropriate provision is set up. Buildings that are under construction are classified as trading properties under construction on the face of the balance sheet.

 

Inventory of real estate

Land for future development of trading properties is classified as "Inventory of real estate" as non-current asset when it is not expected to develop and sell the properties within the Group's normal operating cycle. It is presented at the lower of cost or net realisable value.

 

Deferred income

Income received in advance is classified under non-current and current liabilities as deferred income and comprise rental income received for future periods and amounts received in advance for the sale of trading properties, for which recognition of revenue has not yet commenced.

 

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Impairment

Non-derivative financial assets

A financial asset not classified as at fair value through profit or loss is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence that it is impaired. A financial asset is impaired if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset, and that loss event(s) had an impact on the estimated future cash flows of that asset that can be estimated reliably.

 

An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortised cost is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount, and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the asset's original effective interest rate.

 

Individually significant financial assets are assessed for specific impairment. Those found not to be specifically impaired are then collectively assessed for any impairment that has been incurred but not yet identified. Assets that are not individually significant are collectively assessed for impairment by grouping together assets with similar risks characteristics.

 

All impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss.

 

Non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of the Group's non-financial assets, other than investment property, investment property under development, VAT recoverable, inventories and deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists then the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. Goodwill and intangible assets are tested annually for impairment. An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss.

 

The recoverable amount of an asset is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.

 

An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. For other assets, an impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss has been recognised.

 

Assets held for sale or held for distribution

Non-current assets, or disposal groups comprising assets and liabilities, are classified as held-for sale or held-for-distribution if it is highly probable that they will be recovered primarily through sale or distribution rather than through continuing use.

 

 Immediately before classification as held for sale or held-for-distribution, the assets, or components of a disposal group, are remeasured in accordance with the Group's other accounting policies. Thereafter generally the assets, or disposal group, are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less cost to sell.

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Assets held for sale or held for distribution (continued)

Any impairment loss on a disposal group first is allocated to goodwill, and then to the remaining assets and liabilities on a pro rata basis, except that no loss is allocated to inventories, financial assets, deferred tax assets, employee benefit assets, investment property or biological assets, which continue to be measured in accordance with the Group's accounting policies. Impairment losses on initial classification as held for sale or held for distribution and subsequent gains or losses on remeasurement are recognised in profit or loss. Gains are not recognised in excess of any cumulative impairment loss.

 

Once classified as held for sale or held for distribution, intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment are no longer amortised or depreciated.

 

Employee benefits

Short-term employee benefits

Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognised for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.

 

Share-based payment transactions

The grant-date fair value of share-based payment options granted to employees is recognised as an employee expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period that the employees unconditionally become entitled to the options. The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options that vest.

 

The fair value of the amount payable to employees in respect of share appreciation rights, which are settled in cash, is recognised as an expense, with a corresponding increase in liabilities, over the period that the employees become unconditionally entitled to payment. The liability is remeasured at each reporting date and at settlement date. Any changes in the liability are recognised as personnel expenses in profit or loss.

 

Provisions

A provision is recognised if, as a result of a past event, the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recognised as finance cost.

 

Revenue

Sale of trading properties

Revenue from sale of trading properties is recognised in profit or loss when significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer.

 

Construction Management fee

Revenue from construction management is recognised in profit or loss in proportion to the stage of completion of the transaction at the reporting date. The stage of completion is assessed by reference to surveys of work performed.

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Revenue (continued)

Rental income

Rental income from investment property is recognised as revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives granted are recognised as an integral part of the total rental income, over the term of the lease.

 

Hotel operation income

Income from Hotel operations comprises of accommodation, treatments and other services offered at the hotels operated by the group and sales of food and beverages and are recognised upon offering of the service and the acceptance by the client.

 

Gross Profit

Gross Profit is the result of the Group's operations and comprises revenue and other revenue net of all cost for trading properties sold and operating, administrative and other expenses, recognised in the income statement during the year.

 

Finance income and finance costs

Finance income comprises interest income on funds invested and fair value gains on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. Interest income is recognised as it accrues in profit or loss, using the effective interest method.

 

Finance costs comprise interest expense on borrowings, unwinding of the discount on provisions and deferred consideration, fair value losses on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and impairment losses recognised on financial assets.

 

Borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss using the effective interest method, net of interest capitalised.

 

Foreign currency gains and losses on financial assets and financial liabilities are reported on a net basis as either finance income or finance cost depending on whether foreign currency movements are in a net gain or net loss position.

 

Tax

Tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.

 

Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantially enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Current tax payable also includes any tax liability arising from the declarations of dividends.

 

Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Tax (continued)

 

Deferred tax is not recognised for temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss.

 

Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realised simultaneously.

 

A deferred tax asset is recognised for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.

 

The provision for taxation either current or deferred is based on the tax rates applicable to the country of residence of each subsidiary.

 

Discontinued operations

A discontinued operation is a component of the Group's business, the operations and cash flows of which can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the Group and which represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations that has been disposed of or is held for sale, or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale. Classification as a discontinued operation occurs on disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, if earlier. When an operation is classified as a discontinued operation, the comparative statement of comprehensive income is re-presented as if the operation had been discontinued from the start of the comparative year.

 

Earnings per share

The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to the owners of Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to the owners and the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares, which comprise share options granted to employees.

 

Segment reporting

An operating segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any of the Group's other components. All segments results are reviewed regularly by the Group's management to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available.

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Adoption of new and revised International Financial Reporting Standards and Interpretations

As from 1 January 2012, the Company adopted all changes to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) which are relevant to its operations.

 

The following Standards, Amendments to Standards and Interpretations have been issued but are not yet effective for annual periods beginning on 1 January 2012. Those which may be relevant to the Company are set out below. The Company does not plan to adopt these Standards early.

 

Standards and Interpretations adopted by the EU

·; IFRS 7 (Amendments) ''Financial Instruments: Disclosures'' - ''Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IFRS 10 ''Consolidated Financial Statements'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IFRS 11 ''Joint Arrangements'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IFRS 12 ''Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IFRS 13 ''Fair Value Measurement'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IAS 1 (Amendments) ''Presentation of items of other Comprehensive Income'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012).

·; IAS 19 (Amendments) ''Employee Benefits'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IAS 27 (Revised) ''Separate Financial Statements'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IAS 28 (Revised) ''Investments in Associates and Joint ventures'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IAS 32 (Amendments) ''Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014).

 

Standards and Interpretations not adopted by the EU

·; Improvements to IFRSs 2009-2011 (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IFRS 1 (Amendments): ''Government Loans'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; IFRS 7 (Amendments) ''Financial Instruments: Disclosures'' - ''Disclosures on transition to IFRS 9'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015).

·; IFRS 9 ''Financial Instruments'' (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015).

·; Transition Guidance - Amendments to IFRS 10, 11 and 12 (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013).

·; Investment Entities - Amendments to IFRS 10, 12 and IAS 27 (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014).

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 

Adoption of new and revised International Financial Reporting Standards and Interpretations (continued)

 

The Board of Directors expects that the adoption of the above financial reporting standards in future periods will not have a significant effect on the financial statements of the Company except of:

 

·; The adoption of IFRS 11 that would change the accounting and presentation of Joint ventures in the consolidated financial statements.

·; The adoption of IFRS 10 could affect the consolidated financial statements.

 

The extent of the impact has not been determined.

 

4. DETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUES

 

A number of the Group's accounting policies and disclosures require the determination of fair value for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Fair values have been determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the following methods. When applicable, further information about the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that asset or liability.

 

Property, plant and equipment

The fair value of property, plant and equipment recognised as a result of a business combination is the estimated amount for which property could be exchanged on the acquisition date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm's length transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably. The fair value of land and buildings and buildings under development is based on the quoted market prices for similar items when available and replacement cost when appropriate.

 

Investment property

An external, independent valuation company, having appropriate recognised professional qualifications and recent experience in the location and category of property being valued, values the Group's investment property portfolio. As fair values have to be reported quarterly, commencing 2009, the Group is performing a revaluation of the Investments property portfolio twice a year.

 

The fair values are based on market values, being the estimated amount, for which a property could be exchanged on the date of the valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm's length transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably.

 

In the absence of current prices in an active market, the valuations are prepared by considering the aggregate of the estimated cash flows expected to be received from renting out the property. A yield that reflects the specific risks inherent in the net cash flows is then applied to the net annual cash flows to arrive at the property valuation.

 

4. DETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUES (continued)

 

Investment property (continued)

Valuations reflect, where appropriate, the type of tenants actually in occupation or responsible for meeting lease commitments or likely to be in occupation after letting vacant accommodation, and the market's general perception of their creditworthiness; the allocation of maintenance and insurance responsibilities between the Group and the lessee; and the remaining economic life of the property. When rent reviews or lease renewals are pending with anticipated reversionary increases, it is assumed that all notices and when appropriate counter-notices have been served validly and within the appropriate time.

 

Share-based payment transactions

The fair value of the employee share options is measured using a binomial lattice model. The fair value of share appreciation rights is measured using the Black-Scholes formula. Measurement inputs include the share price on measurement date, the exercise price of the instrument, expected volatility (based on an evaluation of the Company's historic volatility, particularly over the historic period commensurate with the expected term), expected term of the instruments (based on historical experience and general option holder behaviour), expected dividends, and the risk-free interest rate (based on government bonds). Service and non-market performance conditions attached to the transactions are not taken into account in determining fair value.

 

5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

 

Overview

The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:

·; credit risk

·; liquidity risk

·; market risk

·; operational risk

 

This note presents information about the Group's exposure to each of the above risks, the Group's objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk, and the Group's management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout these consolidated financial statements.

 

Risk management framework

The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Group's risk management framework and is responsible for developing and monitoring the Group's risk management policies.

 

The Group's risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group's activities. The Group, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to develop a disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.

 

5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

 

Risk management framework (continued)

The Company's Audit Committee overseas how management monitors compliance with the Group's risk management policies and procedures, and reviews the adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group. The Company's Audit Committee is assisted in its oversight role by Internal Audit. Internal Audit undertakes both regular and ad hoc reviews of risk management controls and procedures, the results of which are reported to the Audit Committee.

 

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Group's receivables from customers and cash deposited with banks.

 

Trade and other receivables

Financial assets which are potentially subject to credit risk consist principally of trade and other receivables as well as credit exposures with respect to rental customers and buyers of residential properties including outstanding receivables. The carrying amount of trade and other receivable represents the maximum amount exposed to credit risk. Approximately 10 percent of the Group's rental revenue is attributable to revenue from a single customer. Geographically there is no concentration of credit risk. The Group has policies in place to ensure that, where possible rental contracts are made with customers with an appropriate credit history.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents. Cash transactions are limited to high-credit-quality financial institutions. The utilisation of credit limits is regularly monitored.

 

The Group has no other significant concentrations of credit risk. Although collection of receivables could be influenced by economic factors, management believes that there is no significant risk of loss to the Group.

 

Investments

The Group limits its exposure to credit risk by investing only in liquid securities and only with counterparties that have a high credit rating. Management actively monitors credit ratings and given that the Group only has invested in securities with high credit ratings, management does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations.

 

Guarantees

The Company's policy is to provide financial guarantees only to wholly-owned subsidiaries in exceptional cases. In negotiations with lending banks the Company is aiming to avoid recourse to AFI Development on loans taken by subsidiaries. As at 31 December 2012, there were three outstanding guarantees: one of AFI Development Plc for the amount of US$1 million in favour of a bank of the VTB Group under a loan facility agreement of Bellgate Construction Limited and two solitary guarantees by Stroyinkom-K LLC and AFI RUS LLC for the amount of RUR606.77 million (circa US$19.98 million) under a loan facility agreement of Eitan-K LLC. As at 31 December 2011 there was one guarantee outstanding under two separate non-revolving credit lines from JSC VTB Bank for total value of RUR 13.448 billion.

 

5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

 

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group's approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group's reputation.

 

Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. Due to the dynamic nature of the underlying businesses, the Group aims to maintain flexibility in its funding requirements by keeping cash and committed credit lines available.

 

The Group's liquidity position is monitored by the management which take necessary actions if required. The Group structures its assets and liabilities in such a way that liquidity risk is minimised.

 

The Group maintains the following lines of credit as at 31 December 2012:

·; A secure bank loan facility from VTB Group Bank for RUR 21billion, with the majority of the funds designated for refinancing existing loans and the rest for the financing of the acquisition and construction AFIMALL City parking

·; A four year US$20 million loan from Sberbank. The loan is denominated in Russian Rouble and is being used for the reconstruction of Kalinina project.

 

Market risk

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the Group's income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return.

 

Currency risk

The Group is exposed to currency risk on future commercial transactions, recognised monetary assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign operations that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional currencies of Group entities, primarily the United States Dollars and Russian Roubles. The currencies in which these transactions primarily are denominated are Russian Roubles, United States Dollars, Euro and Ukrainian Hryvnia.

 

Operational risk

Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect loss arising from a wide variety of causes associated with the Group's processes, personnel, technology and infrastructure, and from external factors other than credit, market and liquidity risks such as those arising from legal and regulatory requirements and generally accepted standards of corporate behaviour. Operational risks arise from all of the Group's operations.

 

The Group's objective is to manage operational risk so as to balance the avoidance of financial losses and damage to the Group's reputation with overall cost effectiveness and to avoid control procedures that restrict initiative and creativity.

 

5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

 

Operational risk (continued)

 

The primary responsibility for the development and implementation of controls to address operational risk is assigned to senior management within each business unit. This responsibility is supported by the development of overall Group standards for the management of operational risk in the following areas:

 

·; requirements for appropriate segregation of duties, including the independent authorisation of transactions

·; requirements for the reconciliation and monitoring of transactions

·; compliance with regulatory and other legal requirements

·; documentation of controls and procedures

·; requirements for the periodic assessment of operational risks faced, and the adequacy of controls and procedures to address the risks identified

·; requirements for the reporting of operational losses and proposed remedial action

·; development of contingency plans

·; training and professional development

·; ethical and business standards

·; risk mitigation, including insurance where this is effective

 

Compliance with Group standards is supported by a programme of periodic reviews undertaken by Internal Audit. The results of Internal Audit reviews are discussed with the management of the business unit to which they relate, with summaries submitted to the Audit Committee and senior management of the Group.

 

Capital management

The Board's policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business.

 

There were no changes in the Group's approach to capital management during the year. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

 

The Company is committed to delivering the highest standards in boardroom practice and financial transparency through:

·; clear and open communication with investors;

·; maintaining accurate quarterly financial records which transparently and honestly reflect the financial position of its business; and

·; endeavouring to maximise shareholder returns.

 

A full programme of investor relations activity ensures appropriate contact with institutional and private shareholders, with regular meetings, presentations and disclosure of important information. Great care is taken to provide suitably detailed information on the Group's activities and results to enable various stakeholders to understand the performance and prospects of the Group.

6. OPERATING SEGMENT

 

The Group has 5 reportable segments, as described below, which are the Group's strategic business units. The strategic business units offer different types of real estate products and services and are managed separately because they require different marketing strategies as they address different types of clients. For each strategic business unit the Group's management reviews internal management reports on at least monthly basis. The following summary describes the operation in each of the Group's reportable segments.

 

·; Development Projects - Commercial projects: Include construction of property for future lease.

·; Development Projects - Residential projects: Include construction and selling of residential properties.

·; Asset Management: Includes the operation of investment property for lease.

·; Hotel Operation: Includes the operation of Hotels

·; Other - Land bank: Includes the investment and holding of property for future development.

 

Information regarding the results of each reportable segment is included below. Performance is measured based on segment profit before income tax, as included in the internal managementreports that are reviewed by the Group's management team. Segment profit is used to measure performance as management believes that such information is the most relevant in evaluating the results of certain segments relative to other entities that operate within these industries. Inter-segment pricing is determined on an arm's length basis.

 

 

6. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)

 

Development projects

Asset management

Hotel Operation

Other - land bank

Total

Commercial projects

Residential projects

 

 

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

External revenues

25

-

14,105

15,929

107,277

91,532

24,610

13,337

16,622

13,126

162,639

133,924

Inter-segment revenue

-

2

3

3

-

6

38

51

539

760

580

822

Interest revenue

7,812

7,313

11

46

1,470

322

426

14

1,855

539

11,574

8,234

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

(47)

(32)

(641)

(679)

(58,120)

(41,120)

(2,337)

(170)

(271)

(1,262)

(61,416)

(43,263)

Depreciation

-

(466)

-

-

(537)

(97)

(1,431)

(1,020)

(206)

(287)

(2,174)

(1,870)

Reportable segment profit before tax

 

12,412

 

(3,309)

 

769

 

9,080

 

35,366

 

(4,001)

 

1,165

 

1,657

 

(23,188)

 

(22,854)

 

26,524

 

(19,427)

Other material

non-cash items:

Net valuation gains/(losses) on properties

(203,920)

(52,062)

(62,722)

18,042

(33,632)

241,340

-

1,436

(11,267)

60,233

(311,541)

268,989

Reportable segment assets

 

461,856

 

563,820

 

141,501

 

202,049

 

1,263,641

 

1,440,922

 

61,996

 

64,510

 

434,607

 

470,078

 

2,363,601

 

2,741,379

Reportable segment liabilities

 

217,960

 

690,876

 

11,151

 

12,280

 

724,353

 

249,997

 

23,469

 

13,583

 

5,657

 

33,642

 

982,590

 

1,000,378

 

 

 

Note:

Development projects: investment projects under construction, including construction of residential properties.

Asset management: yielding property management (all commercial properties).

 

6. OPERATING SEGMENT (continued)

 

Reconciliations of reportable segment revenues, profit or loss, assets and liabilities and other material items.

 

 

2012

2011

 

US$'000

US$'000

Revenues

 

 

Total revenue for reportable segments

163,219

134,746

Elimination of inter-segment revenue

(580)

(822)

Consolidated revenue

162,639

133,924

 

 

 

 

 

 

Profit or loss

 

 

Total profit or loss for reportable segments

26,524

(19,427)

Other profit or loss

1,480

(1,638)

Valuation (loss)/gain on investment property

(246,096)

267,978

Impairment loss on inventory of real estate

(65,445)

-

Impairment loss reversal on property, plant and equipment

-

1,320

Impairment of prepayment for investments

-

(1,178)

Impairment loss on trading properties

-

(414)

Consolidated (loss)/profit before tax

(283,537)

246,641

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

Total assets for reportable segments

2,363,601

2,741,379

Other unallocated amounts

386,020

143,703

Consolidated total assets

2,749,621

2,885,082

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

Total liabilities for reportable segments

982,590

1,000,378

Other unallocated amounts

140,499

17,348

Consolidated total liabilities

1,123,089

1,017,726

 

 

 

Reportable segment totals

 

Adjustments

Consolidated totals

 

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

 

 

 

 

Other material items 2012

 

 

 

Interest revenue

11,574

(2,264)

9,310

Interest expense

(61,416)

5,129

(56,287)

Net valuation (loss)/gain on properties

(311,541)

-

(311,541)

 

6. OPERATING SEGMENT (continued)

 

 

Reportable segment totals

 

Adjustments

Consolidated totals

 

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

Other material items 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest revenue

8,234

-

8,234

Interest expense

43,263

(3,137)

40,126

Net valuation gain on properties

268,989

-

268,989

 

Geographical segments

Geographically the Group operates only in Russia and has no significant revenue or assets abroad. Therefore no geographical segment reporting is presented.

 

Major customer

Revenues from one customer of the asset management segment, represents approximately 10% (2011: 12%) of the Group's total rental revenue.

 

7. DISPOSAL OF INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

 

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

The profit on disposal of subsidiaries consists of:

 

Profit on disposal of OOO Ozerkovka

2,637

-

Loss on disposal of Roppler Engineering Limited and

its subsidiary OOO CDM

 

(275)

 

-

Translation gain recognised on disposal of OOO Kama Gate

367

-

 

2,729

-

 

The selling price of the disposal of OOO Ozerkovka was US$6 million. The resulting profit on sale amounting to US$2,843 thousand and the realised exchange loss amounting to $206 thousand were recognised in the income statement at an amount of US$ 2,637 thousand profit.

 

7. DISPOSAL OF INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES (continued)

 

The above disposals had the following effect on the Group's assets and liabilities:

 

 

2012

2012

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

OOO

Ozerkovka

Roppler Ltd &

OOO CDM

 

 

 

Investment property

(3,160)

-

Trade and other receivables

(26)

(540)

Cash and cash equivalents

(98)

(115)

Short term loans and borrowings

-

359

Deferred income

84

-

Trade and other payables

22

19

Current tax liabilities

21

-

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets

(3,157)

(277)

 

 

 

Consideration received in cash

6,000

2

Cash disposed of

(98)

(115)

Net cash inflow from the disposal of each subsidiary

 5,902

(113)

 

 

 

Net cash inflow from disposal of subsidiaries

5,789

 

8. REVENUE

2012

2011

US$ '000

US$ '000

Rental income

121,396

103,612

Proceeds from sale of trading properties

14,105

15,929

Hotel operation income

24,610

13,377

Construction consulting/management fees

2,528

1,006

162,639

133,924

 

9. OTHER INCOME

 

2012

2011

Other income consist of:

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Negative Goodwill written off

1,929

-

Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment

48

14

Sundries

1,304

740

 

3,281

754

 

 

10. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Consultancy fees

4,671

1,693

Legal fees

1,447

1,876

Auditors' remuneration

900

1,156

Valuation expenses

397

607

Directors' remuneration

510

437

Salaries and wages

141

574

Depreciation

163

1,870

Insurance

456

334

Provision for Doubtful Debts

4,227

13,279

Share option expense

1,256

62

Donations

4,212

4,213

Other administrative expense

2,030

4,214

 

 20,410

 30,315

 

11. OPERATING EXPENSES

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Maintenance, utility and security expenses

28,536

32,580

Agency and brokerage fees

1,214

1,115

Advertising expenses

4,743

5,644

Salaries and wages

19,626

12,104

Consultancy fees

827

3,596

Depreciation

2,011

-

Insurance

1,091

545

Rent

1,444

3,434

Property and other taxes

14,862

13,070

Other

89

14

 

 74,443

 72,102

 

12. OTHER EXPENSES

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

Prior years' VAT non recoverable (note 21)

1,854

2,335

Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment

474

-

Sundries

294

8

 

2,622

2,343

 

13. FINANCE INCOME AND FINANCE COSTS

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Interest income on loans receivable

6,917

7,557

Interest/investment income on bank deposits and cash equivalents

2,393

677

Net foreign exchange gain

17,280

-

Finance income

26,590

8,234

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans and borrowings

(646)

(691)

Interest expense on bank loans

(56,846)

(57,604)

Interest capitalised

8,005

18,169

Net change in fair value of financial assets

(124)

(327)

Other finance costs

(10,931)

(2,265)

Net foreign exchange loss

-

(6,154)

Finance costs

(60,542)

(48,872)

 

 

 

Net finance costs

(33,952)

(40,638)

 

Subject to the provisions of IAS23 "Borrowing costs" the Group capitalised US$8,005 thousand (2011: US$18,169 thousand) financing costs to the projects that are in construction phase. These were added to the cost of the Investment property under development, Buildings under construction and to the cost of Trading properties under construction.

 

14. TAX EXPENSE

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

Current tax expense

 

 

Current year

4,705

12,737

Adjustment for prior years

595

882

 

5,300

 13,619

Deferred tax expense

 

 

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

(13,310)

 61,479

 

 

 

Total tax (benefit)/expense

(8,010)

 75,098

 

 

 

 

 

14. TAX EXPENSE (continued)

 

 

 

 

 

The provision for taxation either current or deferred is based on the tax rates applicable to the country of residence of each Group entity. Cypriot entities are subject to 10% corporate rate whereas Russian subsidiaries are subject to 20% corporate rate.

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

%

US$ '000

%

US$ '000

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss)/profit for the year after tax

 

(275,527)

 

171,543

Total tax (benefit)/expense

 

(8,010)

 

75,098

(Loss)/profit before tax

 

(283,537)

 

246,641

 

 

 

 

 

Tax using the Company's domestic tax rate

(10.00)

(28,358)

10.00

24,664

Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions

0.15

414

(6.52)

(16,075)

Tax exempt income

(1.20)

(3,396)

(0.26)

(631)

Non deductible expenses

9.45

26,795

23.70

58,461

Change in estimates related to prior years

(1.69)

(4,784)

0.36

882

Current year losses for which no deferred tax asset recognised

 

0.46

 

1,319

 

3.16

 

7,797

 

(2.83)

(8,010)

30.45

75,098

 

The current tax assets of US$2,877 thousand as at 31 December 2012, represents the net amount of income tax overpayment in respect of current and prior periods. The current tax liability of US$203 thousand for the year ended 31 December 2011, represents the net amount of income tax payable in respect of year ended 31 December 2011 and prior periods net of payments made up to the year end.

 

15. EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

2012

2011

Basic earnings per share

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

(Loss)/Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

(269,098)

170,870

 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares

Shares in thousands

Shares in thousands

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares

1,047,694

1,047,694

 

 

 

Earnings per share (cent)

(25.68)

16.31

 

Diluted earnings per share are not presented as the assumed conversion of the employee share options outstanding would have an anti-dilutive effect i.e. increase in earnings per share.

 

 

16. INVESTMENT PROPERTY

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Balance 1 January

1,403,580

192,973

Transfer from investment property under development

234,727

822,376

Transfer to assets held for sale

(177,996)

-

(Disposals)/acquisitions

(3,160)

203,849

Renovations/additional cost

16,557

5,736

Fair value adjustment

(33,632)

247,663

Effect of movement in foreign exchange rates

46,351

(69,017)

Balance 31 December

1,486,427

1,403,580

 

The carrying amount of investment property is the fair value of the property as determined by a registered independent appraiser having an appropriate recognised professional qualification and recent experience in the location and category of the property being valued. Fair values were determined having regard to recent market transactions for similar properties in the same location as the Group's investment property. The same applies for investment property under development in note 17 below. During the year two valuations took place one on the 30 June 2012 and the last valuation took place on 31 December 2012. The cumulative adjustments for all projects, for both valuation dates are shown in line "Fair value adjustment" in the table above.

 

The transfer from investments property under development represents projects Tverskaya Plaza Ib and II for the amount of $40,600 thousand, see note 17 for more information on these two projects. In addition the transfer from investments property under development in 2012 represents project Ozerkovskaya phase III of fair value US$194,127 thousand which was completed in the 4th quarter of 2012 and reclassified on 31 December 2012. On that date prior to reclassification the property was revalued and the resulting fair value adjustment was recorded in the Investment property under development note 17 below.

 

The transfer to the assets held for sale represents Four Winds Plaza which was disposed after the year end to a third party (see more details in note 26).

 

The disposal of US$3,160 represents project Ozerkovskaya phase IV which was disposed for the amount of US$6,000 thousand and the resulting gain of US$2,635 thousand was recognised in the income statement.

 

The increase due to the effect of the foreign exchange rates is a result of the strengthening of the rouble compared to the US Dollar by 5.7% during 2012. The fair value adjustment loss in investments property is mostly related to the rouble appreciation.

 

In brief the major events that took place during the year ended 31 December 2011 were:

 

On 10 March 2011, AFIMALL City opened to the public, and it was transferred to investment property. On 30 September 2011 the Company completed the acquisition of the 25% share in AFIMALL City from the City of Moscow for a consideration of RUR5 billion including VAT. On 16 December 2011 the Company acquired the parking area under the AFIMALL City for a consideration of RUR4 billion including VAT.

 

17. INVESTMENT PROPERTY UNDER DEVELOPMENT

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Balance 1 January

983,598

1,674,585

Construction costs

10,898

58,860

Capitalised interest

7,623

18,156

Transfer to investment property

(234,727)

(822,376)

Transfer from/(to) VAT recoverable

-

8,256

Fair value adjustment

(212,464)

20,315

Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates

13,232

25,802

Balance 31 December

568,160

983,598

 

As noted in note 16 above the transfers to investment property comprise of three properties. Tverskaya plaza Ib and II and Ozerkovskaya phase III.

 

Ozerkovskaya phase III, of fair value US$194,127 thousand (50%) which was completed in the 4th quarter of 2012 and reclassified on 31 December 2012. On that date prior to its reclassification the property was revalued on the work by external independent appraisers and the resulting revaluation adjustment of US$1,155 thousand loss which was transferred to the income statement. With this loss the net fair value gain of the year of Ozarkovskaya phase III, was US$2,723 thousand.

 

On 30 June 2012, further to their revaluation, see paragraph below, projects Tverskaya Plaza Ib and II, were transferred to Investment Property based on the fact that the Company was notified by Moscow City authorities that any development of these two plazas cannot exceed the parameters of the existing buildings. As a result the company has cancelled its plans of redevelopment of the two plazas but will retain and manage the current buildings at their existing condition.

 

The valuation loss on investment properties under development reflects a decrease in the value of the Company's four projects, which are classified as investment property under development - Pochtovaya, Kossinskaya, Tverskaya Plaza Ib and Tverskaya Plaza II. The projects were valued by the independent appraiser on 30 June 2012 and 31 December 2012. The valuation loss resulted from changes in master planning and development policies of the Moscow government. The Company received information/confirmation of these changes and made revisions in its relevant projects during the period June - August 2012. All other projects were not affected from these changes and therefore no valuation loss was recognised.

 

The increase due to the effect of the foreign exchange rates is a result of the Rouble strengthening compared to the US Dollar by 5.7% during 2012. A part of fair value adjustment loss in 2012 is a result of this rouble appreciation.

 

In brief the major events that took place during the year ended 31 December 2011 were:

 

The transfer to investment property of projects AFIMALL City and Paveletskaya phase I, upon completion. The Company reached a non-binding agreement with the City of Moscow for the re-approval and renewal of the Company's development rights and leasehold interests in land plots at Plaza Ic (part of Plaza I), Plaza IIa and Plaza IV projects. Restablished Paveletskaya Phase II project, at the amount of US$13,137 thousand which was fully written off in previous years.

 

18. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

Buildings

 under

construction

 

Land &

 Buildings

 

Office Equipment

 

Motor

Vehicles

 

 

Total

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

Cost

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at 1 January 2012

31,571

59,727

3,998

2,037

97,333

Additions

6,088

805

308

266

7,467

Additions due to acquisition of subsidiaries

-

315

-

-

315

Transfer of completed building

(23,532)

23,532

-

-

-

Reclassify to assets held for sale

-

-

(191)

-

(191)

Interest capitalised

368

-

-

-

368

Disposals

-

(1,196)

(33)

(346)

(1,575)

Effect of movement in foreign exchange rates

2,789

3,602

190

96

6,677

Balance at 31 December 2012

17,284

86,785

4,272

2,053

110,394

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at 1 January 2012

-

 1,466

2,254

1,579

 5,299

Charge for the year

-

1,423

647

246

2,316

Additions due to acquisition of subsidiaries

-

266

-

-

266

Reclassify to assets held for sale

-

-

(82)

-

(82)

Disposals

-

(397)

(20)

(253)

(670)

Effect of movement in foreign exchange rates

-

120

140

95

355

Balance at 31 December 2012

-

2,878

2,939

1,667

7,484

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2012

17,284

83,907

1,333

386

102,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at 1 January 2011

24,494

62,736

3,044

2,152

92,426

Additions

7,935

298

1,253

160

9,646

Reversal of Impairment loss

1,320

-

-

-

1,320

Disposals

-

(38)

(133)

(80)

(251)

Effect of movement in foreign exchange rates

(2,178)

(3,269)

(166)

(195)

(5,808)

Balance at 31 December 2011

31,571

59,727

3,998

2,037

 97,333

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at 1 January 2011

-

693

1,889

1,442

4,024

Charge for the year

-

914

585

330

1,829

Disposals

-

(37)

(58)

(61)

(156)

Effect of movement in foreign exchange rates

-

(104)

(162)

(132)

(398)

Balance at 31 December 2011

-

1,466

2,254

1,579

5,299

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2011

31,571

58,261

1,744

458

 92,034

 

 

18. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)

 

During the year the Company completed the construction of a new Hotel in the Zheleznovodsk area called Sanatorium Plaza SPA, which was put into operation during the year. Upon completion it was reclassified to Land and Buildings and depreciated on a straight line method over 100 years.

 

19. LOANS RECEIVABLE

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

Long-term loans

 

 

Loans to non-related companies

 759

739

 

 

 

Short-term loans

 

 

Loans to non-related companies

92

81

 

Terms and loan repayment schedule

 

Terms and conditions of outstanding loans were as follows:

 

Currency

Nominal

Year of

2012

2011

interest rate

maturity

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

Unsecured loans to non-related companies

RUR

CBR rate*1.1

2014

36

34

USD

2.5%

2014

723

705

RUR

11%

On demand

92

81

 851

820

 

20. INVENTORY OF REAL ESTATE

 

On 31 December 2011, the Company reclassified its project "Botanic Gardens" from current assets "Trading properties under construction" to non-current assets as "Inventory of real estate", because the project was held for future development of trading properties which are not expected to be constructed within the Company's 3-year operating cycle. During 2012 the company proceeded with the impairment of this project to zero. The impairment of the inventory of real estate reflects the Company's decision to write-off its Botanic Garden project. A subsidiary of the Company is a "co-investor" in the project together with a company fully owned by the City of Moscow, which is the main investor and beneficiary of land lease rights for Botanic Garden project. A claim filed with a Moscow court on 2 August 2012 by a third party creditor is seeking to declare the main investor bankrupt, while its assets were previously arrested for the benefit of the same creditor. The Company considers, based on the opinion of its legal advisers, that any recovery of the Company's costs relating to its investments in the project is unlikely. Given the current circumstances, the Company has decided to write-off its rights in the project from its books. Notwithstanding, the Company will continue its efforts to recover its costs and/or receive the development rights to the project. For more information see note 40 "Subsequent events".

 

21. VAT RECOVERABLE

 

Represents VAT paid on construction costs and expenses which according to the Russian VAT law can be recovered upon completion of the construction. Part of this VAT is expected to be recovered after more than 12 months from the balance sheet date. Due to the uncertainties in the Russian tax and VAT law, the management has assessed the recoverability of this VAT and has provided for any amounts that their recoverability was deemed doubtful or questionable (see note 12). Under Russian VAT legislation, VAT can also be claimed during the period of construction provided that all required documentation is presented to the VAT authorities. The Group was successful in recovering VAT during the year, and it is estimated that part of the VAT recoverable as at the year-end will be recovered within the next 12 months, which is classified as trade and other receivables, note 24.

 

22. TRADING PROPERTIES

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Balance 1 January

11,053

21,386

Transfer to assets held for sale

(322)

-

Impairment loss

-

(414)

Disposals

(9,218)

(10,345)

Effect of movements in exchange rates

599

426

Balance 31 December

2,112

 11,053

 

Trading properties comprise of the unsold apartments and parking spaces. During the year the Group has sold a number of the remaining apartments and parking places and their cost was transferred to income statement.

 

23. TRADING PROPERTIES UNDER CONSTRUCTION

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Balance 1 January after reclassification of comparative

129,598

105,962

Reclassification of comparative year

-

68,842

Balance 1 January as previously stated

129,598

174,804

Acquisitions

-

23,174

Construction costs

9,592

837

Transfer to VAT recoverable

-

(1,227)

Capitalised interest

-

13

Reclassified as Inventory of real estate (note 20)

-

(66,221)

Effect of movements in exchange rates

2,597

(1,782)

Balance 31 December

141,787

129,598

 

Trading properties under construction comprise of "Otradnoye" project which involves primarily the construction of residential properties and approximately 643 parking places underneath AFIMALL City which the company has the intention to sell. The comparative period includes also, "Botanic Gardens" which was reclassified on 31 December 2011, as a non-current asset in "Inventory of real estate", see note 20.

 

23. TRADING PROPERTIES UNDER CONSTRUCTION (continued)

In November 2012 Bellgate Construction Limited ("Bellgate"), the Company's subsidiary owning and operating AFIMALL City, entered into an agreement to dispose approximately 643 parking lots to VTB Bank. The transaction is structured in two stages. The first stage entailed a sale-purchase transaction between Bellgate and VTB Bank on 21,354 sq.m. of parking space. During the second stage 9,247 sq.m. owned (at completion) by VTB Bank will be exchanged for 7,847 sq. m. owned by Bellgate. This two-tier transaction structure stemmed from the fact that part of the parking space that VTB Bank is interested in purchasing is located on a land plot to which Bellgate has not yet registered leasehold rights. The resulting estimated total net cash flow for AFI Development is US$54.5 million and net profit is circa US$20 million. As of 31 December 2012 the Company received 90% of the total consideration in the amount of US$51.4 million (net of VAT), which are presented in current liabilities as advances for the sale of trading properties. The remaining 10% is expected to be received at completion, when Bellgate registers the title to the parking to VTB Bank.

 

24. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Advances to builders

29,849

26,393

Amounts receivable from related companies (note 38)

2,793

2,575

Trade receivables net

16,041

13,290

Other receivables

12,069

15,523

VAT recoverable (note 21)

15,033

47,749

Tax receivables

2,763

1,640

 

 78,548

107,170

 

Trade receivables net

Trade receivables are presented net of an accumulated provision for doubtful debts of US$13,736 thousand (2011: US$9,510).

 

25. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

2012

2011

Cash and cash equivalents consist of:

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

Cash at banks

178,060

84,798

Cash in hand

135

22

 

178,195

84,820

 

26. DISPOSAL GROUP HELD FOR SALE

 

In December 2012 the Company entered into an agreement to dispose of its 50% of stake in Westec Four Winds Limited (along with its partner, Snegiri Development), which had developed and operated Four Winds. The deal was completed in January 2013 with total consideration received by the Company of circa US$103.4 million. The transaction also resulted in reduction of overall debt of AFI Development following the removal of the project loan by Nordea Bank from its consolidated balance sheet. Project Westec Four Winds plaza together with all assets and liabilities of the 50% joint controlled entity Westec Four Wind Limited and its subsidiary Dulverton Limited with their Russian Branches are presented as a disposal group held for sale following the share purchase agreement which the Company entered into in December 2012.

The fair value of the Company's share in Four Winds (including the office building, retail/fitness zone and remaining unsold apartments and parking lots) is as shown in the below table. The total profit on disposal will be approximately US$50 million. In Q4 2012 the Company recognised a fair value gain of US$18 million net, out of the total profit.

At 31 December 2012, the disposal group comprised of the following assets and liabilities.

 

Assets of disposal group held for sale

2012

 

US$ '000

Investment property

177,996

Trading properties

322

Trade and other receivables

2,768

Cash and cash equivalents

4,691

Property, Plant and Equipment

109

VAT recoverable

2

 

 185,888

Liabilities of disposal group held for sale

Long-term loans and borrowings

81,408

Deferred tax liabilities

26,615

Trade and other payables

6,056

Income tax payable

518

 

 114,597

 

27. SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES

 

2012

2011

Share capital

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Authorised

 

 

2,000,000,000 shares of US$0.001 each

2,000

2,000

 

Issued and fully paid

523,847,027 A ordinary shares of US$0.001 each

523,847,027 B ordinary shares of US$0.001 each

524

524

524

524

 

1,048

1,048

 

27. SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES (continued)

 

There were no changes to the authorised or the issued share capital of the Company during the year ended 31 December 2012.

 

Share premium

It represents the share premium on the issue of shares on 31 December 2006 for the conversion of the shareholders' loans to capital US$421,325 thousand. It also includes the share premium on the issued shares which were represented by GDRs listed in the LSE in 2007. It was the result of the difference between the offering price, US$14, and the nominal value of the shares, US$0.001, after deduction of all listing expenses. An amount of US$1,399,900 thousand less US$57,292 thousand transaction costs was recognised during the year 2007. On 5 July 2010 an amount of US$524 thousand was capitalised as a result of a bonus issue.

 

Employee Share option plan

The Company has established an employee share option plan operated by the Board of Directors, which is responsible for granting options and administrating the employee share option plan. Eligible are employees and directors, excluding independent directors, of the Company and employees and directors of the ultimate holding company, Africa Israel Investments Ltd and its subsidiaries. The employees share option plan is discretionary and options will be granted only when the Board so determines at an exercise price derived from the closing middle market price preceding the date of grant. No payment will be required for the grant of the options. In any 10 year period not more that 10 per cent of the issued ordinary share capital may be issued or be issuable under the employee share option plan.

 

As of 31 December 2012 the following options were granted.

 

·; During 2007 and 2008 options over 1,593,676 GDRs, 0.15% of the issued share capital, with an exercise price of US$7 which have already vested, one-third on the second anniversary of the date of grant, a further one-third on the third anniversary and the remaining one-third, on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant provided that the participants remained in employment until the vesting date. The vesting was not subject to any performance conditions. All 1,593,676 options granted have a contractual life of ten years from the date of grant.

 

·; On 21 May 2012, the Board of Directors approved the grant of additional options to Company's employees. Options over 16,763,104 B shares, 1.6% of the issued share capital, were granted with an exercise price equal to US$0.7208, vesting one-third on the second anniversary of the date of grant, a further one-third on the third anniversary and the remaining one-third, on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant provided that the participants remain in employment until the vesting date. The vesting is not subject to any performance conditions. Their contractual life is ten years from the date of grant. Up to the year end 1.047.694 options were cancelled.

 

·; On 22 November 2012, the Board of Directors approved the grant of additional options to the Company's executive chairman. Options over 31,430,822 B shares, 3% of the issued share capital, were granted with an exercise price equal to US$0.5667, vesting one-third on the second anniversary of the date of grant, a further one-third on the third anniversary and the remaining one-third, on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant provided that the participants remain in employment until the vesting date. The vesting is not subject to any performance conditions. Their contractual life is ten years from the date of grant.

 

27. SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES (continued)

 

Employee Share option plan (continued)

If a participant ceases to be employed his options will normally lapse subject to certain exceptions. In the event of a takeover, reorganisation or winding up vested options may be exercised or exchanged for new equivalent options where appropriate. Shares/GDRs issued under the plan will rank equally with all other shares at the time of issue. The Board of Directors may satisfy (with the consent of the participant) an option by paying the participant in cash or other assets the gain as an alternative of issuing and transferring the shares/GDRs. The Board of Directors may amend the rules of the plan at any time.

 

Translation reserve

The translation reserve comprises all foreign currency differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations to the Group presentation currency and the foreign exchange differences on loans designated as loans to an investee company which are accounted for as part of the investor's investment (IAS21.15) as their repayment is not planned or likely to occur in the foreseeable future. These foreign exchange differences are recognised directly to Translation Reserve.

 

Retained earnings

The amount at each reporting date is available for distribution. No dividends were proposed, declared or paid during the year ended 31 December 2012.

 

28. LOANS AND BORROWINGS

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

Non-current liabilities

 

 

Secured bank loans

554,551

528,111

Unsecured loan from non-related company

-

5

 

554,551

528,116

Current liabilities

 

 

Secured bank loans

1,357

84,436

Unsecured loans from other non-related companies

 15,988

 14,537

 

 17,345

 98,973

 

The outstanding loans on 31 December 2012 comprise of the following:

 

(i) A secured loan from a bank of the VTB Group ("the Bank") signed on 22 June 2012 by its subsidiary Bellgate Construction Ltd ("Bellgate"). On 29 June 2012 a drawdown of the first tranche of a new loan facility agreement was effected. On 3 August 2012 a drawdown of the second tranche, of US$69,386 thousand (RUR 2,252 million). This new loan facility agreement offers a credit line totalling RUR 21 billion, which can be drawn down in 5 tranches, each with a designated purpose: the majority of the funds are designated to refinance existing loans previously issued by JSC VTB Bank. The remaining funds are designated for the refinancing of construction costs related to the AFIMALL City parking and for the financing of the outstanding payments constituting part of the consideration for the acquisition of the parking.

 

28. LOANS AND BORROWINGS (continued)

 

The Company has discretion over the currency of each tranche, which can be drawn down either in US dollars or in Russian roubles. The loan facility has differentiated interest rates which are currency dependent: 9.5% for loans drawn down in Russian roubles and 3 months LIBOR plus 6.7% for loans drawn down in US dollars. The interest on the loans is payable on a quarterly basis, throughout the term of the credit line. Bellgate has undertaken to make equal quarterly payments of US$6.5 million from 2014 to 2016, on account of the principal of the loans, while it has been agreed that the remainder of the loan will mature in April 2018. The terms of the loan facility agreement are substantially similar to those of the loan facility agreement entered into in February 2012 with JSC VTB Bank in relation to the financing of the acquisition of the AFIMALL City parking (for more information regarding the said loan facility, see below). However, certain conditions of the new loan facility will differ from the aforementioned loan, including the following:

 

a) The guarantee of AFI Development Plc over the obligations of Bellgate under the loan facility agreement will be in the amount of US$ 1 million, the nominal value of Bellgate's shares;

b) Additional mortgage over the premises of "Aquamarine" Hotel will be registered in favour of the Bank. This shall be removed in the case that Bellgate redeems US$20 million of principal;

c) Additional guarantee will be provided to the Bank by Semprex LLC, a Russian company which is an indirect subsidiary of AFI Development Plc, and owner of the "Aquamarine" Hotel. This shall be removed in the case that Bellgate redeems US$20 million of principal;

d) The turnover covenant has been changed from monthly bank accounts turnovers of not less than RUR 200 million to quarterly revenues (including VAT) exceeding agreed thresholds, determined as amounts gradually increasing from RUR 651 million for Q3 2012 to the amount of RUR1,139 million for Q1 2018. The penalty for not meeting the covenant is changed from 1% additional interest for the next month to 0.5% additional interest for the next quarter.

 

The loan facility agreement contains other generally acceptable terms, such as the borrower undertaking to maintain the aggregate value of the pledged assets, securing the loan facility, providing the lender with periodic reporting and similar common conditions.

 

(ii) Loan by JSC VTB Bank, dated 22 February 2012, for financing the acquisition of parking area under AFIMALL City, of US$45,777 thousand (RUR 1,333 million). On 3 July 2012, the Group repaid the amount of RUR 1,333 million principal plus RUR7.9 million interest. All necessary funds for the AFIMALL Parking acquisition and construction works financing have been provided for, in the new loan facility with a subsidiary of VTB Bank described in (i) above.

 

(iii) A four year US$20 million loan from Sberbank which was obtained during the year 2010 by the 100% owned subsidiary Eitan K LLC. The loan is denominated in Russian Roubles and was used for the reconstruction of Kalinina project. The loan carries an annual interest rate of 13.5% and due to subsidy of Ministry of Economic Development of the Stavropol Territory the rate is decrease to 6.75%. Up to 31 December 2012 the subsidiary withdrew RUR607 million (2011: RUR 377 million).

 

28. LOANS AND BORROWINGS (continued)

 

All other loans that were outstanding on 31 December 2011 were repaid in full during the year as shown in the table below.

 

Terms and debt repayment schedule

 

Terms and conditions of outstanding loans were as follows:

 

Currency

Nominal

Year of

2012

2011

interest rate

maturity

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured loan from VTB Group bank

RUR

9.5%

2018

226,545

-

Secured loan from VTB Group bank

USD

3m USD LIBOR+

6.7%

2018

309,386

-

Secured loan from VTB Bank

RUR

11.5%

2013

-

420,191

Secured loan from Sberbank

USD

6m USD LIBOR + 9.5%

2012

-

73,400

USD

11.75%

2015

-

23,279

USD

6.75%

2014

19,977

11,740

Secured loan from Nordea Bank

USD

3m USD LIBOR + 4.5%

2018

-

83,937

Unsecured loans from non-related companies

USD

12%

2013

1,041

1,027

USD

0%

2013

454

454

RUR

18.5%

2013

6,796

5,808

RUR

0%

2013

6,876

6,486

RUR

12%

2013

85

78

RUR

0.1% - 5%

2013

736

689

571,896

627,089

 

 

 

2012

2011

The loans and borrowings are payable as follows:

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Less than one year

17,345

98,973

Between one and five years

96,620

469,254

More than five years

457,931

58,862

 

571,896

627,089

 

 

29. LONG TERM AMOUNTS PAYBLE

Represents an amount payable to the City of Moscow, for the acquisition of the parking area under the AFIMALL City, see note 16 for more details. The amount is payable in three yearly installments starting from February 2012 and with the last falling due in February 2014. The amount payable within the next twelve months is presented as current liability in "Trade and other payables", see note 31 below.

 

30. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 

Deferred tax (assets) and liabilities are attributable to the following:

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Investment property

149,417

114,505

Investment property under development

7,075

62,131

Property, plant and equipment

(3,137)

(6,890)

Trading properties

61

(701)

Trading properties under construction

4,180

4,704

Trade and other receivables

(4,678)

(2,659)

Long term loans and borrowings

26

(1,330)

Short term loans and borrowing

(9)

902

Trade and other payables

538

3,061

Other items

60

(123)

Tax losses carried forward

(48,940)

(31,507)

Deferred tax liability

104,593

142,093

 

31. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Trade payables

10,962

8,276

Payables to related parties

6,406

6,893

Amount payable to builders

7,969

6,056

VAT and other taxes payable

17,391

7,245

Receipts in advance from sale of investment

100,000

21,998

Receipts in advance for the sale of parking places

61,734

-

Amount payable for the acquisition of properties (note 28)

43,068

41,473

Amount payable to joint venture partners

21,479

48,869

Other payables

4,507

13,282

 

273,516

154,092

The above are payable within one year and bear no interest.

 

Payables to related parties

Include an amount of US$5,120 thousand (31/12/11: US$5,066) payable to Danya Cebus Rus LLC, related party of the Group, for new contracts signed in relation to the completion of AFIMALL City.

 

Receipts in advance from sale of investment

The company received an advance payment for the disposal of the Westec Four Winds plaza which was classified as current liability until the completion of the transaction in January 2013.

 

For the year ended 31 December 2011 the balance of US$21,998 thousand represented an amount refundable to the buyer of Kosinskaya project in order to settle all mutual claims, as agreed in November 2011with Bedhunt Holdings Ltd, the buyer. This amount was fully settled in April 2012 and upon full settlement the Group received title of the shares of Rognestar Finance Limited.

 

32. DEFERRED INCOME

 

Represents rental income received in advance, which corresponds to periods after the reporting date.

 

33. JOINTLY CONTROLLED ENTITIES

 

Included in the consolidated financial statements are the following items that represent the Group's interests in the assets and liabilities, income and expenses of the joint ventures:

 

 

 

Current

Non-current

Current

Non-current

 

 

Profit /

 

Ownership

 assets

assets

liabilities

Liabilities

Income

Expenses

(loss)

 

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

US$ '000

2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nouana Limited

50%

159

4,006

56

11,078

2,670

(2,462)

208

Craespon Management Ltd

50%

698

52

143

-

3,290

(784)

2,506

OOO Tirel

50%

1,682

14,980

2,255

11,210

4,923

(5,474)

(551)

OOO Krown Investments

50%

(1,144)

176,618

6,353

109,911

19,551

(15,617)

3,934

OOO Sanatoriy Plaza

50%

2,628

82

2,410

3

10,479

(12,203)

(1,724)

OOO NPC Plaza LLC

50%

7

-

-

-

-

(4)

(4)

 

 

4,030

195,738

11,217

132,202

 40,913

 (36,544)

 4,369

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nouana Limited

50%

138

3,779

48

10,640

-

(1,401)

(1,401)

OOO Tirel

50%

1,965

12,291

954

9,767

4,169

(4,253)

(84)

OOO Krown Investments

50%

9,732

126,670

9,555

59,529

11,490

(9,248)

2,242

Westec Four Winds Limited

50%

22,372

139,584

25,998

58,823

43,711

(35,469)

8,242

Dulverton Limited

50%

9,353

251,091

21,252

104,947

114,578

 (63,640)

 50,938

 

 

 43,560

533,415

57,807

243,706

173,948

(114,011)

 59,937

 

 

34. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

Credit risk

 

The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:

 

 

Carrying amount

 

 

 

2012

2011

 

 

Note

US$'000

US$'000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long term loans receivable

19

759

34

 

Short term loans receivable

19

92

786

 

VAT recoverable

21

15,607

53,119

 

Cash and cash equivalents

25

178,195

84,798

 

Trade and other receivables

24

33,666

33,028

 

 

 

228,319

171,765

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

 

Liquidity risk

 

The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding the impact of netting agreements:

 

31 December 2012

Carrying

Contractual

6 months

6-12

More than

Amount

Cash flow

or less

months

1-2 years

2-5 years

5 years

 

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

 

 

Secured bank loans

555,908

(778,765)

(23,791)

(24,893)

(90,984)

(171,519)

(467,578)

 

Unsecured loans

15,988

(17,404)

 -

(17,404)

-

-

-

 

Long term payables

38,324

(41,473)

-

-

(41,473)

-

-

 

Trade and other payables

111,782

(111,782)

(117,782)

-

-

-

-

 

 

31 December 2011

Carrying

Contractual

6 months

6-12

More than

Amount

Cash flow

or less

months

1-2 years

2-5 years

5 years

 

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

US$'000

 

 

Secured bank loans

612,547

(755,725)

(38,257)

(39,763)

(485,950)

(128,657)

(63,098)

 

Unsecured loans

14,542

(15,158)

(14,838)

(320)

-

-

-

 

Long term payables

71,627

(82,946)

-

-

(41,473)

(41,473)

-

 

Trade and other payables

154,092

(154,092)

(154,092)

-

-

-

-

 

 

Currency risk

 

Sensitivity analysis

The following shows the magnitude of changes in respect of a number of major factors influencing the Group's profit before taxes. The assessment has been made on the year-end figures.

 

Sensitivity analysis (continued)

A 10% strengthening of the United States Dollar against the following currencies at 31 December 2012 would have increased/(decreased) equity and profit for the year by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2011.

 

 

Equity

Profit for

the year

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

31 December 2012

 

 

Russian Roubles

18,802

1,305

Ukrainian Hryvnia

2,303

89

 

 

 

31 December 2011

 

 

Russian Roubles

11,701

2,775

Ukrainian Hryvnia

2,077

227

 

A 10% weakening of the United States Dollar against the above currencies at 31 December 2012 would have the equal but opposite effect on the above currencies to the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.

 

34. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

 

Currency risk (continued)

 

Interest rate risk

 

Profile

At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group's interest-bearing financial instruments was:

 

Carrying amount

 

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

Fixed rate instruments

 

 

Financial assets

179,010

85,584

Financial liabilities

(262,510)

(469,752)

 

(83,500)

(384,168)

Variable rate instruments

 

 

Financial assets

38

34

Financial liabilities

(309,386)

(157,337)

 

(309,348)

(157,303)

 

Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments

An increase of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased/ (decreased) equity and profit for the year by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2011.

 

 

 

Equity

Profit for

the year

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

31 December 2012

 

 

Variable rate instruments

-

(3,093)

 

 

 

31 December 2011

 

 

Variable rate instruments

-

(1,573)

 

A decrease of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have the equal but opposite effect on the above instruments to the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.

 

 

34. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

 

Fair values

Fair value is the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation and is best evidenced by an active quoted market price.

 

The estimated fair values of financial instruments have been determined by the Group using available market information, where it exists, and appropriate valuation methodologies. However judgement is required to interpret market data to determine the estimated fair value.

 

The fair values of financial assets and liabilities are not materially different than their carrying amount shown in the balance sheet.

 

Russian Business Environment

The Russian Federation continues to display some characteristics of an emerging market and economic conditions continue to limit the volume of activity in the financial markets. Market quotations may be outdated or reflect distress sale transactions and therefore not represent fair values of financial instruments.

 

35. OPERATING LEASES

 

Leases as lessee

Non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

Less than a year

5,512

3,313

Between one and five years

8,468

11,803

More than five years

24,258

24,273

 

38,238

39,389

 

Amount recognised as an expense during the year

1,221

2,521

 

The ownership of land in the Russian Federation is rare and especially within Moscow region, in which all of the property with only a few exceptions, is owned by the City of Moscow. The majority of land is occupied by private entities pursuant to lease agreements between occupants, of the building located on the land, and the City of Moscow. The Group has several long-term operating leases for land. These leases are entered into with the intention and right to develop the land and carry out construction. Typically they run for an initial period of one to five years which is the period of development and upon completion of development the developer has the right to renew for a long term period of usually up to 49 years. Under both leases the lessee is required to make periodic lease payments, generally on a quarterly basis to the City of Moscow.

 

There is also the option of long term land lease prior to commencement of construction which the developer can acquire with a lump sum payment that is determined from time to time by the City of Moscow and is based on the size of the land, its location and the proximity to amenities. The Group has two such land rights and they run for period of 49 years.

 

35. OPERATING LEASES (continued)

 

Leases as lessor

The Group leases out investment property under operating leases. The future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable leases are as follows:

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

Less than a year

110,709

68,510

Between one and five years

273,720

1,148,735

More than five years

38,461

150,935

 

422,890

1,368,180

 

 

 

Amount recognised as income during the year

121,396

103,612

 

 

36. CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

 

Up to 31 December 2012 the Group has entered into a number of contracts for the construction of investment or trading properties:

 

Project name

Commitment

 

 

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

 

 

 

AFIMALL City

-

4,492

Ozerkovskaya Embankment - Phase II

-

15,119

 

-

19,611

 

37. CONTINGENCIES

 

There weren't any contingent liabilities as at 31 December 2012 and 2011.

 

38. RELATED PARTIES

 

Outstanding balances with related parties

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

Assets

 

 

Amounts receivable from joint ventures

2,491

2,546

Amounts receivable from other related companies

302

29

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

Amounts payable to ultimate holding company

461

38

Amounts payable to other related companies

 5,945

6,855

 

All outstanding balances with these parties are priced at an arm's length basis and are to be settled in cash. None of the balances is secured.

 

Transactions with the key management personnel

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

Key management personnel compensation comprised:

 

 

Short-term employee benefits

2,175

2,450

 

Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of that entity. The person is a member of the key management personnel of the entity or its parent (includes the immediate, intermediate or ultimate parent). Key management is not limited to directors; other members of the management team also may be key management.

 

Other related party transactions

2012

2011

 

US$ '000

US$ '000

Revenue

 

 

Joint venture - consulting services

1,056

1,006

Joint venture - rental income

3,423

-

Joint venture - interest income

7,818

7,545

 

Expenses

 

 

Ultimate holding company - administrative expenses

370

809

Joint venture - interest expense

1,036

-

Joint venture - operating expenses

137

-

Joint venture - administrative expenses

38

-

 

 

39. GROUP ENTITIES

 

Ultimate controlling party: Lev Leviev Israel

 

Ultimate holding company: Africa Israel Investments Limited Israel

 

Holding company: Africa Israel Investments Limited Israel

 

Significant Subsidiaries Ownership interest Country of incorporation

2012 2011

 

1. OOO AFI RUS 100 100 Russian Federation

2. OOO Avtostoyanka Tverskaya Zastava 100 100 Russian Federation

3. OAO Moskovskiy Kartonazhno-poligraphicheskiy Kombinat (MKPK) 99.17 99.17 Russian Federation

4. Bellgate Construction Limited 100 100 Cyprus

5. OOO Regionalnoe AgroProizvodstvennoeObjedinenie (RAPO) 100 100 Russian Federation

6. OOO Aristeya 100 100 Russian Federation

7. Scotson Limited 100 100 Cyprus

7. ZAO Nedra Publishing 90.17 90.17 Russian Federation

8. OOO Titon 100 100 Russian Federation

9. ZAO MTOK 99.71 99.38 Russian Federation

10. OOO Eitan K 100 100 Russian Federation

11. OOO Semprex 100 100 Russian Federation

12. OOO Zheldoruslugi 95 95 Russian Federation

13. OOO Bizar 74 74 Russian Federation

13. AFI D Finance SA 100 100 British Virgin Islands

 

Jointly controlled entities

1. OOO Krown Investments 50 50 Russian Federation

2. OOO Tirel 50 50 Russian Federation

 

During the year ended 31 December 2012 the Group acquired 50% stake (joint venture) of Craespon Management Limited with its subsidiary OOO Sanatoriy Plaza.

40. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

Subsequent to 31 December 2012 there were no events that took place which have a bearing on the understanding of these financial statements except of the following

·; In January 2013 AFI Development entered into an agreement to purchase the remaining 50 interest and to settle all outstanding liabilities of AFI Development to its partner in Krown Investments LLC (the holding company with the rights to the Ozerkovskaya project) from its joint venture partner, Super Passion Limited, for a total cash consideration of US$230 million. The transaction was completed in February 2013, when AFI Development exercised its right under the agreement with Super Passion Limited to pay the consideration ahead of agreed schedule of payments applying a discount. Total consideration paid in this transaction was US$227.5 million. Following the transaction completion, Company became the sole owner of the Ozerkovskaya project 

 

40. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)

 

 

·; On 28 January 2013 the Company's subsidiary Krown Investments Ltd signed a loan facility agreement with JSC VTB Bank to refinance its construction costs related to the development of Ozerkovskaya III, which were initially financed by intra-group loans provided by companies within the AFI Development group. The new loan facility offers a credit line totalling US$220 million and carries an annual interest rate of 3 months LIBOR + 5.7%. The credit line can be drawn down in US Dollars in two tranches: the first tranche of US$150 million can be drawn down within 14 days from execution of the loan facility agreement, while the second tranche of US$70 million can be drawn down between 1 March 2013 and 14 March 2013. The both tranches of the loan were drawn down in full in February and March 2013.

 

·; As a result of negotiations with the Moscow city authorities, the Company's development rights to the project were recognized through an addendum to the investment contract for the Botanic Garden project dated 4 February 2013. According to this addendum, NKM shall not have any claims to the investments made by AFI Development in the Botanic Garden project and its subsidiary, OOO "Nordservice", became the only investor under the investment contract. After thorough assessment of risks to the Company's development rights in respect of the project, AFI Development agreed to make payments to the city of Moscow under the addendum to the investment contract in return for additional development rights. The total aggregate amount of the payments for additional development rights is approximately US$18.5 million, which will be paid in several instalments. It should be noted that the provision to write-off the Botanic Garden (made in August 2012) was not cancelled at this stage, due to remaining legal risks related to the on-going bankruptcy proceedings of NKM.

 

 


[1] Goskomstat of Russia

[2] Cushman & Wakefield Marketbeat 2012-2013

[3] Commerical Real Estate Market Report Q4 2012 Jones Lang LaSalle

[4] Commerical Real Estate Market Report Q4 2012 Jones Lang LaSalle

[5] Commerical Real Estate Market Report Q4 2012 Jones Lang LaSalle

[6] Debt includes all loans and borrowings. For further details please see note 24 to the Financial Statements.

[7] According to the IFRS rules, Investment property and Investment property under development are presented on a fair value basis, Trading property and Property, plant and equipment are presented on a cost basis.

[8] Valuation figures represent Company's share (74%)

[9] Valuation figures represent Company's share (95%)

[10] Valuation figures represent Company's share (99%)

[11] It is noted that as part of the valuations of the Company's properties in CIS, account was taken of the value of the Company group's rights in the various projects, whether if rights under a development or investment agreement, ownership rights in the land, or rights under a long‑term lease were involved.

[12] It is noted that long‑term leases, which are for a period of at least one year, as well as ownership rights, are to be registered in the Real Estate Register, whereas investment agreements were not subject to recording in the Real Estate Register, and were recorded with the relevant local authorities (for example, investment agreements with respect to lands in Moscow were recorded with the Tender Committee of the City of Moscow).

[13] Under the investment contract, upon completion the project is to include approx. 450,000 sq.m of residential area as well as objects of social use (including the school, the kindergarten (the both to be built in two stages) and the health centre, etc.). As at the date of this statement, approval of the design documentation and construction permit valid until May 30, 2017 have been obtained by the holding company with regard to the first two construction stages of one residential building comprising 2,787 residential units.

It is noted that in the investment agreement relating to the Otradnoye project, the holding company was required to construct a school and a kindergarten by mid-2010. As earlier the project has been suspended due to financial crisis, the holding company did not construct these facilities within the timeframe originally contemplated and accordingly was in breach of the contract after mid-2010. In July 2011 the Municipal Authority of the Odintsovo District served to the holding company written notices on failure of the holding company to comply with the deadlines set by the investment contract and informed the holding company that it might seek to early terminate the investment contract. The holding company responded to the notices, thus, initiating negotiations with the Municipal Authority of the Odintsovo District which resulted in further developments of the project, namely the issuance of the construction permit to the holding company. It is further noted that the holding company is negotiating on extending the investment contract and 38 land plot lease agreements so that they match the term of the construction permit (May 30, 2017).

[14] Pursuant to investment contract (from 2004) between the Ministry of Construction of the Moscow Region, the Municipal Authority of the Odintsovo District and the holding company, the latter will be entitled to 94% of the total residential premises and about 13,400 sq. m. of apartment space, while the Municipal Authority of the Odintsovo will be entitled to receive the balance of the areas (including objects of social use). The holding company will be entitled to 90% of the total non-residential premises. In addition, the holding company has an option (the period of which is not defined in the said investment agreement) to buy out the Odintsovo Municipal Authority's share (all or part of it) in the residential premises, for a price to be agreed to between the parties. Pursuant to the investment agreement, the holding company is not entitled to sell residential units in the project until the parties execute an act of distribution of the shares in the property constructed. The Company and the Municipal Authority are currently negotiating introduction of certain modifications to the investment contract in order to set forth the possibilities to perform such sales at an earlier stage.

[15] It is noted that the investment contract in connection with the project (which was assigned to the holding company) was executed in 2004 whereas the Company's group rights in the holding company were acquired during 2005.

[16] Regarding the long‑term lease, there are 38 land lease agreements executed in 2009 between the holding company and the Municipal Authority of the Odintsovo District with respect to an area of about 317,000 sq. m. needed for purposes of execution of the project. The holding company also owns several land plots with a total area of approx. 7,500 sq.m partly involved in the development of the project.

[17] The costs accrued as stated include mainly infrastructure work and performance of work for the benefit of the Local Authority.

[18] Construction of Ozerkovskaya III has been completed in 2012. Ozerkovskaya III was put into operation and ownership right to it has been registered in the Real Estate Register in the name of the holding company.

[19] In September 2006, the Company signed an agreement with a third party not related to the Group (hereinafter the "Partner"), whereby the Company would sell 50% of the issued capital of the Russian subsidiary, Krown Investment Limited LLC (hereinafter "Krown"), subject to several conditions with regard to the cooperation in the development of the Ozerkovskaya III Project. The transfer of 50% share in the issued capital of Krown to the Partner has never been completed. On January 3, 2013 the Company entered into an agreement with the Partner to buy out the Partner's share in the issued capital of Krown so that the Company becomes back the sole owner of 100% share in Krown's issued capital. The transfer of 50% share by the Partner becomes effective upon the full payment of the consideration under the agreement which should be paid in installments by January 3, 2014. As at the date of this statement, the full payment of such consideration, in the amount of USD 228 million has been effected.

[20] The previous name of the project was the Mall of Russia.

[21] In December 2011, the holding company Bellgate Construction Ltd. (hereinafter "Bellgate ") entered into an agreement with GUP of the City of Moscow "Tsentr City" (a municipal corporation controlled by the City of Moscow, hereinafter the "Seller") to purchase rights to underground parking garage adjacent to AFIMALL CITY (approx. 2,700 parking units after completion of construction, divided into 3 underground floors) (hereinafter the "Parking Garage"). According to the agreement, Bellgate will pay a total of RUB 4,000 million (equaling to approx. USD 131 million) including VAT for the Parking Garage. According to the agreement, the remuneration will be paid in four installments: (1) RUB 700 million (approx. USD 23 million) including VAT to be paid by January 12, 2012; (2) RUB 633 million (approx. USD 21 million) including VAT to be paid by February 29, 2012; (3) RUB 1,333 million (approx. USD 44 million) including VAT to be paid by February 28, 2013; and (4) RUB 1,333 million (USD 44 million) including VAT to be paid by February 28, 2014. Until the price for the Parking Garage is paid by Bellgate in full, the Parking Garage is mortgaged in favor of the Seller.

As of December 31, 2012 the works in the Parking Garage were mostly completed. The ownership of Bellgate to the Parking Garage as uncompleted construction was registered with the Real Estate Register. In January 2013 construction of the Parking Garage was completed, it was put into operation and Bellgate's ownership to it was registered with the Real Estate Register on January 31, 2013.

Together with the Parking Garage sale and purchase agreement Bellgate and the Seller entered the same day into an agreement under which Bellgate undertook, after completion of construction of the Parking Garage, to transfer to the Seller part of the premises in the Parking Garage with the total area of 22,679.43 sq.m and a share of 16/100 in the premises with the total area of 14,833.30 sq.m in return for the sum of RUB 12 million with VAT (approx. USD 390,000 with VAT) due to be paid until March 20, 2012. The payment price was paid by the Seller on March 27, 2012.

In December 2012 Bellgate has reached an agreement with VTB Bank OJSC ("VTB Bank") on the disposal of parking space in the underground parking at AFIMALL CITY.

The transaction is structured in two stages. In accordance with the first stage, on December 3, 2012 Bellgate and VTB Bank signed a sale and purchase agreement on 21,354.9 sq.m. of the parking space. In accordance with the second stage on December 13, 2012 Bellgate and VTB Bank signed a preliminary agreement whereby the following was agreed: once construction of the Parking Garage is completed, 9,247 sq.m owned by VTB Bank will be exchanged for 7,847 sq.m owned by Bellgate. The exchange transaction is to be completed by December 13, 2015. This two-tier transaction structure stems from the fact that part of the parking space that VTB Bank is interested in purchasing is located on a land plot to which Bellgate has not yet registered lease rights.

The transaction documents do not specify the number of parking spaces being purchased by VTB Bank, which will be able to allocate parking spaces and plan the configuration of the acquired parking space at its own discretion. The parties estimate the eventual number of parking spaces transacted at 643.

[22] With respect to this property it is noted that the Company owns 100% stake in Bellgate Constructions Ltd., which is the holding company of the project. The rate of holdings, as stated, is the rate the Group is entitled to, based on the investment agreement with the City of Moscow (that was signed in 2005). In 2011 Bellgate Constructions Ltd. bought out the 25% share of the City of Moscow thus becoming the sole owner of the AFIMALL CITY.

[23] Construction of AFIMALL CITY was carried out based on an investment agreement of 2005 executed between the City of Moscow and Bellgate. GUP of the City of Moscow "Tsentr City" was engaged in the project by the City of Moscow as a project management company and held lease rights to the land plot underlying the construction site of AFIMALL CITY under the lease agreement executed in 2005. In July 2012, Bellgate became a co-tenant of the land plot underlying, inter alia, AFIMALL CITY and the underground parking under a land plot lease agreement with multiple tenants executed with the City of Moscow. Under Russian law, a lease agreement with multiple tenants (co-tenants) is executed when there are several owners/users of different real estate objects located on the same land plot.

[24] It is noted that long-term lease agreements entered into for a period of one year or more as well as ownership rights are registered with the Real Estate Register. Accordingly, ownership rights of Bellgate to the properties of AFIMALL CITY and the underground parking are registered with the Real Estate Register. Bellgate is a co-tenant of the land plot underlying the AFIMALL CITY and the underground parking, and the lease agreement is registered in the Real Estate Register.

[25] Constitutes 100% of AFIMALL CITY and 2,075 underground parking spaces (following completion of the underground parking and transfer of premises to third parties). For details on preliminary agreement for exchange of parking spaces, as well as other arrangements regarding the underground parking see footnote [11] on previous page.

[26] Calculated on the basis of shop area

[27] Calculated on the basis of shop area

[28] Stores under operation except kiosks and terminals

[29] Average revenue per sq.m relates to 10,306 sq.m. rented GLA area, or 14% of the total rented space. It is hereby clarified that this data is to the Company's best knowledge, based on information received from lessees.

[30] The number of parking spaces is approximate. The underground parking was purchased and registered with the Real Estate Register as premises and not fixed parking spaces, therefore the calculation of the parking spaces is based on the Company's design and may vary from time to time.

[31] Phase III parking construction

[32] Based on Cushman & Wakefield valuation reports as of December 31, 2012.

[33] Part of the premises of the underground parking will be transferred to GUP of the City of Moscow "Tsentr-City" and Bank VTB OJSC due to the contractual arrangements described in footnote [11] above. The changes in the areas owned by Bellgate will have to be registered with the Real Estate Register and new ownership certificates will have to be issued.

[34] The first disbursement of the credit facility was made by the holding company on June 29, 2012.

[35] As of December 31, 2012 the valuation report refers to 100% of the shopping center and 2,075 underground parking spaces. Valuations reports as of June 30, 2011 and before refer to 75% of the shopping center and 100% of construction expenses.

[36] With respect to this property it is noted that OOO "Zheldoruslugi", a Russian limited liability company which used to hold the rights to the land for the Plaza IV project site, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Beslaville Management Ltd., in which the Companyowns a 95% stake. The Group has a put option to acquire the remaining 5% in this stage of the project, for a price of about USD 7,120,000. At the date of this statement, the Company has not used the put option.

It should be noted, that under the non-binding agreement between the Company and the City of Moscow, reached in November 2011, the City of Moscow agreed tore-approve and renew the Company's development rights and leasehold interest to land plots in Tverskaya Plaza IV, Tverskaya Plaza Ic and Tverskaya Plaza IIa projects in exchange for cancellation of the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre project. Since the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre project was developed by ATZ, it is expected that the lease rights to the land and development rights will be granted to ATZ. For more details on cancellation of the Tverskaya Zastava Shopping Centre please refer to section [9] below.

[37] OOO "Zheldoruslugi" owns 7 land plots; however, these land plots cannot be used for development of the project and are expected to be transferred to the ownership of the City of Moscow.

[38] With and subject to the realization of the said non-binding agreement reached between the Company and the City of Moscow in November 2011, the lease right to the land plot intended for the development of Tverskaya Plaza IV project is expected to be granted to ATZ for a term of 10 years based on a resolution of the Moscow City Government in return for transferring 8 buildings and 7 underlying land plots owned by OOO "Zheldoruslugi" to the ownership of the City of Moscow.

[39] The Group's ownership rights to the land totaling to 2,145 sq.m. in the Tverskaya Plaza IV project (expected to be transferred to the ownership of the City of Moscow when the said non-binding agreement is realized) and existing 8 buildings registered in the Real Estate Register. The Company is negotiating the terms of such transfer with the City of Moscow.

[40] It is to note that the development rights for Tverskaya Plaza IV are expected to be granted to ATZ which is a 100% -owned subsidiary of the Company.

[41] In 2012 - 2013 Bugis Finance entered into three sale and purchase agreements in relation to non-residential premises with a total area of 497.5 sq.m. The title of Bugis Finance to these properties has not been registered in the Property Register yet. Following the state registration of these properties, the total area of the project will amount to 6,007.6 sq.m.

[42] Bugis Finance and ATZ own separate residential and non-residential premises. In order to carry out the Tverskaya Plaza II project, relevant development permits as well as rights to the land plot underlying planned construction site are to be obtained. Currently, the property is a yielding property, its premises are leased to third party tenants.

[43] The area of the properties may increase to 6,007.6 sq.m due to contractual arrangements of Bugis Finance described in footnote [31] above.

[44] The Company has designed this project as a capital repair of the existing non-residential building with total area of 111,770 sq.m aimed at redevelopment of the building into a multifunctional complex with office and retail premises. Under Russian law, capital repair of the building does not cover replacement and/or restoration of the building's framings. As long as the scope of works contemplated for the project falls within the scope of capital repair as set by law, the permit for such works is not required.

[45] The indicated GBA relates to the building under capital repair located at bld. 21,9 Kosinskaya st. The concept and feasibility of redevelopment of the properties located at 34 Moldagulovoy st. is being internally discussed by the Company. Existing properties at 34 Moldagulovoy st. are expected to be used for technical needs of the redevelopment project (storage, etc.)

[46] In 2012 the project was reviewed by the authorities of the City of Moscow which approved its construction parameters. Based on this review the holding company has obtained documents required for preparation of the design documentation for the future development.

[47] One lease agreement was executed by the holding company in 1996 before the Company acquired the project.

[48] At the end of 2011 the holding company registered its ownership to two uncompleted construction - boiler and water treatment unit - located at 24, Bolshaya Pochtovaya

[49] Lease rights to the land plot at 24, Bolshaya Pochtovaya Str. have not been perfected in the name of the holding company yet.

[50] Except for the land plot underlying unfinished constructions (boiler and water treatment unit) located at: 24, Bolshaya Pochtovaya Str. lease rights to this land plot have not been yet obtained by the holding company.

[51] According to the non-binding agreement between the City of Moscow and the Company, one of the conditions precedent to provision of the land plot for construction of Plaza IV is transfer of 7 land plots owned by the holding company with a total area of 2,145 sq.m together with the buildings located thereon to the property of the City of Moscow. This is the Company's understanding that once and provided that the transfer has occurred, a new land plot is to be formed from the land plots transferred, and provided to the holding company for lease.

[52] The addendum to the land lease agreement has not been registered with the Real Estate Register yet and therefore has not become effective.

[53] General increase of employees (149 in 2012 vs 138 in 2011) is a result of new development project's start.(Otradnoye, Kosinskaya)

[54] In addition to the above mentioned number, as of December 31, 2011, Semprex LLC is employing 117 operational employees at the Moscow Aquamarine Hotel and 46 employees at the AFIMALL CITY

[55] Excluding 122 operational employees employed at the Moscow Aquamarine Hotel and 30 employees employed in the construction of the AFIMALL CITY.

This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
FR UWOOROUAOAUR
Date   Source Headline
12th Feb 20207:00 amRNSApproval of Application for Squeeze Out
28th Jan 20202:31 pmRNSSubmission of Application for Squeeze Out to CySEC
23rd Jan 20207:00 amRNSProposed Delisting Of GDRs And B Ordinary Shares
14th Jan 20207:50 amRNSIncreased Offers & Intention To Procure Delisting
20th Dec 20194:41 pmRNSLevel of Acceptances Update
19th Dec 20192:16 pmRNSPosting Of Revised Offer Document
17th Dec 20197:00 amRNSResult of Annual General Meeting
26th Nov 20197:00 amRNSResults for the nine months to 30 September 2019
19th Nov 20194:13 pmRNSPosting of Offer Document
19th Nov 20194:04 pmRNSNotice of AGM
19th Nov 20193:17 pmRNSAFI Development Notice of 9M 2019 Results
25th Oct 20196:25 pmRNSOffer for AFI Development Plc
16th Oct 20191:55 pmRNSNotification Of Major Interest In Shares
27th Aug 20197:00 amRNSHalf-year Report
16th Aug 201911:58 amRNSAFI Development Plc - Notice of H1 2019 Results
26th Jul 20194:41 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
26th Jul 20194:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
26th Jun 20192:21 pmRNSPARTIAL REPAYMENT OF AFIMALL CITY LOAN
28th May 20197:00 amRNS1st Quarter Results
21st May 20191:10 pmRNSAFI Development PLC - Notice of Q1 2019 Results
20th May 20194:45 pmRNSAgreement On Partial Repayment Of Sanatoria Loans
30th Apr 20193:57 pmRNSAnnual Financial Report
26th Apr 201910:10 amRNSEMPLOYMENT CONTRACT WITH MR LEV LEVIEV
23rd Apr 20197:00 amRNSAFI DEVELOPMENT AGREES TO SELL BUILDING 3
16th Apr 20194:40 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
16th Apr 20194:35 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
16th Apr 20193:56 pmRNSPRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF RESULTS FOR 2018
8th Apr 20199:37 amRNSNotice of Results
7th Feb 201912:07 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
7th Feb 201912:02 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
21st Dec 20189:22 amRNSAFI Development PLC - Result of AGM
18th Dec 201810:32 amRNSAFI Development - Change to the Board of Directors
12th Dec 20184:41 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
12th Dec 20184:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
21st Nov 20189:22 amRNSAFI Development - Notice of Annual General Meeting
20th Nov 20182:11 pmRNSAFI Development - Changes to the Board
20th Nov 20187:00 amRNSAFI Development Plc - Announcement of Q3 Results
13th Nov 20184:18 pmRNSAFI Development: Notification of Q3 2018 Results
30th Aug 20189:47 amRNSCHANGES IN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
30th Aug 20187:00 amRNSCHANGES IN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
30th Aug 20187:00 amRNSRESULTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS TO 30 JUNE 2018
16th Aug 201810:06 amRNSNOTIFICATION OF H1 2018 FINANCIAL RESULTS
29th Jun 20183:04 pmRNSPUBLICATION OF 2017 NON-FINANCIAL REPORT
24th May 20187:00 amRNS1st Quarter Results
18th May 20186:01 pmRNSNotification of Q1 2018 Results
23rd Apr 20184:46 pmRNSPublication of annual report 2017
17th Apr 20183:42 pmRNSAnnual Financial Report - Replacement
17th Apr 20187:01 amRNSNew management appointment
29th Mar 20181:16 pmRNSNOTIFICATION OF 2017 ANNUAL RESULTS
18th Jan 201811:41 amRNSLOAN RESTRUCTURING AGREEMENT REACHED WITH VTB BANK

Due to London Stock Exchange licensing terms, we stipulate that you must be a private investor. We apologise for the inconvenience.

To access our Live RNS you must confirm you are a private investor by using the button below.

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Quickpicks are a member only feature

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.