Member Info for Worzel7

With the ever increasing population. The world will need ever increasing amounts of energy to provide for said population. So called green energy will not come close to providing that power imo. It would need massive wind farms, and massive solar farms just to come close. Nuclear IS more safer now than it's ever been. Plus the power it generates has very little carbon footprint once the reactor is built. Yes you have the toxic waste, but even that is now disposed of in a much safer way. Smaller model reactors are the way forward in the next decade or so imo. China has agreed not to build any more coal fired power stations that are not under contract. Am all for battery powered forms of transportation. But this so called renewable green energy is rubbish. My opinion only. It's NOT green as you need huge amount of energy (carbon footprint) to mine, ship, processes smelting and manufacturing etc. Just to produce the components for the so called green energy. Those blades for wind turbines have a short life span. Guess where they end up. Most go into LANDFILL. Google it. Anyway enough of that. So imo, mr jonson has made a very savvy move looking at the future demand for power into uranium.

Full RNS with all links.
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/POW/uranium-portfolio-expansion-8211-athabasca-basin-1pyz2wr6mzioaei.html

Link to the map and surrounding areas.
https://www.powermetalresources.com/power-canada-uranium-property-map-2/

Morning Troajan. Will be looking to dip toe back in on Monday mate.

Apologies if already posted.
https://www.mining.com/web/andrew-forrest-spearheads-global-green-hydrogen-push/

Don,t know if this has been posted before so apologies if it has.
https://www.mining.com/web/andrew-forrest-spearheads-global-green-hydrogen-push/

any thought on when target B drilling will start?
It will start when they say it will

Now over $36k .
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/tin

https://www.mining.com/web/uranium-rally-is-a-high-stakes-bet-on-future-of-nuclear-power/

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/tin

https://www.ft.com/content/40577a9b-d4d9-4cdd-8d08-43ce1c132406

At least no dilution of shares that's a positive in its self. Should be more than enough cash now. See they're sorting out the power supply as not to have any more problems like they did a few months ago.

I look at it this way. XRF results is a bit like a standard xray machine. Assay results are like an MRI SCAN? More precise/accurate. A bit simple I know but that's the easy way to look at it.
Those last 3 trades showing, 1 blue and 2 reds are all buys btw. Looking at times and prices.

That it is BCB. Not far off 12 month high. Be nice to break through the 6.40 in next few trading days

Yes it,s new i think. PJ gets asked at the back end of interview. About which is his most favorite. That question has been asked before. This time he mentions 4 that he most excited about.

When you consider the market is taking a hit today across the board. KAV is doing very nicely.

Bonkers. Strange that as when i click on that link it,s about PJ interview on the 17th.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXeg3LADSL8

It's getting very interesting indeed. Plenty to chew over the weekend no doubt. I suspect plenty to talk about over this weekend by those on site.
Pegmatite can contain a whole host of minerals/metals. Lithium tin tungsten tantalum to name a few. Rare earth elements, even gemstones. Possible to have one source of metals like copper that have already been mentioned. Then have another source of a different mineral/ metals lower down . Have a great weekend all. Looking forward to Monday

Come on guys, no need for this. Powerfulpete is right, this is exactly what the troll wants. Don't turn this great bb into a S bb.
On a lighter note. I picked my name from work as worzel was what I was called . Working in milton Keynes with herefordshire accent lol.