What a mess....10 Jun 2026 19:14
What a box of frogs the current exec management team has inherited. In addition to substandard financial controls it now seems the previous lot overpaid on the acquisition of In Motion. I strongly suspect that for some time, they were also over bidding on new sites based on over ambitious footfall asumptions. Is this the difference between believing in the strengths of your own business model and believing in your own BS
In fairness to current management, they didnt cause this mess and they can't be held responsible for the knock on effects of USA gov actons. They have also been decisive and canny in acting now, in presenting what is a distress situation as a "macro economic" led event. Very smart, and significantly better than waiting six months, then have to launch a genuine rescue rights issue on the back of a leverage (and possibly other) covenant breach with bank lenders.
It is also good to see management put their own money on the line. Great commitment and all credit to them.
So i guess we now fall into two camps. On the one hand, those like me who like what they see from the new management team but feel there are too many unanswered questions to work out the true underlying profitability of this business. And on the other hand, those who believe they have enough information to believe this is the bottom and it can only get better from here.
One question needs to be asked though. What is it that makes WHS special. When bidding for renewal of existing sites, or for new ones, they will need to convince landlords that WHS can pay the highest, sustainable rent relative to other bidders. So what is their USP? What is it that will set them apart from their competitors. If you can't answer this question with confidence, the next best strategy is to flip a coin and hope for the best