Member Info for WongaFC

While it's anything but a deadline, it would appear the lack of MSC trial news as we rapidly run out of January, is having a detrimental effect on the SP. With no news, I can easily see it sub 2p in early Feb. Of course, there is always the chance of the agreement being signed ay any point, which could hurt the current paper hands.

Stick or twist???

I said some time ago, I will give QED until the end of this quarter before making any decision. However, should no tangible progress take place in Q1, that will be it for me and my already greatly reduced holding will be taken down to next to nothing.

That will be 14 years since my first investment in this company and I have had enough. Probably good news for you remaining as I am more often unlucky, than lucky, with my speculative investment decisions. Hence the SP could well rise after I'm out.

I still hold on to a fading glimmer of hope something positive can happen in the next 10 weeks or so but as we all know, that is merely a blink of an eye in QED historical timescales.

Checked your spam/junk folder?

Pretty much agree with everything there Vince.

I was hoping Peter would quickly arrange a trial with a smaller outfit, with fewer logistical problems and red tape, in order to further prove the technology and benefits of our offering. Even this seems to be taking some time. Either that or he has badly underestimated the complexity. Still relatively early days, (for him) so I'll continue to wait and see....

Sounds dubious to me. Board member fails to properly inform of his (near peak) sell, just prior to fund raise and subsequent collapse of SP. Hmmmmm?

I would suggest buys. Doubt you would get 2.95p+ for a £25k sell just now?

Deary me....

The lawyers "January off" assertion is not HF's, he was quoting Stockchump who opined this at this time last year as an possible excuse for the delay in signing the agreements.

I've been invested in QFI/QED for 13 years now, would be a stretch to call that impatient!

Can anyone tell me what AM brings to the company? Seems like a needless expense to me.

On a positive note, I kept getting the feeling PB was itching to say more but couldn't. I think the "parallel" trial could well be the shipper he said he had very good knowledge of and was friendly with the owner. I'm hopeful for some positive news before year end.

On the downside, based on today's update, I can't see any revenues in 2026, his clutching of the Valkor straw seemed to reflect this. No doubt Valkor timelines will shift and our scheduled payments will be delayed again!

Dearly hope to be proved wrong but I can see yet another raise happening prior to the establishment of commercial revenues. Should that be the case, I'll be sold up and out and will consign this very expensive experiment to my failure drawer.

it wouldn't surprise me if pb chose to dodge the agm today. if i was just in the door, i would delegate am and jm to take the flak considering the last 12 months is basically their ****sh0w.

i'm prepared to give the new guy 6 months which will tie in nicely with the tax-year end. failure to deliver any significant progress by then will see me bow out.

"The power generation are really very large clients, but it's complex and time-consuming to get them where shipping is"

Please god no..... So much for a quick turnaround, commercial deal with Sparkle!

I now seriously doubt we'll ever get this to commercial revenues before investor fatigue, causes some serious funding dilution. Not looking good without a more positive news flow in the next few months!

Don't forget HF14, we had a Moroccan Industrial trial as well as the initial pilot trial. There is no reason why MSAR could not have been operationally employed at the (Site B I think it was) location for years.

I think it's one of two scenarios. Either we have been lied to, regarding OCP's eagerness to employ our fuels, or they remain keen but want to see a commercial supply hub in place prior to committing to a fuel agreement.

"This time last year SP went from 0.7p to 7p in 6 weeks. Could see it exceeding that again now before Xmas if the agreements come to fruition."

The SP was still 6.5p in mid Jan until the punitive fund raise was announced, causing it to drop to around 4p. At that point you assured us; "the SP would be back to pre-raise levels within the week". Well it's now over 9 months and the SP remains in the doldrums, again highlighting what a rampy fool you are Stockchump!

No Stockchump. It's the difference between a realist and a ramper.

Tell me what has Andy Morrison, Vicky Boiten-Lee and Tony Foster have achieved since their appointments. They may be working away tirelessly and efficiently in the background but as far as I can see, they have not achieved anything.

Hopefully, Peter will turn things around in the not too distant future. If he can't then this very expensive project will have some difficulty raising further capital just to keep doing trials.

Yes, the new CEO deserves time to turn around this company from a glorified science project, to a global commercial success. Time will tell. However the hiring of both VBL and TF doesn't seem to have achieved anything so far and AM has been in post for years as we continue to fail to deliver positive results.

It's looking to me like the next 6-9 months are going to be make or break time. This commercial failure can't go on much longer.

To be 80% underwater, (based on current sp) you would need to have bought in @ 11p, or 1.10p pre-consolidation. As it has never been at these prices, I suggest you're being a drama queen. Unless of course, you have been trading the share, (badly) in which case I have no sympathy for you!

I suggested a while back, OCP's OEM excuse was a red herring. Strange they never needed OEM's sign off for any of the trials at the other sites?

Thing is, I'm not sure if this latest in a litany of Moroccan excuses is the work of OCP or JM. I have my suspicions it may be the latter.

Anyone with half an ounce of investment intelligence knows fine well, investing in penny stocks or on AIM in general is a very high risk approach. Yes, nine out of ten companies could well fall by the wayside eventually. However there are rare successes to be found and even the failures, can produce investment success if bought and sold at the right time, easy with hindsight.

Don't invest here if you can't handle the short-term fluctuations but if you do, you have to be prepared to lose your money. Often it's simply individual greed and/or looking for a fast buck which results in people coming unstuck in these high risk plays.

And who could forget his prophecy at the latest raise in Q1 this year. The sp dropped from its trading range of 6.5p-7.5p to around the offer price. Yet we were all assured "it would be back to previous levels within a week".

Nine months and still waiting.....................

We should count our blessings this investment guru chooses to spend so much time here, passing on the wisdom of his infallible investment decisions.

In Stockmessiah we trust!