RE: See31 Jul 2023 08:18
Crumbs has a point, whilst this RNS appears to written with a more positive tone, it could be better still IMO. And it also reiterates that they should have split the previous all encompassing RNS into separate, more positive, succinct RNS's, like this one.
Whilst you have other AIM companies issuing overly bullish RNS, overselling and over-hyping, whereas Scancell have always gone too far in the other direction, massively (IMO) under selling, under selling, dry and dour, bordering on depressing. Always seemed a bit off to me.
If you have great products/science, shout about it and be positive about it for Pete's sake!