Member Info for zumore

I've said this in the past but when I had a subscription of "British newspaper archives" from a few years ago, I looked back at old newspapers from the 1880s and shockingly I discovered that a great great great grandfather had got 7 years in prison for the manslaughter of my great great great grandmother.

.....

The story goes:

Both of them had a reputation for being drunks.

Anyway the great great great grandfather returned home drunk one evening and got into an argument with my × 3 great grandmother. She threw a chamber pot at him and then ran down the stairs. He retaliated and picked up a gas lantern and threw it at her down the stairs, it hit her and her nightie caught fire which resulted in her dying of severe burns. Which resulted in him getting sent to prison for manslaughter for 7 years.

I later looked at ancestry. Com and in a later census virtually all their children dumped their father's surname and went with their late mother's maiden name.

Thanks to "Google Lens" I can now quickly copy the text from an old newspaper article.

MANCHESTER EVENING NEWS

Article dated Friday 31 January 1986:

.........

FREE TRADERS ALL

"THE FREE trade principles that led to Manchester becoming the cradle of the industrial revolution have been revived and brought up to date by a newly formed group.

The Manchester Society intend providing the city with a distinctive non-political voice.

One of the founders, Mr Stephen Lundy, aged 29, and a Tory Party member said that so far about 60 people had joined the society from across the political divides.

The basic tenets of the society are free trade, freedom of contract, individual libery and peace.

Mr Lundy, of Victoria Park, Rus-holme, Manchester, said these prin-ciples changed the face of Britain between the 1830s and 1870s and gave birth to the anti-Corn Law league.

Mr Lundy, an insurance consultant, said he believed talent was being stif-led by too much interference in their lives from local and national government.

The group, which will stage its first public event tomorrow with a confer-ence on inner city problems at Man-chester Town Hall, plan to stage a rally at the Free Trade Hall on June 6."

This is UK's Greta Thunberg:

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&sca_esv=b8b38d03dd492d23&q=ed+miliband&udm=2&fbs=ABzOT_BwhWbvgbq2-ldlJF_Xac4lwl4ZcQUKTNIEuq5aS_Zepj3qrSaXICRsYV5N74W3tzQ8qgkPE5OlPTIX8TQj1LRGfgKPPamJKoxFCdI797CjXuFOlmhCoV9q-5LFb_FzFq87URjL20NF5ViSK0cbf2ycW8fwU3fzdLRSgRqovkMJzce32a7WZ3_Tu-p0kb459WnnluI51qfVIq_QAvPG2fyct7ALSMkKzfuhip-6lqZ9wpyLBZg&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjIr_vf09KMAxUPaEEAHc3aAo0QtKgLegQIDhAB&biw=158&bih=324&dpr=2.61

We are going to have cheaper energy bills in 10 to 15 years. 😎

We only need a few more windmills. 😎

Specinvestor, regarding your 19:06 post.

Your post is essentially saying that Andrew is a crook, a scammer, a conman, in the way he has been constantly misleading RRR shareholders/ potential shareholders into believing that the DRC money was always near to happening. When in reality it was not.

Good post! 👍

Also to clear up any confusion, in my 18:12 post, I linked the Felix interview video in response to Specinvestor's final point 7. 👍

Orslega, sorry I don't know what your last post means. Please explain?

Unless you somehow think that Andrew won me over with his twitter broadcast and you consider my last post a ramping post?

If you do think that then let me put you in no doubt. When Bell in his twitter broadcast kind of indicated that it was him who indirectly suggested to Felix that he should suggest a mineral partnership to the USA in return for security.

When he kind of suggested that I thought he was insane. 🤪

On that last point. Here is the DRC presidents interview with Fox news from a couple of weeks ago. Though I think another poster might have previously posted it.

The interview begins at 3 min 10 secs. Though some may find the first 3 minutes interesting because the interviewer gives some background on some of the DRC past troubles.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Nml7OEK27lU&pp=ygUaZmVsaXggdHNoaXNla2VkaSBmb3ggbmV3cyA%3D

If you look at my 31 March, 20.02 post you can see "Google lens" translated the French letter Andrew Bell posted last October.

So with the help of Google Lens I could do it. Or you could.

And I thank you for not checking out all my links. That way it prevents you from nitpicking at them. 😎

NI = Nitpicker

KE = Keeps

A = Achieving

I = Irritating

R = Responses

.....

Like you, I hardly click on Helpful's links. Probably 5% at most.

Nikeair, I believed you said you are a balanced poster. You are NOT! 😂 But even you've got to admit 'Helpful' has the pottiest filthiest mouth on this thread.

It took me a while to realise what FW meant. I don't believe I've ever said that obscenity to anyone.

So I do hope the Manc Yuppie **n* is more polite when he is face to face.

Here's the thing 'Helpful', you constantly criticise posters intelligence but you yourself are a right old thicko if you genuinely believe Andrew Bell is any good: because Bell is completely useless! I mean what does Andrew actually do at Red Rock? What is he an expert in?

.....

On a different topic, I was trying to think who you remind me of because I did see a couple of photos of you in those very old newspaper articles.

Then it came to me: TORY BOY!

Even though you are from the Manchester area, i suspect you put on a fake posher voice.

With the glasses on I can see similarities with you and TORY BOY. I suspect you were a right old stick in the mud like him growing up:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zInyrDfR4us&pp=ygUWdG9yeSBib3kgaGFycnkgZW5maWVsZA%3D%3D

This is a link that poster HawaiiFive0 posted last year. It involves POW CEO Sean Wade at a investor presentation.

Hawaii said it was him who asked Sean about the rationale in selling the Australian licenses to Red Rock.

Here's my June post from last year when I transcripted most of Sean's reply:

.........................

It's at the 23 minute mark in this video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FLSEq-Jbfck

From the above video i have transcripted what Sean Wade said to an investor on why he's willing to sell.

Sean Wade said:

"Red Rock are very keen to buy it.

But also it's very important to understand. It's actually very very difficult exploration, New Ballarat specifically,

It's very nuggety gold. It's not a sort of nice seam where you can get grade, so it is an extremely expensive exploration program.

So we would be committing our investors to a very very expensive multi year program, which is not something we are really set up to do. Not something i really want to do.

The bid is there at this point. It's a good evaluation. It's considerably more than it's held in our books."

In this 15 Jan Stockbox interview https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XKwM7nbJeII&pp=ygUScmVkIHJvY2sgcmVzb3VyY2Vz Andrew Bell was absolutely convinced that the upcoming 22 Jan DRC meeting was the final arbitration meeting where all the arbitration money would be awarded and divvied out.

..

However in Bell's next 31 Jan Stockbox interview https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VWPceByoPGA&pp=ygUScmVkIHJvY2sgcmVzb3VyY2Vz the cold hard reality had hit Andrew. All his numerous prior meetings with DRC Pastors who now worked in DRC government had been for nothing.

Around 2 minutes 50 seconds Andrew Bell talked about the 22 Jan meeting:

"So we had the meeting but that just means that after a 29 months intermission, the arbitrators have taken up the matter again in order to finish it. And that is the clear objective is to finish it. So I'm staying out here to make sure that happens"

...

Andrew Bell eventually returned home to London empty handed. His last DRC visit was in mid February and over 10 weeks have passed since the 22 January DRC meeting.

...

Yes the recent Red Rock half yearly did say: "We are now at the point where the judgement is near the point of publication"

However to me "near the point" is just a new way to say "imminent".

To me it's very clear Andrew Bell and his DRC legal team are all pretty clueless in regards to whether or not the DRC governmental officials are ACTUALLY at present working on Red Rock's arbitration case. We know this because Andrew Bell and his DRC legal team had wrongly thought that the arbitration award would be given at the 22 January meeting. Then at the 22 January meeting reality hit them when they all found out that in the previous 29 months nobody had actually been working on their arbitration case.

So for me I personally think that no arbitration money will be coming. Though I will point out that my negative view is in no way important to Andrew Bell.

What i guess is important to Andrew Bell is that the high net worth RRR shareholders who lend RRR the money carry on lending RRR the money and they believe in Andrew when he personally tells them that the arbitration money is near.

That's all that matters to Andrew. My opinion is not important. 👍

Banbury, I cannot find his post but yes I recall 'Helpful' saying Topham was a client of his.

Here is an old holding RNS dating from 2019 in Bell's former company RGM. If you scroll all the way down in this RNS you can see both Topham and Lundy declaring their present holding in RGM:

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/RGM/holdings-in-company-cs3tctflcm9fkdh.html

I earlier said:

"I think it's triggered me to do a post later, on why in my opinion Andrew Bell is a useless piece of sh*t. 👍"

....

I'm going to push my posts to the weekend. So I can do some in depth research.

Have no doubt. I'm confident I can win most of you doubters around in proving that Andrew Bell is indeed a useless piece of sh*t. 👍

In particular I'm very confident I can persuade Nikeair. 😎

I think it's triggered me to do a post later, on why in my opinion Andrew Bell is a useless piece of sh*t. 👍

I don't know...I look at some of the posts on here, and it does trigger my inner loathing for Andrew Bell. 😂😂😂

Specinvestor, I realised quite a while back that you and I do not see eye to eye on anything to do with the DRC situation.

I see the PPP chairman was named Stephen Lunn. 😳

Rumour has it that he was just too embarrassed to put the dy on the end. 😂

"in that same interview Zumore, between two minutes and 2 minutes 10 seconds it was explained that in the RNS of the same day, they stuck to the formal text of the invitation."

......

So we can assume this extract from the Red Rock 15th January RNS:

"Red Rock has received an official invitation from the Cabinet du Chef d'Etat, which conducted the Arbitration, to a WORKING MEETING of the parties next Wednesday, 22nd January 2025, at the Palais de la Nation"

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/RRR/follow-up-drc-1j06fql3bc2se1z.html

.......

Red Rock probably received a mundane invite to a "working meeting" in the DRC.

Then in the same day (15th January 2025) Stockbox interview: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XKwM7nbJeII&pp=ygURU3RvY2tib3ggcmVkIHJvY2s%3D

Andrew Bell gave a demonstration of his wild imagination.

Nothing he said in that Stockbox interview came true. In fact in his next Stockbox interview he admitted that after a 29 month intermission the arbitrators were only taking up the case again.

What I've learnt about Andrew Bell over the years, is Andrew Bell may be highly educated but he sure is a dunce when it comes to his judgement. He is always wrong. He has no ability to weigh up situations correctly.

So he now thinks that Red Rock's arbitration is gradually working it's way through the DRC governmental departments and the arbitration judgement is near.

Yet the 22 January "working meeting" was almost 10 weeks ago. Bell returned from the DRC mid February, so almost 7 weeks ago.

So like he normally is, Andrew may be completely wrong again.